Analyze Diet
Veterinary dermatology1999; 10(4); 291-295; doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3164.1999.00126.x

The use of compound 48/80 as a positive control in equine intradermal allergy testing.

Abstract: The macroscopic and microscopic effects following the intradermal injection of the mast cell degranulator compound 48/80 were investigated in horses. It was found that a 1000 μg mL-1 solution of compound 48/80 could be used as an alternative to histamine as a positive control in equine intradermal allergy tests. An inflammatory cell infiltration was noted on histological examination, following compound 48/80 injection. This inflammatory cell pattern was similar to that noted for Type-I hypersensitivity.
Publication Date: 1999-12-01 PubMed ID: 34645056DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3164.1999.00126.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates the effects of using compound 48/80 in equine intradermal allergy tests, suggesting its potential as an alternative to histamine as a positive control.

Compound 48/80 and Equine Intradermal Allergy Testing

  • Equine intradermal allergy testing typically involves the use of histamine as a positive control. A deviation from this standard method was investigated in this study, with the researchers looking into the potential of using the mast cell degranulator, compound 48/80, instead.
  • The focus of the study was exploring the macroscopic (visible to the naked eye) and microscopic (visible only under a microscope) effects when compound 48/80 is injected intradermally (directly into the skin) of horses.

Findings of the Research

  • After injecting a solution of compound 48/80 into the skin, the researchers found that it could indeed serve as an adequate substitution to histamine in these tests. The tested solution concentration was 1000 μg mL, which yielded the anticipated reactions.
  • The research noted that following the injection of compound 48/80, there was a visible infiltration of inflammatory cells. This response is an essential part of the body’s immune response to foreign substances.

Comparison to Type-I Hypersensitivity

  • The post-injection inflammation observed exhibited a cellular pattern that was found to be similar to that displayed in cases of Type-I hypersensitivity. This type of hypersensitivity is more commonly recognized as an immediate allergic reaction, such as hay fever or food allergies, where the body overreacts to a foreign substance that is typically harmless.

Implications of the Study

  • The resemblances between the reactions induced by compound 48/80 and hypersensitivity reactions imply that the compound may be a viable alternative to histamine for use in equine intradermal allergy tests. It suggests that it could produce similar diagnostic results.

Cite This Article

APA
Shipstone , Mueller , Bettenay , Mason , Friend . (1999). The use of compound 48/80 as a positive control in equine intradermal allergy testing. Vet Dermatol, 10(4), 291-295. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3164.1999.00126.x

Publication

ISSN: 1365-3164
NlmUniqueID: 9426187
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 10
Issue: 4
Pages: 291-295

Researcher Affiliations

Shipstone,
  • Animal Skin and Allergy Clinic, 70 Blackburn Road, Mt Waverley 3149, Melbourne, Australia.
Mueller,
  • Animal Skin and Allergy Clinic, 70 Blackburn Road, Mt Waverley 3149, Melbourne, Australia.
Bettenay,
  • Animal Skin and Allergy Clinic, 70 Blackburn Road, Mt Waverley 3149, Melbourne, Australia.
Mason,
  • Dorevitch Tresize Pathology, Melbourne, Australia.
Friend,
  • Central Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory. Melbourne, Australia.

References

This article includes 8 references
  1. Paton WDM. Compound 48/80: a potent histamine liberator.. British Journal of Pharmacology 1951; 6: 499 508.
  2. Riley FF, West GB. Tissue mast cells. Studies with a histamine liberator of low toxicity (compound 48/80).. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 1955; 69: 269 82.
  3. Voorhorst R, Nikkels AH. Atopic skin test re-evaluated. IV. The use of compound 48/80 in routine skin testing.. Annals of Allergy 1977; 38: 255 62.
  4. Van Stee EW. Compound 48/80 in routine skin testing for canine allergy.. Veterinary Medicine Small Animal Clinics 1982; 77: 1081 6.
  5. Hino RH, Lau CKH, Read GW. The site and action of the histamine releaser compound 48/80 in causing mast cell degranulation.. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 1977; 200: 658 63.
  6. Prophet EB. Laboratory Methods in Histotechnology. 2nd edn. American Registry of Pathology, Washington DC, 1994.
  7. James MP, Kennedy AR, Eady RAJ. A microscopic study of inflammatory reactions in human skin induced by histamine and compound 48/80.. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology 1981; 78: 406 13.
  8. Mason IS, Lloyd DH. Evaluation of compound 48/80 as a model of immediate hypersensitivity in the skin of dogs.. Veterinary Dermatology 1996; 7: 81 3.