Analyze Diet
Scientific reports2026; doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-39311-y

Transmission of Salmonella clones between different animal species in a horse and cattle breeding region in Japan.

Abstract: Sequence type 34 (ST34) Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and its monophasic variant (Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:-) are the most prevalent clones among humans and animals worldwide, including in Japan. Although cross-species transmission may have occurred in the background of global spread, the matter remains unresolved. Here, we conducted high-resolution phylogenetic analysis using whole-genome sequencing data of Salmonella Typhimurium and 4,[5],12:i:- obtained from a horse and cattle breeding district in Japan and identified cases of cross-species transmission of ST34 Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- between horses and cattle. These isolates were classified into five clusters, core genome single-nucleotide polymorphism (cgSNP) clusters 1-5, based on the SNP distance. To elucidate the genetic background of each cgSNP cluster, we also conducted a phylogenetic analysis of 496 ST34 strains obtained from Japan and other countries. Hierarchical clustering using rhierBAPS revealed three clades. The past ST34 epidemic strains in Japan and cgSNP clusters 1-3 were concentrated in clades 1 and 3, which should be referred to as the Japanese epidemic lineages, whereas cgSNP cluster 5 belonged to clade 2, which should be referred to as the global lineage. These results suggest that ST34 Salmonella may have entered Japan through multiple routes and was transmitted between horses and cattle.
Publication Date: 2026-03-06 PubMed ID: 41792274DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-39311-yGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Transmission of Salmonella enterica ST34 clones occurs between horses and cattle in a breeding region in Japan, with genetic evidence showing both local Japanese epidemic lineages and global lineages circulating among these animals.

Background and Importance

  • Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium sequence type 34 (ST34) and its monophasic variant (Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:-) are widespread clones causing infections in humans and animals worldwide, including Japan.
  • Understanding transmission dynamics of these clones, especially across different animal species, is critical for controlling outbreaks in agriculture and preventing zoonotic transmission to humans.
  • Although prior studies suggested cross-species transmission might occur, the mechanisms and patterns of spread, especially between horses and cattle in the same area, had not been fully elucidated.

Study Objective and Region

  • The study focused on a horse and cattle breeding district in Japan to investigate whether cross-species transmission of ST34 Salmonella clones happens between these animals.
  • The goal was to use high-resolution genomic methods to analyze the genetic relationships among Salmonella isolates from these species.

Methodology

  • Whole-genome sequencing was performed on Salmonella Typhimurium and 4,[5],12:i:- isolates collected from horses and cattle in the region.
  • Genetic variation was analyzed using core genome single-nucleotide polymorphisms (cgSNPs) to classify the isolates into distinct clusters (cgSNP clusters 1-5) based on their genetic distance.
  • A broader phylogenetic analysis was conducted including 496 ST34 strains from Japan and other countries to contextualize the local isolates within global diversity.
  • Hierarchical clustering through the rhierBAPS tool was used to define major clades (genetically related groups) within the ST34 population.

Key Findings

  • The isolates from the horse and cattle breeding region grouped into five distinct cgSNP clusters, suggesting multiple independent transmission events or sources.
  • CgSNP clusters 1-3 were primarily found in two major clades (clades 1 and 3), defined as Japanese epidemic lineages, indicating these are well-established local strains circulating within Japan.
  • CgSNP cluster 5 belonged to clade 2, which corresponds to a global lineage, suggesting that international or external strains have also entered the Japanese breeding region.
  • The presence of multiple clusters across clades and the detection of the same clones in both horses and cattle confirmed cross-species transmission in the breeding district.
  • Findings indicate that ST34 Salmonella entered Japan through multiple routes rather than a single introduction and that interspecies transmission contributes to local epidemiology.

Implications and Conclusions

  • This study highlights the risk of Salmonella transmission between different livestock species, which can complicate disease control and eradication efforts in animal breeding areas.
  • Understanding the genetic background and transmission routes of ST34 clones can inform targeted surveillance, biosecurity, and intervention strategies for both animal and public health.
  • The detection of both local Japanese epidemic strains and global lineages suggests that international trade or movement of animals or animal products may play a role in introducing Salmonella variants.
  • Overall, the research demonstrates the power of whole-genome sequencing and phylogenetic analysis for unraveling complex epidemiological patterns and guiding effective management of zoonotic pathogens.

Cite This Article

APA
Arai N, Niwa H, Uchida-Fujii E, Sawa Y, Tamamura-Andoh Y, Kinoshita Y, Momoki A, Watanabe-Yanai A, Iwata T, Kubo M, Kusumoto M. (2026). Transmission of Salmonella clones between different animal species in a horse and cattle breeding region in Japan. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39311-y

Publication

ISSN: 2045-2322
NlmUniqueID: 101563288
Country: England
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Arai, Nobuo
  • Division of Zoonosis Research, National Institute of Animal Health, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Niwa, Hidekazu
  • Division of Microbiology, Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.
Uchida-Fujii, Eri
  • Division of Microbiology, Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.
Sawa, Yuiko
  • Hokkaido Hidaka Livestock Hygiene Service Center, Hidaka, Hokkaido, Japan.
Tamamura-Andoh, Yukino
  • Division of Zoonosis Research, National Institute of Animal Health, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Kinoshita, Yuta
  • Division of Microbiology, Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.
Momoki, Anna
  • Division of Zoonosis Research, National Institute of Animal Health, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Watanabe-Yanai, Ayako
  • Division of Zoonosis Research, National Institute of Animal Health, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Iwata, Taketoshi
  • Division of Zoonosis Research, National Institute of Animal Health, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Kubo, Midori
  • Hokkaido Hidaka Livestock Hygiene Service Center, Hidaka, Hokkaido, Japan.
Kusumoto, Masahiro
  • Division of Zoonosis Research, National Institute of Animal Health, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan. kusumoto.masahiro645@naro.go.jp.
  • Graduate School of Veterinary Science, Osaka Metropolitan University, Izumisano, Osaka, Japan. kusumoto.masahiro645@naro.go.jp.

Grant Funding

  • JP24K18035 / Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

This article includes 53 references
  1. Han J. Infection biology of Salmonella enterica. EcoSal Plus 12, eesp-0001-2023 (2024).
  2. European Food Safety Authority. The European union one health 2021 zoonoses report. EFSA J. 20, e07666 (2022).
    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7666google scholar: lookup
  3. Barton AJ, Hill J, Blohmke CJ, Pollard AJ. Host restriction, pathogenesis and chronic carriage of typhoidal Salmonella. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. (2021).
    doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuab014google scholar: lookup
  4. Rabsch W. Salmonella enterica serotype typhimurium and its host-adapted variants. Infect. Immun. 70, 2249–2255 (2002).
  5. Chung The H. Multidrug resistance plasmids underlie clonal expansions and international spread of Salmonella enterica serotype 1,4,[5],12:i:- ST34 in Southeast Asia. Commun. Biol. 6, 1007 (2023).
  6. Mather AE. Distinguishable epidemics of multidrug-resistant Salmonella typhimurium DT104 in different hosts. Science 341, 1514–1517 (2013).
    doi: 10.1126/science.1240578google scholar: lookup
  7. Boyd D. Complete nucleotide sequence of a 43-kilobase genomic Island associated with the multidrug resistance region of Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium DT104 and its identification in phage type DT120 and serovar agona. J. Bacteriol. 183, 5725–5732 (2001).
  8. Petrovska L. Microevolution of monophasic Salmonella typhimurium during epidemic, united Kingdom, 2005–2010. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 22, 617–624 (2016).
    doi: 10.3201/eid2204.150531google scholar: lookup
  9. Bone A. Nationwide outbreak of Salmonella enterica serotype 4,12:i:- infections in France, linked to dried pork sausage, March-May 2010. Euro Surveill 15 (2010).
  10. Mossong J. Outbreaks of monophasic Salmonella enterica serovar 4,[5],12:i:- in Luxembourg, 2006. Euro. Surveill 12, E11-12 (2007).
  11. Elnekave E. Salmonella enterica serotype 4,[5],12:i:- in swine in the united States midwest: an emerging Multidrug-Resistant clade. Clin. Infect. Dis. 66, 877–885 (2018).
    doi: 10.1093/cid/cix909google scholar: lookup
  12. Elnekave E. Transmission of multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica 4,[5],12:i:- sequence type 34 between Europe and the United States. Emerg Infect Dis 26, 3034–3038 (2020).
    doi: 10.3201/eid2612.200336google scholar: lookup
  13. Tavechio AT, Ghilardi AC, Fernandes SA. Multiplex PCR identification of the atypical and monophasic Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype 1,4,[5],12:i:- in São Paulo State, Brazil: frequency and antibiotic resistance patterns. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 46, 115–117 (2004).
  14. Al-Gallas N. Quinolone resistance among Salmonella Kentucky and typhimurium isolates in Tunisia: first report of Salmonella typhimurium ST34 in Africa and qnrB19 in Tunisia. J. Appl. Microbiol. 130, 807–818 (2021).
    doi: 10.1111/jam.14822google scholar: lookup
  15. Ingle DJ. Evolutionary dynamics of multidrug resistant Salmonella enterica serovar 4,[5],12:i:- in Australia. Nat. Commun. 12, 4786 (2021).
  16. Arnott A. Multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica 4,[5],12:i:- sequence type 34, new South Wales, Australia, 2016–2017. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 24, 751–753 (2018).
    doi: 10.3201/eid2404.171619google scholar: lookup
  17. Deng L. Clonal spread of bla-carrying Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium clone ST34 and wide spread of IncHI2/ST3-bla plasmid in China. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 79, 1900–1909 (2024).
    doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae178google scholar: lookup
  18. Mather AE. New Variant of Multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium associated with invasive disease in immunocompromised patients in Vietnam. mBio (2018).
    doi: 10.1128/mbio.01056-18google scholar: lookup
  19. Arai N. Phylogenetic characterization of Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium and its monophasic variant isolated from food animals in Japan revealed replacement of major epidemic clones in the last 4 decades. J. Clin. Microbiol. (2018).
    doi: 10.1128/jcm.01758-17google scholar: lookup
  20. Arai N. Identification of a recently dominant sublineage in Salmonella 4,[5],12:i:- sequence type 34 isolated from food animals in Japan. Front. Microbiol. 12, 690947 (2021).
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.690947google scholar: lookup
  21. Bearson BL. The role of Salmonella genomic island 4 in metal tolerance of Salmonella enterica serovar I 4,[5],12:i:- pork outbreak isolate USDA15WA-1. Genes (Basel) (2020).
    doi: 10.3390/genes11111291google scholar: lookup
  22. de la Pardos M. Countrywide multi-serotype outbreak of Salmonella Bovismorbificans ST142 and monophasic Salmonella typhimurium ST34 associated with dried pork sausages in France, September 2020* to January 2021. Euro. Surveill 28, 2 (2023).
  23. Tassinari E. Microevolution of antimicrobial resistance and biofilm formation of Salmonella typhimurium during persistence on pig farms. Sci. Rep. 9, 8832 (2019).
  24. Hsieh YC, Poole TL, Runyon M, Hume M, Herrman TJ. Prevalence of nontyphoidal Salmonella and Salmonella strains with conjugative antimicrobial-resistant serovars contaminating animal feed in Texas. J. Food Prot. 79, 194–204 (2016).
  25. Brandenburg JM. Salmonella Hadar linked to two distinct transmission vehicles highlights challenges to enteric disease outbreak investigations. Epidemiol. Infect. 152, e86 (2024).
    doi: 10.1017/s0950268824000682google scholar: lookup
  26. Bentum KE. Salmonellosis in cattle: sources and risk of infection, control, and prevention. Zoonotic Dis. 5, 4 (2025).
  27. Yamaguchi E. Is Salmonella enterica shared between wildlife and cattle in cattle farming areas? An 11-year retrospective study in Tokachi district, Hokkaido, Japan. Vet. Med. Sci. 8, 758–770 (2022).
    doi: 10.1002/vms3.685google scholar: lookup
  28. Kurosawa A. Molecular typing of Salmonella enterica serotype typhimurium and serotype 4,5,12:i:- isolates from cattle by multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeats analysis. Vet. Microbiol. 160, 264–268 (2012).
  29. Tamamura Y. A case study on Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium at a dairy farm associated with massive sparrow death. Acta Vet. Scand. (2016).
    doi: 10.1186/s13028-016-0205-8google scholar: lookup
  30. Tamamura Y. Molecular epidemiology of Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium isolates from cattle in Hokkaido, japan: evidence of clonal replacement and characterization of the disseminated clone. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 1739–1750 (2011).
    doi: 10.1128/aem.01910-10google scholar: lookup
  31. Deng X. Genomic epidemiology of Salmonella enterica serotype enteritidis based on population structure of prevalent lineages. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 20, 1481–1489 (2014).
    doi: 10.3201/eid2009.131095google scholar: lookup
  32. Ghalayini M. Evolution of a dominant natural isolate of Escherichia coli in the human gut over the course of a year suggests a neutral evolution with reduced effective population size. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. (2018).
    doi: 10.1128/aem.02377-17google scholar: lookup
  33. Octavia S, Wang Q, Tanaka MM, Sintchenko V, Lan R. Genomic variability of serial human isolates of Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium associated with prolonged carriage. J. Clin. Microbiol. 53, 3507–3514 (2015).
    doi: 10.1128/jcm.01733-15google scholar: lookup
  34. Zhou Z. Neutral genomic microevolution of a recently emerged pathogen, Salmonella enterica serovar agona. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003471 (2013).
  35. Lee K, Izumiya H, Iyoda S, Ohnishi M. Effective surveillance using multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis and whole-genome sequencing for enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. (2019).
    doi: 10.1128/aem.00728-19google scholar: lookup
  36. Ewing WH. Edwards and Ewing’s Identification of Enterobacteriaceae 4th edn.. Elseview Science Publishing Co., Inc., 1986.
  37. Grimont PWF. Antigenic Formulae of the Salmonella Serovars, World Health Organization Centre for Reference and Research on Salmonella. 9th edn. Pasteur Institute, 2007.
  38. Prjibelski A, Antipov D, Meleshko D, Lapidus A, Korobeynikov A. Using spades de Novo assembler. Curr. Protoc. Bioinf. 70, e102 (2020).
    doi: 10.1002/cpbi.102google scholar: lookup
  39. Arndt D. PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W16–21 (2016).
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw387google scholar: lookup
  40. Croucher NJ. Rapid phylogenetic analysis of large samples of Recombinant bacterial whole genome sequences using Gubbins. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e15 (2015).
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1196google scholar: lookup
  41. Page AJ. SNP-sites: rapid efficient extraction of SNPs from multi-FASTA alignments. Microb. Genom. 2, e000056 (2016).
    doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000056google scholar: lookup
  42. Kozlov AM, Darriba D, Flouri T, Morel B, Stamatakis A. RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 35, 4453–4455 (2019).
  43. Cheng L, Connor TR, Siren J, Aanensen DM, Corander J. Hierarchical and spatially explicit clustering of DNA sequences with BAPS software. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 1224–1228 (2013).
    doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst028google scholar: lookup
  44. Tonkin-Hill G, Lees JA, Bentley SD, Frost SDW, Corander J. RhierBAPS: an R implementation of the population clustering algorithm hierbaps. Wellcome Open. Res. 3, 93 (2018).
  45. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, W78–W82 (2024).
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae268google scholar: lookup
  46. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods. 9, 772 (2012).
    doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2109google scholar: lookup
  47. Guindon S, Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52, 696–704 (2003).
    doi: 10.1080/10635150390235520google scholar: lookup
  48. Bouckaert R. BEAST 2.5: an advanced software platform for bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 15, e1006650 (2019).
  49. Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA. Posterior summarization in bayesian phylogenetics using tracer 1.7. Syst. Biol. 67, 901–904 (2018).
    doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syy032google scholar: lookup
  50. Bortolaia V. ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 75, 3491–3500 (2020).
    doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa345google scholar: lookup
  51. Zankari E. PointFinder: a novel web tool for WGS-based detection of antimicrobial resistance associated with chromosomal point mutations in bacterial pathogens. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 72, 2764–2768 (2017).
    doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx217google scholar: lookup
  52. Carattoli A, Hasman H. PlasmidFinder and in Silico pMLST: identification and typing of plasmid replicons in whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Methods Mol. Biol. 2075, 285–294 (2020).
  53. Bharat A. Correlation between phenotypic and in silico detection of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella enterica in Canada using staramr. Microorganisms (2022).

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.