Trephination of the equine rostral maxillary sinus: efficacy and safety of two trephine sites.
Abstract: To examine 2 rostral maxillary sinus (RMS) trephine sites for safety and efficacy using skulls of horses of varying age. Methods: Descriptive study. Methods: Cadaveric equine skulls (n=40). Methods: Two RMS trephination sites (rostral, caudal) were made in each skull. Radiographic projections using markers at each site were used to determine if sites were within the RMS and directly overlying a cheek tooth. Sinusotomy in 14 skulls was used to determine correlation between radiographic and anatomic location of trephine sites, and of the rostrolateral aspect of the maxillary septum. Age-related risk of trephine site being directly over a cheek tooth was determined using logistic regression. Results: Trephine site was within the RMS in 98% of skulls using the rostral portal and 68% using the caudal portal. The rostral site was over a cheek tooth in 18% of skulls compared with 10% using the caudal site. There was a significant negative relationship between the trephine site overlying a tooth and horse age for rostral (P=.02) and caudal (P=.03) sites. The radiographic appearance of the maxillary septum correlated to the rostrolateral portion of the septum in 12 of 14 skulls that had sinusotomy. Conclusions: The rostral RMS trephine portal is more reliable than the caudal site for entering the RMS. Horses <or=5 years are at high risk for the trephine site overlying a cheek tooth and we advise that RMS trephination in this age group be performed with radiographic guidance.
Publication Date: 2008-04-09 PubMed ID: 18394075DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2008.00377.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research examines two different methods for accessing the rostral maxillary sinus in horses, a procedure called trephination, their safety and efficacy were studied using horse skulls of different ages. The rostral method was found to be more reliable and safer, though caution is recommended when the procedure is performed on horses less than or equal to the age of five due to the risk of damaging a cheek tooth.
Methodology
- The researchers used the skulls of deceased horses (40 in total) for this descriptive study.
- Two methods of rostral maxillary sinus (RMS) trephination were employed on each skull – a rostral approach and a caudal approach.
- Radiographic imaging was used to establish the accuracy of the trephination sites, checking if they were within the RMS and directly above a cheek tooth.
- Furthermore, Sinusotomy was performed on 14 of the skulls to verify the relationship between the radiographic and anatomical location of the trephination sites and also to establish the anatomical position of the maxillary septum.
- A logistic regression model was used to determine the age-related risk of the trephine site being directly over a cheek tooth.
Results
- The rostral approach of trephine site was within the RMS in 98% of skulls, while the caudal approach was successful in 68% of cases.
- Studies indicate that there is an 18% chance of the rostral site being directly above a cheek tooth compared to a 10% chance with the caudal site.
- There was a significant negative relationship between the trephine site overlying a tooth and the age of the horse for both rostral and caudal sites.
- The radiographic images were largely accurate when compared with the actual anatomical position of the maxillary septum in the skulls which underwent sinusotomy.
Conclusions
- The researchers concluded that the rostral approach to RMS trephination is more reliable and safer than the caudal approach.
- However, they also found that younger horses (i.e., less than or equal to 5 years of age) are at a higher risk of the procedure damaging a cheek tooth. Hence, they recommend the use of radiographic guidance when performing RMS trephination on horses of this age group.
Cite This Article
APA
Barakzai SZ, Kane-Smyth J, Lowles J, Townsend N.
(2008).
Trephination of the equine rostral maxillary sinus: efficacy and safety of two trephine sites.
Vet Surg, 37(3), 278-282.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2008.00377.x Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Division of Veterinary Clinical Science, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Roslin, Midlothian, Scotland, EH25 9RG, UK. safia.barakzai@ed.ac.uk
MeSH Terms
- Age Factors
- Animals
- Cadaver
- Frontal Sinus / anatomy & histology
- Frontal Sinus / diagnostic imaging
- Frontal Sinus / surgery
- Horses
- Maxillary Sinus / anatomy & histology
- Maxillary Sinus / diagnostic imaging
- Maxillary Sinus / surgery
- Paranasal Sinuses / anatomy & histology
- Paranasal Sinuses / diagnostic imaging
- Paranasal Sinuses / surgery
- Radiography
- Risk Factors
- Safety
- Trephining / adverse effects
- Trephining / methods
- Trephining / veterinary
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists