Analyze Diet
Veterinary surgery : VS2011; 40(8); 1009-1014; doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00884.x

Unilateral and bilateral laparoscopic ovariectomy in 157 mares: a retrospective multicenter study.

Abstract: To evaluate surgical techniques, perioperative complications and outcome of laparoscopic surgery for unilateral and bilateral ovariectomy in mares. Methods: Retrospective multicenter case series. Methods: Mares (n = 157). Methods: Indications for surgery were neutering, fertility problems, elimination of hormone-related abnormal behavior, ovarian tumors as well as nonregressive ovarian hematomas or cysts. Ovariectomy (n = 206) were performed by a standard laparoscopic procedure in 157 standing sedated mares. Dissection and hemostasis were achieved by using either (1) a linear stapling device, (2) bipolar electrosurgical instruments, with or without a modified Roeder knot, (3) a vessel-sealing system, or (4) a diode-laser with ligation. For some larger ovarian masses (>20 cm diameter), a 2-step surgical procedure was used with standing flank laparoscopic ovariectomy followed by ovarian retrieval through a median celiotomy. Surgical techniques, outcome, and perioperative complications of each method were recorded and analyzed. Results: Laparoscopic dissection of the ovary was accomplished in all mares. Because of the size of the ovarian tumor (n = 7) or in 1 mare with behavioral problems (n = 1), the dissected ovary was removed through a median celiotomy under general anesthesia. Seventeen mares (10.8%) developed postoperative complications (eg, incisional drainage, incisional infection, seroma formation, dehiscence, transient fever and mild abdominal discomfort). All mares with flank incisional problems had ovarian size >12 cm and in 15 (88%) of these mares electrosurgical instruments were used for mesovarial dissection. Conclusions: Laparoscopic ovariectomy in standing sedated mares provides good surgical access and is associated with low morbidity.
Publication Date: 2011-10-26 PubMed ID: 22092147DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00884.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Evaluation Study
  • Journal Article
  • Multicenter Study

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper addresses the evaluation of surgical techniques, complications, and outcomes in laparoscopic ovariectomy (a surgical procedure to remove one or both ovaries) performed in 157 mares.

Research Methodology

  • The authors adopted a retrospective multicenter case series design in evaluating the surgical techniques. The study participants were 157 mares.
  • The surgical procedures carried out were done with various indications including neutering, fertility issues, removal of hormonal-related unusual behaviors, ovarian tumors, and nonregressive ovarian hematomas or cysts.
  • The researchers performed 206 ovariectomies using a standard laparoscopic procedure. The mares were sedated and standing during the operation.
  • The dissection and hemostasis were accomplished using a linear stapling device, bipolar electrosurgical instruments (with or without a modified Roeder knot), a vessel-sealing system, or a diode-laser with ligation.
  • In cases of larger ovarian masses (over 20cm in diameter), a two-step surgical procedure was applied that entailed standing flank laparoscopic ovariectomy accompanied by ovarian retrieval through a median celiotomy.

Surgical Techniques, Outcome, and Complications

  • All the surgical techniques, outcomes, and perioperative complications were precisely recorded and thoroughly analyzed.
  • The study’s results indicate that all the mare subjects underwent successful laparoscopic dissection of their ovaries.
  • In 8 cases, due to the size of the ovarian tumor or behavioral problems, it was necessary to remove the dissected ovary through a median celiotomy under general anesthesia.
  • Approximately 10.8% (17) of the mare subjects experienced postoperative complications. These included incisional drainage, incisional infection, seroma formation, dehiscence, a temporary fever, and mild abdominal discomfort.
  • Mares with flank incisional issues had ovarian sizes larger than 12 cm and in 15 of these cases, electrosurgical instruments were utilized for mesovarial dissection.

Research Conclusions

  • The researchers concluded that laparoscopic ovariectomy in standing, sedated mares offers excellent surgical access and is associated with low morbidity.

Cite This Article

APA
Röcken M, Mosel G, Seyrek-Intas K, Seyrek-Intas D, Litzke F, Verver J, Rijkenhuizen AB. (2011). Unilateral and bilateral laparoscopic ovariectomy in 157 mares: a retrospective multicenter study. Vet Surg, 40(8), 1009-1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00884.x

Publication

ISSN: 1532-950X
NlmUniqueID: 8113214
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 40
Issue: 8
Pages: 1009-1014

Researcher Affiliations

Röcken, Michael
  • Veterinary Clinic Starnberg, Germany. MRoecken@t-online.de
Mosel, Gesine
    Seyrek-Intas, Kamil
      Seyrek-Intas, Deniz
        Litzke, F
          Verver, Jorrit
            Rijkenhuizen, Astrid B M

              MeSH Terms

              • Animals
              • Female
              • Horse Diseases / surgery
              • Horses / surgery
              • Laparoscopy / veterinary
              • Ovarian Diseases / surgery
              • Ovarian Diseases / veterinary
              • Ovariectomy / methods
              • Ovariectomy / veterinary
              • Postoperative Complications / veterinary
              • Retrospective Studies
              • Sterilization, Reproductive / methods
              • Sterilization, Reproductive / veterinary
              • Treatment Outcome

              Citations

              This article has been cited 10 times.
              1. Hardefeldt L, Thomas K, Page S, Norris J, Browning G, El Hage C, Stewart A, Gilkerson J, Muscatello G, Verwilghen D, van Galen G, Bauquier J, Cuming R, Reynolds B, Whittaker C, Wilkes E, Clulow J, Burden C, Begg L. Antimicrobial prescribing guidelines for horses in Australia. Aust Vet J 2025 Dec;103(12):781-889.
                doi: 10.1111/avj.70003pubmed: 40903020google scholar: lookup
              2. Wolf N, Hahn JA, Walter I, Zablotski Y, Zerbe H, Witte TS. Pathohistological Findings after Bilateral Ovariectomy in Mares with Behavioral Problems. Animals (Basel) 2024 Oct 8;14(19).
                doi: 10.3390/ani14192899pubmed: 39409848google scholar: lookup
              3. Giambrone G, Catone G, Marino G, Gugliandolo E, Miloro R, Vullo C. Loco-Regional Anaesthesia during Standing Laparoscopic Ovariectomy in Equids: A Systematic Review (2003-2023) of the Literature. Animals (Basel) 2024 Aug 8;14(16).
                doi: 10.3390/ani14162306pubmed: 39199841google scholar: lookup
              4. Aurich C, Kaps M. Suppression of reproductive behaviour and gonadal function in female horses-An update. Reprod Domest Anim 2022 Sep;57 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):4-12.
                doi: 10.1111/rda.14129pubmed: 35467049google scholar: lookup
              5. Straticò P, Guerri G, Palozzo A, Varasano V, Petrizzi L. Current Use of Equine Laparoscopy in Urogenital Disorders: A Scoping Review of the Literature from 2000 to 2021. Vet Sci 2022 Jan 22;9(2).
                doi: 10.3390/vetsci9020041pubmed: 35202295google scholar: lookup
              6. Vullo C, Tambella AM, Meligrana M, Catone G. Analgesic and Sedative Effects of Epidural Lidocaine-Xylazine in Elective Bilateral Laparoscopic Ovariectomy in Standing Mule Mares. Animals (Basel) 2021 Aug 17;11(8).
                doi: 10.3390/ani11082419pubmed: 34438877google scholar: lookup
              7. Devick IF, Hendrickson DA. Effects of Leaving Amputated Ovaries Intra-Abdominally during Elective Bilateral Standing Laparoscopic Ovariectomy in Equids. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jan 18;11(1).
                doi: 10.3390/ani11010232pubmed: 33477730google scholar: lookup
              8. Straticò P, Varasano V, Guerri G, Celani G, Palozzo A, Petrizzi L. A Retrospective Study of Cryptorchidectomy in Horses: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcome and Complications in 70 Cases. Animals (Basel) 2020 Dec 21;10(12).
                doi: 10.3390/ani10122446pubmed: 33371184google scholar: lookup
              9. Devick IF, Leise BS, Rao S, Hendrickson DA. Evaluation of post-operative pain after active desufflation at completion of laparoscopy in mares undergoing ovariectomy. Can Vet J 2018 Mar;59(3):261-266.
                pubmed: 29599556
              10. Sassot LN, Ragle CA, Farnsworth KD, Lund CM. Morcellation for testes extraction in horses undergoing standing laparoscopic cryptorchidectomy. Can Vet J 2017 Nov;58(11):1215-1220.
                pubmed: 29089662