FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Front Microbiol / Unveiling the Biogeography and Potential Functions of the In...
Frontiers in microbiology2020; 11; 596882; doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.596882

Unveiling the Biogeography and Potential Functions of the Intestinal Digesta- and Mucosa-Associated Microbiome of Donkeys.

Abstract: The intestinal microbial composition and metabolic functions under normal physiological conditions in the donkey are crucial for health and production performance. However, compared with other animal species, limited information is currently available regarding the intestinal microbiota of donkeys. In the present study, we characterized the biogeography and potential functions of the intestinal digesta- and mucosa-associated microbiota of different segments of the intestine (jejunum, ileum, cecum, and colon) in the donkey, focusing on the differences in the microbial communities between the small and large intestine. Our results show that, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes dominate in both the digesta- and mucosa-associated microbiota in different intestinal locations of the donkey. Starch-degrading and acid-producing (butyrate and lactate) microbiota, such as and , were more enriched in the small intestine, while the fiber- and mucin-degrading bacteria, such as , were more enriched in the large intestine. Furthermore, metabolic functions in membrane transport and lipid metabolism were more enriched in the small intestine, while functions for energy metabolism, metabolism of cofactors and vitamins, amino acid metabolism were more enriched in the large intestine. In addition, the microbial composition and functions in the digesta-associated microbiota among intestinal locations differed greatly, while the mucosal differences were smaller, suggesting a more stable and consistent role in the different intestinal locations. This study provides us with new information on the microbial differences between the small and large intestines of the donkey and the synergistic effects of the intestinal microbiota with host functions, which may improve our understanding the evolution of the equine digestive system and contribute to the healthy and efficient breeding of donkeys.
Copyright © 2020 Zhang, Zhang, Dang, Irwin, Wang and Zhang.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2020-12-04 PubMed ID: 33424800PubMed Central: PMC7793809DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.596882Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research studies the different types of microorganisms found in different parts of a donkey’s intestine and their functions, finding that different bacteria dominate in different areas and perform different roles. This study sheds light on the key role of microbiota in the health and efficient breeding of donkeys.

Understanding the Donkey’s Intestinal Biogeography and Microbial Function

  • This research provides valuable insights into the normal physiology of a donkey’s intestinal microbiome. This is particularly important because little comparative information is available regarding the intestinal bacteria composition in donkeys.
  • The study evaluated the microbial communities and their potential functions in different segments of the donkey’s intestine, including the jejunum, ileum, cecum, and colon.
  • It focused on understanding the differences between the microbial communities in the small intestine versus the large intestine.

Main Findings

  • The major findings indicate that two primary types of bacteria, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, are dominant in both the digesta- (the contents within the intestines) and mucosa-associated (lining of the intestines) microbiota in different intestinal locations in the donkey.
  • Starch-degrading and acid-producing microbiota such as those that produce butyrate and lactate were more abundant in the small intestine.
  • In contrast, the large intestine had a greater prevalence of fiber- and mucin-degrading bacteria. This suggests that different bacteria perform different duties based on their location within the intestinal tract.
  • The researchers also discovered that metabolic functions vary across different sections of the intestine. For instance, functions related to membrane transport and lipid metabolism were more active in the small intestine, while the large intestine was more enriched with functions associated with energy metabolism, metabolism of cofactors and vitamins, amino acid metabolism.

Implications and Future Research

  • The research demonstrated that the microbial composition and functions in the digesta-associated microbiota were highly variable across different intestinal locations, whereas the differences in the mucosa were smaller. This suggests a more stable and consistent function throughout the intestine.
  • These findings are significant because they provide new insights into the symbiotic relationship between the host (donkey) and its intestinal microbiota. This information could improve our understanding of the evolution of the equine digestive system and the role of microbiota in influencing the health and reproductive success of donkeys.
  • Further research could provide more insights into how the gut microbiome can be manipulated to improve animal health, efficiency, and productivity.

Cite This Article

APA
Zhang R, Zhang J, Dang W, Irwin DM, Wang Z, Zhang S. (2020). Unveiling the Biogeography and Potential Functions of the Intestinal Digesta- and Mucosa-Associated Microbiome of Donkeys. Front Microbiol, 11, 596882. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.596882

Publication

Frontiers in microbiology
ISSN: 1664-302X
NlmUniqueID: 101548977
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 11
Pages: 596882
PII: 596882

Researcher Affiliations

Zhang, Ruiyang
  • Institute of Equine Sciences, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China.
Zhang, Junpeng
  • Institute of Equine Sciences, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China.
Dang, Wanyi
  • Institute of Equine Sciences, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China.
Irwin, David M
  • Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Wang, Zhe
  • Institute of Equine Sciences, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China.
Zhang, Shuyi
  • Institute of Equine Sciences, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 54 references
  1. Al Jassim RA, Andrews FM. The bacterial community of the horse gastrointestinal tract and its relation to fermentative acidosis, laminitis, colic, and stomach ulcers.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2009 Aug;25(2):199-215.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2009.04.005pubmed: 19580934google scholar: lookup
  2. Backes G, Hennig U, Petzke KJ, Elsner A, Junghans P, Nürnberg G, Metges CC. Contribution of intestinal microbial lysine to lysine homeostasis is reduced in minipigs fed a wheat gluten-based diet.. Am J Clin Nutr 2002 Dec;76(6):1317-25.
    doi: 10.1093/ajcn/76.6.1317pubmed: 12450899google scholar: lookup
  3. Bao Y, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Wang L, Dong X. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum P-8 on lipid metabolism in hyperlipidemic rat model. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 114 1230–1236.
    doi: 10.1002/ejlt.201100393google scholar: lookup
  4. Belzer C, de Vos WM. Microbes inside--from diversity to function: the case of Akkermansia.. ISME J 2012 Aug;6(8):1449-58.
    doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.6pmc: PMC3401025pubmed: 22437156google scholar: lookup
  5. Blachier F, Mariotti F, Huneau JF, Tomé D. Effects of amino acid-derived luminal metabolites on the colonic epithelium and physiopathological consequences.. Amino Acids 2007 Nov;33(4):547-62.
    doi: 10.1007/s00726-006-0477-9pubmed: 17146590google scholar: lookup
  6. Bröer S. Amino acid transport across mammalian intestinal and renal epithelia.. Physiol Rev 2008 Jan;88(1):249-86.
    doi: 10.1152/physrev.00018.2006pubmed: 18195088google scholar: lookup
  7. Caesar R, Fåk F, Bäckhed F. Effects of gut microbiota on obesity and atherosclerosis via modulation of inflammation and lipid metabolism.. J Intern Med 2010 Oct;268(4):320-8.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02270.xpubmed: 21050286google scholar: lookup
  8. Camillo F, Rota A, Biagini L, Tesi M, Fanelli D, Panzani D. The current situation and trend of donkey industry in europe. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 65 44–49.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2017.11.008google scholar: lookup
  9. Canale-Parola E. Biology of the sugar-fermenting Sarcinae.. Bacteriol Rev 1970 Mar;34(1):82-97.
    doi: 10.1128/mmbr.34.1.82-97.1970pmc: PMC378349pubmed: 4909648google scholar: lookup
  10. Connors J, Dawe N, Van Limbergen J. The Role of Succinate in the Regulation of Intestinal Inflammation.. Nutrients 2018 Dec 22;11(1).
    doi: 10.3390/nᄁ0025pmc: PMC6356305pubmed: 30583500google scholar: lookup
  11. Flint HJ, Scott KP, Duncan SH, Louis P, Forano E. Microbial degradation of complex carbohydrates in the gut.. Gut Microbes 2012 Jul-Aug;3(4):289-306.
    doi: 10.4161/gmic.19897pmc: PMC3463488pubmed: 22572875google scholar: lookup
  12. Garrity GM. Bergey’s Manual Systematic bacteriology. The Proteobacteria, Part C: The Alpha-, Beta-, Delta-, and Epsilonproteobacteria, Vol. 2. New York, NY.: Springer.
  13. Getachew B, Aubee JI, Schottenfeld RS, Csoka AB, Thompson KM, Tizabi Y. Ketamine interactions with gut-microbiota in rats: relevance to its antidepressant and anti-inflammatory properties.. BMC Microbiol 2018 Dec 22;18(1):222.
    doi: 10.1186/s12866-018-1373-7pmc: PMC6303954pubmed: 30579332google scholar: lookup
  14. Gidenne T, Perez J. Effect of dietary starch origin on digestion in the rabbit. 2. Starch hydrolysis in the small intestine, cell wall degradation and rate of passage measurements. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 42 249–257.
    doi: 10.1016/0377-8401(93)90102-pgoogle scholar: lookup
  15. Gilbert MS, Pantophlet AJ, Berends H, Pluschke AM, van den Borne JJ, Hendriks WH, Schols HA, Gerrits WJ. Fermentation in the small intestine contributes substantially to intestinal starch disappearance in calves.. J Nutr 2015 Jun;145(6):1147-55.
    doi: 10.3945/jn.114.208595pubmed: 25878206google scholar: lookup
  16. Han R, Zhu D, Xing J, Li Q, Li Y, Chen L. The effect of temperature fluctuation on the microbial diversity and community structure of rural household biogas digesters at Qinghai Plateau.. Arch Microbiol 2020 Apr;202(3):525-538.
    doi: 10.1007/s00203-019-01767-0pubmed: 31712862google scholar: lookup
  17. Harlow BE, Lawrence LM, Hayes SH, Crum A, Flythe MD. Effect of Dietary Starch Source and Concentration on Equine Fecal Microbiota.. PLoS One 2016;11(4):e0154037.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154037pmc: PMC4851386pubmed: 27128793google scholar: lookup
  18. Henderson C, Demeyer D. The rumen as a model of the microbiology of fibre digestion in the human intestine. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 23 227–240.
    doi: 10.1016/0377-8401(89)90099-0google scholar: lookup
  19. Hendriks WH, van Baal J, Bosch G. Ileal and faecal protein digestibility measurement in humans and other non-ruminants - a comparative species view.. Br J Nutr 2012 Aug;108 Suppl 2:S247-57.
    pubmed: 23107535doi: 10.1017/s0007114512002395google scholar: lookup
  20. Hooper LV. Bacterial contributions to mammalian gut development.. Trends Microbiol 2004 Mar;12(3):129-34.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2004.01.001pubmed: 15001189google scholar: lookup
  21. Ikeda M, Katsumata R. Metabolic Engineering To Produce Tyrosine or Phenylalanine in a Tryptophan-Producing Corynebacterium glutamicum Strain.. Appl Environ Microbiol 1992 Mar;58(3):781-5.
    doi: 10.1128/aem.58.3.781-785.1992pmc: PMC195334pubmed: 16348670google scholar: lookup
  22. Islam M, Lee SS. Recent application technologies of rumen microbiome is the key to enhance feed fermentation. J. Life Sci. 28 1244–1253.
  23. Joyce SA, MacSharry J, Casey PG, Kinsella M, Murphy EF, Shanahan F, Hill C, Gahan CG. Regulation of host weight gain and lipid metabolism by bacterial bile acid modification in the gut.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014 May 20;111(20):7421-6.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323599111pmc: PMC4034235pubmed: 24799697google scholar: lookup
  24. Kauter A, Epping L, Semmler T, Antao E-M, Kannapin D, Stoeckle SD. The gut microbiome of horses: current research on equine enteral microbiota and future perspectives. Anim. Microbiome. 1 14.
  25. Khafipour E, Li S, Tun H, Derakhshani H, Moossavi S, Plaizier J. Effects of grain feeding on microbiota in the digestive tract of cattle. Anim. Front. 6 13–19.
    doi: 10.2527/af.2016-0018pubmed: 0google scholar: lookup
  26. Lakhan R, Said HM. Lipopolysaccharide inhibits colonic biotin uptake via interference with membrane expression of its transporter: a role for a casein kinase 2-mediated pathway.. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2017 Apr 1;312(4):C376-C384.
    pmc: PMC5407016pubmed: 28052864doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00300.2016google scholar: lookup
  27. Lamendella R, Domingo JW, Ghosh S, Martinson J, Oerther DB. Comparative fecal metagenomics unveils unique functional capacity of the swine gut.. BMC Microbiol 2011 May 15;11:103.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-103pmc: PMC3123192pubmed: 21575148google scholar: lookup
  28. Langille MG, Zaneveld J, Caporaso JG, McDonald D, Knights D, Reyes JA, Clemente JC, Burkepile DE, Vega Thurber RL, Knight R, Beiko RG, Huttenhower C. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences.. Nat Biotechnol 2013 Sep;31(9):814-21.
    doi: 10.1038/nbt.2676pmc: PMC3819121pubmed: 23975157google scholar: lookup
  29. Ley RE, Hamady M, Lozupone C, Turnbaugh PJ, Ramey RR, Bircher JS, Schlegel ML, Tucker TA, Schrenzel MD, Knight R, Gordon JI. Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes.. Science 2008 Jun 20;320(5883):1647-51.
    pmc: PMC2649005pubmed: 18497261doi: 10.1126/science.1155725google scholar: lookup
  30. Li B, Zhang K, Li C, Wang X, Chen Y, Yang Y. Characterization and Comparison of Microbiota in the Gastrointestinal Tracts of the Goat (Capra hircus) During Preweaning Development.. Front Microbiol 2019;10:2125.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02125pmc: PMC6753876pubmed: 31572331google scholar: lookup
  31. Li F, Hitch TCA, Chen Y, Creevey CJ, Guan LL. Comparative metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses reveal the breed effect on the rumen microbiome and its associations with feed efficiency in beef cattle.. Microbiome 2019 Jan 14;7(1):6.
    pmc: PMC6332916pubmed: 30642389doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0618-5google scholar: lookup
  32. Li M, Kang S, Zheng Y, Shao J, Zhao H, An Y, Cao G, Li Q, Yue X, Yang M. Comparative metabolomics analysis of donkey colostrum and mature milk using ultra-high-performance liquid tandem chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry.. J Dairy Sci 2020 Jan;103(1):992-1001.
    doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17448pubmed: 31677837google scholar: lookup
  33. Liu G, Bou G, Su S, Xing J, Qu H, Zhang X, Wang X, Zhao Y, Dugarjaviin M. Microbial diversity within the digestive tract contents of Dezhou donkeys.. PLoS One 2019;14(12):e0226186.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226186pmc: PMC6910686pubmed: 31834903google scholar: lookup
  34. Liu H, Zhao X, Han X, Xu S, Zhao L, Hu L, Xu T, Zhao N, Zhang X, Chen D, He F, Chen X. Comparative study of gut microbiota in Tibetan wild asses (Equus kiang) and domestic donkeys (Equus asinus) on the Qinghai-Tibet plateau.. PeerJ 2020;8:e9032.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.9032pmc: PMC7276150pubmed: 32547852google scholar: lookup
  35. Liu X, Fan H, Ding X, Hong Z, Nei Y, Liu Z, Li G, Guo H. Analysis of the gut microbiota by high-throughput sequencing of the V5-V6 regions of the 16S rRNA gene in donkey.. Curr Microbiol 2014 May;68(5):657-62.
    doi: 10.1007/s00284-014-0528-5pubmed: 24452427google scholar: lookup
  36. Malmuthuge N, Guan LL. Understanding host-microbial interactions in rumen: searching the best opportunity for microbiota manipulation.. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2017;8:8.
    pmc: PMC5244612pubmed: 28116074doi: 10.1186/s40104-016-0135-3google scholar: lookup
  37. Mao S, Zhang M, Liu J, Zhu W. Characterising the bacterial microbiota across the gastrointestinal tracts of dairy cattle: membership and potential function.. Sci Rep 2015 Nov 3;5:16116.
    pmc: PMC4630781pubmed: 26527325doi: 10.1038/srep16116google scholar: lookup
  38. Park JH, Lee SY. Metabolic pathways and fermentative production of L-aspartate family amino acids.. Biotechnol J 2010 Jun;5(6):560-77.
    doi: 10.1002/biot.201000032pubmed: 20518059google scholar: lookup
  39. Perea K, Perz K, Olivo SK, Williams A, Lachman M, Ishaq SL, Thomson J, Yeoman CJ. Feed efficiency phenotypes in lambs involve changes in ruminal, colonic, and small-intestine-located microbiota.. J Anim Sci 2017 Jun;95(6):2585-2592.
    doi: 10.2527/jas2016.1222pubmed: 28727071google scholar: lookup
  40. Qin J, Li R, Raes J, Arumugam M, Burgdorf KS, Manichanh C, Nielsen T, Pons N, Levenez F, Yamada T, Mende DR, Li J, Xu J, Li S, Li D, Cao J, Wang B, Liang H, Zheng H, Xie Y, Tap J, Lepage P, Bertalan M, Batto JM, Hansen T, Le Paslier D, Linneberg A, Nielsen HB, Pelletier E, Renault P, Sicheritz-Ponten T, Turner K, Zhu H, Yu C, Li S, Jian M, Zhou Y, Li Y, Zhang X, Li S, Qin N, Yang H, Wang J, Brunak S, Doré J, Guarner F, Kristiansen K, Pedersen O, Parkhill J, Weissenbach J, Bork P, Ehrlich SD, Wang J. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing.. Nature 2010 Mar 4;464(7285):59-65.
    pmc: PMC3779803pubmed: 20203603doi: 10.1038/nature08821google scholar: lookup
  41. Rooks MG, Garrett WS. Gut microbiota, metabolites and host immunity.. Nat Rev Immunol 2016 May 27;16(6):341-52.
    doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.42pmc: PMC5541232pubmed: 27231050google scholar: lookup
  42. Sahu NP, Kamra DN. Microbial Eco-system of the gastro-intestinal tract of wild herbivorous animals. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 21 207–230.
    doi: 10.1080/09712119.2002.9706370google scholar: lookup
  43. Savadogo A, Ouattara AC, Bassole HI, Traore SA. Bacteriocins and lactic acid bacteria-a minireview. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 5 678–683.
  44. Schoster A. Probiotic Use in Equine Gastrointestinal Disease.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2018 Apr;34(1):13-24.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2017.11.004pubmed: 29402478google scholar: lookup
  45. Suda Y, Villena J, Takahashi Y, Hosoya S, Tomosada Y, Tsukida K, Shimazu T, Aso H, Tohno M, Ishida M, Makino S, Ikegami S, Kitazawa H. Immunobiotic Lactobacillus jensenii as immune-health promoting factor to improve growth performance and productivity in post-weaning pigs.. BMC Immunol 2014 Jun 19;15:24.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2172-15-24pmc: PMC4068960pubmed: 24943108google scholar: lookup
  46. Sun Y, Zhou L, Fang L, Su Y, Zhu W. Responses in colonic microbial community and gene expression of pigs to a long-term high resistant starch diet.. Front Microbiol 2015;6:877.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00877pmc: PMC4548152pubmed: 26379652google scholar: lookup
  47. Sun YZ, Mao SY, Yao W, Zhu WY. DGGE and 16S rDNA analysis reveals a highly diverse and rapidly colonising bacterial community on different substrates in the rumen of goats.. Animal 2008 Mar;2(3):391-8.
    doi: 10.1017/s1751731107001231pubmed: 22445041google scholar: lookup
  48. Umu ÖCO, Rudi K, Diep DB. Modulation of the gut microbiota by prebiotic fibres and bacteriocins.. Microb Ecol Health Dis 2017;28(1):1348886.
    doi: 10.1080/16512235.2017.1348886pmc: PMC5614387pubmed: 28959178google scholar: lookup
  49. Wang Y, Song W, Wang J, Wang T, Xiong X, Qi Z, Fu W, Yang X, Chen YG. Single-cell transcriptome analysis reveals differential nutrient absorption functions in human intestine.. J Exp Med 2020 Feb 3;217(2).
    pmc: PMC7041720pubmed: 31753849doi: 10.1084/jem.20191130google scholar: lookup
  50. Xie Y, Luo T, Yang J, Dong Y. Rapid Determination of Amino Acids in Beer, Red Wine, and Donkey-Hide Gelatin by Gradient Elution of HPLC: From Micellar Liquid Chromatography to High Submicellar Liquid Chromatography.. J AOAC Int 2018 Jan 1;101(1):249-255.
    doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.17-0103pubmed: 28762321google scholar: lookup
  51. Zhang H, Shao M, Huang H, Wang S, Ma L, Wang H, Hu L, Wei K, Zhu R. The Dynamic Distribution of Small-Tail Han Sheep Microbiota across Different Intestinal Segments.. Front Microbiol 2018;9:32.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00032pmc: PMC5797768pubmed: 29445360google scholar: lookup
  52. Zhao F, Zhou G, Liu X, Song S, Xu X, Hooiveld G, Müller M, Liu L, Kristiansen K, Li C. Dietary Protein Sources Differentially Affect the Growth of Akkermansia muciniphila and Maintenance of the Gut Mucus Barrier in Mice.. Mol Nutr Food Res 2019 Dec;63(23):e1900589.
    doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201900589pubmed: 31588624google scholar: lookup
  53. Zhou K. Strategies to promote abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila, an emerging probiotics in the gut, evidence from dietary intervention studies.. J Funct Foods 2017 Jun;33:194-201.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2017.03.045pmc: PMC6223323pubmed: 30416539google scholar: lookup
  54. Zoetendal EG, Raes J, van den Bogert B, Arumugam M, Booijink CC, Troost FJ, Bork P, Wels M, de Vos WM, Kleerebezem M. The human small intestinal microbiota is driven by rapid uptake and conversion of simple carbohydrates.. ISME J 2012 Jul;6(7):1415-26.
    doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.212pmc: PMC3379644pubmed: 22258098google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 7 times.
  1. Liu F, Li R, Zhong Y, Liu X, Deng W, Huang X, Price M, Li J. Age-related alterations in metabolome and microbiome provide insights in dietary transition in giant pandas.. mSystems 2023 Jun 29;8(3):e0025223.
    doi: 10.1128/msystems.00252-23pubmed: 37273228google scholar: lookup
  2. Zhao D, Zhang H, Liu K, Wu Y, Zhang B, Ma C, Liu H. Effect of Cyberlindnera jadinii supplementation on growth performance, serum immunity, antioxidant status, and intestinal health in winter fur-growing raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides).. Front Vet Sci 2023;10:1154808.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1154808pubmed: 37252386google scholar: lookup
  3. Wei Y, Zhou M, Fang W, Liu Q, Mao H, Chen B, Zhang T, Xu Y, Zhang W, Zheng Y, Hu X. Differences in the luminal and mucosal gut microbiomes and metabolomes of oriental rat snake (Ptyas mucosus).. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2023 May;107(10):3257-3271.
    doi: 10.1007/s00253-023-12524-1pubmed: 37071138google scholar: lookup
  4. Zhang Z, Huang B, Wang Y, Zhan Y, Zhu M, Wang C. Dynamic alterations in the donkey fecal bacteria community and metabolome characteristics during gestation.. Front Microbiol 2022;13:927561.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.927561pubmed: 36060774google scholar: lookup
  5. Hu X, Wei Y, Zhang T, Wang X, Xu Y, Zhang W, Zheng Y. Gastrointestinal Biogeography of Luminal Microbiota and Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Sika Deer (Cervus nippon).. Appl Environ Microbiol 2022 Sep 13;88(17):e0049922.
    doi: 10.1128/aem.00499-22pubmed: 35950850google scholar: lookup
  6. Tong L, Zhang X, Hao H, Liu Q, Zhou Z, Liang X, Liu T, Gong P, Zhang L, Zhai Z, Hao Y, Yi H. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG Derived Extracellular Vesicles Modulate Gut Microbiota and Attenuate Inflammatory in DSS-Induced Colitis Mice.. Nutrients 2021 Sep 23;13(10).
    doi: 10.3390/nጐ3319pubmed: 34684320google scholar: lookup
  7. Zhou P, Hao X, Liu Y, Yang Z, Xu M, Liu S, Zhang S, Yang T, Wang X, Wang Y. Determination of the protective effects of Hua-Zhuo-Jie-Du in chronic atrophic gastritis by regulating intestinal microbiota and metabolites: combination of liquid chromatograph mass spectrometer metabolic profiling and 16S rRNA gene sequencing.. Chin Med 2021 May 1;16(1):37.
    doi: 10.1186/s13020-021-00445-ypubmed: 33933119google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,359 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.