Analyze Diet

[Use of a fast test to detect rotavirus in feces].

Abstract: The commercially available immunoassay "OnSite Rotavirus" was used for the detection of animal rotaviruses in 113 faecal samples. The sensitivity of the test was 88% and the specificity 96% compared with reference methods (EIA, EM). This test would detect approximately 4.4 x 10(6) to 1.8 x 10(7) virus particles per ml. The presence of virus could be demonstrated in fresh faecal samples from cattle, horses and pigs within a few minutes. The rotaviruses of group A were identified independently of the virus serotype. Further results and additional problems of using this test kit are described.
Publication Date: 1999-03-20 PubMed ID: 10084947
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • English Abstract
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research focused on the usage of a specific immunoassay, called “OnSite Rotavirus,” to quickly detect rotaviruses in animal fecal samples. The test showed high sensitivity and specificity in comparison to reference methods.

Methodology and Results

  • The researchers analyzed 113 animal fecal samples using the OnSite Rotavirus test. This immunoassay is a commercially available test used for the rapid detection of rotaviruses.
  • The results showed that the test had a sensitivity of 88%. In scientific research, sensitivity refers to the ability of a test to correctly identify positive results. Therefore, 88% of the times, this test was able to correctly identify the presence of rotaviruses in the samples.
  • The specificity of the test was 96%. Specificity refers to a test’s ability to correctly generate a negative result for people free from a condition. This means that 96% of the times, the test correctly identified samples that were free of rotaviruses.
  • The test was able to detect approximately 4.4 x 10(6) to 1.8 x 10(7) virus particles per milliliter.

Practical Implications and Limitations

  • The test was effective in detecting the presence of rotaviruses in fresh fecal samples from various animals including cattle, horses, and pigs, and results were delivered within minutes, making it a quick diagnostic tool in veterinary science.
  • It was able to identify group A rotaviruses irrespective of the virus serotype. Serotyping is the division of microorganisms into groups (serotypes) based on their reaction to a specific antibody. Group A rotaviruses are the most common cause of severe diarrheal disease in young children, and can also affect animals and are zoonotic, meaning they can be transmitted to humans.
  • The paper also hints at additional problems associated with using this test kit, but does not specify what these problems are. For a full understanding, it would be important to explore the full article.

Cite This Article

APA
Otto P, Elschner M, Schulze P, Prudlo J, Schrader R. (1999). [Use of a fast test to detect rotavirus in feces]. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr, 110(10), 397-400.

Publication

ISSN: 0005-9366
NlmUniqueID: 0003163
Country: Germany
Language: ger
Volume: 110
Issue: 10
Pages: 397-400

Researcher Affiliations

Otto, P
  • Bundesinstitut für gesundheitlichen Verbraucherschutz und Veterinärmedizin, Jena.
Elschner, M
    Schulze, P
      Prudlo, J
        Schrader, R

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Cattle
          • Cattle Diseases
          • Feces / virology
          • Horse Diseases
          • Horses
          • Immunoassay / methods
          • Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
          • Rotavirus / isolation & purification
          • Rotavirus Infections / diagnosis
          • Rotavirus Infections / veterinary
          • Sensitivity and Specificity
          • Swine
          • Swine Diseases
          • Time Factors

          Citations

          This article has been cited 0 times.