Analyze Diet

Use of a handheld device for analysis of blood electrolyte concentrations and blood gas partial pressures in dogs and horses.

Abstract: To compare, for blood samples from dogs and horses, blood electrolyte concentrations, blood gas partial pressures, and Hct obtained using a handheld analyzer with those obtained using a standard chemistry analyzer and to compare results obtained with the handheld analyzer using warm versus cold test cartridges. Methods: Case series with analysis of split samples. Methods: Blood samples from 22 dogs and 17 horses. Methods: Sodium, potassium, ionized calcium, bicarbonate, and total CO2 concentrations, pH, PO2, PCO2, base excess, and Hct were determined by use of a handheld analyzer and test cartridges that had been allowed to warm to ambient temperature or had been recently removed from a refrigerator. Results were compared with those from a standard chemistry analyzer by use of linear regression. Results: For canine samples, values obtained with the handheld analyzer and warm cartridges were highly correlated (r2 > or = 0.83) with values obtained with the standard chemistry analyzer, except for sodium concentration (r2 = 0.6). For equine samples, values obtained with the handheld analyzer and warm cartridges were highly correlated (r2 > or = 0.79) with values obtained with the standard chemistry analyzer, except for Hct (r2 = 0.38). For all samples, results obtained with cold and warm cartridges were moderately correlated (r2 > or = 0.69). Conclusions: Results obtained with the handheld analyzer were similar to those obtained from the standard chemistry analyzer, with the exception of sodium concentration for canine samples and Hct for equine samples. Results were not substantially affected by use of cold, rather than warm, test cartridges.
Publication Date: 1998-08-26 PubMed ID: 9713538
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study tested the use of a handheld device to analyze blood electrolytes and gas partial pressures in dogs and horses, finding that its results were largely comparable to those obtained using a standard chemistry analyzer. However, it did find some discrepancy in the results for sodium concentration in dogs and hematocrit in horses.

Objective and Methodology

  • This research aimed to compare the results obtained by a handheld analyzer on blood samples from dogs and horses with those obtained using a standard chemistry analyzer.
  • The handheld analyzer was used to assess sodium, potassium, ionized calcium, bicarbonate, and total CO2 concentrations, pH, PO2, PCO2, base excess, and hematocrit (Hct).
  • The study used a case series and split sample analysis on blood samples obtained from 22 dogs and 17 horses.
  • Two sets of test cartridges were used with the handheld analyzer, one set that had been warmed to ambient temperature and the other just removed from refrigeration.

Results

  • For canine samples, most measurements (with a correlation of r2 > 0.83) corresponded well with those obtained by the standard chemistry analyzer. However, sodium concentration measurements showed lower correspondence (r2 = 0.6).
  • For equine samples, most measurements (with a correlation of r2 > 0.79) also corresponded well with results of the standard chemistry analyzer. The exception here was for Hct, which showed a lower correlation (r2 = 0.38).
  • Results from the handheld analyzer using both cold and warm test cartridges showed moderate correlation (r2 > or = 0.69).

Conclusions

  • The handheld analyzer provided results similar to those from a standard chemistry analyzer. The exceptions noted were for sodium concentration in canine samples and Hct in equine samples.
  • Whether the test cartridges used with the handheld device were warm or cold did not significantly affect the results.

This study supports the viability of handheld devices as useful tools for analyzing blood electrolyte concentrations and blood gas pressures in dogs and horses. However, it also indicates the necessity of further studies to understand the varying results for certain parameters.

Cite This Article

APA
Looney AL, Ludders J, Erb HN, Gleed R, Moon P. (1998). Use of a handheld device for analysis of blood electrolyte concentrations and blood gas partial pressures in dogs and horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 213(4), 526-530.

Publication

ISSN: 0003-1488
NlmUniqueID: 7503067
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 213
Issue: 4
Pages: 526-530

Researcher Affiliations

Looney, A L
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Ludders, J
    Erb, H N
      Gleed, R
        Moon, P

          MeSH Terms

          • Acid-Base Equilibrium
          • Animals
          • Blood Chemical Analysis / instrumentation
          • Blood Chemical Analysis / veterinary
          • Blood Gas Analysis / instrumentation
          • Blood Gas Analysis / veterinary
          • Carbon Dioxide / blood
          • Dogs / blood
          • Electrochemistry
          • Electrolytes / blood
          • Female
          • Hematocrit / instrumentation
          • Hematocrit / veterinary
          • Horses / blood
          • Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
          • Male
          • Oxygen / blood

          Citations

          This article has been cited 1 times.
          1. Yildirim E, Karapinar T, Hayirli A. Reliability of the i-STAT for the determination of blood electrolyte (K+, Na+, and CI-) concentrations in cattle.. J Vet Intern Med 2015 Jan;29(1):388-94.
            doi: 10.1111/jvim.12526pubmed: 25619525google scholar: lookup