Analyze Diet
American journal of veterinary research2005; 66(2); 284-288; doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.284

Use of force plate analysis to compare the analgesic effects of intravenous administration of phenylbutazone and flunixin meglumine in horses with navicular syndrome.

Abstract: To use force plate analysis to evaluate the analgesic efficacies of flunixin meglumine and phenylbutazone administered i.v. at typical clinical doses in horses with navicular syndrome. Methods: 12 horses with navicular syndrome that were otherwise clinically normal. Methods: Horses received flunixin (1.1 mg/kg), phenylbutazone (4.4 mg/kg), or physiologic saline (0.9% NaCI; 1 mL/45 kg) solution administered IV once daily for 4 days with a 14-day washout period between treatments (3 treatments/horse). Before beginning treatment (baseline) and 6, 12, 24, and 30 hours after the fourth dose of each treatment, horses were evaluated by use of the American Association of Equine Practitioners lameness scoring system (half scores permitted) and peak vertical force of the forelimbs was measured via a force plate. Results: At 6, 12, and 24 hours after the fourth treatment, subjective lameness evaluations and force plate data indicated significant improvement in lameness from baseline values in horses treated with flunixin or phenylbutazone, compared with control horses; at those time points, the assessed variables in flunixin- or phenylbutazone-treated horses were not significantly different. Conclusions: In horses with navicular syndrome treated once daily for 4 days, typical clinical doses of flunixin and phenylbutazone resulted in similar significant improvement in lameness at 6, 12, and 24 hours after the final dose, compared with findings in horses treated with saline solution. The effect of flunixin or phenylbutazone was maintained for at least 24 hours. Flunixin meglumine and phenylbutazone appear to have similar analgesic effects in horses with navicular syndrome.
Publication Date: 2005-03-11 PubMed ID: 15757129DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.284Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study analysed the effectiveness of two pain-relieving drugs, flunixin meglumine and phenylbutazone, on horses affected with navicular syndrome. Researchers used a force-plate analysis to come to the conclusion that both medicines provided significant improvement in lameness compared to a saline solution.

Objectives of the study

  • The main objective of this study was to understand the analgesic (pain-relieving) effects of the two drugs, namely: flunixin meglumine and phenylbutazone, on horses diagnosed with navicular syndrome.
  • Another aim of the research was to employ the use of a force plate analysis to measure the efficacy of these drugs.
  • The study also intended to compare the two medications’ effects against using a saline solution.

Methods and Procedures

  • Involvement of 12 horses with navicular syndrome that were otherwise clinically normal.
  • Administration of flunixin (1.1 mg/kg), phenylbutazone (4.4 mg/kg), or physiologic saline (0.9% NaCI; 1 mL/45 kg) solution iv once daily for 4 days.
  • Use of a 14-day washout period between treatments so each horse underwent three different treatments.
  • Evaluation of horses before treatment (baseline), and at 6, 12, 24, and 30 hours post the fourth dose of each treatment.
  • Use of the American Association of Equine Practitioners lameness scoring system to evaluate treatment effects, and a force plate for measuring peak vertical force of the forelimbs.

Main Findings

  • Both flunixin and phenylbutazone showed significant improvement in lameness from initial values, faring better than control horses that received only the saline solution. This improvement was visible at 6, 12, and 24 hours after the last dose of treatment.
  • There was no significant difference observed in the horses treated with either of the two drugs, indicating comparable effects.
  • The effect of both flunixin and phenylbutazone lasted for at least 24 hours after the final dose.

Conclusions

  • The results suggest that for horses affected with navicular syndrome, standard clinical doses of flunixin and phenylbutazone yield a marked improvement in lameness compared to horses treated with a saline solution, and the effect lasted for at least a day after dosage.
  • Both flunixin meglumine and phenylbutazone showed similar pain-relieving effects in horses with this condition, thereby suggesting their use as effective analgesics for horses suffering from navicular syndrome.

Cite This Article

APA
Erkert RS, MacAllister CG, Payton ME, Clarke CR. (2005). Use of force plate analysis to compare the analgesic effects of intravenous administration of phenylbutazone and flunixin meglumine in horses with navicular syndrome. Am J Vet Res, 66(2), 284-288. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.284

Publication

ISSN: 0002-9645
NlmUniqueID: 0375011
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 66
Issue: 2
Pages: 284-288

Researcher Affiliations

Erkert, Ronald S
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.
MacAllister, Charles G
    Payton, Mark E
      Clarke, Cyril R

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal / administration & dosage
        • Clonixin / administration & dosage
        • Clonixin / analogs & derivatives
        • Foot Diseases / drug therapy
        • Foot Diseases / veterinary
        • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
        • Horses / injuries
        • Injections, Intravenous / veterinary
        • Lameness, Animal / drug therapy
        • Phenylbutazone / administration & dosage
        • Syndrome
        • Treatment Outcome

        Citations

        This article has been cited 7 times.
        1. Jacobs C, Schnabel LV, Redding Horne C, Tufts S, Martin EGM, Love K. Postoperative management following equine orthopedic surgery: a survey of diplomates of the ACVS and ACVSMR. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1708401.
          doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1708401pubmed: 41427135google scholar: lookup
        2. Mercer MA, Davis JL, McKenzie HC. The Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutic Evaluation of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Adult Horses. Animals (Basel) 2023 May 10;13(10).
          doi: 10.3390/ani13101597pubmed: 37238029google scholar: lookup
        3. Taguchi T, Morales Yniguez FJ, Takawira C, Andrews FM, Lopez MJ. Agmatine Administration Effects on Equine Gastric Ulceration and Lameness. J Clin Med 2022 Dec 8;11(24).
          doi: 10.3390/jcm11247283pubmed: 36555900google scholar: lookup
        4. Flood J, Stewart AJ. Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Associated Toxicities in Horses. Animals (Basel) 2022 Oct 26;12(21).
          doi: 10.3390/ani12212939pubmed: 36359062google scholar: lookup
        5. Banse H, Cribb AE. Comparative efficacy of oral meloxicam and phenylbutazone in 2 experimental pain models in the horse. Can Vet J 2017 Feb;58(2):157-167.
          pubmed: 28216685
        6. Robinson KA, Manning ST. Efficacy of a single-formula acupuncture treatment for horses with palmar heel pain. Can Vet J 2015 Dec;56(12):1257-60.
          pubmed: 26663921
        7. Jülke H, Mainil-Varlet P, Jakob RP, Brehm W, Schäfer B, Nesic D. The Role of Cells in Meniscal Guided Tissue Regeneration: A Proof of Concept Study in a Goat Model. Cartilage 2015 Jan;6(1):20-9.
          doi: 10.1177/1947603514548213pubmed: 26069707google scholar: lookup