Analyze Diet
Behavioural processes2011; 86(3); 329-339; doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.02.001

Using differential reinforcement to improve equine welfare: shaping appropriate truck loading and feet handling.

Abstract: Inappropriate behavior during common handling procedures with horses is often subject to aversive treatment. The present study replicated and extended previous findings using differential reinforcement to shape appropriate equine handling behavior. In Study 1, a multiple baseline across subjects design was used with four horses to determine first the effects of shaping target-touch responses and then successive approximations of full truck loading under continuous and intermittent schedules of reinforcement. Full loading responses were shaped and maintained in all four horses and occurrences of inappropriate behaviors reduced to zero. Generalization of the loading response was also observed to both a novel trainer and trailer. In Study 2, a changing criterion design was used to increase the duration of feet handling with one horse. The horse's responding reached the terminal duration criterion of 1min and showed consistent generalization and one-week maintenance. Overall, the results of both studies support the use of applied equine training systems based on positive reinforcement for increasing appropriate behavior during common handling procedures.
Publication Date: 2011-02-15 PubMed ID: 21310219DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.02.001Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article discusses the use of differential reinforcement techniques to improve the behavior of horses during common handling procedures, such as truck loading and feet handling. These techniques were found to increase appropriate behavior, reduce instances of inappropriate behavior, and maintain the behavior in various situations.

Methodology

In the study, two experiments were conducted.

  • Study 1: A multiple baseline across subjects design was used on four horses to assess the effects of shaping target-touch responses and sequential approximations of full truck loading under continuous and intermittent reinforcement schedules. The goal was to shape and maintain full loading responses in all four horses while reducing occurrences of inappropriate behaviors to zero.
  • Study 2: A changing criterion design was applied for a single horse to prolong the duration of feet handling. The response of the horse was measured against a terminal duration criterion of 1 minute.

Results

Both studies yielded positive results.

  • In Study 1, results showed that full loading responses were shaped and maintained in all four horses, with inappropriate behaviors reduced to zero. There was also evidence of generalization of the loading response to a novel trainer and trailer, suggesting that the horses had acquired the required behavior and could apply it in different contexts.
  • In Study 2, the horse’s response met the terminal duration criterion of 1 minute, demonstrating successful implementation of the changing criterion design method. Additionally, the trained behavior showed consistent generalization and maintained itself after a week, signifying that the behavior was effectively learned and retained.

Conclusion

The findings of both studies underscore the effectiveness of using differential reinforcement to shape appropriate equine handling behavior. This indicates the potential of such techniques in enhancing equine welfare, as they help increase appropriate behavior during common handling procedures. Additionally, these outcomes support the use of horse training systems grounded in positive reinforcement.

Cite This Article

APA
Slater C, Dymond S. (2011). Using differential reinforcement to improve equine welfare: shaping appropriate truck loading and feet handling. Behav Processes, 86(3), 329-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2011.02.001

Publication

ISSN: 1872-8308
NlmUniqueID: 7703854
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 86
Issue: 3
Pages: 329-339

Researcher Affiliations

Slater, Charlotte
  • Department of Psychology, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, United Kingdom.
Dymond, Simon

    MeSH Terms

    • Animal Welfare
    • Animals
    • Association Learning
    • Behavior Control / methods
    • Behavior Control / psychology
    • Conditioning, Operant
    • Cooperative Behavior
    • Generalization, Psychological
    • Handling, Psychological
    • Horses / psychology
    • Male
    • Motivation
    • Reinforcement Schedule
    • Reinforcement, Psychology

    Citations

    This article has been cited 7 times.
    1. Carroll SL, Sykes BW, Mills PC. Moving toward Fear-Free Husbandry and Veterinary Care for Horses. Animals (Basel) 2022 Oct 24;12(21).
      doi: 10.3390/ani12212907pubmed: 36359031google scholar: lookup
    2. Nielsen SS, Alvarez J, Bicout DJ, Calistri P, Canali E, Drewe JA, Garin-Bastuji B, Gonzales Rojas JL, Gortázar Schmidt C, Michel V, Miranda Chueca MÁ, Padalino B, Pasquali P, Roberts HC, Spoolder H, Stahl K, Velarde A, Viltrop A, Winckler C, Earley B, Edwards S, Faucitano L, Marti S, Miranda de La Lama GC, Costa LN, Thomsen PT, Ashe S, Mur L, Van der Stede Y, Herskin M. Welfare of equidae during transport. EFSA J 2022 Sep;20(9):e07444.
      doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7444pubmed: 36092762google scholar: lookup
    3. Brando S, Basom L, Bashaw M, Druyor C, Fonte E, Thompson R. Individualized Target Training Facilitated Transfer of Group Housed Capuchin Monkeys (Sapajus apella) to Test Cubicles and Discrimination of Targets on Computer Touch Screens. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jul 12;11(7).
      doi: 10.3390/ani11072070pubmed: 34359198google scholar: lookup
    4. Pfaller-Sadovsky N, Hurtado-Parrado C, Cardillo D, Medina LG, Friedman SG. What's in a Click? The Efficacy of Conditioned Reinforcement in Applied Animal Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Animals (Basel) 2020 Sep 28;10(10).
      doi: 10.3390/ani10101757pubmed: 32998242google scholar: lookup
    5. Fernandez EJ. Training Petting Zoo Sheep to Act Like Petting Zoo Sheep: An Empirical Evaluation of Response-Independent Schedules and Shaping with Negative Reinforcement. Animals (Basel) 2020 Jul 1;10(7).
      doi: 10.3390/ani10071122pubmed: 32630257google scholar: lookup
    6. York A, Matusiewicz J, Padalino B. How to minimise the incidence of transport-related problem behaviours in horses: a review. J Equine Sci 2017;28(3):67-75.
      doi: 10.1294/jes.28.67pubmed: 28955158google scholar: lookup
    7. Meier J, Theby V, Gygax L, Hillman E, Fischer-Tenhagen C. Why workshops work: Examining the efficacy of training trainers to train goats. Anim Welf 2023;32:e76.
      doi: 10.1017/awf.2023.94pubmed: 38516208google scholar: lookup