Analyze Diet
Rheumatology international2010; 31(10); 1341-1348; doi: 10.1007/s00296-010-1471-9

Variations in chondrocyte apoptosis may explain the increased prevalence of osteoarthritis in some joints.

Abstract: To investigate whether there are any variations in chondrocyte susceptibility to an apoptotic stimulus between cells of articular cartilage (AC) from equine joints that differ in prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: Cartilage from macroscopically normal equine metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP) and distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints was used. Prior to culture, chondrocyte viability was assessed using the fluorescein diacetate (FDA) and propidium iodide paravital staining method. AC explants were subsequently treated with tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in combination with Actinomycin D to induce apoptosis. Apoptosis of chondrocytes in cartilage sections was assessed by expression of active caspase-3 using indirect immunohistochemistry and sections also histologically graded using a 'modified' Mankin scoring system. Results: Prior to culture (mean ± standard deviation) chondrocyte viability was 80.7% (3.5). The extent of chondrocyte apoptosis induced by TNF-α/Actinomycin D varied markedly according to the joint type that the cartilage was sampled from. For MCP joints, the extent of overall chondrocyte apoptosis was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in stimulated explants (26.7%, 10.3) than that observed in unstimulated control samples (9.6%, 7.5). Conversely, chondrocytes from PIP and DIP joint cartilage did not respond significantly to apoptotic stimulation (P > 0.05). Significant variations in cellularity and thickness were also evident between cartilages of different joint types. Conclusions: Data in this study demonstrate that chondrocytes from three equine joint types with varying prevalences of OA differ significantly in terms of susceptibility to apoptosis induction. This may provide a possible explanation for the joint-specific nature of the disease.
Publication Date: 2010-04-16 PubMed ID: 20396889DOI: 10.1007/s00296-010-1471-9Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigates the differences in susceptibility to programmed cell death (apoptosis) in cartilage cells (chondrocytes) from various horse (equine) joints. The aim is to determine if these variations in cell behavior could provide insight into why some joints are more prone to osteoarthritis – a degenerative joint disease.

Methods

  • The research examined three types of equine joints – the metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), and distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints.
  • The health of these cells was evaluated using the fluorescein diacetate and propidium iodide paravital staining method, before culture.
  • Subsequently, to understand how these cells react to factors causing programmed cell death or apoptosis, the cartilage samples were exposed to tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and Actinomycin D, known inducers of apoptosis.
  • The number of cells undergoing apoptosis were calculated by examining expression of a protein called active caspase-3, known to be involved in apoptosis, using a technique called indirect immunohistochemistry.
  • Cartilage samples were also graded histologically based on cellularity and thickness using a ‘modified’ Mankin scoring system.

Results

  • Before they were cultured and subjected to apoptosis-inducing stimulus, most of the chondrocytes were found to be viable (~80%).
  • Apoptosis varied noticeably between the cartilage from different joint types after they were exposed to the TNF-α/Actinomycin D combination.
  • In the cartilage from MCP joints, a significantly high level of chondrocyte apoptosis was observed when compared to the unstimulated samples.
  • On the other hand, the chondrocytes from PIP and DIP joints did not show a significant response in terms of apoptosis to the same stimulus.
  • Variations were also found in the cellularity and thickness of the cartilage from different joints.

Conclusions

  • This research found that chondrocytes from different types of equine joints, which have varying prevalence of osteoarthritis, differ significantly in their response to the process of apoptosis.
  • These results suggest a possible explanation for why osteoarthritis affects certain joints more than others by implying an inherent difference in how cartilage cells from these joints behave when faced with apoptotic conditions.

Cite This Article

APA
Thomas CM, Whittles CE, Fuller CJ, Sharif M. (2010). Variations in chondrocyte apoptosis may explain the increased prevalence of osteoarthritis in some joints. Rheumatol Int, 31(10), 1341-1348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-010-1471-9

Publication

ISSN: 1437-160X
NlmUniqueID: 8206885
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 31
Issue: 10
Pages: 1341-1348

Researcher Affiliations

Thomas, C M
  • Department of Anatomy, University of Bristol, Southwell Street, Bristol, BS2 8EJ, UK.
Whittles, C E
    Fuller, C J
      Sharif, M

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Apoptosis / physiology
        • Cartilage, Articular / pathology
        • Cells, Cultured
        • Chondrocytes / pathology
        • Disease Models, Animal
        • Female
        • Horse Diseases / pathology
        • Horses
        • Male
        • Metacarpophalangeal Joint / pathology
        • Organ Specificity
        • Osteoarthritis / epidemiology
        • Osteoarthritis / pathology
        • Prevalence
        • Toe Joint / pathology
        • Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha / physiology

        Grant Funding

        • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

        References

        This article includes 28 references
        1. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007 Jan;15(1):27-34
          pubmed: 16859932
        2. Connect Tissue Res. 2006;47(2):92-101
          pubmed: 16754515
        3. Lab Invest. 1996 Jan;74(1):232-40
          pubmed: 8569187
        4. J Orthop Res. 1998 Sep;16(5):551-6
          pubmed: 9820277
        5. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006 May;14(5):435-41
          pubmed: 16368252
        6. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2001 Jun;121(6):301-6
          pubmed: 11482459
        7. Acta Med Okayama. 2001 Dec;55(6):333-40
          pubmed: 11779095
        8. J Orthop Res. 2002 May;20(3):526-34
          pubmed: 12038627
        9. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006 Jul;14(7):660-9
          pubmed: 16492401
        10. Vet Rec. 2001 Feb 17;148(7):204-6
          pubmed: 11265997
        11. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003 Jul;11(7):538-47
          pubmed: 12814617
        12. Arthritis Rheum. 1998 Jul;41(7):1266-74
          pubmed: 9663485
        13. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002 Jul 26;295(4):937-44
          pubmed: 12127985
        14. J Immunol. 2000 Feb 15;164(4):2233-9
          pubmed: 10657679
        15. Equine Vet J. 2001 Jul;33(4):360-5
          pubmed: 11469768
        16. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005 Feb;13(2):93-103
          pubmed: 15694570
        17. Arthritis Rheum. 1998 Sep;41(9):1632-8
          pubmed: 9751096
        18. Orthopade. 2006 Jul;35(7):784-90
          pubmed: 16609893
        19. Equine Vet J. 1999 Jan;31(1):73-81
          pubmed: 9952333
        20. J Orthop Res. 2000 Sep;18(5):739-48
          pubmed: 11117295
        21. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2001 Jul;9(5):499-507
          pubmed: 11467899
        22. Vet J. 2003 Jul;166(1):52-7
          pubmed: 12788017
        23. Equine Vet J. 2006 Nov;38(6):538-42
          pubmed: 17124844
        24. J Orthop Res. 2000 May;18(3):356-63
          pubmed: 10937621
        25. Ann Rheum Dis. 1991 Jan;50(1):8-13
          pubmed: 1994877
        26. Ann Rheum Dis. 1999 Jan;58(1):27-34
          pubmed: 10343537
        27. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2001 Jan;9(1):49-55
          pubmed: 11178947
        28. Microsc Res Tech. 2000 Aug 1;50(3):236-42
          pubmed: 10891889

        Citations

        This article has been cited 7 times.
        1. Xu Y, Yang Y, Song H, Li M, Shi W, Yu T, Lin J, Yu Y. The Role of Exerkines in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: From Mechanisms to Exercise Strategies. Orthop Surg 2025 Apr;17(4):1021-1035.
          doi: 10.1111/os.14365pubmed: 39854050google scholar: lookup
        2. Lee YT, Mohd Yunus MH, Yazid MD, Ugusman A. Unraveling the path to osteoarthritis management: targeting chondrocyte apoptosis for therapeutic intervention. Front Cell Dev Biol 2024;12:1347126.
          doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1347126pubmed: 38827524google scholar: lookup
        3. Kong H, Wang XQ, Zhang XA. Exercise for Osteoarthritis: A Literature Review of Pathology and Mechanism. Front Aging Neurosci 2022;14:854026.
          doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.854026pubmed: 35592699google scholar: lookup
        4. Chen L, Cheng S, Sun K, Wang J, Liu X, Zhao Y, Yang J, Zhao D, Xue C, Tao Y, Zhao S, Zhang H, Lu S, Shi Q, Wang Y, Shu B. Changes in macrophage and inflammatory cytokine expressions during fracture healing in an ovariectomized mice model. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021 May 28;22(1):494.
          doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04360-zpubmed: 34049522google scholar: lookup
        5. Sirong S, Yang C, Taoran T, Songhang L, Shiyu L, Yuxin Z, Xiaoru S, Tao Z, Yunfeng L, Xiaoxiao C. Effects of tetrahedral framework nucleic acid/wogonin complexes on osteoarthritis. Bone Res 2020;8:6.
          doi: 10.1038/s41413-019-0077-4pubmed: 32047705google scholar: lookup
        6. Chen L, Li Q, Wang J, Jin S, Zheng H, Lin J, He F, Zhang H, Ma S, Mei J, Yu J. MiR-29b-3p promotes chondrocyte apoptosis and facilitates the occurrence and development of osteoarthritis by targeting PGRN. J Cell Mol Med 2017 Dec;21(12):3347-3359.
          doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13237pubmed: 28609022google scholar: lookup
        7. Fox B, Schantz JT, Haigh R, Wood ME, Moore PK, Viner N, Spencer JP, Winyard PG, Whiteman M. Inducible hydrogen sulfide synthesis in chondrocytes and mesenchymal progenitor cells: is H2S a novel cytoprotective mediator in the inflamed joint?. J Cell Mol Med 2012 Apr;16(4):896-910.