Analyze Diet

Vesicular exanthema of swine virus: isolation and serotyping of field samples.

Abstract: Virus isolation was attempted from 262 field samples of vesicular material collected during the outbreaks of vesicular exanthema of swine in the U.S.A. from 1952-54. Using primary swine kidney culture, viral cytopathogenic agents were isolated from 76.3% of the samples. However, an overall recovery rate of 82.1% was obtained after samples negative in tissue culture were inoculated intradermally in susceptible swine. All vesicular exanthema of swine virus isolates were identified as serotype B51 using complement fixation and serum neutralization tests. Two isolates did not react with antisera to known vesicular agents of swine and failed to produce vesicles or clinical signs of disease upon inoculation in swine. One vesicular exanthema of swine virus isolate from tissue of equine origin was pathogenic for swine but produced limited vesiculation at the site of intradermalingual inoculation in the tongue of a pony infected experimentally. Type B51 virus was reisolated from lesions produced in the pony and the pony became seropositive for virus type B51.
Publication Date: 1987-07-01 PubMed ID: 3651889PubMed Central: PMC1255337
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article focuses on the study of the Vesicular Exanthema of Swine Virus (VESV), as it details attempts at isolating and serotyping different samples during various outbreaks across the U.S.A. between 1952 and 1954.

Research Methodology

  • The study made use of 262 samples collected from the field during outbreaks of the Vesicular Exanthema of Swine Virus (VESV) in the USA between the years 1952 and 1954.
  • Primary swine kidney culture was the medium used to attempt virus isolation from collected samples. This method was successful in isolating viral cytopathogenic agents from 76.3% of the samples.
  • For those samples initially yielding negative results in tissue culture, they were inoculated intradermally into susceptible swine, which raised the overall virus recovery rate to 82.1%. Inoculating directly into swine allowed viruses that were not demonstrating in the culture medium to manifest as infections in the swine.

Findings and Results

  • All isolates of the Vesicular Exanthema of Swine Virus were identified as serotype B51. This was determined through complement fixation and serum neutralization tests, standard methods for virus identification and serotyping.
  • Two of the isolates did not exhibit reaction with antisera to known vesicular agents of swine. Upon inoculation in swine, these isolates failed to produce vesicles or any clinical signs of the disease. This could indicate a variant strain of the virus, or perhaps an entirely different pathogen was present in these samples.
  • One isolate of the Vesicular Exanthema of Swine Virus, which had originated from equine tissue, was pathogenic for swine, but only produced limited vesiculation at the site of intradermalingual inoculation in the tongue of an experimentally infected pony. A limited reaction to the virus may suggest some species-specific characteristics of the virus, or potentially, some level of resistance or tolerance in equine species.
  • The B51 virus was successfully reisolated from the lesions produced in the pony, and the pony was found to be seropositive for the B51 virus type, offering further evidence of the infectivity and virulence of this strain of the virus.

Cite This Article

APA
Edwards JF, Yedloutschnig RJ, Dardiri AH, Callis JJ. (1987). Vesicular exanthema of swine virus: isolation and serotyping of field samples. Can J Vet Res, 51(3), 358-362.

Publication

ISSN: 0830-9000
NlmUniqueID: 8607793
Country: Canada
Language: English
Volume: 51
Issue: 3
Pages: 358-362

Researcher Affiliations

Edwards, J F
  • Department of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843.
Yedloutschnig, R J
    Dardiri, A H
      Callis, J J

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Caliciviridae / classification
        • Caliciviridae / isolation & purification
        • Serotyping
        • Swine / microbiology
        • Vesicular Exanthema of Swine / microbiology

        References

        This article includes 7 references
        1. CASEY HL. STANDARDIZED DIAGNOSTIC COMPLEMENT FIXATION METHOD AND ADAPTATION TO MICRO TEST. I. LABORATORY BRANCH COMPLEMENT FIXATION METHOD BY LABORATORY BRANCH TASK FORCE. II. ADAPTATION OF LBCF METHOD TO MICRO TECHNIQUE.. Public Health Monogr 1965;74:1-34.
          pubmed: 14344306
        2. Swaney LM. Susceptibility of a new fetal pig kidney cell line (MVPK-1) to foot-and-mouth disease virus.. Am J Vet Res 1976 Nov;37(11):1319-22.
          pubmed: 185927
        3. BANKOWSKI RA, KUMMER MB. Vesicular stomatitis and vesicular exanthema differentiation by complement fixation.. Am J Vet Res 1955 Jul;16(60):374-6.
          pubmed: 13238737
        4. BROWN F, CRICK J. Application of agar gel precipitin tests to the study of the virus of foot-and-mouth disease.. Virology 1958 Feb;5(1):133-44.
          pubmed: 13519754doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(58)90010-2google scholar: lookup
        5. Forman AJ. A study of foot-and-mouth disease virus strains by complement fixation. II. A comparison of tube and microplate tests for the differentiation of strains.. J Hyg (Lond) 1974 Jun;72(3):407-13.
          pubmed: 4367224doi: 10.1017/s0022172400023640google scholar: lookup
        6. BANKOWSKI RA, WICHMANN R, KUMMER M. A complement-fixation test for identification and differentiation of immunological types of the virus of vesicular exanthema of swine.. Am J Vet Res 1953 Apr;14(51):145-9.
          pubmed: 13050870
        7. Smith AW, Skilling DE, Ritchie AE. Immunoelectron microscopic comparisons of caliciviruses.. Am J Vet Res 1978 Sep;39(9):1531-3.
          pubmed: 567950

        Citations

        This article has been cited 1 times.
        1. Desselberger U. Caliciviridae Other Than Noroviruses.. Viruses 2019 Mar 21;11(3).
          doi: 10.3390/v11030286pubmed: 30901945google scholar: lookup