FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Veterinary and Equine Science Students’ Interpretation...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2017; 7(8); 63; doi: 10.3390/ani7080063

Veterinary and Equine Science Students’ Interpretation of Horse Behaviour.

Abstract: Many veterinary and undergraduate equine science students have little previous horse handling experience and a poor understanding of horse behaviour; yet horses are one of the most unsafe animals with which veterinary students must work. It is essential for veterinary and equine students to learn how to interpret horse behaviour in order to understand demeanour and levels of arousal, and to optimise their own safety and the horses' welfare. The study utilised a qualitative research approach to investigate veterinary science and veterinary technology and undergraduate equine science students' interpretation of expressive behaviours shown by horses. The students (N = 127) were shown six short video clips and asked to select the most applicable terms, from a pre-determined list, to describe the behavioural expression of each individual horse. A wide variation of terms were selected by students and in some situations of distress, or situations that may be dangerous or lead to compromised welfare, apparently contradictory terms were also selected (happy or playful) by students with less experience with horses. Future studies should consider the use of Qualitative Behavioural Analysis (QBA) and free-choice profiling to investigate the range of terms used by students to describe the expressive demeanour and arousal levels of horses.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2017-08-15 PubMed ID: 28809810PubMed Central: PMC5575575DOI: 10.3390/ani7080063Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research analyzes how veterinary and equine science students interpret horse behavior. The study found that there is a wide range of interpretations and that less experienced students sometimes incorrectly label distressed, potentially dangerous, or compromised behavior as happy or playful.

Understanding the Study

  • The paper is fundamentally about assessing the knowledge and understanding of horse behavior by veterinary and undergraduate equine science students, many of whom have little previous horse handling experience.
  • It is important for such students to gain a good understanding of horse behavior, given that they are considered unsafe animals to work with unless handled properly. Interpreting horse behavior correctly can secure both the handler’s and the horse’s safety and welfare.

Research Methodology

  • The research employed a qualitative approach to gather data.
  • A total of 127 students were shown six short video clips of horse behaviors. The students were then asked to select the most applicable terms from a pre-determined list to characterize each horse’s behavior.
  • The discrepancy and variation in students’ interpretations were a significant focus in this study, causing researchers to note how some distressed or potentially dangerous situations were described as happy or playful, particularly by less experienced students.

Implications of the Study and Future Research

  • The results of the research indicate the potential difficulties and misunderstandings that veterinary and equine science students might experience when trying to interpret horse behavior.
  • This misinterpretation has significant implications on the safety and welfare of both the handler and the horse, because incorrect interpretation of distress signals might lead to danger or compromised welfare for both.
  • With these findings, the researchers suggest that future studies should use Qualitative Behavioural Analysis (QBA) and free-choice profiling in order to further explore the range of terms students use to describe the demeanor and levels of arousal in horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Gronqvist G, Rogers C, Gee E, Martinez A, Bolwell C. (2017). Veterinary and Equine Science Students’ Interpretation of Horse Behaviour. Animals (Basel), 7(8), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7080063

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 7
Issue: 8
PII: 63

Researcher Affiliations

Gronqvist, Gabriella
  • Massey Equine, Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand. g.gronqvist@massey.ac.nz.
Rogers, Chris
  • Massey Equine, Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand. c.w.rogers@massey.ac.nz.
Gee, Erica
  • Massey Equine, Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand. e.k.gee@massey.ac.nz.
Martinez, Audrey
  • École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse 23 Chemin des Capelles, BP 87614, 31076 Toulouse CEDEX 3, France. a.martinez_14@envt.fr.
Bolwell, Charlotte
  • Massey Equine, Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand. c.bolwell@massey.ac.nz.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 36 references
  1. Stafford KJ, Erceg VH. Teaching animal handling to veterinary students at Massey University, New Zealand.. J Vet Med Educ 2007 Winter;34(5):583-5.
    doi: 10.3138/jvme.34.5.583pubmed: 18326767google scholar: lookup
  2. LeGuin E, Raber K, Tucker T J. The Culture of the Horse: Status, Discipline, and Identity in the Early Modern World. .
  3. Hausberger M, Roche H, Henry S, Visser E K. A review of the human–horse relationship. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008;109:1–24.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2007.04.015google scholar: lookup
  4. Thompson K, McGreevy P, McManus P. A Critical Review of Horse-Related Risk: A Research Agenda for Safer Mounts, Riders and Equestrian Cultures.. Animals (Basel) 2015 Jul 17;5(3):561-75.
    doi: 10.3390/ani5030372pmc: PMC4598694pubmed: 26479374google scholar: lookup
  5. Heath TJ. Number, distribution and concentration of Australian veterinarians in 2006, compared with 1981, 1991 and 2001.. Aust Vet J 2008 Jul;86(7):283-9.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2008.00314.xpubmed: 18616482google scholar: lookup
  6. Wake AA, Stafford KJ, Minot EO. The experience of dog bites: a survey of veterinary science and veterinary nursing students.. N Z Vet J 2006 Jun;54(3):141-6.
    doi: 10.1080/00480169.2006.36626pubmed: 16751845google scholar: lookup
  7. White P, Chapman S. Two students' reflections on their training in animal handling at the University of Sydney.. J Vet Med Educ 2007 Winter;34(5):598-9.
    doi: 10.3138/jvme.34.5.598pubmed: 18326769google scholar: lookup
  8. Doherty O, McGreevy P D, Pearson G. The importance of learning theory and equitation science to the veterinarian. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2017;190:111–122.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.012google scholar: lookup
  9. Lucas M, Day L, Fritschi L. Injuries to Australian veterinarians working with horses.. Vet Rec 2009 Feb 14;164(7):207-9.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.164.7.207pubmed: 19218591google scholar: lookup
  10. Lucas M, Day L, Shirangi A, Fritschi L. Significant injuries in Australian veterinarians and use of safety precautions.. Occup Med (Lond) 2009 Aug;59(5):327-33.
    doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqp070pubmed: 19468101google scholar: lookup
  11. Fritschi L, Day L, Shirangi A, Robertson I, Lucas M, Vizard A. Injury in Australian veterinarians.. Occup Med (Lond) 2006 May;56(3):199-203.
    doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqj037pubmed: 16492680google scholar: lookup
  12. Loomans J B A, van Weeren-Bitterling M S, van Weeren P R, Barneveld A. Occupational disability and job satisfaction in the equine veterinary profession: How sustainable is this ‘tough job’ in a changing world?. Equine Vet. Educ. 2008;20:597–607.
    doi: 10.2746/095777308X360177google scholar: lookup
  13. . Survey reveals high risk of injury to equine vets.. Vet Rec 2014 Sep 20;175(11):263.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.g5714pubmed: 25234445google scholar: lookup
  14. Payne E, Boot M, Starling M, Henshall C, McLean A, Bennett P, McGreevy P. Evidence of horsemanship and dogmanship and their application in veterinary contexts.. Vet J 2015 Jun;204(3):247-54.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.04.004pubmed: 25959129google scholar: lookup
  15. Mellor D J, Beausoleil N J. Extending the ‘five domains’ model for animal welfare assessment to incorporate positive welfare states. Anim. Welf. 2015;24:241–253.
    doi: 10.7120/09627286.24.3.241google scholar: lookup
  16. Mellor D J, Reid C S W. Concepts of animal well-being and predicting the impact of procedures on experimental animals. 1994. pp. 3–18.
  17. Beausoleil N J. Fulfilling public expectation: Training vets as animal welfare experts. Proceedings of the New Zealand Veterinary Association Conference; Hamilton, New Zealand. 21–24 June 2016.
  18. Coleman GJ, Hemsworth PH. Training to improve stockperson beliefs and behaviour towards livestock enhances welfare and productivity.. Rev Sci Tech 2014 Apr;33(1):131-7.
    doi: 10.20506/rst.33.1.2257pubmed: 25000785google scholar: lookup
  19. Mellor DJ. Updating Animal Welfare Thinking: Moving beyond the "Five Freedoms" towards "A Life Worth Living".. Animals (Basel) 2016 Mar 14;6(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani6030021pmc: PMC4810049pubmed: 27102171google scholar: lookup
  20. Beausoleil N J, Mellor D. Complementary roles for systematic analytical evaluation and qualitative whole animal profiling in welfare assessment for three RS applications. Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences; Montreal, QC, Canada. 21–25 August 2011.
  21. Meagher R K. Observer ratings: Validity and value as a tool for animal welfare research. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009;119:1–14.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.026google scholar: lookup
  22. Wemelsfelder F, Hunter EA, Mendl MT, Lawrence AB. The spontaneous qualitative assessment of behavioural expressions in pigs: first explorations of a novel methodology for integrative animal welfare measurement.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2000 Apr 3;67(3):193-215.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00093-3pubmed: 10736529google scholar: lookup
  23. Wemelsfelder F, Hunter T E A, Mendl M T, Lawrence A B. Assessing the ‘whole animal’: A free choice profiling approach. Anim. Behav. 2001;62:209–220.
    doi: 10.1006/anbe.2001.1741google scholar: lookup
  24. Wemelsfelder F, Nevison I, Lawrence A B. The effect of perceived environmental background on qualitative assessments of pig behaviour. Anim. Behav. 2009;78:477–484.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.06.005google scholar: lookup
  25. Clarke T, Pluske J R, Fleming P A. Are observer ratings influenced by prescription? A comparison of free choice profiling and fixed list methods of qualitative behavioural assessment. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2016;177:77–83.
  26. Minero M, Dalla Costa E, Dai F, Murray L A M, Canali E, Wemelsfelder F. Use of qualitative behaviour assessment as an indicator of welfare in donkeys. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2016;174:147–153.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.10.010google scholar: lookup
  27. Greenacre M. Correspondence Analysis in Practice. 2nd ed. 2007.
  28. Yarnell K, Hall C, Royle C, Walker SL. Domesticated horses differ in their behavioural and physiological responses to isolated and group housing.. Physiol Behav 2015 May 1;143:51-7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.02.040pubmed: 25725117google scholar: lookup
  29. Gronqvist G, Rogers C, Gee E, Bolwell C, Gordon S. The Challenges of Using Horses for Practical Teaching Purposes in Veterinary Programmes.. Animals (Basel) 2016 Nov 11;6(11).
    doi: 10.3390/ani6110069pmc: PMC5126771pubmed: 27845702google scholar: lookup
  30. Riley CB, Liddiard JR, Thompson K. A Cross-Sectional Study of Horse-Related Injuries in Veterinary and Animal Science Students at an Australian University.. Animals (Basel) 2015 Sep 25;5(4):951-64.
    doi: 10.3390/ani5040392pmc: PMC4693196pubmed: 26479478google scholar: lookup
  31. Barrett LF, Mesquita B, Ochsner KN, Gross JJ. The experience of emotion.. Annu Rev Psychol 2007;58:373-403.
    doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085709pmc: PMC1934613pubmed: 17002554google scholar: lookup
  32. Bokkers E A M, de Vries M, Antonissen I, de Boer I J M. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of experienced and inexperienced observers for the qualitative behaviour assessment in dairy cattle. Anim. Welf. 2012;21:307–318.
    doi: 10.7120/09627286.21.3.307google scholar: lookup
  33. Duijvesteijn N, Benard M, Reimert I, Camerlink I. Same pig, different conclusions: Stakeholders differ in qualitative behaviour assessment. J. Agric. Environ. Eth. 2014;27:1019–1047.
    doi: 10.1007/s10806-014-9513-zgoogle scholar: lookup
  34. Old J M, Spencer R. Development of online learning activities to enhance student knowledge of animal behaviour prior to engaging in live animal handling practical sessions. Open J. Anim. Sci. 2011;1:65–74.
    doi: 10.4236/ojas.2011.12009google scholar: lookup
  35. Goodenough J, McGuire B, Jakob E. Perspectives on Animal Behavior. 3rd ed. 2009.
  36. . AWIN Welfare Assessment Protocol for Horses. [(accessed on 7 April 2017)]; Available online: https://www.google.ch/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwjzsZ-N5tXVAhXqAMAKHcmZAK4QFggrMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Funi-sz.bg%2Ftruni11%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fbiblioteka%2Ffile%2FTUNI10015665.pdf&usg=AFQjCNFV5KuoTmZYy4c91cA0dRmatmQQFQ.

Citations

This article has been cited 8 times.
  1. Carroll SL, Sykes BW, Mills PC. Moving toward Fear-Free Husbandry and Veterinary Care for Horses. Animals (Basel) 2022 Oct 24;12(21).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12212907pubmed: 36359031google scholar: lookup
  2. Merson C, Navas Gonzalez FJ, Orth E, Adams A, McLean A. Back in the saddle: student response to remote online equine science classes. Transl Anim Sci 2020 Oct;4(4):txaa218.
    doi: 10.1093/tas/txaa218pubmed: 33403358google scholar: lookup
  3. Guinnefollau L, Gee EK, Norman EJ, Rogers CW, Bolwell CF. Horses Used for Educational Purposes in New Zealand: A Descriptive Analysis of Their Use for Teaching. Animals (Basel) 2020 Sep 1;10(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10091547pubmed: 32882976google scholar: lookup
  4. Grant EP, Wickham SL, Anderson F, Barnes AL, Fleming PA, Miller DW. Preliminary Findings on a Novel Behavioural Approach for the Assessment of Pain and Analgesia in Lambs Subject to Routine Husbandry Procedures. Animals (Basel) 2020 Jul 7;10(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10071148pubmed: 32645863google scholar: lookup
  5. Guinnefollau L, Gee EK, Bolwell CF, Norman EJ, Rogers CW. Benefits of Animal Exposure on Veterinary Students' Understanding of Equine Behaviour and Self-Assessed Equine Handling Skills. Animals (Basel) 2019 Aug 28;9(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9090620pubmed: 31466298google scholar: lookup
  6. Czycholl I, Skovlund CR, Forkman B. Literature review of the use of Qualitative Behaviour Assessment with a fixed list of terms. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1588346.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1588346pubmed: 41585521google scholar: lookup
  7. Haussler KK, le Jeune SS, MacKechnie-Guire R, Latif SN, Clayton HM. The Challenge of Defining Laterality in Horses: Is It Laterality or Just Asymmetry?. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jan 21;15(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15030288pubmed: 39943060google scholar: lookup
  8. Müller-Klein A, Braun MN, Ferreira de Sá DS, Michael T, Link-Dorner U, Lass-Hennemann J. A Relaxed Horse-A Relaxed Client? An Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Therapy Horses' Stress on Clients' Stress, Mood, and Anxiety. Animals (Basel) 2024 Feb 13;14(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14040604pubmed: 38396572google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,075 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.