Analyze Diet
Journal of equine veterinary science2025; 152; 105639; doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2025.105639

What ‘knot’ to do whilst castrating donkeys. A retrospective comparison of ligation method on spermatic cord haemorrhage in 261 donkeys castrated by vet students in rural Malawi using transfixing and modified millers’ ligatures.

Abstract: Special considerations for donkeys undergoing castration compared with horses include the presence of large scrotal vessels, larger testicular artery and vein and the consequential increased risk of post-operative haemorrhage which necessitates spermatic cord ligation. Objective: This retrospective study compares haemorrhagic complication rates between two methods of spermatic cord ligation in donkeys castrated in rural Malawi. Methods: All donkeys presenting to Veterinary Education Malawi / Lilongwe Society for the Protection and Care of Animals rural large animal outreach clinics for castration between February 2020 and August 2024 that underwent castration, performed by veterinary studentswho had undergone training in surgical castration were included. From 02.2020-02.2024 a transfixing ligature was placed and from February 2024 a modified millers' knot was placed. Age, weight and incidence of spermatic cord haemorrhage were recorded. Results: Two-hundred-sixty-one donkeys were included, with a median age of 4 years (inter-quartile-range (IQR); 3.5). Spermatic cord haemorrhage was recorded during significantly more procedures where a transfixing ligature was placed (6; 3.8 %, confidence interval 95 % (CI): 0.7-7 %) compared with procedures where a modified millers' knot was placed (0; 0 %, CI: 0-0 %). Age or weight did not significantly differ between treatment groups or between cases where haemorrhage was and was not recorded. Conclusions: This is the first study to compare the outcomes between two methods of spermatic cord ligation in donkeys. The modified millers' knot is easy to apply, provides excellent hemostasis and may be preferentially used over the transfixing ligature for ligation of the spermatic cord in donkeys undergoing castration.
Publication Date: 2025-06-30 PubMed ID: 40602643DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2025.105639Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article compares the effectiveness of two methods of ligation (tying) during the castration of donkeys. It concluded that the modified millers’ knot is safer and easier to implement than the transfixing ligature method.

Objective of the Study

The main goal of this retrospective study was to compare the complication rates associated with the use of two different ligature methods during the castration of donkeys. This was conducted in rural areas of Malawi.

Methodology

  • Data for the research was collected from veterinary education clinics in Malawi from the period of February 2020 to August 2024.
  • The candidate donkeys were all those which were presented for castration operations in community clinics during this entire period, and all procedures were performed by trained vet students.
  • During castration of these donkeys, two ligature methods were practiced. Before and until February 2024 transfixing ligature method was used, thereafter, modified millers’ knot method was applied. Detailed records were kept regarding the donkey’s age, weight, and notes about the occurrence of haemorrhage.

Results of the Study

  • Total 261 donkeys were sampled for this research study, and the average age of these animals was 4 years.
  • The chance of haemorrhage was found to be higher in donkeys where the transfixing ligature was used compared to those where the modified millers’ knot method was applied.
  • No significant differences were observed between the two treatment groups in terms of the donkeys’ age or weight. Similarly, the factor of haemorrhage did not show any substantial correlation with the age or weight of the donkeys.

Conclusions from the Study

  • This research is the first of its kind to compare the results of these two particular ligation methods in donkey castration.
  • The modified millers’ knot exhibited superior characteristics in that it was easier to apply and provided better haemostasis (stopping of bleeding).
  • Hence, based on the findings, it is recommended that the modified millers’ knot should be preferred over the transfixing ligature for the ligation of the spermatic cord in donkeys undergoing castration.

Cite This Article

APA
Yeomans A, Hampson R, Razemba T. (2025). What ‘knot’ to do whilst castrating donkeys. A retrospective comparison of ligation method on spermatic cord haemorrhage in 261 donkeys castrated by vet students in rural Malawi using transfixing and modified millers’ ligatures. J Equine Vet Sci, 152, 105639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2025.105639

Publication

ISSN: 0737-0806
NlmUniqueID: 8216840
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 152
Pages: 105639
PII: S0737-0806(25)00297-7

Researcher Affiliations

Yeomans, A
  • Veterinary Education Malawi, 2 colliers cottages, Midhurst Road, Haslemere, West Sussex GU27 3EX, UK. Electronic address: a.m.c.yeomans@gmail.com.
Hampson, R
  • Veterinary Education Malawi, 2 colliers cottages, Midhurst Road, Haslemere, West Sussex GU27 3EX, UK.
Razemba, T
  • The Lilongwe Society for the Protection and Care of Animals, Kanengo, Lilongwe, Malawi.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.