Analyze Diet
BMC veterinary research2021; 17(1); 138; doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-02793-1

Zonal characterization and differential trilineage potentials of equine intrasynovial deep digital flexor tendon-derived cells.

Abstract: Intrasynovial deep digital flexor tendon (DDFT) injuries occur frequently and are often implicated in cases of navicular disease with poor outcomes and reinjuries. Cell-based approaches to tendon healing are gaining traction in veterinary medicine and ultimately may contribute to improved DDFT healing in horses. However, a better understanding of the innate cellular characteristics of equine DDFT is necessary for developing improved therapeutic strategies. Additionally, fibrocartilaginous, intrasynovial tendons like the DDFT are common sites of injury and share a poor prognosis across species, offering translational applications of this research. The objective of this study is to isolate and characterize tendon-derived cells (TDC) from intrasynovial DDFT harvested from within the equine forelimb podotrochlear bursa. TDC from the fibrocartilaginous and tendinous zones are separately isolated and assessed. Flow cytometry is performed for mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) surface markers (CD 29, CD 44, CD 90). Basal tenogenic, osteogenic and chondrogenic markers are assessed via quantitative real time-PCR, and standard trilineage differentiation is performed with third passage TDC from the fibrocartilaginous (fTDC) and tendinous (tTDC) zones of DDFT. Results: Low-density plating isolated homogenous TDC populations from both zones. During monolayer passage, both TDC subpopulations exhibited clonogenicity, high in vitro proliferation rate, and fibroblast-like morphology. fTDC and tTDC were positive for MSC surface markers CD90 and CD29 and negative for CD44. There were no significant differences in basal tenogenic, osteogenic or chondrogenic marker expression between zones. While fTDC were largely restricted to chondrogenic differentiation, tTDC underwent osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation. Both TDC subpopulations displayed weak adipogenic differentiation potentials. Conclusions: TDC at the level of the podotrochlear bursa, that potentially could be targeted for enhancing DDFT injury healing in horses were identified and characterized. Pending further investigation, promoting chondrogenic properties in cells administered exogenously into the intrasynovial space may be beneficial for intrasynovial tendon regeneration.
Publication Date: 2021-04-01 PubMed ID: 33794882PubMed Central: PMC8015054DOI: 10.1186/s12917-021-02793-1Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study conducts an in-depth examination of cells derived from the intrasynovial deep digital flexor tendon (DDFT) in horses, which is frequently injured and difficult to treat. Characterizing these cells and their healing capabilities is critical for developing effective cell-based healing strategies for these injuries, and the results could potentially offer broader applications across different species.

Research Methodology

  • Cells from the intrasynovial DDFT were harvested. They were specifically from the horse’s forelimb podotrochlear bursa.
  • The cells were divided based on their originating zones, fibrocartilaginous and tendinous, and isolated separately.
  • This cell division was followed by a flow cytometry process for MSC surface markers CD 29, CD 44, CD 90.
  • They assessed basal tenogenic, osteogenic and chondrogenic markers through quantitative real time-PCR.
  • Subsequently, they carried out a standard trilineage differentiation with the third passage of tendon-derived cells (TDC) from both zones.

Research Findings

  • The researchers successfully isolated homogeneous cell populations using low-density plating.
  • Both cell subpopulations demonstrated clonogenicity, an impressive in vitro proliferation rate, and fibroblast-like morphology during monolayer passage.
  • The fibrocartilaginous TDC (fTDC) and tendinous TDC (tTDC) were positive for MSC surface markers CD90 and CD29, but negative for CD44.
  • There was no significant difference in basal tenogenic, osteogenic, or chondrogenic marker expression observed between the two zones.
  • fTDC were mostly chondrogenic while tTDC were both osteogenic and chondrogenic. Both TDC subpopulations showed low potential for adipogenic differentiation.

Research Implications

  • The researchers concluded that they had successfully characterized tendon-derived cells at the level of the podotrochlear bursa. These cells could lead to enhanced healing of DDFT injuries in horses.
  • Further investigation is needed, but promoting chondrogenic properties in cells administered exogenously into the intrasynovial space may benefit intrasynovial tendon regeneration.

Cite This Article

APA
Quam VG, Altmann NN, Brokken MT, Durgam SS. (2021). Zonal characterization and differential trilineage potentials of equine intrasynovial deep digital flexor tendon-derived cells. BMC Vet Res, 17(1), 138. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-02793-1

Publication

ISSN: 1746-6148
NlmUniqueID: 101249759
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 17
Issue: 1
Pages: 138
PII: 138

Researcher Affiliations

Quam, Vivian G
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, 601 Vernon L. Tharp Street, Columbus, OH, USA.
Altmann, Nadine N
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, 601 Vernon L. Tharp Street, Columbus, OH, USA.
Brokken, Matthew T
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, 601 Vernon L. Tharp Street, Columbus, OH, USA.
Durgam, Sushmitha S
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, 601 Vernon L. Tharp Street, Columbus, OH, USA. durgam.3@osu.edu.

MeSH Terms

  • Adipogenesis
  • Animals
  • Cell Differentiation
  • Cells, Cultured
  • Chondrogenesis
  • Flow Cytometry / veterinary
  • Forelimb
  • Horses
  • Mesenchymal Stem Cells / cytology
  • Mesenchymal Stem Cells / metabolism
  • Osteogenesis
  • Tendons / cytology

Grant Funding

  • The Ohio State University Equine Research Fund by the Ohio State Racing Commission. / Ohio State University

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 43 references
  1. Waguespack R, Hanson RR. Navicular syndrome in equine patients anatomy, causes, and diagnosis.. Compend Contin Educ Vet 2010 Dec;32(12):E7.
    pubmed: 23705198
  2. Lutter JD, Schneider RK, Sampson SN, Cary JA, Roberts GD, Vahl CI. Medical treatment of horses with deep digital flexor tendon injuries diagnosed with high-field-strength magnetic resonance imaging: 118 cases (2000-2010).. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2015 Dec 1;247(11):1309-18.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.247.11.1309pubmed: 26594815google scholar: lookup
  3. Blunden A, Dyson S, Murray R, Schramme M. Histopathology in horses with chronic palmar foot pain and age-matched controls. Part 2: The deep digital flexor tendon.. Equine Vet J 2006 Jan;38(1):23-7.
    doi: 10.2746/042516406775374342pubmed: 16411582google scholar: lookup
  4. Blunden A, Murray R, Dyson S. Lesions of the deep digital flexor tendon in the digit: a correlative MRI and post mortem study in control and lame horses.. Equine Vet J 2009 Jan;41(1):25-33.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408X343028pubmed: 19301578google scholar: lookup
  5. Marsh CA, Schneider RK, Sampson SN, Roberts GD. Response to injection of the navicular bursa with corticosteroid and hyaluronan following high-field magnetic resonance imaging in horses with signs of navicular syndrome: 101 cases (2000-2008).. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2012 Nov 15;241(10):1353-64.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.241.10.1353pubmed: 23113529google scholar: lookup
  6. Dyson SJ, Murray R, Schramme MC. Lameness associated with foot pain: results of magnetic resonance imaging in 199 horses (January 2001--December 2003) and response to treatment.. Equine Vet J 2005 Mar;37(2):113-21.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164054223804pubmed: 15779622google scholar: lookup
  7. Bell CD, Howard RD, Taylor DS, Voss ED, Werpy NM. Outcomes of podotrochlear (navicular) bursa injections for signs of foot pain in horses evaluated via magnetic resonance imaging: 23 cases (2005-2007).. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2009 Apr 1;234(7):920-5.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.234.7.920pubmed: 19335243google scholar: lookup
  8. Gutierrez-Nibeyro SD, Werpy NM, Gold SJ, Olguin S, Schaeffer DJ. Standing MRI lesions of the distal interphalangeal joint and podotrochlear apparatus occur with a high frequency in warmblood horses.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2020 May;61(3):336-345.
    doi: 10.1111/vru.12855pubmed: 32162431google scholar: lookup
  9. Smith MR, Wright IM. Endoscopic evaluation of the navicular bursa: observations, treatment and outcome in 92 cases with identified pathology.. Equine Vet J 2012 May;44(3):339-45.
  10. Gutierrez-Nibeyro SD, White Ii NA, Werpy NM. Outcome of medical treatment for horses with foot pain: 56 cases.. Equine Vet J 2010 Nov;42(8):680-5.
  11. Beck S, Blunden T, Dyson S, Murray R. Are matrix and vascular changes involved in the pathogenesis of deep digital flexor tendon injury in the horse?. Vet J 2011 Sep;189(3):289-95.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.07.015pubmed: 21821448google scholar: lookup
  12. Blunden A, Dyson S, Murray R, Schramme M. Histopathology in horses with chronic palmar foot pain and age-matched controls. Part 1: Navicular bone and related structures.. Equine Vet J 2006 Jan;38(1):15-22.
    doi: 10.2746/042516406775374298pubmed: 16411581google scholar: lookup
  13. Nessler JP, Amadio PC, Berglund LJ, An KN. Healing of canine tendon in zones subjected to different mechanical forces.. J Hand Surg Br 1992 Oct;17(5):561-8.
    doi: 10.1016/S0266-7681(05)80242-6pubmed: 1479251google scholar: lookup
  14. Benjamin M, Qin S, Ralphs JR. Fibrocartilage associated with human tendons and their pulleys.. J Anat 1995 Dec;187 ( Pt 3)(Pt 3):625-33.
    pmc: PMC1167465pubmed: 8586561
  15. Benjamin M, Ralphs JR. Fibrocartilage in tendons and ligaments--an adaptation to compressive load.. J Anat 1998 Nov;193 ( Pt 4)(Pt 4):481-94.
  16. Wong J, Bennett W, Ferguson MW, McGrouther DA. Microscopic and histological examination of the mouse hindpaw digit and flexor tendon arrangement with 3D reconstruction.. J Anat 2006 Oct;209(4):533-45.
  17. Bi Y, Ehirchiou D, Kilts TM, Inkson CA, Embree MC, Sonoyama W, Li L, Leet AI, Seo BM, Zhang L, Shi S, Young MF. Identification of tendon stem/progenitor cells and the role of the extracellular matrix in their niche.. Nat Med 2007 Oct;13(10):1219-27.
    doi: 10.1038/nm1630pubmed: 17828274google scholar: lookup
  18. Durgam S, Schuster B, Cymerman A, Stewart A, Stewart M. Differential Adhesion Selection for Enrichment of Tendon-Derived Progenitor Cells During In Vitro Culture.. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2016 Aug;22(8):801-8.
    doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2016.0152pubmed: 27406327google scholar: lookup
  19. Williamson KA, Lee KJ, Humphreys WJ, Comerford EJ, Clegg PD, Canty-Laird EG. Restricted differentiation potential of progenitor cell populations obtained from the equine superficial digital flexor tendon (SDFT).. J Orthop Res 2015 Jun;33(6):849-58.
    doi: 10.1002/jor.22891pmc: PMC4657492pubmed: 25877997google scholar: lookup
  20. Cadby JA, Buehler E, Godbout C, van Weeren PR, Snedeker JG. Differences between the cell populations from the peritenon and the tendon core with regard to their potential implication in tendon repair.. PLoS One 2014;9(3):e92474.
  21. Rui YF, Lui PP, Li G, Fu SC, Lee YW, Chan KM. Isolation and characterization of multipotent rat tendon-derived stem cells.. Tissue Eng Part A 2010 May;16(5):1549-58.
    doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0529pubmed: 20001227google scholar: lookup
  22. Lui PP, Chan KM. Tendon-derived stem cells (TDSCs): from basic science to potential roles in tendon pathology and tissue engineering applications.. Stem Cell Rev Rep 2011 Nov;7(4):883-97.
    doi: 10.1007/s12015-011-9276-0pubmed: 21611803google scholar: lookup
  23. Zhang C, Zhu J, Zhou Y, Thampatty BP, Wang JH. Tendon Stem/Progenitor Cells and Their Interactions with Extracellular Matrix and Mechanical Loading.. Stem Cells Int 2019;2019:3674647.
    pmc: PMC6815631pubmed: 31737075doi: 10.1155/2019/3674647google scholar: lookup
  24. Durgam SS, Stewart AA, Sivaguru M, Wagoner Johnson AJ, Stewart MC. Tendon-derived progenitor cells improve healing of collagenase-induced flexor tendinitis.. J Orthop Res 2016 Dec;34(12):2162-2171.
    doi: 10.1002/jor.23251pubmed: 27035120google scholar: lookup
  25. Lee CH, Lee FY, Tarafder S, Kao K, Jun Y, Yang G, Mao JJ. Harnessing endogenous stem/progenitor cells for tendon regeneration.. J Clin Invest 2015 Jul 1;125(7):2690-701.
    doi: 10.1172/JCI81589pmc: PMC4563693pubmed: 26053662google scholar: lookup
  26. Tarafder S, Brito JA, Minhas S, Effiong L, Thomopoulos S, Lee CH. In situ tissue engineering of the tendon-to-bone interface by endogenous stem/progenitor cells.. Biofabrication 2019 Nov 18;12(1):015008.
    doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab48capmc: PMC6904927pubmed: 31561236google scholar: lookup
  27. Sakabe T, Sakai K, Maeda T, Sunaga A, Furuta N, Schweitzer R, Sasaki T, Sakai T. Transcription factor scleraxis vitally contributes to progenitor lineage direction in wound healing of adult tendon in mice.. J Biol Chem 2018 Apr 20;293(16):5766-5780.
    doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.001987pmc: PMC5912447pubmed: 29507095google scholar: lookup
  28. Runesson E, Ackermann P, Karlsson J, Eriksson BI. Nucleostemin- and Oct 3/4-positive stem/progenitor cells exhibit disparate anatomical and temporal expression during rat Achilles tendon healing.. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015 Aug 20;16:212.
    doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0658-3pmc: PMC4545962pubmed: 26290425google scholar: lookup
  29. Lovati AB, Corradetti B, Lange Consiglio A, Recordati C, Bonacina E, Bizzaro D, Cremonesi F. Characterization and differentiation of equine tendon-derived progenitor cells.. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 2011 Apr-Jun;25(2 Suppl):S75-84.
    pubmed: 22051173
  30. Asai S, Otsuru S, Candela ME, Cantley L, Uchibe K, Hofmann TJ, Zhang K, Wapner KL, Soslowsky LJ, Horwitz EM, Enomoto-Iwamoto M. Tendon progenitor cells in injured tendons have strong chondrogenic potential: the CD105-negative subpopulation induces chondrogenic degeneration.. Stem Cells 2014 Dec;32(12):3266-77.
    doi: 10.1002/stem.1847pmc: PMC4245375pubmed: 25220576google scholar: lookup
  31. Clements LE, Garvican ER, Dudhia J, Smith RK. Modulation of mesenchymal stem cell genotype and phenotype by extracellular matrix proteins.. Connect Tissue Res 2016 Nov;57(6):443-453.
    doi: 10.1080/03008207.2016.1215442pubmed: 27448620google scholar: lookup
  32. McCorry MC, Puetzer JL, Bonassar LJ. Characterization of mesenchymal stem cells and fibrochondrocytes in three-dimensional co-culture: analysis of cell shape, matrix production, and mechanical performance.. Stem Cell Res Ther 2016 Mar 12;7:39.
    doi: 10.1186/s13287-016-0301-8pmc: PMC4789279pubmed: 26971202google scholar: lookup
  33. Tan Q, Lui PP, Rui YF. Effect of in vitro passaging on the stem cell-related properties of tendon-derived stem cells-implications in tissue engineering.. Stem Cells Dev 2012 Mar 20;21(5):790-800.
    doi: 10.1089/scd.2011.0160pmc: PMC3295857pubmed: 21627568google scholar: lookup
  34. De Schauwer C, Piepers S, Van de Walle GR, Demeyere K, Hoogewijs MK, Govaere JL, Braeckmans K, Van Soom A, Meyer E. In search for cross-reactivity to immunophenotype equine mesenchymal stromal cells by multicolor flow cytometry.. Cytometry A 2012 Apr;81(4):312-23.
    doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.22026pubmed: 22411893google scholar: lookup
  35. Mauck RL, Martinez-Diaz GJ, Yuan X, Tuan RS. Regional multilineage differentiation potential of meniscal fibrochondrocytes: implications for meniscus repair.. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2007 Jan;290(1):48-58.
    doi: 10.1002/ar.20419pubmed: 17441197google scholar: lookup
  36. De Luca P, Castagnetta M, de Girolamo L, Coco S, Malacarne M, Ragni E, Viganò M, Lugano G, Brayda-Bruno M, Coviello D, Colombini A. Intervertebral disc and endplate cell characterisation highlights annulus fibrosus cells as the most promising for tissue-specific disc degeneration therapy.. Eur Cell Mater 2020 Mar 3;39:156-170.
    doi: 10.22203/eCM.v039a10pubmed: 32125689google scholar: lookup
  37. Murray RC, Schramme MC, Dyson SJ, Branch MV, Blunden TS. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of the foot in horses with palmar foot pain and control horses.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2006 Jan-Feb;47(1):1-16.
  38. Sullivan SN, Altmann NN, Brokken MT, Durgam SS. In vitro Effects of Methylprednisolone Acetate on Equine Deep Digital Flexor Tendon-Derived Cells.. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:486.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00486pmc: PMC7419577pubmed: 32851046google scholar: lookup
  39. Zheng CH, Levenston ME. Fact versus artifact: avoiding erroneous estimates of sulfated glycosaminoglycan content using the dimethylmethylene blue colorimetric assay for tissue-engineered constructs.. Eur Cell Mater 2015 Apr 19;29:224-36; discussion 236.
    doi: 10.22203/eCM.v029a17pmc: PMC4445729pubmed: 25890595google scholar: lookup
  40. Kyllönen L, Haimi S, Mannerström B, Huhtala H, Rajala KM, Skottman H, Sándor GK, Miettinen S. Effects of different serum conditions on osteogenic differentiation of human adipose stem cells in vitro.. Stem Cell Res Ther 2013 Feb 15;4(1):17.
    doi: 10.1186/scrt165pmc: PMC3706769pubmed: 23415114google scholar: lookup
  41. Kraus NA, Ehebauer F, Zapp B, Rudolphi B, Kraus BJ, Kraus D. Quantitative assessment of adipocyte differentiation in cell culture.. Adipocyte 2016 Oct-Dec;5(4):351-358.
  42. Durgam SS, Altmann NN, Coughlin HE, Rollins A, Hostnik LD. Insulin Enhances the In Vitro Osteogenic Capacity of Flexor Tendon-Derived Progenitor Cells.. Stem Cells Int 2019;2019:1602751.
    doi: 10.1155/2019/1602751pmc: PMC6948345pubmed: 31949435google scholar: lookup
  43. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.. Methods 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8.
    doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262pubmed: 11846609google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.