A comparative study of experimental and spontaneous emphysema.
Abstract: Normal lung architecture of the rat, mouse, hamster, horse, and human was compared to that of emphysematous lungs from the same species by utilizing a light microscope and a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The results obtained by SEM examination of normal and emphysematous lungs corresponded to those obtained with the light microscope. However, the SEM provided a view of alveoli and airway morphology not obtainable with the light microscope. Because of the variability in pore size and number of pores per alveolus, a pore-to-alveolus ratio was determined with the SEM on the normal lungs of the above species plus the rabbit, dog, guinea pig, and rhesus monkey. Depending on the extent of other pathways for collateral ventilation, differences in number of pores per alveolus may affect a species' susceptibility to a given mechanism in the genesis of spontaneous or induced emphysema. The small number of pores per alveolus in the rat, mouse, rabbit, and hamster suggests that they would not be responsible for emphysematous changes. Pores do appear to be involved in human and horse emphysema.
Publication Date: 1977-01-01 PubMed ID: 403296DOI: 10.1080/15287397709529460Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Comparative Study
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- U.S. Gov't
- Non-P.H.S.
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The study compares the structure of healthy and emphysematous lungs across various animal species, including humans, using both light microscope and scanning electron microscope (SEM). The researchers found that the findings from SEM examinations corroborated findings from light microscopy but offered more detailed visualizations of the lung anatomy. The number and size of pores per alveolus was found to vary between species, which could influence their susceptibility to emphysema.
Comparative Study Method
- The researchers undertook a comparative study of lung architecture across different animal species, both normal and those affected by emphysema. The species examined included rats, mice, hamsters, horses, and humans. Examination of the lungs was done using two types of microscopic techniques: a light microscope and a scanning electron microscope (SEM).
Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Methodology
- Whereas the light microscope has been the traditional tool for examining cellular and tissue structures, the researchers also utilized a SEM. Apart from corroborating findings from the light microscope, the SEM allows for a more detailed visualization of the smallest air sacs in the lungs – the alveoli – and the airway morphology, which would not be discernable using a light microscope.
Pore-to-Alveolus Ratio
- The variability of pore size and number of pores in each alveolus led the researchers to establish a pore-to-alveolus ratio, also using the SEM, for each species, which included rabbits, dogs, guinea pigs, and rhesus monkeys, in addition to the initially mentioned species.
Implications for Emphysema Susceptibility
- The number of pores per alveolus may affect a species’ vulnerability to emphysema, as these pathways for collateral ventilation could be impacted by the disease. It was suggested that rats, mice, rabbits, and hamsters, with their small number of pores per alveolus, may not develop emphysema due to this structural feature.
- In contrast, pores appear to play a significant role in the development of emphysema in humans and horses, suggesting that these species may be more susceptible to this disease due to the greater number of pores per alveolus.
Conclusions and Future Research
- The research offers a fresh understanding of the susceptibility to emphysema across different species based on the anatomy of their lung structure. Their analysis suggests that the number of pores per alveolus may be a contributing factor to the development of emphysema.
- This breakthrough could pave the way for further detailed studies on the causal relationship between lung structure and emphysema, potentially leading to improved prevention and treatment methodologies for the disease.
Cite This Article
APA
Port CD, Ketels KV, Coffin DL, Kane P.
(1977).
A comparative study of experimental and spontaneous emphysema.
J Toxicol Environ Health, 2(3), 589-604.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15287397709529460 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
MeSH Terms
- Aged
- Animals
- Cricetinae
- Dogs
- Emphysema / chemically induced
- Emphysema / pathology
- Guinea Pigs
- Haplorhini
- Horses
- Humans
- Lung / pathology
- Male
- Mice
- Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
- Nitrogen Dioxide
- Pulmonary Alveoli / pathology
- Rabbits
- Rats
- Species Specificity
Citations
This article has been cited 4 times.- Quiros KAM, Nelson TM, Sattari S, Mariano CA, Ulu A, Dominguez EC, Nordgren TM, Eskandari M. Mouse lung mechanical properties under varying inflation volumes and cycling frequencies.. Sci Rep 2022 May 2;12(1):7094.
- Frasca JM, Auerbach O, Carter HW, Parks VR. Morphologic alterations induced by short-term cigarette smoking.. Am J Pathol 1983 Apr;111(1):11-20.
- Goldstein E, Dungworth D, Ricci PF. Photochemical air pollution. Part II.. West J Med 1985 Apr;142(4):523-31.
- Kubota K, Murakami M, Takenaka S, Kawai K, Kyono H. Effects of long-term nitrogen dioxide exposure on rat lung: morphological observations.. Environ Health Perspect 1987 Aug;73:157-69.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists