Analyze Diet
Andrologia2015; 48(5); 558-563; doi: 10.1111/and.12479

A comparative study of two cooling protocols on stallion sperm cryosurvival.

Abstract: There are many protocols for horse sperm cryopreservation, but results are inconsistent; sperm survival after freeze-thawing is usually poor; in consequence, fertility is low. The objective of this work was to see whether slow cooling before freezing to minus 3 °C instead of +5 °C, the traditional target temperature, could improve horse sperm cryosurvival, capability to carry out capacitation and the acrosome reaction induced by progesterone. Spermatozoa from five stallions were packaged in straws and slowly cooled to +5 °C. Half of the straws were frozen directly and the other half was further cooled to -3 °C before freezing. Progressive motility, viability, plasma membrane integrity, acrosome integrity and capacitation status were assessed. After thawing, there were no differences between cooling treatments on motility, viability, acrosome integrity and capacitation status; however, there was difference (P < 0.05) regarding plasma membrane integrity. Acrosome integrity decreased as incubation, without or with progesterone (2 μg ml(-1) ), progressed, but there were no differences between cooling treatments regardless of progesterone. Both capacitated and acrosome-reacted spermatozoa increased as incubation progressed, but there were no differences between cooling treatments regardless of progesterone. Slow cooling to -3 °C before freezing did not improve horse sperm cryosurvival or capability to undergo the acrosome reaction.
Publication Date: 2015-09-04 PubMed ID: 26341721DOI: 10.1111/and.12479Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study aimed to compare two different cooling protocols in the preservation of horse sperm and found that cooling to -3°C before freezing doesn’t provide improvement in sperm cryosurvival and its ability to undergo the acrosome reaction.

Objectives and Methods

In the context of horse breeding, the cryopreservation of sperm is a pivotal procedure. However, the methods currently employed produce inconsistent results, often leading to poor sperm survival post freeze-thawing and concomitantly low fertility rates. To potentially improve upon this, this study investigated if a different approach to cooling temperatures prior to freezing would yield better results.

  • Study Design: The researchers collected sperm from five stallions and stored them in straws. The sperm was first cooled slowly to +5°C, following which, half the samples were directly frozen while the rest were further cooled to -3°C before freezing. The aim was to compare the effects of the two cooling protocols.
  • Evaluation: To discern the effects of the two cooling treatments, the researchers assessed several key parameters post thaw: progressive motility, viability, plasma membrane integrity, acrosome integrity, and capacitation status.

Findings

Upon thawing, the researchers found:

  • No difference in motility, viability, acrosome integrity or capacitation status between the two cooling methods. This suggests that cooling to -3°C before freezing had no significant advantage in these regards.
  • A statistically significant difference in plasma membrane integrity. The abstract does not specify which cooling treatment yielded better results in this regard.
  • Acrosome integrity decreased over time, with or without progesterone incubation, but showed no difference between the two cooling protocols.
  • Both capacitated and acrosome-reacted sperm increased as incubation progressed, and exhibited no differences between the cooling treatments, again showing that the -3°C pre-freezing treatment offered no benefits.

Consequently, the study demonstrated that slow cooling to -3°C before freezing did not improve horse sperm cryosurvival or the capability to undergo an acrosome reaction. This suggests that current protocols involving slow cooling to +5°C remain an efficient option for the cryopreservation of horse sperm.

Cite This Article

APA
Contreras-Mendez LA, Medrano A. (2015). A comparative study of two cooling protocols on stallion sperm cryosurvival. Andrologia, 48(5), 558-563. https://doi.org/10.1111/and.12479

Publication

ISSN: 1439-0272
NlmUniqueID: 0423506
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 48
Issue: 5
Pages: 558-563

Researcher Affiliations

Contreras-Mendez, L A
  • Departamento de Ciencias Pecuarias, Facultad de Estudios Superiores - Cuautitlan, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Cuautitlan Izcalli, Mexico.
Medrano, A
  • Departamento de Ciencias Pecuarias, Facultad de Estudios Superiores - Cuautitlan, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Cuautitlan Izcalli, Mexico.

MeSH Terms

  • Acrosome Reaction / drug effects
  • Animals
  • Cell Survival / drug effects
  • Cryopreservation / methods
  • Cryopreservation / veterinary
  • Horses
  • In Vitro Techniques
  • Male
  • Progesterone / pharmacology
  • Semen Analysis / veterinary
  • Semen Preservation / methods
  • Semen Preservation / veterinary
  • Sperm Capacitation / drug effects
  • Sperm Motility / drug effects

Citations

This article has been cited 2 times.
  1. Sánchez-Rivera UÁ, Medrano A, Cruz-Cano NB, Alcántar-Rodríguez A, Dávila-Govantes R, Castro-Camacho YJ, Martínez-Torres M. Implementation of a method for sperm cryopreservation in sceloporine lizards. Conserv Physiol 2022;10(1):coac068.
    doi: 10.1093/conphys/coac068pubmed: 36382339google scholar: lookup
  2. Martinez-Rodriguez JA, Carbajal FJ, Martinez-De-Anda R, Alcantar-Rodriguez A, Medrano A. Melatonin added to freezing diluent improves canine (Bulldog) sperm cryosurvival. Reprod Fertil 2020 Jul;1(1):11-19.
    doi: 10.1530/RAF-20-0022pubmed: 35128421google scholar: lookup