Analyze Diet
Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience2009; 3(12); 1728-1732; doi: 10.1017/S1751731109990656

A comparison between the 2N and 4N HCl acid-insoluble ash methods for digestibility trials in horses.

Abstract: The digestibility of horse feeds and rations can be determined using different techniques such as calculations based on the chemical composition, in vivo or in vitro methods. The marker methods overcome difficulties like discomfort for the animals and longer experimental times encountered using the ingesta/egesta method. In field conditions, a natural indigestible marker like acid-insoluble ash (AIA), with no changes in the normal ration, could be a very useful tool for digestibility trials. A group of six standardbred horses was used in a set of seven apparent digestibility trials. The diets were based on a first-cut meadow hay added to three different cereals (barley for trials 1 and 2; oats for trials 3 and 5 and corn for trials 6 and 7), the hay : concentrate ratio being 60 : 40 or 70 : 30 on a dry matter basis. Feedstuffs and faeces were analysed to determine the AIA content, using 2N HCl or 4N HCl technique. No differences about AIA concentration were found between the two methods for means and accuracy in each diet. Digestion coefficients for each diet did not differ with AIA method, even if in some trials interfering factors consistently lowered the overall values. Consequently, the AIA 2N HCl can be considered the easier and cheaper method to state apparent digestibility in field conditions, and a good tool for digestibility trials in horses fed hay-based diets.
Publication Date: 2009-12-01 PubMed ID: 22443557DOI: 10.1017/S1751731109990656Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This article explores the comparison of 2N and 4N HCl acid-insoluble ash (AIA) methods in determining the digestibility of horse feeds. The research found no difference between the two methods with respect to accuracy, and concludes that the 2N HCl method, being easier and cheaper, can effectively be used in field conditions.

Investigation Methods and Objectives

  • The researchers embarked on seven digestibility trials using a group of six Standardbred horses to test the methods of determining the digestibility of horse feeds.
  • The methodological approach involved comparing two techniques for measuring the AIA content in horse feed: a 2N solution of hydrochloric acid and a 4N solution of the same.
  • The researchers aimed to determine which method provides a more accurate, efficient, and economical way of ascertaining the digestibility of different types of feed.

Dietary Trials

  • The horses’ diets consisted of a mix of first-cut meadow hay, supplemented with three different cereals – barley, oats, and corn – for various trials. The ratio of hay to concentrate was either 60:40 or 70:30 on a dry matter basis, depending on the trial.
  • AIA was used as a natural indigestible marker, which was beneficial for the field conditions as it did not require any changes to the normal ration.

Findings

  • The study found nothing to indicate a significant difference in the concentration of AIA in the feed assessed using either a 2N HCL or 4N HCL technique.
  • The digestion coefficients for each diet did not vary depending on the AIA method applied, in spite of minor disruptions affecting the aggregate scores in some trials.

Conclusions

  • The research concludes that, given the comparable accuracy of both methods and the fact that the 2N HCL process is simpler and more cost-effective, the latter is particularly suitable for field conditions.
  • Therefore, the 2N HCL method is recommended as a viable tool for conducting digestibility trials for horses fed hay-based diets. This includes identifying the content of acid-insoluble ash in animal feed, a key step in gauging its digestibility.

Cite This Article

APA
Bergero D, Préfontaine C, Miraglia N, Peiretti PG. (2009). A comparison between the 2N and 4N HCl acid-insoluble ash methods for digestibility trials in horses. Animal, 3(12), 1728-1732. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731109990656

Publication

ISSN: 1751-7311
NlmUniqueID: 101303270
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 3
Issue: 12
Pages: 1728-1732

Researcher Affiliations

Bergero, D
  • 1DIPAEE, Torino University, Via L. Da Vinci 44, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy.
Préfontaine, C
    Miraglia, N
      Peiretti, P G

        Citations

        This article has been cited 1 times.
        1. Zicarelli F, Tudisco R, Lotito D, Musco N, Iommelli P, Ferrara M, Calabrò S, Infascelli F, Lombardi P. Forage:Concentrate Ratio Effects on In Vivo Digestibility and In Vitro Degradability of Horse's Diet.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Aug 11;13(16).
          doi: 10.3390/ani13162589pubmed: 37627380google scholar: lookup