A Comparison of Devices for Race Day Characterization of North American Turfgrass Thoroughbred Racing Surfaces.
Abstract: Both pre-race meet and daily turf surface condition measurements are required by regulations adopted as part of the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act (HISA). The Orono Biomechanical Surface Tester (OBST) is the primary device used for characterizing a racing surface and is used for the pre-meet inspections. Tools that are better suited for the daily testing of turf surfaces are also needed to meet the new federal regulations. The purpose of this study was to compare five simple tools commonly used in turf applications to the OBST. Data were collected with each of the six devices at plots chosen to approximate the current and potential compositions of North American turf racetracks. Correlations and linear regression models were then established between the simple tool measurements and the parameters measured by the OBST. The moisture probe was found to be the primary device for race day characterization due to its strong correlation to OBST measurements. The Longchamp Penetrometer is also prioritized for daily measurements due to its established correlation to horse performance and injuries. The Clegg Impact Hammer provides further improvement of the linear regression model. The Turf Shear Tester and GoingStick were not found to correlate well to the biomechanically based device.
Publication Date: 2023-12-21 PubMed ID: 38200768PubMed Central: PMC10777964DOI: 10.3390/ani14010038Google Scholar: Lookup The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research article investigates the effectiveness of different devices used for daily and pre-race meet measurements of turfgrass racing surfaces as mandated by the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act (HISA). The study compared six different tools, including the Orono Biomechanical Surface Tester (OBST), with the moisture probe found most effective for race day characterizations due to strong correlations with OBST measurements.
Objective & Methodology
- The overall aim of this study was to identify equipment that is both manageable for everyday use and accurate in characterizing the condition of turfgrass race tracks.
- In particular, the study compared five simpler tools in turf applications with the OBST, the main apparatus currently used for characterizing racing surfaces during pre-meet reviews.
- Data were collected utilizing all the devices at areas selected to reflect the current and potential compositions of North American turf racecourses.
Findings
- The findings of this research indicate that the moisture probe was the most consistent device for race day characterization, showcasing a strong correlation to measurements undertaken by the OBST. This is essential for ensuring the safety of racehorses and jockeys due to varying track conditions.
- Additionally, the Longchamp Penetrometer was also highly regarded for daily measurements, due to it having an established correlation with racehorse performance and injuries. These daily measurements allow for regular monitoring of the track, increasing safety and performance ability.
- Furthermore, the study found that the Clegg Impact Hammer could enhance the linear regression model. This implies that the device might add value for more detailed or specific analyses of the turfgrass conditions.
Devices that did not correlate well
- The Turf Shear Tester and GoingStick didn’t show a significant correlation with the biomechanically based OBST. As such, these instruments might be less reliable or informative for race day turf characterization.
Significance of the Study
- This study is crucial to promoting the safety of racehorses and jockeys by identifying the best tools for the regular assessment of turfgrass conditions.
- By establishing the best apparatus for daily turf condition testing, the findings could help horse racing authorities meet the federal regulations set out in the HISA, thereby improving the credibility of the sport.
Cite This Article
APA
Schmitt PR, Sanderson W, Rogers JT, Barzee TJ, Peterson MM.
(2023).
A Comparison of Devices for Race Day Characterization of North American Turfgrass Thoroughbred Racing Surfaces.
Animals (Basel), 14(1), 38.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14010038 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40503, USA.
- Racing Surfaces Testing Laboratory, Lexington, KY 40502, USA.
- Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40503, USA.
- Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
- Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40503, USA.
- Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40503, USA.
- Racing Surfaces Testing Laboratory, Lexington, KY 40502, USA.
Grant Funding
- 6T42OH010278 / NIOSH CDC HHS
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
This article includes 45 references
- Eisenberg J. Off to the Races. The Smithsonian Magazine. Aug 1, 2004. [(accessed on 1 November 2023)]. Available online: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/off-to-the-races-2266179/
- Heleski C., Stowe C.J., Fiedler J., Peterson M.L., Brady C., Wickens C., Macleod J.N. Thoroughbred racehorse welfare through the lens of social license to operateu2014With an emphasis on a US perspective. Sustainability. 2020;12:1706. doi: 10.3390/su12051706.
- The Jockey Club Equine Injury Database. [(accessed on 1 November 2023)]. Available online: https://jockeyclub.com/pdfs/eid_14_year_tables.pdf.
- Hitchens P.L., Hill A.E., Stover S.M. The role of catastrophic injury or sudden death of the horse in race-day jockey falls and injuries in California, 2007u20132012. Equine Vet. J. 2014;48:50u201356. doi: 10.1111/evj.12392.
- Peterson M.L., Roepstorff L., Thomason J.J., Mahaffey C., McIlwraith C.W. Racing Surfaces White Paper. [(accessed on 1 November 2023)]. Available online: http://www.grayson-jockeyclub.org/resources/White_Paper_04272012.pdf.
- Pfau T., Witte T.H., Wilson A.M. Centre of mass movement and mechanical energy fluctuation during gallop locomotion in the Thoroughbred racehorse. J. Exp. Biol. 2006;209:3742u20133757. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02439.
- Thomason J.J., Peterson M.L. Biomechanical and mechanical investigations of the hoof-track interface in racing horses. Vet. Clin. North Am. Equine Pract. 2008;24:53u201377. doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2007.11.007.
- Tan H., Wilson A.M. Grip and limb force limits to turning performance in competition horses. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2010;278:2105u20132111. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2395.
- Self Davies Z.T., Spence A.J., Wilson A.M. Ground reaction forces of overground galloping in ridden Thoroughbred racehorses. J. Exp. Biol. 2019;222:jeb204107. doi: 10.1242/jeb.204107.
- Crawford K.L., Finnane A., Phillips C.J., Greer R.M., Woldeyohannes S.M., Perkins N.R., Kidd L.J., Ahern B.J. The Risk Factors for Musculoskeletal Injuries in Thoroughbred Racehorses in Queensland, Australia: How These Vary for Two-Year-Old and Older Horses and with Type of Injury. Animals. 2021;11:270. doi: 10.3390/ani11020270.
- Wiggers N., Nauwelaerts S.L., Hobbs S.J., Bool S., Wolschrijn C.F., Back W. Functional locomotor consequences of uneven forefeet for trot symmetry in individual riding horses. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0114836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114836.
- Georgopoulos S.P., Parkin T.D.H. Risk factors associated with fatal injuries in Thoroughbred racehorses competing in flat racing in the United States and Canada. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2016;249:931u2013939. doi: 10.2460/javma.249.8.931.
- Parkin T.D.H., Clegg P.D., French N.P., Proudman C.J., Riggs C.M., Singer E.R., Webbon P.M., Morgan K.L. Race- and course-level risk factors for fatal distal limb fracture in racing Thoroughbreds. Equine Vet. J. 2004;36:521u2013526. doi: 10.2746/0425164044877332.
- Hitchens P.L., Blizzard C.L., Jones G., Day L., Fell J. Predictors of race-day jockey falls in flat racing in Australia. Occup. Environ. Med. 2010;67:693u2013698. doi: 10.1136/oem.2009.050567.
- Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority . In: Rule 2000 Seriesu2014Racetrack Safety Program. Federal Register, editor. Volume 87. Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority; Lexington, KY, USA: 2022. pp. 445u2013459.
- Peterson M.L., McIlwraith C.W., Reiser R.F. Development of a system for the in-situ characterization of thoroughbred horse racing track surfaces. Biosyst. Eng. 2008;101:260u2013269. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2008.07.007.
- Maeda Y., Hanada M., Oikawa M.A. Epidemiology of racing injuries in Thoroughbred racehorses with special reference to bone fractures: Japanese experience from the 1980s to 2000s. J. Equine Sci. 2016;27:81u201397. doi: 10.1294/jes.27.81.
- Gibson M.J., Legg K.A., Gee E.K., Rogers C.W. The Reporting of Racehorse Fatalities in New Zealand Thoroughbred Flat Racing in the 2011/12u20132021/22 Seasons. Animals. 2023;13:612. doi: 10.3390/ani13040612.
- Dufour M.J.D., Mumford C. GoingStick technology and electromagnetic induction scanning for naturally-turfed sports surfaces. Sports Technol. 2008;1:125u2013131. doi: 10.1080/19346182.2008.9648463.
- Standard Test Method for In-Situ Testing of Functional Properties of Equine Surfaces: Artificial Surfaces. ASTM International; West Conshohocken, PA, USA: 2019.
- Standard Test Method for Measuring Impact-Attenuation Characteristics of Natural Playing Surface Systems Using a Lightweight Portable Apparatus. ASTM International; West Conshohocken, PA, USA: 2018.
- Standard Specification for Shock-Absorbing Properties of North American Football Field Playing Systems as Measured in the Field. ASTM International; West Conshohocken, PA, USA,: 2007.
- Guisasola I., James I., Stiles V., Dixon S. Dynamic behaviour of soils used for natural turf sports surfaces. Sports Eng. 2010;12:111u2013122. doi: 10.1007/s12283-010-0036-1.
- Schmitt P.R., Stanton V., Peterson M.L. Laser Diffraction Particle Size Distribution of North American Turfgrass Horse Racing Surfaces. J. ASABE. 2023;66:735u2013746. doi: 10.13031/ja.15396.
- Henderson J.J., Rogers J.N., III, Crum J.R. The effects of natural and artificial root zone inclusions on the playing surface characteristics of trafficked Kentucky bluegrass. Int. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 2009;11:1107u20131129.
- Henderson J.J. Ph.D. Thesis. Michigan State University; East Lansing, MI, USA: 2003. A New Apparatus to Simulate Athletic Field Traffic and an Evaluation and Comparison of Naturally and Artificially Enhanced Sand Textured Athletic Field Root Zones.
- Hernlund E., Lonnell C., Roepstorff L., Lundholm M., Egenvall A. Equestrian Surfacesu2014A Guide. Svenska Ridsportfu00f6rbundet. 2014. [(accessed on 1 November 2023)]. Available online: https://inside.fei.org/system/files/Equestrian_Surfaces-A_Guide.pdf.
- Ratzlaff M.H., Hyde M.L., Hutton D.V., Rathgeber R.A., Balch O.K. Interrelationships between moisture content of the track, dynamic properties of the track and the locomotor forces exerted by galloping horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 1997;17:35u201342. doi: 10.1016/S0737-0806(97)80456-X.
- Thomas V.J., Murphy J.W., Field T.R.O. Racetrack Traction Assessment by Penetrometer Part I. The Model. J. Turfgrass Manag. 1996;1:37u201349. doi: 10.1300/J099v01n04_04.
- Murphy J.W., Field T.R.O., Thomas V.J. Racetrack Traction Assessment by Penetrometer Part II. Application of the Model. J. Turfgrass Manag. 1996;1:51u201362. doi: 10.1300/J099v01n04_05.
- Sherratt P.J., Street J.R., Gardner D.S. Effects of biomass accumulation on the playing quality of a Kentucky bluegrass stabilizer system used for sports fields. Agron. J. 2005;97:1107u20131114. doi: 10.2134/agronj2004.0182.
- Blanco M.A., Hourquebie R., Dempsey K., Schmitt P., Peterson M.L. An Experimental Comparison of Simple Measurements Used for the Characterization of Sand Equestrian Surfaces. Animals. 2021;11:2896. doi: 10.3390/ani11102896.
- Standard Test Methods for Water Content and Density of Soil In situ by Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) ASTM International; West Conshohocken, PA, USA: 2019.
- Graydon R., Northrop A.J., Martin J.H., Lucey M., Schramel J.P., Peham C., Roepstorff L., Sinclair J., Hobbs S.J. The Development of a Standardized Protocol for Quantifying Equestrian Eventing Cross-Country Ground. Animals. 2023;3:343u2013361. doi: 10.3390/biomechanics3030029.
- Kruse L., Traulsen I., Krieter J. The Use of a Technical Device for Testing the Sport-Functional Properties of Riding Surfaces. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2013;33:539u2013546. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2012.08.008.
- Kozlowski R., Zheng H., Daniels K.E., Socolar J.E.S. Stick-Slip Dynamics in a Granular Material With Varying Grain Angularity. Front. Phys. 2022;10:916190. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2022.916190.
- Clark A.H., Behringer R.P., Krim J. Vibration can enhance stick-slip behavior for granular friction. Granul. Matter. 2019;21:55. doi: 10.1007/s10035-019-0895-5.
- Sion B.D., Shoop S.A., McDonald E.V. Evaluation of in-situ relationships between variable soil moisture and soil strength using a plot-scale experimental design. J. Terramechanics. 2022;103:33u201351. doi: 10.1016/j.jterra.2022.07.002.
- Al-Shayea N.A. The combined effect of clay and moisture content on the behavior of remolded unsaturated soils. Eng. Geol. 2001;62:319u2013342. doi: 10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00032-1.
- Zhang X., Zhang D., Wang Y., Ji S., Zhao H. Dynamic characteristics of sphere impact into wet granular materials considering suction. Granul. Matter. 2023;25:18. doi: 10.1007/s10035-022-01304-9.
- Scholtes L., Chareyre B., Nicot F., Darve F. Micromechanics of granular materials with capillary effects. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 2009;47:64u201375. doi: 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2008.07.002.
- Suescun-Florez E., Iskander M. Effect of Fast Constant Loading Rates on the Global Behavior of Sand in Triaxial Compression. Geotech. Test. J. 2017;40:52u201371. doi: 10.1520/GTJ20150253.
- Alonso E.E., Gens A., Josa A. A constitutive model for partially saturated soils. Geotechnique. 1990;40:405u2013430. doi: 10.1680/geot.1990.40.3.405.
- Hernlund E., Egenvall A., Hobbs S.J., Peterson M.L., Northrop A., Bergh A., Martin J.H., Roepstorff L. Comparing subjective and objective evaluation of show jumping competition and warm-up arena surfaces. Vet. J. 2017;227:49u201357. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2017.09.001.
- Allen R.G., Pereira L.S., Raes D., Smith M. Crop Evapotranspirationu2014Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAOu2014Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; Rome, Italy: 1998.