Analyze Diet
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia2003; 30(3); 183-190; doi: 10.1046/j.1467-2995.2003.00105.x

A comparison of the antinociceptive effects of xylazine, detomidine and romifidine on experimental pain in horses.

Abstract: To study the analgesic potency of the alpha2-agonist romifidine in the horse using both an electrical current and a mechanical pressure model for nociceptive threshold testing. In addition, a comparison was made with doses of detomidine and xylazine that produce equivalent degrees of sedation. Methods: Randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded cross-over study. Methods: Six adult Swiss warmblood horses, one mare and five geldings, weighing from 530 to 650 kg and aged 6-15 years. Methods: Nociceptive thresholds were measured using an electrical stimulus applied to the coronary band and using a pneumatically operated pin pressing on the cannon bone. Measurements were made immediately before and every 15 minutes for 2 hours after IV injection of the test substances. Lifting of the foot indicated the test end point. Results: The three alpha2-agonists caused a temporary increase in nociceptive thresholds with a maximal effect within 15 minutes and a return to baseline levels within 1 hour. Using electrical current testing nociceptive thresholds were significantly different from placebo (mean +/- SD) for detomidine at 15 minutes (from control 5.8 +/- 0.9 to 23.3 +/- 3.9 mA, p = 0.0066) and 30 minutes (from control 6.6 +/- 1.1 to 18.8 +/- 3.3 mA, p = 0.0091). The difference was significant for romifidine at 15 minutes only (from control 5.8 +/- 0.9 to 18.7 +/- 3.8 mA, p = 0.0066). With mechanical pressure testing nociceptive thresholds were significantly different from control for detomidine at 15 minutes (from 3.2 +/- 0.2 to 6.2 +/- 0.5 N, p = 0.00076) and 30 minutes (from 3.2 +/- 0.7 to 5.7 +/- 0.8 N, p = 0.0167). The difference was significant for xylazine at 15 minutes (from control 3.2 +/- 0.2 to 5.6 +/- 0.7 N, p = 0.0079). At 15 minutes the order of magnitude of the measured antinociceptive effect was significantly different between the two pain tests for both romifidine and detomidine, but not for xylazine. For romifidine, the increase of mean thresholds compared to placebo was 4.0 +/- 1.3 times placebo levels with the electrical current test compared to 1.3 +/- 0.3 times for the mechanical pressure test (p = 0.037). For detomidine, the increase of mean thresholds compared to placebo was 5.4 +/- 1.7 times control levels with the electrical current test compared to 2.0 +/- 0.2 times for the mechanical pressure test (p = 0.040). This represents a 2.7 (romifidine) and 3.4 times (detomidine) greater increase in thresholds using electrical current testing compared to the use of mechanical pressure testing. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the analgesic potential of alpha2-agonists in the horse for somatic pain and that they can have quantitatively different antinociceptive effects according to the antinociceptive test used.
Publication Date: 2003-09-23 PubMed ID: 14498850DOI: 10.1046/j.1467-2995.2003.00105.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study aimed to investigate the pain-relieving potency of the drug romifidine in horses, comparing it with equivalent doses of the other two drugs, detomidine and xylazine. The research involved electrical and mechanical tests to gauge pain threshold and showed that all three of these drugs can temporarily increase pain thresholds, although their effectiveness varied depending on the method of pain testing.

Methods and Participants

  • The method was designed as a randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded cross-over study.
  • There were six participants, all adult Swiss warmblood horses, including one mare and five geldings.
  • The horses weighed between 530 to 650 kg and were aged between 6-15 years.
  • The study measured the horses’ pain thresholds using an electrical stimulus applied to the coronary band and a pneumatic pin pressing against the cannon bone. The end of the test was signaled by the horse lifting its foot.

Results of the Study

  • The results showed that all three drugs (romifidine, detomidine, and xylazine) temporarily increased the pain thresholds of the horses. The maximum effect was seen within 15 minutes of intravenous injection, and the effects returned to baseline within one hour.
  • The increase in the pain threshold by these drugs was found to be significant for detomidine for both the 15 and 30 minute marks for the electrical current test, and significant for romifidine at the 15-minute mark only.
  • In the mechanical pressure test, detomidine caused a significant increase in pain threshold at the 15 and 30-minute marks, while xylazine caused a significant increase at the 15-minute mark.
  • However, the extent of the increase in pain thresholds varied significantly between the electrical and mechanical tests for both romifidine and detomidine, but not for xylazine.

Conclusions

  • The findings demonstrated the potential of these three drugs as pain relievers in somatic pain (pain that originates from the skin, muscles, and soft tissues) in horses.
  • Furthermore, it was found that these drugs produced quantitatively different results in pain relief depending on the type of test used to measure nociception (the sensory nervous system’s response to harmful stimuli).
  • The findings suggest that electrical current testing may be more sensitive in detecting changes in pain thresholds caused by alpha2-agonist drugs.

Cite This Article

APA
Moens Y, Lanz F, Doherr MG, Schatzmann U. (2003). A comparison of the antinociceptive effects of xylazine, detomidine and romifidine on experimental pain in horses. Vet Anaesth Analg, 30(3), 183-190. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-2995.2003.00105.x

Publication

ISSN: 1467-2987
NlmUniqueID: 100956422
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 30
Issue: 3
Pages: 183-190

Researcher Affiliations

Moens, Yves
  • Department of Clinical Veterinary Sciences, Anesthesiology section, Länggass-strasse 124, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland. yves.moens@knp.unibe.ch
Lanz, Francisca
    Doherr, Marcus G
      Schatzmann, Urs

        MeSH Terms

        • Adrenergic alpha-Agonists
        • Analgesics
        • Animals
        • Cross-Over Studies
        • Female
        • Horses / physiology
        • Imidazoles
        • Male
        • Single-Blind Method
        • Xylazine

        Citations

        This article has been cited 4 times.
        1. Fadel C, Giorgi M. Synopsis of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, applications, and safety of firocoxib in horses. Vet Anim Sci 2023 Mar;19:100286.
          doi: 10.1016/j.vas.2023.100286pubmed: 36684818google scholar: lookup
        2. Kullmann A, Sanz M, Fosgate GT, Saulez MN, Page PC, Rioja E. Effects of xylazine, romifidine, or detomidine on hematology, biochemistry, and splenic thickness in healthy horses. Can Vet J 2014 Apr;55(4):334-40.
          pubmed: 24688132
        3. Seo JP, Son WG, Gang S, Lee I. Sedative and analgesic effects of intravenous xylazine and tramadol on horses. J Vet Sci 2011 Sep;12(3):281-6.
          doi: 10.4142/jvs.2011.12.3.281pubmed: 21897102google scholar: lookup
        4. Smith P, Tolbert MK, Gould E, Taylor A, Knych H, Messenger K. Pharmacokinetics, sedation and hemodynamic changes following the administration of oral transmucosal detomidine gel in cats. J Feline Med Surg 2020 Dec;22(12):1184-1190.
          doi: 10.1177/1098612X20917305pubmed: 32643979google scholar: lookup