Analyze Diet
Organogenesis2016; 12(3); 109-118; doi: 10.1080/15476278.2016.1205775

A concise review of common animal models for the study of limb regeneration.

Abstract: Correct selection of an appropriate animal mode to closely mimic human extremity diseases or to exhibit desirable phenotypes of limb regeneration is the first critical step for all scientists in biomedical and regenerative researches. The commonly-used animals in limb regeneration and repairing studies, such as axolotl, mice, and rats, are discussed in the review and other models including cockroaches, dogs, and horses are also mentioned. The review weighs the general advantages, disadvantages, and precedent uses of each model in the context of limb and peripheral injury and subsequent regeneration. We hope that this review can provide the reader an overview of each model, from which to select one for their specific purpose.
Publication Date: 2016-07-08 PubMed ID: 27391218PubMed Central: PMC4993303DOI: 10.1080/15476278.2016.1205775Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article reviews various animal models commonly used in the study of limb regeneration and how they might offer insights into similar processes in humans.

Importance of Selecting an Appropriate Animal Model

  • The selection of an appropriate animal model is vital for scientists involved in biomedical and regenerative research. This model should ideally mimic human diseases of the extremities or display desirable limb regeneration characteristics. The choice of the model is essential in understanding the processes and mechanisms involved in limb regeneration and repair.

Commonly Used Animal Models

  • The review discusses several animal models often used in the study of limb regeneration, including the axolotl, mice, and rats. These animals have demonstrated a considerable ability to regrow limbs, tail, heart, and spinal cord after injury.
  • Axolotls, in particular, are remarkable for their unlimited capacity to regenerate. Mice and rats, although not as prolific as axolotls, provide significant insights due to their genetic similarity to humans.

Other Animal Models

  • Other models discussed include cockroaches, dogs, and horses. While these are not as typically used, they offer valuable insights into limb regeneration and repair. For instance, cockroaches can regenerate their antennae, while certain dog breeds have shown an ability to regrow skin and fur.

Evaluating Advantages and Disadvantages of Each Model

  • The review assesses the general advantages, disadvantages, and previous uses of each animal model. The choice of a model depends on the specific research question, available resources, and ethical considerations.
  • The review provides a comprehensive overview of each model, allowing readers to select the most suitable option for their particular research needs.

Cite This Article

APA
Farah Z, Fan H, Liu Z, He JQ. (2016). A concise review of common animal models for the study of limb regeneration. Organogenesis, 12(3), 109-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/15476278.2016.1205775

Publication

ISSN: 1555-8592
NlmUniqueID: 101253266
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 12
Issue: 3
Pages: 109-118

Researcher Affiliations

Farah, Zayd
  • a Department of Biomedical Sciences & Pathobiology , Center for Veterinary Regenerative Medicine (CVRM), Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech , Blacksburg , VA , USA.
Fan, Huimin
  • b Research Institute of Heart Failure , Shanghai East Hospital of Tongji University , Shanghai , China.
Liu, Zhongmin
  • b Research Institute of Heart Failure , Shanghai East Hospital of Tongji University , Shanghai , China.
He, Jia-Qiang
  • a Department of Biomedical Sciences & Pathobiology , Center for Veterinary Regenerative Medicine (CVRM), Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech , Blacksburg , VA , USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Extremities / physiology
  • Mammals / physiology
  • Models, Animal
  • Regeneration / physiology
  • Urodela / physiology

References

This article includes 56 references
  1. Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, Travison TG, Brookmeyer R. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050.. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008 Mar;89(3):422-9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.005pubmed: 18295618google scholar: lookup
  2. Christensen J, Ipsen T, Doherty P, Langberg H. Physical and social factors determining quality of life for veterans with lower-limb amputation(s): a systematic review.. Disabil Rehabil 2016 Dec;38(24):2345-53.
    doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1129446pubmed: 26985705google scholar: lookup
  3. Hart CA, Tsui J, Khanna A, Abraham DJ, Baker DM. Stem cells of the lower limb: their role and potential in management of critical limb ischemia.. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2013 Oct;238(10):1118-26.
    doi: 10.1177/1535370213503275pubmed: 23996960google scholar: lookup
  4. Stocum DL, Cameron JA. Looking proximally and distally: 100 years of limb regeneration and beyond.. Dev Dyn 2011 May;240(5):943-68.
    doi: 10.1002/dvdy.22553pubmed: 21290477google scholar: lookup
  5. Rinkevich B, Rinkevich Y. The "Stars and Stripes" Metaphor for Animal Regeneration-Elucidating Two Fundamental Strategies along a Continuum.. Cells 2012 Dec 27;2(1):1-18.
    doi: 10.3390/cells2010001pmc: PMC3972663pubmed: 24709641google scholar: lookup
  6. Sánchez Alvarado A, Tsonis PA. Bridging the regeneration gap: genetic insights from diverse animal models.. Nat Rev Genet 2006 Nov;7(11):873-84.
    doi: 10.1038/nrg1923pubmed: 17047686google scholar: lookup
  7. Burkhardt GE, Spencer JR, Gifford SM, Propper B, Jones L, Sumner N, Cowart J, Rasmussen TE. A large animal survival model (Sus scrofa) of extremity ischemia/reperfusion and neuromuscular outcomes assessment: a pilot study.. J Trauma 2010 Jul;69 Suppl 1:S146-53.
    doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e6a09bpubmed: 20622610google scholar: lookup
  8. French V. Leg regeneration in the cockroach, Blatella germanica. II. Regeneration from a non-congruent tibial graft/host junction.. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1976 Apr;35(2):267-301.
    pubmed: 939940
  9. Kazemi D, Fakhrjou A, Dizaji VM, Alishahi MK. Effect of autologous platelet rich fibrin on the healing of experimental articular cartilage defects of the knee in an animal model.. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:486436.
    doi: 10.1155/2014/486436pmc: PMC4083211pubmed: 25028656google scholar: lookup
  10. Hovius SE, Stevens HP, Van Nierop PW, Godschalk M, Kusuma A, Deelen G, Van de Bergh M, Van der Meulen JC. Replantation of the radial side of the hand in the rhesus monkey: anatomical and functional aspects. A preliminary study to composite tissue allografting.. J Hand Surg Br 1992 Dec;17(6):651-6.
    doi: 10.1016/0266-7681(92)90193-6pubmed: 1484247google scholar: lookup
  11. Diogo R, Nacu E, Tanaka EM. Is salamander limb regeneration really perfect? Anatomical and morphogenetic analysis of forelimb muscle regeneration in GFP-transgenic axolotls as a basis for regenerative, developmental, and evolutionary studies.. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2014 Jun;297(6):1076-89.
    doi: 10.1002/ar.22906pubmed: 24692358google scholar: lookup
  12. Roy S, Gatien S. Regeneration in axolotls: a model to aim for!. Exp Gerontol 2008 Nov;43(11):968-73.
    doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2008.09.003pubmed: 18814845google scholar: lookup
  13. McCusker C, Gardiner DM. The axolotl model for regeneration and aging research: a mini-review.. Gerontology 2011;57(6):565-71.
    doi: 10.1159/000323761pubmed: 21372551google scholar: lookup
  14. Simon A, Tanaka EM. Limb regeneration.. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol 2013 Mar-Apr;2(2):291-300.
    doi: 10.1002/wdev.73pubmed: 24009038google scholar: lookup
  15. Roensch K, Tazaki A, Chara O, Tanaka EM. Progressive specification rather than intercalation of segments during limb regeneration.. Science 2013 Dec 13;342(6164):1375-9.
    doi: 10.1126/science.1241796pubmed: 24337297google scholar: lookup
  16. Endo T, Bryant SV, Gardiner DM. A stepwise model system for limb regeneration.. Dev Biol 2004 Jun 1;270(1):135-45.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.02.016pubmed: 15136146google scholar: lookup
  17. Fei JF, Schuez M, Tazaki A, Taniguchi Y, Roensch K, Tanaka EM. CRISPR-mediated genomic deletion of Sox2 in the axolotl shows a requirement in spinal cord neural stem cell amplification during tail regeneration.. Stem Cell Reports 2014 Sep 9;3(3):444-59.
  18. Tanaka EM, Gann AA, Gates PB, Brockes JP. Newt myotubes reenter the cell cycle by phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein.. J Cell Biol 1997 Jan 13;136(1):155-65.
    doi: 10.1083/jcb.136.1.155pmc: PMC2132456pubmed: 9008710google scholar: lookup
  19. Tanaka EM, Drechsel DN, Brockes JP. Thrombin regulates S-phase re-entry by cultured newt myotubes.. Curr Biol 1999 Jul 29-Aug 12;9(15):792-9.
    doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(99)80362-5pubmed: 10469562google scholar: lookup
  20. Han M, Yang X, Taylor G, Burdsal CA, Anderson RA, Muneoka K. Limb regeneration in higher vertebrates: developing a roadmap.. Anat Rec B New Anat 2005 Nov;287(1):14-24.
    doi: 10.1002/ar.b.20082pubmed: 16308860google scholar: lookup
  21. Heber-Katz E, Leferovich JM, Bedelbaeva K, Gourevitch D. Spallanzani's mouse: a model of restoration and regeneration.. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2004;280:165-89.
    pubmed: 14594211doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-18846-6_5google scholar: lookup
  22. Clark LD, Clark RK, Heber-Katz E. A new murine model for mammalian wound repair and regeneration.. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1998 Jul;88(1):35-45.
    doi: 10.1006/clin.1998.4519pubmed: 9683548google scholar: lookup
  23. Chadwick RB, Bu L, Yu H, Hu Y, Wergedal JE, Mohan S, Baylink DJ. Digit tip regrowth and differential gene expression in MRL/Mpj, DBA/2, and C57BL/6 mice.. Wound Repair Regen 2007 Mar-Apr;15(2):275-84.
  24. Imokawa Y, Yoshizato K. Expression of Sonic hedgehog gene in regenerating newt limb blastemas recapitulates that in developing limb buds.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997 Aug 19;94(17):9159-64.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.17.9159pmc: PMC23086pubmed: 9256452google scholar: lookup
  25. Buckley G, Wong J, Metcalfe AD, Ferguson MW. Denervation affects regenerative responses in MRL/MpJ and repair in C57BL/6 ear wounds.. J Anat 2012 Jan;220(1):3-12.
  26. Heydemann A. The super super-healing MRL mouse strain.. Front Biol (Beijing) 2012 Dec 1;7(6):522-538.
    doi: 10.1007/s11515-012-1192-4pmc: PMC3806350pubmed: 24163690google scholar: lookup
  27. Kwiatkowski A, Piatkowski M, Chen M, Kan L, Meng Q, Fan H, Osman AK, Liu Z, Ledford B, He JQ. Superior angiogenesis facilitates digit regrowth in MRL/MpJ mice compared to C57BL/6 mice.. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2016 May 13;473(4):907-912.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.03.149pubmed: 27040769google scholar: lookup
  28. Leferovich JM, Bedelbaeva K, Samulewicz S, Zhang XM, Zwas D, Lankford EB, Heber-Katz E. Heart regeneration in adult MRL mice.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001 Aug 14;98(17):9830-5.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.181329398pmc: PMC55538pubmed: 11493713google scholar: lookup
  29. Robey TE, Murry CE. Absence of regeneration in the MRL/MpJ mouse heart following infarction or cryoinjury.. Cardiovasc Pathol 2008 Jan-Feb;17(1):6-13.
  30. Vaughan EE, Liew A, Mashayekhi K, Dockery P, McDermott J, Kealy B, Flynn A, Duffy A, Coleman C, O'Regan A, Barry FP, O'Brien T. Pretreatment of endothelial progenitor cells with osteopontin enhances cell therapy for peripheral vascular disease.. Cell Transplant 2012;21(6):1095-107.
    doi: 10.3727/096368911X623880pubmed: 22304991google scholar: lookup
  31. Cunha FF, Martins L, Martin PK, Stilhano RS, Han SW. A comparison of the reparative and angiogenic properties of mesenchymal stem cells derived from the bone marrow of BALB/c and C57/BL6 mice in a model of limb ischemia.. Stem Cell Res Ther 2013 Jul 26;4(4):86.
    doi: 10.1186/scrt245pmc: PMC3856613pubmed: 23890057google scholar: lookup
  32. Tan Y, Li Y, Xiao J, Shao H, Ding C, Arteel GE, Webster KA, Yan J, Yu H, Cai L, Li X. A novel CXCR4 antagonist derived from human SDF-1beta enhances angiogenesis in ischaemic mice.. Cardiovasc Res 2009 Jun 1;82(3):513-21.
    doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvp044pmc: PMC2682612pubmed: 19196827google scholar: lookup
  33. Watchko JF, O'Day TL, Hoffman EP. Functional characteristics of dystrophic skeletal muscle: insights from animal models.. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2002 Aug;93(2):407-17.
  34. Gutpell KM, Hrinivich WT, Hoffman LM. Skeletal muscle fibrosis in the mdx/utrn+/- mouse validates its suitability as a murine model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.. PLoS One 2015;10(1):e0117306.
  35. Salvini TF, Morini CC, Selistre de Araújo HS, Ownby CL. Long-term regeneration of fast and slow murine skeletal muscles after induced injury by ACL myotoxin isolated from Agkistrodon contortrix laticinctus (broad-banded copperhead) venom.. Anat Rec 1999 Apr 1;254(4):521-33.
  36. Iannaccone PM, Jacob HJ. Rats!. Dis Model Mech 2009 May-Jun;2(5-6):206-10.
    doi: 10.1242/dmm.002733pmc: PMC2675817pubmed: 19407324google scholar: lookup
  37. Lau TW, Sahota DS, Lau CH, Chan CM, Lam FC, Ho YY, Fung KP, Lau CB, Leung PC. An in vivo investigation on the wound-healing effect of two medicinal herbs using an animal model with foot ulcer.. Eur Surg Res 2008;41(1):15-23.
    doi: 10.1159/000122834pubmed: 18382110google scholar: lookup
  38. Kaplan HM, Mishra P, Kohn J. The overwhelming use of rat models in nerve regeneration research may compromise designs of nerve guidance conduits for humans.. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2015 Aug;26(8):226.
    doi: 10.1007/s10856-015-5558-4pmc: PMC4545171pubmed: 26296419google scholar: lookup
  39. Varejão AS, Melo-Pinto P, Meek MF, Filipe VM, Bulas-Cruz J. Methods for the experimental functional assessment of rat sciatic nerve regeneration.. Neurol Res 2004 Mar;26(2):186-94.
    doi: 10.1179/016164104225013833pubmed: 15072638google scholar: lookup
  40. Gutmann E, Guttmann L, Medawar P, Young J. The rate of regeneration of nerve. J Exp Biol 1942; 19:14-44.
  41. Cheng L, Liu Y, Zhao H, Zhang W, Guo YJ, Nie L. Lentiviral-mediated transfer of CDNF promotes nerve regeneration and functional recovery after sciatic nerve injury in adult rats.. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2013 Oct 18;440(2):330-5.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.09.084pubmed: 24076387google scholar: lookup
  42. Kobayashi J, Mackinnon SE, Watanabe O, Ball DJ, Gu XM, Hunter DA, Kuzon WM Jr. The effect of duration of muscle denervation on functional recovery in the rat model.. Muscle Nerve 1997 Jul;20(7):858-66.
  43. Tetik C, Ozer K, Ayhan S, Siemionow K, Browne E, Siemionow M. Conventional versus epineural sleeve neurorrhaphy technique: functional and histomorphometric analysis.. Ann Plast Surg 2002 Oct;49(4):397-403.
  44. Ishikane S, Ohnishi S, Yamahara K, Sada M, Harada K, Mishima K, Iwasaki K, Fujiwara M, Kitamura S, Nagaya N, Ikeda T. Allogeneic injection of fetal membrane-derived mesenchymal stem cells induces therapeutic angiogenesis in a rat model of hind limb ischemia.. Stem Cells 2008 Oct;26(10):2625-33.
    doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0236pubmed: 18669910google scholar: lookup
  45. Sawa Y. Current status of myocardial regeneration therapy.. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013 Jan;61(1):17-23.
    doi: 10.1007/s11748-012-0153-9pubmed: 23132738google scholar: lookup
  46. Gelberman RH, Khabie V, Cahill CJ. The revascularization of healing flexor tendons in the digital sheath. A vascular injection study in dogs.. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991 Jul;73(6):868-81.
    pubmed: 1712787
  47. Estrada RJ, van Weeren PR, van de Lest CH, Boere J, Reyes M, Ionita JC, Estrada M, Lischer CJ. Comparison of healing in forelimb and hindlimb surgically induced core lesions of the equine superficial digital flexor tendon.. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2014;27(5):358-65.
    doi: 10.3415/VCOT-13-11-0136pubmed: 25078543google scholar: lookup
  48. Gaughan EM, Nixon AJ, Krook LP, Yeager AE, Mann KA, Mohammed H, Bartel DL. Effects of sodium hyaluronate on tendon healing and adhesion formation in horses.. Am J Vet Res 1991 May;52(5):764-73.
    pubmed: 1854104
  49. Costantino PD, Shybut G, Friedman CD, Pelzer HJ, Masini M, Shindo ML, Sisson GA Sr. Segmental mandibular regeneration by distraction osteogenesis. An experimental study.. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990 May;116(5):535-45.
  50. Nakashima M, Iohara K. Regeneration of dental pulp by stem cells.. Adv Dent Res 2011 Jul;23(3):313-9.
    doi: 10.1177/0022034511405323pubmed: 21677085google scholar: lookup
  51. Géraudie J, Monnot MJ, Brulfert A, Ferretti P. Caudal fin regeneration in wild type and long-fin mutant zebrafish is affected by retinoic acid.. Int J Dev Biol 1995 Apr;39(2):373-81.
    pubmed: 7669548
  52. Olsen AS, Sarras MP Jr, Intine RV. Limb regeneration is impaired in an adult zebrafish model of diabetes mellitus.. Wound Repair Regen 2010 Sep-Oct;18(5):532-42.
  53. Jaźwińska A, Sallin P. Regeneration versus scarring in vertebrate appendages and heart.. J Pathol 2016 Jan;238(2):233-46.
    doi: 10.1002/path.4644pmc: PMC5057359pubmed: 26414617google scholar: lookup
  54. Varshney GK, Sood R, Burgess SM. Understanding and Editing the Zebrafish Genome.. Adv Genet 2015;92:1-52.
    doi: 10.1016/bs.adgen.2015.09.002pubmed: 26639914google scholar: lookup
  55. Nakamura T, Mito T, Bando T, Ohuchi H, Noji S. Dissecting insect leg regeneration through RNA interference.. Cell Mol Life Sci 2008 Jan;65(1):64-72.
    doi: 10.1007/s00018-007-7432-0pubmed: 18030418google scholar: lookup
  56. French V, Bryant PJ, Bryant SV. Pattern regulation in epimorphic fields.. Science 1976 Sep 10;193(4257):969-81.
    doi: 10.1126/science.948762pubmed: 948762google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 5 times.
  1. Rajagopalan K, Christyraj JDS, Chelladurai KS, Gnanaraja JKJS, Christyraj JRSS. Comparative analysis of the survival and regeneration potential of juvenile and matured earthworm, Eudrilus eugeniae, upon in vivo and in vitro maintenance. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2022 Aug;58(7):587-598.
    doi: 10.1007/s11626-022-00706-6pubmed: 35920958google scholar: lookup
  2. Mukherjee P, Roy S, Ghosh D, Nandi SK. Role of animal models in biomedical research: a review. Lab Anim Res 2022 Jul 1;38(1):18.
    doi: 10.1186/s42826-022-00128-1pubmed: 35778730google scholar: lookup
  3. Alt EU, Schmitz C, Bai X. Perspective: Why and How Ubiquitously Distributed, Vascular-Associated, Pluripotent Stem Cells in the Adult Body (vaPS Cells) Are the Next Generation of Medicine. Cells 2021 Sep 3;10(9).
    doi: 10.3390/cells10092303pubmed: 34571951google scholar: lookup
  4. Lee YS, Park YH, Lee DS, Seo YM, Lee JH, Park JH, Choung HW, Park SH, Shon WJ, Park JC. Tubular Dentin Regeneration Using a CPNE7-Derived Functional Peptide. Materials (Basel) 2020 Oct 16;13(20).
    doi: 10.3390/ma13204618pubmed: 33081300google scholar: lookup
  5. Saliba I, Bachy-Razzouk M, Bensidhoum M, Hoc T, Potier E, Vialle R, Hardy A. Analysis of a Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability Model in the Rat: Conclusions and Suggestions for Future Research. Life (Basel) 2024 Jun 28;14(7).
    doi: 10.3390/life14070829pubmed: 39063583google scholar: lookup