Analyze Diet
Tropical animal health and production2019; 51(7); 1927-1933; doi: 10.1007/s11250-019-01888-0

A cross-sectional study of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at the equine-human interface.

Abstract: The present study aimed at investigating the percent prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in equines and associated personnel. A total of 150 swabs of equines and 50 nasal swab samples of associated personnel were collected. These samples were processed in mannitol salt broth for enrichment. A total of 175 nasal swab samples changed the broth color from pink to yellow which were detected as samples containing S. aureus. These samples were processed further on specific media, namely mannitol salt agar, Staph-110, and blood agar, for phenotypic and Gram's staining-based confirmation of S. aureus isolates. Out of these 175 S. aureus-positive samples, 150 were of equine and 25 were of human origin. Identification of MRSA isolates in 175 S. aureus-positive samples was carried out by antimicrobial susceptibility testing by disc diffusion method. Results showed the presence of MRSA in 87 samples, out of which 81 samples were collected from equines and six samples from humans. Results of antibiotic testing revealed that percentage positivity of MRSA was higher (54%) in equines as compared with the associated personnel (24%). Most resistant antibiotics against MRSA isolates were oxacillin and methicillin while linezolid was found to be the most sensitive antibiotic against MRSA. In conclusion, our findings indicated prevalence of MRSA in equines and associated personnel evidencing an occupational risk of contracting MRSA from horses.
Publication Date: 2019-04-10 PubMed ID: 30972624DOI: 10.1007/s11250-019-01888-0Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study explores the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteria in horses and their handlers. The findings indicate that horses have a higher prevalence of MRSA, presenting an occupational health risk for those working closely with these animals.

Study Design and Data Collection

The researchers adopted a cross-sectional study design. The data was collected from two sources:

  • 150 swab samples from horses
  • 50 nasal swab samples from the personnel working with the horses

These samples were then processed in mannitol salt broth for enrichment, a procedure known for amplifying the presence of the Staphylococcus aureus bacteria.

Identification and Confirmation of Bacteria

After the enrichment process, 175 swab samples turned the color of the broth from pink to yellow. This color change indicated the presence of S. aureus bacteria.

The identified samples underwent further processing on specific media such as mannitol salt agar, Staph-110, and blood agar. This additional processing, coupled with Gram’s staining, served to confirm the presence of S. aureus isolates.

Of the 175 confirmed S. aureus-positive samples, 150 were from horses and 25 were from humans.

Detecting MRSA

The researchers then identified MRSA isolates from the 175 confirmed S. aureus samples via antimicrobial susceptibility testing with the disc diffusion method.

Out of these, 87 samples were identified as MRSA, 81 of which were from horses and 6 from personnel.

Examination of Antibiotic Susceptibility

The study also examined the antibiotic susceptibility of these MRSA isolates. The antibiotics oxacillin and methicillin proved to be most resistant against MRSA, while linezolid was found to be the most sensitive.

Key Findings

The results of the study demonstrated a higher percentage positivity of MRSA in horses (54%) compared to the associated personnel (24%).

This led to the conclusion that the higher prevalence of MRSA in equines could present an occupational risk to the personnel who work closely with these animals. These individuals may be more likely to contract MRSA from horses due to the extensive contact involved in their work.

Cite This Article

APA
Waqar N, Amin Q, Munir T, Ikram MS, Shahzad N, Mirza A, Ali A, Arshad MI. (2019). A cross-sectional study of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at the equine-human interface. Trop Anim Health Prod, 51(7), 1927-1933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-019-01888-0

Publication

ISSN: 1573-7438
NlmUniqueID: 1277355
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 51
Issue: 7
Pages: 1927-1933

Researcher Affiliations

Waqar, Namra
  • Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Amin, Quratulain
  • Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Munir, Tariq
  • Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Ikram, Muhammad Sohaib
  • Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Shahzad, Naveed
  • School of Biological Sciences, The University of Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Mirza, Arkim
  • Race Course Club, Lahore, Pakistan.
Ali, Arshad
  • Livestock and Dairy Development Department, Civil Veterinary Hospital, 5-GB, Nankana Sahib, Pakistan.
Arshad, Muhammad Imran
  • Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan. drimranarshad@yahoo.com.

MeSH Terms

  • Agar
  • Animals
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Culture Media
  • Horses / microbiology
  • Humans
  • Methicillin
  • Methicillin Resistance
  • Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus / isolation & purification
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
  • Prevalence
  • Zoonoses

References

This article includes 20 references
  1. J Small Anim Pract. 2009 Apr;50(4):168-73
    pubmed: 19320810
  2. Epidemiol Infect. 2010 May;138(5):626-44
    pubmed: 20141646
  3. Infect Genet Evol. 2014 Jan;21:523-30
    pubmed: 23473831
  4. Trends Microbiol. 2014 Jan;22(1):42-7
    pubmed: 24331435
  5. Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Jan;58 Suppl 1:S10-9
    pubmed: 24343827
  6. Vet Res. 2014 Mar 19;45:31
    pubmed: 24641543
  7. Pathog Dis. 2016 Jun;74(4):ftw025
    pubmed: 27052029
  8. Vet Rec. 2016 May 7;178(19):473
    pubmed: 27114407
  9. BMC Infect Dis. 2016 May 15;16:199
    pubmed: 27179682
  10. Vet Microbiol. 2017 Feb;200:71-78
    pubmed: 27291944
  11. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Apr 1;72(4):957-968
    pubmed: 27999066
  12. Front Microbiol. 2017 Apr 03;8:543
    pubmed: 28421046
  13. One Health. 2015 Dec 12;2:11-17
    pubmed: 28616471
  14. J Vet Intern Med. 2017 Sep;31(5):1551-1555
    pubmed: 28661019
  15. Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 14;7(1):5499
    pubmed: 28710350
  16. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2017 Sep;17(9):645-653
    pubmed: 28816638
  17. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2017 Dec;14(12):735-741
    pubmed: 29068722
  18. Front Microbiol. 2017 Dec 13;8:2493
    pubmed: 29326664
  19. Vet Microbiol. 2018 Jul;221:153-158
    pubmed: 29981702
  20. Front Microbiol. 2018 Oct 24;9:2516
    pubmed: 30405574

Citations

This article has been cited 4 times.
  1. Nielsen SS, Bicout DJ, Calistri P, Canali E, Drewe JA, Garin-Bastuji B, Gonzales Rojas JL, Gortázar C, Herskin M, Michel V, Miranda Chueca MÁ, Padalino B, Pasquali P, Roberts HC, Spoolder H, Ståhl K, Velarde A, Viltrop A, Winckler C, Baldinelli F, Broglia A, Kohnle L, Alvarez J. Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in cattle and horses. EFSA J 2022 May;20(5):e07312.
    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7312pubmed: 35582361google scholar: lookup
  2. Tahoun A, Elnafarawy HK, El-Sharkawy H, Rizk AM, Alorabi M, El-Shehawi AM, Youssef MA, Ibrahim HMM, El-Khodery S. The Prevalence and Molecular Biology of Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Healthy and Diseased Equine Eyes in Egypt. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022 Feb 10;11(2).
    doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11020221pubmed: 35203823google scholar: lookup
  3. Little SV, Hillhouse AE, Lawhon SD, Bryan LK. Analysis of Virulence and Antimicrobial Resistance Gene Carriage in Staphylococcus aureus Infections in Equids Using Whole-Genome Sequencing. mSphere 2021 Aug 25;6(4):e0019620.
    doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00196-20pubmed: 34346711google scholar: lookup
  4. Scholtzek AD, Hanke D, Walther B, Eichhorn I, Stöckle SD, Klein KS, Gehlen H, Lübke-Becker A, Schwarz S, Feßler AT. Molecular Characterization of Equine Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Exhibiting Reduced Oxacillin Susceptibility. Toxins (Basel) 2019 Sep 13;11(9).
    doi: 10.3390/toxins11090535pubmed: 31540335google scholar: lookup