Analyze Diet
Journal of biomechanical engineering2010; 132(10); 105001; doi: 10.1115/1.4002374

A linear laser scanner to measure cross-sectional shape and area of biological specimens during mechanical testing.

Abstract: Measure of the cross-sectional area (CSA) of biological specimens is a primary concern for many biomechanical tests. Different procedures are presented in literature but besides the fact that noncontact techniques are required during mechanical testing, most of these procedures lack accuracy or speed. Moreover, they often require a precise positioning of the specimen, which is not always feasible, and do not enable the measure of the same section during tension. The objective of this study was to design a noncontact, fast, and accurate device capable of acquiring CSA of specimens mounted on a testing machine. A system based on the horizontal linear displacement of two charge-coupled device reflectance laser devices next to the specimen, one for each side, was chosen. The whole measuring block is mounted on a vertical linear guide to allow following the measured zone during sample tension (or compression). The device was validated by measuring the CSA of metallic rods machined with geometrical shapes (circular, hexagonal, semicircular, and triangular) as well as an equine superficial digital flexor tendon (SDFT) in static condition. We also performed measurements during mechanical testing of three SDFTs, obtaining the CSA variations until tendon rupture. The system was revealed to be very fast with acquisition times in the order of 0.1 s and interacquisition time of about 1.5 s. Measurements of the geometrical shapes yielded mean errors lower than 1.4% (n=20 for each shape) while the tendon CSA at rest was 90.29 ± 1.69 mm(2) (n=20). As for the tendons that underwent tension, a mean of 60 measures were performed for each test, which lasted about 2 min until rupture (at 20 mm/min), finding CSA variations linear with stress (R(2)>0.85). The proposed device was revealed to be accurate and repeatable. It is easy to assemble and operate and capable of moving to follow a defined zone on the specimen during testing. The system does not need precise centering of the sample and can perform noncontact measures during mechanical testing; therefore, it can be used to measure variations of the specimen CSA during a tension (or compression) test in order to determine, for instance, the true stress and transverse deformations.
Publication Date: 2010-10-05 PubMed ID: 20887025DOI: 10.1115/1.4002374Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The article discusses the research and development of a rapid and accurate device to measure the cross-sectional area of biological specimens during mechanical testing, using two laser devices to track changes even during tension or compression testing. The device also negates the need for precise positioning of the specimen.

Device Design and Function

  • The core objective of this study was to create an accurate and high-speed device that can measure cross-sectional areas (CSA) of specimens during mechanical testing, without touching them.
  • The mechanism of the device is based on two charge-coupled device reflectance laser devices that move horizontally alongside the specimen, one for each side. These devices are attached to a vertical linear guide to track changes in the examined zone.
  • This design does not require precise centering of the specimen, allowing for more flexible testing conditions and more accurate results.

Device Validation

  • The accuracy and effectiveness of the device were examined using metallic rods with different geometrical shapes and an equine superficial digital flexor tendon (SDFT) in a static condition.
  • Errors for the geometric shapes measured less than 1.4% while the tendon CSA at rest was around 90.29 ± 1.69 mm(2).
  • During mechanical testing, approximately 60 measurements were taken for each test until the tendons ruptured. This process took around two minutes at a rate of 20 mm/min, and the changes in CSA correlated linearly with stress.

Device Performance and Implications

  • The device delivered fast results with acquisition times of about 0.1 s and interacquisition times of roughly 1.5 s.
  • It demonstrated repeatability and accuracy, and was user-friendly for assembly and operation.
  • Given the system’s ability to track changes during testing and its noncontact measurement feature, it can be used to assess variations in the CSA during tension or compression tests. This in turn will provide insight into the specimen’s true stress and transverse deformations, which could be valuable in fields like biomechanics.

Cite This Article

APA
Vergari C, Pourcelot P, Holden L, Ravary-Plumioën B, Laugier P, Mitton D, Crevier-Denoix N. (2010). A linear laser scanner to measure cross-sectional shape and area of biological specimens during mechanical testing. J Biomech Eng, 132(10), 105001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002374

Publication

ISSN: 1528-8951
NlmUniqueID: 7909584
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 132
Issue: 10
Pages: 105001

Researcher Affiliations

Vergari, Claudio
  • USC INRA-ENVA, Biomécanique et Pathologie Locomotrice du Cheval, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, 7 Avenue du Général de Gaulle, 94704 Maisons-Alfort Cedex, France. c.vergari@gmail.com
Pourcelot, Philippe
    Holden, Laurène
      Ravary-Plumioën, Bérangère
        Laugier, Pascal
          Mitton, David
            Crevier-Denoix, Nathalie

              MeSH Terms

              • Animals
              • Biomechanical Phenomena
              • Biomedical Engineering / instrumentation
              • Biomedical Engineering / methods
              • Horses
              • In Vitro Techniques
              • Lasers
              • Stress, Mechanical
              • Tendons / anatomy & histology
              • Tendons / physiology

              Citations

              This article has been cited 7 times.
              1. Wagner FC, Reese S, Gerlach K, Böttcher P, Mülling CKW. Cyclic tensile tests of Shetland pony superficial digital flexor tendons (SDFTs) with an optimized cryo-clamp combined with biplanar high-speed fluoroscopy.. BMC Vet Res 2021 Jun 25;17(1):223.
                doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-02914-wpubmed: 34172051google scholar: lookup
              2. Ge XJ, Zhang L, Xiang G, Hu YC, Lun DX. Cross-Sectional Area Measurement Techniques of Soft Tissue: A Literature Review.. Orthop Surg 2020 Dec;12(6):1547-1566.
                doi: 10.1111/os.12757pubmed: 32930465google scholar: lookup
              3. Ge X, Ding J, Wang M, Li Q, Hu Y, Lun D, Zhang L, Wang L, Wang W, Liu B. A novel alginate localization molding technique for cross-sectional area measurement of human tendon to access biomechanical properties.. Cell Tissue Bank 2021 Mar;22(1):11-24.
                doi: 10.1007/s10561-020-09858-9pubmed: 32808143google scholar: lookup
              4. Carrillo F, Suter S, Casari FA, Sutter R, Nagy L, Snedeker JG, Fürnstahl P. Digitalization of the IOM: A comprehensive cadaveric study for obtaining three-dimensional models and morphological properties of the forearm's interosseous membrane.. Sci Rep 2020 Apr 14;10(1):6401.
                doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63436-3pubmed: 32286490google scholar: lookup
              5. Hayes A, Easton K, Devanaboyina PT, Wu JP, Kirk TB, Lloyd D. A review of methods to measure tendon dimensions.. J Orthop Surg Res 2019 Jan 14;14(1):18.
                doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-1056-ypubmed: 30636623google scholar: lookup
              6. Meier Bürgisser G, Calcagni M, Bachmann E, Fessel G, Snedeker JG, Giovanoli P, Buschmann J. Rabbit Achilles tendon full transection model - wound healing, adhesion formation and biomechanics at 3, 6 and 12 weeks post-surgery.. Biol Open 2016 Sep 15;5(9):1324-33.
                doi: 10.1242/bio.020644pubmed: 27635037google scholar: lookup
              7. Meier Bürgisser G, Calcagni M, Müller A, Bonavoglia E, Fessel G, Snedeker JG, Giovanoli P, Buschmann J. Prevention of peritendinous adhesions using an electrospun DegraPol polymer tube: a histological, ultrasonographic, and biomechanical study in rabbits.. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:656240.
                doi: 10.1155/2014/656240pubmed: 25101292google scholar: lookup