Abstract: Keeping horses in groups is widely recommended but limited information is available about how this is implemented in practice. The aim of this survey was to describe how horses are kept in the Nordic countries in relation to sex, age, breed, and equestrian discipline and to assess owners' attitudes toward keeping horses in groups. Horse owners in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden were approached using a web-based questionnaire, which was translated into 4 languages and distributed online via equestrian forums, organizations, and social media. The number of respondents was 3,229, taking care of 17,248 horses. Only 8% of horses were never kept in groups, 47% were permanently grouped for 24 h/d, and 45% were stabled singly but grouped during turnout. Yearlings were most often permanently kept in groups (75%), mares and geldings more commonly during parts of the day (50 and 51%, respectively), and stallions were often kept alone (38%). Icelandic horses were more likely to be permanently kept in groups (36%) than warmbloods (16%) and ponies (15%). Twice as many competition horses (51%) were never grouped compared with horses used for breeding (20%) or leisure purposes (15%). The majority of respondents (86%) strongly agreed that group housing benefits horse welfare and that it is important for horses to have the company of conspecifics (92%). Nevertheless, not all horses were kept in groups, showing that attitudes toward group housing may not necessarily reflect current management. The risk of injury was a concern of many respondents (45%), as was introducing unfamiliar horses into already established groups (40%) and challenges in relation to feeding in groups (44%). Safety of people (23%) and difficulties handling group-kept horses (19%) were regarded as less problematic. Results suggest that the majority of horses have the possibility to freely interact with other horses, either as fulltime members of a group during 24 h/d or during turnout. Future research should address the extent to which being a part-time member of a group affects horse welfare. For permanent group housing to become more widespread, such as it is the case for most farm animals, future research could focus on solving some of the reoccurring problems perceived with keeping horses in groups. The dissemination of evidence-based information on all aspects around keeping horses in groups can ultimately stimulate further positive changes in the management of group-kept horses.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research focused on the practice and attitudes towards keeping horses in groups in the Nordic countries. The survey observed that the majority of horses live in groups, either permanently or during specific times of the day, and only a small percentage are always kept alone. Most owners agreed that group housing enhanced horse welfare. However, problems such as injuries, conflicts during feedings, and difficulties in introducing new horses into established groups were identified as ongoing issues.
Survey Methodology
The researchers conducted an online survey targeting horse owners in four Nordic countries: Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden.
The survey was translated into corresponding languages and distributed through equestrian organizations, forums, and social media platforms.
There were 3,229 respondents, collectively taking care of 17,248 horses.
Findings on Horse Management Practices
The findings showed that 8% of the horses were always kept alone. In contrast, 47% were kept in groups 24 hours a day, while 45% were housed separately but grouped during outside time.
Mares and geldings were more likely to be grouped during parts of the day (50% and 51%, respectively), while stallions were often kept alone (38%).
Yearlings were the most frequently kept in groups around the clock (75%).
The breed of the horse influenced the likelihood of group housing. Icelandic horses were more likely to be kept in groups (36%) than warmbloods (16%) and ponies (15%).
The purpose of the horse also affected its housing. Competition horses were twice as likely never to be housed in groups (51%), compared with horses used for breeding (20%) or leisure (15%).
Owners’ Attitudes Towards Group Housing
A majority of the respondents (86%) strongly agreed that group housing improved horse welfare.
Owners also agreed (92%) that it was essential for horses to have companionship with other horses.
However, some concerns were expressed. 45% of owners were worried about the risk of injury in group housing. Difficulties with group feedings and integration of unfamiliar horses into established groups were a concern for 44% and 40% of respondents respectively.
Lesser problems included human safety (23%) and difficulties in handling group-kept horses (19%).
Implications for Future Research
The researchers suggested that future studies need to investigate the impact on horse welfare of being part-time group members vs. full-time group members.
For group housing to be more widespread, future research needs to address prevalent issues related to group housing of horses.
The authors also suggested a need to disseminate scientifically-backed information on all aspects of group horse housing, to promote further positive change in horse management practices.
Cite This Article
APA
Hartmann E, Bøe KE, Christensen JW, Hyyppä S, Jansson H, Jørgensen GH, Ladewig J, Mejdell CM, Norling Y, Rundgren M, Särkijärvi S, Søndergaard E, Keeling LJ.
(2015).
A Nordic survey of management practices and owners’ attitudes towards keeping horses in groups.
J Anim Sci, 93(9), 4564-4574.
https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9233