FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Asian J Neurosurg / A novel equine-derived pericardium membrane for dural repair...
Asian journal of neurosurgery2016; 11(3); 201-205; doi: 10.4103/1793-5482.179645

A novel equine-derived pericardium membrane for dural repair: A preliminary, short-term investigation.

Abstract: A large variety of biological and artificial materials are employed in dural repair, each of them with major limitations. Autologous grafts have limited availability and require an additional incision and surgical time. Cadaveric preparations and heterologous materials entail the risk of iatrogenic transmission of prions, whereas synthetic substitutes have been reported to cause inflammatory reactions and graft rejection. An equine-derived pericardium membrane has been developed (Heart(®), Bioteck, Vicenza, Italy) with mechanical and safety-related features that could make it suitable for neurosurgical application. Objective: This preliminary study aimed to evaluate the short-term safety and efficacy of the Heart(®) membrane in dural repair procedures following meningioma surgeries. Methods: Medical records of patients who were surgically treated for an intracranial meningioma and underwent duraplasty with the Heart(®) membrane were reviewed retrospectively. The occurrence of any graft-related complications such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, postoperative hematoma, wound infection, meningitis, and neurological symptoms was analyzed. Results: Eight patients were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. A watertight closure was achieved in all of them. Postoperatively, no patients exhibited CSF leak, cerebral contusion, hemorrhage, or wound infection. The 1-month radiological follow-up revealed no evidence of pseudomeningocele, wound breakdown, or meningitis. Neurologic complications were observed in three patients but not directly imputable to the dural substitute or its application. Conclusions: In all the patients, the pericardium membrane enabled achievement of a watertight dural closure without graft-related adverse events. Further investigations should be performed to assess medium- and long-term clinical outcomes in a larger set of patients.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2016-07-02 PubMed ID: 27366245PubMed Central: PMC4849287DOI: 10.4103/1793-5482.179645Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research examines and reports the short-term safety and efficacy of a novel equine-derived pericardium membrane, Heart®, for dural repair in patients undergoing meningioma surgeries. No adverse events were related to the use of the membrane, which successfully enabled watertight dural closure in all cases.

Study Objective

  • The research aimed to evaluate the short-term safety and effectiveness of a new equine-derived pericardium membrane known as Heart®. This membrane was used in duraplasty procedures following surgeries to remove intracranial meningioma, a type of brain tumor.

Methods Used in the Study

  • The researchers retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients who had been surgically treated for an intracranial meningioma and who had opted for duraplasty with the Heart® membrane.
  • They specifically analyzed the occurrence of any graft-related complications like cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, postoperative hematoma, wound infection, meningitis, and neurological symptoms.

Study Results

  • The study found that eight patients met the inclusion criteria, displaying a watertight closure in all cases.
  • Post-surgery, none of these patients exhibited complications such as CSF leak, cerebral contusion, hemorrhage, or wound infection.
  • One-month radiological follow-ups showed no evidence of further complications like pseudomeningocele, wound breakdown, or meningitis.
  • While three patients did exhibit neurological complications, these issues were not directly linked to the use of the Heart® membrane or its application in duraplasty.

Conclusions from the Study

  • These preliminary findings suggest that the novel pericardium membrane enables a watertight dural closure without leading to any graft-related adverse events.
  • The researchers propose developing further investigations to assess the medium and long-term clinical outcomes in a larger set of patients, strengthening the validity of these initial findings.

Cite This Article

APA
Centonze R, Agostini E, Massaccesi S, Toninelli S, Morabito L. (2016). A novel equine-derived pericardium membrane for dural repair: A preliminary, short-term investigation. Asian J Neurosurg, 11(3), 201-205. https://doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.179645

Publication

Asian journal of neurosurgery
ISSN: 1793-5482
NlmUniqueID: 101564712
Country: India
Language: English
Volume: 11
Issue: 3
Pages: 201-205

Researcher Affiliations

Centonze, Roberto
  • Division of Neurosurgery, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord Hospital, Pesaro, Italy.
Agostini, Emiliano
  • Division of Neurosurgery, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord Hospital, Pesaro, Italy.
Massaccesi, Samantha
  • Division of Neurosurgery, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord Hospital, Pesaro, Italy.
Toninelli, Stefano
  • Division of Neurosurgery, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord Hospital, Pesaro, Italy.
Morabito, Letterio
  • Division of Neurosurgery, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord Hospital, Pesaro, Italy.

References

This article includes 51 references
  1. Berjano R, Vinas FC, Dujovny M. A review of dural substitutes used in neurosurgery.. Crit Rev Neurosurg 1999;9:217–22.
    pubmed: 10436210
  2. Caroli E, Rocchi G, Salvati M, Delfini R. Duraplasty: Our current experience.. Surg Neurol 2004;61:55–9.
    pubmed: 14706380
  3. Yu F, Wu F, Zhou R, Guo L, Zhang J, Tao D. Current developments in dural repair: A focused review on new methods and materials.. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 2013;18:1335–43.
    pubmed: 23747886
  4. Whittle IR, Smith C, Navoo P, Collie D. Meningiomas.. Lancet 2004;363:1535–43.
    pubmed: 15135603
  5. Brown P, Brandel JP, Sato T, Nakamura Y, MacKenzie J, Will RG. Iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, final assessment.. Emerg Infect Dis 2012;18:901–7.
    pmc: PMC3358170pubmed: 22607808
  6. Sikorska B, Liberski PP. Human prion diseases: From kuru to variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.. Subcell Biochem 2012;65:457–96.
    pubmed: 23225013
  7. Will RG. Acquired prion disease: Iatrogenic CJD, variant CJD, kuru.. Br Med Bull 2003;66:255–65.
    pubmed: 14522863
  8. Brown P, Brandel JP, Preece M, Sato T. Iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: The waning of an era.. Neurology 2006;67:389–93.
    pubmed: 16855204
  9. Kim HL, Do JY, Cho HJ, Jeon YC, Park SJ, Ma HI. Dura mater graft-associated Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: The first case in Korea.. J Korean Med Sci 2011;26:1515–7.
    pmc: PMC3207058pubmed: 22065911
  10. Thadani V, Penar PL, Partington J, Kalb R, Janssen R, Schonberger LB. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease probably acquired from a cadaveric dura mater graft. Case report.. J Neurosurg 1988;69:766–9.
    pubmed: 3054015
  11. Yamada M, Noguchi-Shinohara M, Hamaguchi T, Nozaki I, Kitamoto T, Sato T. Dura mater graft-associated Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in Japan: Clinicopathological and molecular characterization of the two distinct subtypes.. Neuropathology 2009;29:609–18.
    pubmed: 19659940
  12. Hannah EL, Belay ED, Gambetti P, Krause G, Parchi P, Capellari S. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease after receipt of a previously unimplicated brand of dura mater graft.. Neurology 2001;56:1080–3.
    pubmed: 11320182
  13. Marx RE, Carlson ER. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease from allogeneic dura: A review of risks and safety.. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991;49:272–4.
    pubmed: 1995817
  14. Heath CA, Barker RA, Esmonde TF, Harvey P, Roberts R, Trend P. Dura mater-associated Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: Experience from surveillance in the UK.. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006;77:880–2.
    pmc: PMC2117491pubmed: 16627534
  15. Brooke FJ, Boyd A, Klug GM, Masters CL, Collins SJ. Lyodura use and the risk of iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in Australia.. Med J Aust 2004;180:177–81.
    pubmed: 14960140
  16. Costa BS, Cavalcanti-Mendes Gde A, de Abreu MS, de Sousa AA. Clinical experience with a novel bovine collagen dura mater substitute.. Asian J Neurosurg 2010;5:31–4.
    pmc: PMC3201076pubmed: 22028756
  17. Cohen AR, Aleksic S, Ransohoff J. Inflammatory reaction to synthetic dural substitute. Case report.. J Neurosurg 1989;70:633–5.
    pubmed: 2926503
  18. Ng TH, Chan KH, Leung SY, Mann KS. An unusual complication of silastic dural substitute: Case report.. Neurosurgery 1990;27:491–3.
    pubmed: 2234349
  19. Siccardi D, Ventimiglia A. Fibrotic-haemorrhagic reaction to synthetic dural substitute.. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1995;132:148–9.
    pubmed: 7754852
  20. Nakagawa S, Hayashi T, Anegawa S, Nakashima S, Shimokawa S, Furukawa Y. Postoperative infection after duraplasty with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sheet.. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2003;43:120–4.
    pubmed: 12699118
  21. Malliti M, Page P, Gury C, Chomette E, Nataf F, Roux FX. Comparison of deep wound infection rates using a synthetic dural substitute (neuro-patch) or pericranium graft for dural closure: A clinical review of 1 year.. Neurosurgery 2004;54:599–603.
    pubmed: 15028133
  22. Yoshioka N. Cranial reconstruction following the removal of an infected synthetic dura mater substitute.. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2014;2:e134.
    pmc: PMC4174208pubmed: 25289327
  23. Ohbayashi N, Inagawa T, Katoh Y, Kumano K, Nagasako R, Hada H. Complication of silastic dural substitute 20 years after dural plasty.. Surg Neurol 1994;41:338–41.
    pubmed: 8165508
  24. Teo M, Martin S, Bowness J, Eljamel MS. Dural graft-induced fibrotic mass twelve years after successful treatment of skull base non-Hodgkin lymphoma mimicking recurrence: Case report and literature review.. Open J Mod Neurosurg 2014;4:7–12.
  25. Ström JO, Boström S, Bobinski L, Theodorsson A. Low-grade infection complicating silastic dural substitute 32 years post-operatively.. Brain Inj 2011;25:250–4.
    pubmed: 21219095
  26. Parízek J, Husek Z, Mericka P, Téra J, Nemecek S, Spacek J. Ovine pericardium: A new material for duraplasty.. J Neurosurg 1996;84:508–13.
    pubmed: 8609566
  27. Parízek J, Mericka P, Husek Z, Suba P, Spacek J, Nemecek S. Detailed evaluation of 2959 allogeneic and xenogeneic dense connective tissue grafts (fascia lata, pericardium, and dura mater) used in the course of 20 years for duraplasty in neurosurgery.. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1997;139:827–38.
    pubmed: 9351987
  28. Filippi R, Schwarz M, Voth D, Reisch R, Grunert P, Perneczky A. Bovine pericardium for duraplasty: Clinical results in 32 patients.. Neurosurg Rev 2001;24:103–7.
    pubmed: 11485229
  29. Durasis Study Group, Bejjani GK, Zabramski J. Safety and efficacy of the porcine small intestinal submucosa dural substitute: Results of a prospective multicenter study and literature review.. J Neurosurg 2007;106:1028–33.
    pubmed: 17564175
  30. Montinaro A, Gianfreda CD, Proto P. Equine pericardium for dural grafts: Clinical results in 200 patients.. J Neurosurg Sci 2007;51:17–9.
    pubmed: 17369787
  31. Norrby E. Prions and protein-folding diseases.. J Intern Med 2011;270:1–14.
    pubmed: 21481020
  32. Antloga K, Meszaros J, Malchesky PS, McDonnell GE. Prion disease and medical devices.. ASAIO J 2000;46:S69–72.
    pubmed: 11110297
  33. Rutala WA, Weber DJ. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: Recommendations for disinfection and sterilization.. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32:1348–56.
    pubmed: 11303271
  34. Papacchini M, Mansi A, Marta I. Prevention of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy and methods for prion inactivation.. Med Lav 2003;94:271–84.
    pubmed: 12918319
  35. Blättler T. Implications of prion diseases for neurosurgery.. Neurosurg Rev 2002;25:195–203.
    pubmed: 12172722
  36. Zhang J. The structural stability of wild-type horse prion protein.. J Biomol Struct Dyn 2011;29:369–77.
    pubmed: 21875155
  37. Khan MQ, Sweeting B, Mulligan VK, Arslan PE, Cashman NR, Pai EF. Prion disease susceptibility is affected by beta-structure folding propensity and local side-chain interactions in PrP.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:19808–13.
    pmc: PMC2993331pubmed: 21041683
  38. Pérez DR, Damberger FF, Wüthrich K. Horse prion protein NMR structure and comparisons with related variants of the mouse prion protein.. J Mol Biol 2010;400:121–8.
    pubmed: 20460128
  39. Giachin G, Biljan I, Ilc G, Plavec J, Legname G. Probing early misfolding events in prion protein mutants by NMR spectroscopy.. Molecules 2013;18:9451–76.
    pmc: PMC6270549pubmed: 23966072
  40. Biroli F, Esposito F, Fusco M, Bani GG, Signorelli A, de Divitiis O. Novel equine collagen-only dural substitute.. Neurosurgery 2008;62(3 Suppl 1):273–4.
    pubmed: 18424997
  41. Cavallo LM, Solari D, Somma T, Di Somma A, Chiaramonte C, Cappabianca P. Use of equine pericardium sheet (LYOMESH®) as dura mater substitute in endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery.. Transl Med UniSa 2013;7:23–8.
    pmc: PMC3829788pubmed: 24251248
  42. Zerris VA, James KS, Roberts JB, Bell E, Heilman CB. Repair of the dura mater with processed collagen devices.. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007;83:580–8.
    pubmed: 17465025
  43. Esposito F, Cappabianca P, Fusco M, Cavallo LM, Bani GG, Biroli F. Collagen-only biomatrix as a novel dural substitute. Examination of the efficacy, safety and outcome: Clinical experience on a series of 208 patients.. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2008;110:343–51.
    pubmed: 18242823
  44. Esposito F, Grimod G, Cavallo LM, Lanterna L, Biroli F, Cappabianca P. Collagen-only biomatrix as dural substitute: What happened after a 5-year observational follow-up study.. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013;115:1735–7.
    pubmed: 23622936
  45. Di Stefano DA, Andreasi Bassi M, Cinci L, Pieri L, Ammirabile G. Treatment of a bone defect consequent to the removal of a periapical cyst with equine bone and equine membranes: Clinical and histological outcome.. Minerva Stomatol 2012;61:477–90.
    pubmed: 23207673
  46. Materni A. Managing a vestibular infra-bony periodontal defect in the aesthetic zone through bone regeneration: A case report.. Stomatolog 2013;19:30–5.
  47. Ernestus RI, Ketter G, Klug N. Dura-plasty in intracranial operations.. Zentralbl Neurochir 1995;56:106–10.
    pubmed: 7483889
  48. Connolly ID, Cole T, Veeravagu A, Popat R, Ratliff J, Li G. Craniotomy for resection of meningioma: An age-stratified analysis of the MarketScan longitudinal database.. World Neurosurg 2015;84:1864–70.
    pubmed: 26318633
  49. Morokoff AP, Zauberman J, Black PM. Surgery for convexity meningiomas.. Neurosurgery 2008;63:427–33.
    pubmed: 18812953
  50. Sanai N, Sughrue ME, Shangari G, Chung K, Berger MS, McDermott MW. Risk profile associated with convexity meningioma resection in the modern neurosurgical era.. J Neurosurg 2010;112:913–9.
    pubmed: 19645533
  51. Nanda A, Bir SC, Konar S, Maiti TK, Bollam P. World Health Organization grade I convexity meningiomas: Study on outcomes, complications and recurrence rates.. World Neurosurg 2015 pii: S1878-875001651-4.
    pubmed: 26704204

Citations

This article has been cited 8 times.
  1. Meslier T, D'Antin JC, Julio G, Roig A. A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Studies on Bacterial Cellulose: From the Earliest Uses to Contemporary Innovations. Adv Healthc Mater 2025 Oct;14(27):e02189.
    doi: 10.1002/adhm.202502189pubmed: 40685851google scholar: lookup
  2. Khurana D, Suresh A, Nayak R, Shetty M, Sarda RK, Knowles JC, Kim HW, Singh RK, Singh BN. Biosubstitutes for dural closure: Unveiling research, application, and future prospects of dura mater alternatives. J Tissue Eng 2024 Jan-Dec;15:20417314241228118.
    doi: 10.1177/20417314241228118pubmed: 38343772google scholar: lookup
  3. Dong RP, Zhang Q, Yang LL, Cheng XL, Zhao JW. Clinical management of dural defects: A review. World J Clin Cases 2023 May 6;11(13):2903-2915.
    doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i13.2903pubmed: 37215425google scholar: lookup
  4. Zhang ZD, Zhao LY, Liu YR, Zhang JY, Xie SH, Lin YQ, Tang ZN, Fang HY, Yang Y, Li SZ, Liu JX, Sheng HS. Absorbable Artificial Dura Versus Nonabsorbable Artificial Dura in Decompressive Craniectomy for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Two Centers. Front Surg 2022;9:877038.
    doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.877038pubmed: 35865039google scholar: lookup
  5. Pasculli A, Gurrado A, De Luca GM, Mele A, Marzullo A, Mangone A, Cellamare S, Ferraro V, Maqoud F, Caggiani MC, Rana F, Cavallaro G, Prete FP, Tricarico D, Altomare CD, Testini M. Bridging repair of the abdominal wall in a rat experimental model. Comparison between uncoated and polyethylene oxide-coated equine pericardium meshes. Sci Rep 2020 Apr 24;10(1):6959.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63886-9pubmed: 32332926google scholar: lookup
  6. Yang C, Yang X, Lan X, Zhang H, Wang M, Zhang Y, Xu Y, Zhen P. [Structure and mechanical characteristics of spinal dura mater in different segments of sheep's spine]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2019 Feb 15;33(2):232-238.
    doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201807085pubmed: 30739422google scholar: lookup
  7. Sun H, Wang H, Diao Y, Tu Y, Li X, Zhao W, Ren J, Zhang S. Large retrospective study of artificial dura substitute in patients with traumatic brain injury undergo decompressive craniectomy. Brain Behav 2018 May;8(5):e00907.
    doi: 10.1002/brb3.907pubmed: 29761002google scholar: lookup
  8. Droutsas K, Papaconstantinou D, Georgalas I, Kymionis G, Andreanos K, Stamou E, Mamas N. Equine pericardium for tectonic globe repair. Int Ophthalmol 2019 Jan;39(1):225-230.
    doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0788-8pubmed: 29260497google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,359 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.