FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Behav Processes / A preliminary study of the effects of handling type on horse...
Behavioural processes2009; 82(2); 202-210; doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.06.012

A preliminary study of the effects of handling type on horses’ emotional reactivity and the human-horse relationship.

Abstract: Handling is a crucial component of the human-horse relationship. Here, we report data from an experiment conducted to assess and compare the effect of two training methods. Two groups of six Welsh mares were trained during four sessions of 50 min, one handled with traditional exercises (halter leading, grooming/brushing, lifting feet, lunging and pseudo-saddling (using only girth and saddle pad) and the second group with natural horsemanship exercises (desensitization, yielding to body pressure, lunging and free-lunging). Emotional reactivity (ER) and the human-horse relationship (HHR) were assessed both prior to and following handling. A social isolation test, a neophobia test and a bridge test were used to assess ER. HHR was assessed through test of spontaneous approach to, and forced approach by, an unknown human. Horses' ER decreased after both types of handling as indicated by decreases in the occurrence of whinnying during stressful situations. Head movement (jerk/shake) was the most sensitive variable to handling type. In the spontaneous approach tests, horses in the traditional handling group showed higher latencies to approach a motionless person after handling than did the natural horsemanship group. Our study suggests that natural horsemanship exercises could be more efficient than traditional exercises for improving horses' HHR.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2009-07-08 PubMed ID: 19591910DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.06.012Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article presents a study examining the impact of two different handling/training methods on the emotional behavior and human-horse relationship of Welsh mares. It reveals that natural horsemanship exercises may be more beneficial in enhancing the human-horse relationship as compared to traditional exercises.

Details of the Experiment

  • The study conducted an experiment on twelve Welsh mares, split into two groups of six. Each group underwent four sessions of 50-minute training.
  • One group was trained using traditional exercises that included halter leading, grooming/brushing, lifting feet, lunging, and pseudo-saddling.
  • The second group was trained using natural horsemanship exercises which involved desensitization, yielding to body pressure, lunging, and free lunging.

Measurement of Emotional Reactivity and Human-Horse Relationship

  • Prior to and after the handling exercises, emotional reactivity (ER) and the human-horse relationship (HHR) in the horses were assessed. There were three tests conducted to assess ER: a social isolation test, a neophobia test, and a bridge test.
  • The assessment of HHR was done through a spontaneous approach to, and a forced approach by, an unknown person to the horse.

Results of the Study

  • As per the findings, the emotional reactiveness of the horses reduced after both types of handling. This was evident in the decrease in occurrences of whinnying, which is a vocal expression, during stressful situations.
  • The research found out that the type of head movement (jerk/shake) was the most sensitive variable to handling type.
  • In the spontaneous approach tests, the horses from the traditional handling group showed higher latencies or delays in approaching a motionless person after handling. This response was lesser in the horses from the natural horsemanship group, suggesting a better HHR.
  • The study concludes that natural horsemanship exercises could be potentially more efficient than traditional exercises for improving horses’ HHR and reducing their emotional reactivity.

Cite This Article

APA
Fureix C, Pagès M, Bon R, Lassalle JM, Kuntz P, Gonzalez G. (2009). A preliminary study of the effects of handling type on horses’ emotional reactivity and the human-horse relationship. Behav Processes, 82(2), 202-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2009.06.012

Publication

Behavioural processes
ISSN: 1872-8308
NlmUniqueID: 7703854
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 82
Issue: 2
Pages: 202-210

Researcher Affiliations

Fureix, Carole
  • Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, UMR 5169 - UFR SVT - Université Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse, France.
Pagès, Magali
    Bon, Richard
      Lassalle, Jean-Michel
        Kuntz, Philippe
          Gonzalez, Georges

            MeSH Terms

            • Animals
            • Behavior, Animal / physiology
            • Fear
            • Female
            • Handling, Psychological
            • Horses / psychology
            • Humans
            • Learning
            • Object Attachment
            • Social Isolation
            • Temperament / physiology
            • Video Recording

            Citations

            This article has been cited 20 times.
            1. Bradshaw-Wiley E, Randle H. The Effect of Stabling Routines on Potential Behavioural Indicators of Affective State in Horses and Their Use in Assessing Quality of Life.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Mar 15;13(6).
              doi: 10.3390/ani13061065pubmed: 36978606google scholar: lookup
            2. Riva MG, Sobrero L, Menchetti L, Minero M, Padalino B, Dalla Costa E. Unhandled horses classified with broken/unbroken test (BUT) exhibit longer avoidance, flight reactions, and displacement behaviors when approached by humans.. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:1022255.
              doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1022255pubmed: 36225797google scholar: lookup
            3. Debeljak N, Košmerlj A, Altimiras J, Šemrov MZ. Relationship between anatomical characteristics and personality traits in Lipizzan horses.. Sci Rep 2022 Jul 23;12(1):12618.
              doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16627-zpubmed: 35871229google scholar: lookup
            4. Kelly KJ, McD￮ LA, Mears K. The Effect of Human-Horse Interactions on Equine Behaviour, Physiology, and Welfare: A Scoping Review.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Sep 24;11(10).
              doi: 10.3390/ani11102782pubmed: 34679804google scholar: lookup
            5. Menchetti L, Dalla Costa E, Minero M, Padalino B. Development and Validation of a Test for the Classification of Horses as Broken or Unbroken.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Aug 4;11(8).
              doi: 10.3390/ani11082303pubmed: 34438758google scholar: lookup
            6. Hartmann E, Rehn T, Christensen JW, Nielsen PP, McGreevy P. From the Horse's Perspective: Investigating Attachment Behaviour and the Effect of Training Method on Fear Reactions and Ease of Handling-A Pilot Study.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Feb 9;11(2).
              doi: 10.3390/ani11020457pubmed: 33572351google scholar: lookup
            7. Hemsworth LM, Jongman EC, Coleman GJ. The Human-Horse Relationship: Identifying the Antecedents of Horse Owner Attitudes towards Horse Husbandry and Management Behaviour.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jan 22;11(2).
              doi: 10.3390/ani11020278pubmed: 33499202google scholar: lookup
            8. Pérez Fraga P, Gerencsér L, Andics A. Human proximity seeking in family pigs and dogs.. Sci Rep 2020 Nov 30;10(1):20883.
              doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77643-5pubmed: 33257733google scholar: lookup
            9. Fenner K, Matlock S, Williams J, Wilson B, McLean A, Serpell J, McGreevy P. Validation of the Equine Behaviour Assessment and Research Questionnaire (E-BARQ): A New Survey Instrument for Exploring and Monitoring the Domestic Equine Triad.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Oct 28;10(11).
              doi: 10.3390/ani10111982pubmed: 33126670google scholar: lookup
            10. Kubasiewicz LM, Rodrigues JB, Norris SL, Watson TL, Rickards K, Bell N, Judge A, Raw Z, Burden FA. The Welfare Aggregation and Guidance (WAG) Tool: A New Method to Summarize Global Welfare Assessment Data for Equids.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Mar 25;10(4).
              doi: 10.3390/ani10040546pubmed: 32218133google scholar: lookup
            11. Scopa C, Contalbrigo L, Greco A, Lanatà A, Scilingo EP, Baragli P. Emotional Transfer in Human-Horse Interaction: New Perspectives on Equine Assisted Interventions.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Nov 26;9(12).
              doi: 10.3390/ani9121030pubmed: 31779120google scholar: lookup
            12. Rosselot P, Mendonça T, González I, Tadich T. Behavioral and Physiological Differences between Working Horses and Chilean Rodeo Horses in a Handling Test.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Jun 29;9(7).
              doi: 10.3390/ani9070397pubmed: 31261934google scholar: lookup
            13. Fenner K, Caspar G, Hyde M, Henshall C, Dhand N, Probyn-Rapsey F, Dashper K, McLean A, McGreevy P. It's all about the sex, or is it? Humans, horses and temperament.. PLoS One 2019;14(5):e0216699.
              doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216699pubmed: 31086385google scholar: lookup
            14. Safryghin A, Hebesberger DV, Wascher CAF. Testing for Behavioral and Physiological Responses of Domestic Horses (Equus caballus) Across Different Contexts - Consistency Over Time and Effects of Context.. Front Psychol 2019;10:849.
              doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00849pubmed: 31057468google scholar: lookup
            15. Finka LR, Ward J, Farnworth MJ, Mills DS. Owner personality and the wellbeing of their cats share parallels with the parent-child relationship.. PLoS One 2019;14(2):e0211862.
              doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211862pubmed: 30721257google scholar: lookup
            16. Luna D, Tadich TA. Why Should Human-Animal Interactions Be Included in Research of Working Equids' Welfare?. Animals (Basel) 2019 Jan 30;9(2).
              doi: 10.3390/ani9020042pubmed: 30704022google scholar: lookup
            17. Kydd E, Padalino B, Henshall C, McGreevy P. An analysis of equine round pen training videos posted online: Differences between amateur and professional trainers.. PLoS One 2017;12(9):e0184851.
              doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184851pubmed: 28922395google scholar: lookup
            18. Luna D, Vásquez RA, Rojas M, Tadich TA. Welfare Status of Working Horses and Owners' Perceptions of Their Animals.. Animals (Basel) 2017 Aug 1;7(8).
              doi: 10.3390/ani7080056pubmed: 28788109google scholar: lookup
            19. Fenner K, Webb H, Starling MJ, Freire R, Buckley P, McGreevy PD. Effects of pre-conditioning on behavior and physiology of horses during a standardised learning task.. PLoS One 2017;12(3):e0174313.
              doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174313pubmed: 28358892google scholar: lookup
            20. Kang OD, Yun YM. Influence of Horse and Rider on Stress during Horse-riding Lesson Program.. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2016 Jun;29(6):895-900.
              doi: 10.5713/ajas.15.1068pubmed: 27004819google scholar: lookup
            Subscribe to our newsletter
            Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.