Abstract: Little is known about wastage in riding horses and the factors like fitness and workload that may reduce injuries and maximise welfare. To evaluate fitness, workload and reasons for premature training ends (PTEs) and temporary training breaks (TTBs) during a nine week training period, two groups of riding horses were used: Group A consisting of 58 horses used for student equitation courses (32 with training prior to admission and 26 without) and Group B consisting of 26 horses owned by two riding schools (school-I and school-II). To assess fitness, all horses performed a standardised exercise test (SET) at the start (SET-I) and end of the training period (SET-II) measuring heart rate (HR bpm) and speed (m/s). In addition, all horses were monitored daily during the training period for their health and workload. In Group A, trained horses had significantly lower HRs in SET-I (P=0.05) compared to untrained horses and in SET-II, trained horses tended to have lower HRs than untrained horses, though this was not statistically significant (P=0.057). During the training period all horses received an identical workload. A total of 19.0% of Group A horses ended the training period prematurely for veterinary reasons (PTEV); of those untrained horses had earlier a PTEV in the training period (after 2.8 ± 1.3 weeks) than trained horses (after 4.1 ± 1.5 weeks, P=0.030). In Group B, school-I and school-II horses did not differ significantly in fitness level nor in workload. More school-II horses ended the training period prematurely for veterinary reasons (n=7; 70%) compared to school-I horses (n=4; 25%, P=0.032), although seven (63.6%) of these horses were still continuously used in riding lessons. In both groups (A and B), small injuries (without a temporary training break) were significantly associated with premature training ends for veterinary reasons later on: in Group A small injuries preceded 27.3% of the PTEVs (P=0.005) and in Group B small injuries preceded 54.5% of the PTEVs (P=0.030). In conclusion, as all horses in each subgroup had the same workload, the occurrence of PTEV seemed not associated with the workload. In Group A horses, level of fitness seems to be an important factor for the point in time injuries will occur during the training period. In all horses, injuries were more likely when a temporary training break was not taken following seemingly minor injuries. Since a lot of injured Group B horses were used in riding lessons against veterinary advice, this may indicate that riding school owners have different perception on welfare and if true this may cause serious welfare problems.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The study sought to understand how fitness and workload may impact the longevity of riding horses, examining the factors that can lead to premature training ends (PTEs) and temporary training breaks (TTBs). The researchers found an association between the fitness levels of horses and when injuries occur during the training period, but the workload itself wasn’t directly linked to premature training ends. Furthermore, it was observed that horses were more prone to injuries when breaks weren’t taken following minor injuries.
Methodology
The researchers conducted a prospective 9-week training study involving two groups of horses. Group A consisted of 58 horses used for student equitation, amongst which 32 had prior training and 26 were untrained. Group B constituted 26 horses owned by two riding schools.
Each horse completed a standardized exercise test (SET) at the beginning and end of the period to measure heart rate and speed, which would determine fitness levels.
The health and workload of all the horses were monitored daily during the training period.
Findings
In Group A, horses who had prior training exhibited lower heart rates on the first SET than untrained horses, indicating better fitness levels. This difference was less pronounced, albeit still present, by the end of the training period. Standardized workload across all horses did not yield any significant differences.
However, 19% of the horses in Group A ended their training prematurely due to veterinary reasons. Interestingly, untrained horses exhibited this trend earlier in their training compared to trained ones.
Premature training ends due to veterinary reasons were also more common in Group B, particularly in the horse group from one of the riding schools (school-II). In fact, despite these issues, over 60% of horses in school-II continued to be used in riding lessons. Fitness levels and workload did not significantly differ between school-I and school-II horses.
Minor injuries without an immediate training break significantly preceded premature training ends in both group A and B.
Conclusion
The research concludes that the level of fitness appears to play a key role in determining at what point in the training period injuries occur, rather than the workload itself.
It was also found that injuries were more likely to occur if a temporary training break was not taken after minor injuries, stressing the importance of rest periods.
Despite veterinary advice, many horses from Group B continued to be used in riding lessons after premature ends, which might indicate a discrepancy in welfare perceptions among riding school owners, potentially leading to serious welfare problems for the horses.
Cite This Article
APA
Munsters CC, van den Broek J, van Weeren R, Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM.
(2012).
A prospective study on fitness, workload and reasons for premature training ends and temporary training breaks in two groups of riding horses.
Prev Vet Med, 108(2-3), 199-208.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.08.005
Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 114, 3584 CM, Utrecht, The Netherlands. carolien@munsters.nl