FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / A Qualitative Exploration of the Lived Experiences and Persp...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2025; 15(15); 2240; doi: 10.3390/ani15152240

A Qualitative Exploration of the Lived Experiences and Perspectives of Equine-Assisted Services Practitioners in the UK and Ireland.

Abstract: Equine-Assisted Services (EAS), which incorporate horses in a variety of ways in an effort to improve human wellbeing, have grown in popularity in recent years. Although much research has been conducted regarding the benefits that horses may provide for human health and wellbeing, little attention has been paid to practitioners' experiences and perspectives of the field, despite the fact they are uniquely positioned to advance our understanding of this area. This study aimed to explore practitioners' lived experiences of EAS, focusing on the benefits they observed, possible underlying mechanisms for any health benefits witnessed, and challenges faced in the area. Fifteen EAS practitioners from the UK/Ireland took part in qualitative semi-structured interviews, analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Five themes were identified, three of which related to the horse's influence on building connections, relationships, and enriching the process, whilst the remainder explored challenges within the field of EAS. These themes were explored through the practitioners' lens, where possible linking them to our current understanding of human-animal interactions and related fields in the literature. Findings showed that horses, through EAS, were considered invaluable for building relationships, relational skills, and motivation to engage in whichever service was being provided. However, EAS was also viewed as complex. Concerns regarding competencies to practice, training, and lack of governance were expressed. These areas need further exploration and progress if EAS is to grow in efficacy and attain professional status.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-07-30 PubMed ID: 40805030PubMed Central: PMC12345575DOI: 10.3390/ani15152240Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article investigates the lived experiences and viewpoints of Equine-Assisted Services (EAS) practitioners in the UK and Ireland. The study delves into the practitioners’ perspectives on the observed advantages, potential health benefits, and challenges of EAS.

Objective and Methodology

  • The primary objective of the study is to explore EAS practitioners’ personal experiences, with a particular focus on the benefits they have noticed, the potential underlying mechanisms contributing to health benefits, and challenges they encounter in this specific field.
  • The research involved 15 EAS practitioners from the UK and Ireland who participated in qualitative semi-structured interviews.
  • The researchers utilized reflexive thematic analysis — a method for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) within data — to examine the interview responses.

Key Findings

  • The analysis revealed five significant themes, three of which related to the horse’s influence on forging connections, forming relationships, and enriching the process.
  • The practitioners viewed horses, within the context of EAS, as priceless for fostering relationships, developing relational skills, and stimulating motivation to participate in the service provided. They also noted that horses appeared to contribute to the overall human wellbeing.
  • However, the study also highlighted some complexities and challenges associated with EAS, such as concerns about practitioner competencies, appropriate training, and lack of regulation in the field.

Implications and Future Research

  • The results, while illuminating the positive aspects and potential benefits of EAS, also raise important issues that need further exploration.
  • To enhance the efficacy of EAS and promote its professional status, further research should also concentrate on addressing the identified challenges related to practitioner competencies, training requirements, and governance in the field of EAS.

Cite This Article

APA
Seery R, Graham-Wisener L, Wells DL. (2025). A Qualitative Exploration of the Lived Experiences and Perspectives of Equine-Assisted Services Practitioners in the UK and Ireland. Animals (Basel), 15(15), 2240. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15152240

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 15
Issue: 15
PII: 2240

Researcher Affiliations

Seery, Rita
  • Animal Behaviour Centre, School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK.
Graham-Wisener, Lisa
  • Animal Behaviour Centre, School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK.
Wells, Deborah L
  • Animal Behaviour Centre, School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK.

Grant Funding

  • N/A / DAERA (Department of Agriculture, the Enironment and Rural Affairs) Northern Ireland. Part of a PhD studenship

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 136 references
  1. Bass M.M., Duchowny C.A., Llabre M.M.. The effects of therapeutic horseback riding on social functioning in children with autism.. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2009;39:1261–1267.
    doi: 10.1007/s10803-009-0734-3pubmed: 19350376google scholar: lookup
  2. Gabriels R.L., Pan Z., Dechant B., Agnew J.A., Brim N., Mesibov G.. Randomized controlled trial of therapeutic horseback riding in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder.. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 2015;54:541–549.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2015.04.007pmc: PMC4475278pubmed: 26088658google scholar: lookup
  3. McDaniel Peters B.C., Wood W.. Autism and equine-assisted interventions: A systematic mapping review.. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2017;47:3220–3242.
    doi: 10.1007/s10803-017-3219-9pubmed: 28733851google scholar: lookup
  4. Aviv T.-L.M., Katz Y.J., Berant E.. The Contribution of Therapeutic Horseback Riding to the Improvement of Executive Functions and Self-Esteem Among Children with ADHD.. J. Atten. Disord. 2021;25:1743–1753.
    doi: 10.1177/1087054720925898pubmed: 32508191google scholar: lookup
  5. Fisher P.W., Lazarov A., Lowell A., Arnon S., Turner J.B., Bergman M., Ryba M., Such S., Marohasy C., Zhu X.. Equine-Assisted Therapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Military Veterans.. J. Clin. Psychiatry. 2021;82:21m14005.
    doi: 10.4088/JCP.21m14005pubmed: 34464523google scholar: lookup
  6. Frederick K.E., Ivey Hatz J., Lanning B.. Not just horsing around: The impact of equine-assisted learning on levels of hope and depression in at-risk adolescents.. Community Ment. Health J. 2015;51:809–817.
    doi: 10.1007/s10597-015-9836-xpubmed: 25698076google scholar: lookup
  7. Hoagwood K.E., Acri M., Morrissey M., Peth-Pierce R., Seibel L., Seag D.E., Vincent A., Guo F., Hamovitch E.K., Horwitz S.. Adaptive Riding Incorporating Cognitive-Behavioral Elements for Youth with Anxiety: An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Study.. Hum.-Anim. Interact. Bull. 2021;9:60–78.
    doi: 10.1079/hai.2021.0038google scholar: lookup
  8. Kendall E., Maujean A.. Horse play: A brief psychological intervention for disengaged youths.. J. Creat. Ment. Health. 2015;10:46–61.
    doi: 10.1080/15401383.2014.962720google scholar: lookup
  9. Davis E., Davies B., Wolfe R., Raadsveld R., Heine B., Thomason P., Dobson F., Graham H.K.. A randomized controlled trial of the impact of therapeutic horse riding on the quality of life, health, and function of children with cerebral palsy.. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2009;51:111–119.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03245.xpubmed: 19191844google scholar: lookup
  10. Lavín-Pérez A.M., Collado-Mateo D., Caña-Pino A., Villafaina S., Parraca J.A., Apolo-Arenas M.D.. Benefits of Equine-Assisted Therapies in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review.. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2022;2022:9656503.
    doi: 10.1155/2022/9656503pmc: PMC9068279pubmed: 35529929google scholar: lookup
  11. Macauley B.L., Gutierrez K.M.. The effectiveness of hippotherapy for children with language-learning disabilities.. Commun. Disord. Q. 2004;25:205–217.
    doi: 10.1177/15257401040250040501google scholar: lookup
  12. Blakely J.M.. Critical Aspects of Equine Assisted Therapy: A Qualitative Study.. .
  13. Burgon H.L.. ‘Queen of the world’: Experiences of ‘at-risk’ young people participating in equine-assisted learning/therapy.. J. Soc. Work. Pract. 2011;25:165–183.
    doi: 10.1080/02650533.2011.561304google scholar: lookup
  14. Carey J.. Exploring the Impact of Equine Facilitated Learning on the Social and Emotional Well-Being of Young People Affected by Educational Inequality.. .
  15. Stoppard L., Donaldson J.. Evaluation of equine-assisted learning in education for primary school children: A qualitative study of the perspectives of teachers.. Front. Educ. 2024;9:1275280.
    doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1275280google scholar: lookup
  16. Seery R., Wells D.. An Exploratory Study into the Backgrounds and Perspectives of Equine-Assisted Service Practitioners.. Animals 2024;14:347.
    doi: 10.3390/ani14020347pmc: PMC10812823pubmed: 38275806google scholar: lookup
  17. Kelle U.. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in research practice: Purposes and advantages.. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006;3:293–311.
  18. Dźwigoł H.. The Role of Qualitative Methods in Social Research: Analyzing Phenomena Beyond Numbers.. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology .
    doi: 10.29119/1641-3466.2024.206.7google scholar: lookup
  19. Lim W.M.. What Is Qualitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines.. Australas. Mark. J. 2024;33:014413582241264619.
    doi: 10.1177/14413582241264619google scholar: lookup
  20. Gough B., Lyons A.. The future of qualitative research in psychology: Accentuating the positive.. Integr. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 2016;50:234–243.
    doi: 10.1007/s12124-015-9320-8pubmed: 26179872google scholar: lookup
  21. Queirós A., Faria D., Almeida F.. Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods.. Eur. J. Educ. Stud. 2017;3:369–387.
    doi: 10.5281/zenodo.887089google scholar: lookup
  22. Campbell K.A., Orr E., Durepos P., Nguyen L., Li L., Whitmore C., Gehrke P., Graham L., Jack S.M.. Reflexive thematic analysis for applied qualitative health research.. Qual. Rep. 2021;26:2011–2028.
    doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5010google scholar: lookup
  23. Braun V., Clarke V.. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2021;18:328–352.
    doi: 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238google scholar: lookup
  24. Braun V., Clarke V.. Supporting best practice in reflexive thematic analysis reporting in Palliative Medicine: A review of published research and introduction to the Reflexive Thematic Analysis Reporting Guidelines (RTARG). Palliat Med. 2024;38:608–616.
    doi: 10.1177/02692163241234800pmc: PMC11157981pubmed: 38469804google scholar: lookup
  25. Fletcher A.J.. Applying critical realism in qualitative research: Methodology meets method.. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 2017;20:181–194.
    doi: 10.1080/13645579.2016.1144401google scholar: lookup
  26. Lauzier-Jobin F., Brunson L., Olson B.. Introduction to the special issue on critical realism.. J. Community Psychol. 2025;53:e22981.
    doi: 10.1002/jcop.22981pubmed: 36573800google scholar: lookup
  27. Braun V., Clarke V.. Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be (com) ing a knowing researcher.. Int. J. Transgender Health. 2023;24:1–6.
    doi: 10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597pmc: PMC9879167pubmed: 36713144google scholar: lookup
  28. Malterud K., Siersma V.D., Guassora A.D.. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power.. Qual. Health Res. 2016;26:1753–1760.
    doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444pubmed: 26613970google scholar: lookup
  29. Braun V., Clarke V.. Using thematic analysis in psychology.. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
    doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oagoogle scholar: lookup
  30. Birke L.. Learning to speak horse”: The culture of” Natural Horsemanship.. Soc. Anim. 2007;15:217–239.
    doi: 10.1163/156853007X217177google scholar: lookup
  31. Hockenhull J., Birke L., Creighton E.. The horse’s tale: Narratives of caring for/about horses.. Soc. Anim. 2010;18:331–347.
    doi: 10.1163/156853010X524307google scholar: lookup
  32. Maurício L.S., Leme D.P., Hötzel M.J.. The easiest becomes the rule: Beliefs, knowledge and attitudes of equine practitioners and enthusiasts regarding horse welfare.. Animals 2024;14:1282.
    doi: 10.3390/ani14091282pmc: PMC11083815pubmed: 38731286google scholar: lookup
  33. Hagerty B.M., Lynch-Sauer J., Patusky K.L., Bouwsema M.. An emerging theory of human relatedness.. Image J. Nurs. Scholarsh. 1993;25:291–296.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1993.tb00262.xpubmed: 8288296google scholar: lookup
  34. Macri A.M., Wells D.L.. Connecting to zoos and aquariums during a COVID-19 lockdown.. J. Zool. Bot. Gard. 2023;4:476–489.
    doi: 10.3390/jzbg4020035google scholar: lookup
  35. Hultsjö S., Jormfeldt H.. The Role of the Horse in an Equine-Assisted Group Intervention-as Conceptualized by Persons with Psychotic Conditions.. Issues Ment. Health Nurs. 2022;43:201–208.
    doi: 10.1080/01612840.2021.1975332pubmed: 34543163google scholar: lookup
  36. Wilson E.O.. Biophilia.. .
  37. Peppard L.. The Connection Paradigm.. J. Am. Psychiatr. Nurses Assoc. 2024;30:914–917.
    doi: 10.1177/10783903241278002pubmed: 39269012google scholar: lookup
  38. Peppard L.. Board of directors’ column: Building connection competence.. J. Am. Psychiatr. Nurses Assoc. 2024;30:187–190.
    doi: 10.1177/10783903231216734pubmed: 38093523google scholar: lookup
  39. Wickramaratne P.J., Yangchen T., Lepow L., Patra B.G., Glicksburg B., Talati A., Adekkanattu P., Ryu E., Biernacka J.M., Charney A.. Social connectedness as a determinant of mental health: A scoping review.. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:e0275004.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275004pmc: PMC9560615pubmed: 36228007google scholar: lookup
  40. Bauer K.L., Johnson-Koenke R., Fort M.P.. What Is Social Connection in the Context of Human Need: An Interdisciplinary Literature Review.. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2025;22:363.
    doi: 10.3390/ijerph22030363pmc: PMC11941835pubmed: 40238403google scholar: lookup
  41. Cacioppo J.T., Cacioppo S.. The growing problem of loneliness.. Lancet. 2018;39:426.
    doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30142-9pmc: PMC6530780pubmed: 29407030google scholar: lookup
  42. Moreno-Agostino D., Wu Y.-T., Daskalopoulou C., Hasan M.T., Huisman M., Prina M.. Global trends in the prevalence and incidence of depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. J. Affect. Disord. 2021;281:235–243.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.035pubmed: 33338841google scholar: lookup
  43. Meng S.-Q., Cheng J.-L., Li Y.-Y., Yang X.-Q., Zheng J.-W., Chang X.-W., Shi Y., Chen Y., Lu L., Sun Y.. Global prevalence of digital addiction in general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2022;92:102128.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102128pubmed: 35150965google scholar: lookup
  44. Sardinha L., Maheu-Giroux M., Stöckl H., Meyer S.R., García-Moreno C.. Global, regional, and national prevalence estimates of physical or sexual, or both, intimate partner violence against women in 2018.. Lancet. 2022;399:803–813.
    doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02664-7pmc: PMC8885817pubmed: 35182472google scholar: lookup
  45. Stanton B., Davis B., Laraque-Arena D.. Global Burden of Violence.. Pediatr. Clin. 2021;68:339–349.
    doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2020.12.001pubmed: 33678289google scholar: lookup
  46. Marinucci M., Pancani L., Aureli N., Riva P.. Online social connections as surrogates of face-to-face interactions: A longitudinal study under Covid-19 isolation.. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2022;128:107102.
    doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107102google scholar: lookup
  47. Carlson E.N.. Overcoming the Barriers to Self-Knowledge:Mindfulness as a Path to Seeing Yourself as You Really Are.. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2013;8:173–186.
    doi: 10.1177/1745691612462584pubmed: 26172498google scholar: lookup
  48. Holt-Lunstad J.. The major health implications of social connection.. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2021;30:251–259.
    doi: 10.1177/0963721421999630google scholar: lookup
  49. Klussman K., Langer J., Nichols A.L., Curtin N.. What’s stopping us from connecting with ourselves? A qualitative examination of barriers to self-connection.. Int. J. Appl. Posit. Psychol. 2020;5:137–152.
    doi: 10.1007/s41042-020-00031-xgoogle scholar: lookup
  50. Waite S., Husain F., Scandone B., Forsyth E., Piggott H.. ‘It’s not for people like (them)’: Structural and cultural barriers to children and young people engaging with nature outside schooling.. J. Adventure Educ. Outdoor Learn. 2023;23:54–73.
    doi: 10.1080/14729679.2021.1935286google scholar: lookup
  51. Zhu D., Al Mahmud A., Liu W.. Social connections and participation among people with mild cognitive impairment: Barriers and recommendations.. Front. Psychiatry. 2023;14:1188887.
    doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1188887pmc: PMC10356108pubmed: 37476544google scholar: lookup
  52. Stafford M., Von Wagner C., Perman S., Taylor J., Kuh D., Sheringham J.. Social connectedness and engagement in preventive health services: An analysis of data from a prospective cohort study.. Lancet Public Health. 2018;3:e438–e446.
    doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30141-5pmc: PMC6123501pubmed: 30143472google scholar: lookup
  53. Pirchio S., Passiatore Y., Panno A., Cipparone M., Carrus G.. The effects of contact with nature during outdoor environmental education on students’ wellbeing, connectedness to nature and pro-sociality.. Front. Psychol. 2021;12:648458.
    doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648458pmc: PMC8129515pubmed: 34017288google scholar: lookup
  54. Capizzi R., Kempton H.M.. Nature Connection, Mindfulness, and Wellbeing: A Network Analysis.. OBM Integr. Complement. Med. 2023;8:050.
    doi: 10.21926/obm.icm.2304050google scholar: lookup
  55. Watts R., Kettner H., Geerts D., Gandy S., Kartner L., Mertens L., Timmermann C., Nour M.M., Kaelen M., Nutt D.. The Watts Connectedness Scale: A new scale for measuring a sense of connectedness to self, others, and world.. Psychopharmacology. 2022;239:3461–3483.
    doi: 10.1007/s00213-022-06187-5pmc: PMC9358368pubmed: 35939083google scholar: lookup
  56. Lee R.M., Robbins S.B.. The relationship between social connectedness and anxiety, self-esteem, and social identity.. J. Couns. Psychol. 1998;45:338–345.
    doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.45.3.338google scholar: lookup
  57. Jordan M.. The power of connection: Self-care strategies of social wellbeing.. J. Interprof. Educ. Pract. 2023;31:100586.
    doi: 10.1016/j.xjep.2022.100586google scholar: lookup
  58. Farooqi S.R.. The Construct of Relationship Quality.. J. Relatsh. Res. 2014;5:e2.
    doi: 10.1017/jrr.2014.2google scholar: lookup
  59. Gille F.. About the Essence of Trust: Tell the Truth and Let Me Choose—I Might Trust You.. Int. J. Public Health. 2022;67:1604592.
    doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604592pmc: PMC9174981pubmed: 35693197google scholar: lookup
  60. Brown P., Calnan M., Scrivener A., Szmukler G.. Trust in Mental Health Services: A neglected concept.. J. Ment. Health. 2009;18:449–458.
    doi: 10.3109/09638230903111122google scholar: lookup
  61. Frith C.D., Frith U.. How we predict what other people are going to do.. Brain Res. 2006;1079:36–46.
    doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.126pubmed: 16513098google scholar: lookup
  62. Gweon H.. Inferential social learning: Cognitive foundations of human social learning and teaching.. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2021;25:896–910.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.07.008pubmed: 34417094google scholar: lookup
  63. Horsburgh J., Ippolito K.. A skill to be worked at: Using social learning theory to explore the process of learning from role models in clinical settings.. BMC Med. Educ. 2018;18:156.
    doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1251-xpmc: PMC6029173pubmed: 29970052google scholar: lookup
  64. Pendry P., Carr A.M., Roeter S.M., Vandagriff J.L.. Experimental trial demonstrates effects of animal-assisted stress prevention program on college students’ positive and negative emotion.. Hum.-Anim. Interact. Bull. 2018;6:81–97.
    doi: 10.1079/hai.2018.0004google scholar: lookup
  65. Mertika A., Mitskidou P., Stalikas A.. “Positive Relationships” and their impact on wellbeing: A review of current literature.. Psychol. J. Hell. Psychol. Soc. 2020;25:115–127.
    doi: 10.12681/psy_hps.25340google scholar: lookup
  66. Peters B.C., Wood W., Hepburn S.. Theoretical development of equine-assisted activities and therapies for children with autism: A systematic mapping review.. Hum.-Anim. Interact. Bull. 2020;8:1–35.
    doi: 10.1079/hai.2020.0012google scholar: lookup
  67. Wells D.L.. The facilitation of social interactions by domestic dogs.. Anthrozoös. 2004;17:340–352.
    doi: 10.2752/089279304785643203google scholar: lookup
  68. Mallon G.P.. A generous spirit: The work and life of Boris Levinson.. Anthrozoös. 1994;7:224–231.
    doi: 10.2752/089279394787001790google scholar: lookup
  69. Baier A.L., Kline A.C., Feeny N.C.. Therapeutic alliance as a mediator of change: A systematic review and evaluation of research.. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2020;82:101921.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101921pubmed: 33069096google scholar: lookup
  70. Zimmermann D., Wampold B.E., Rubel J.A., Schwartz B., Poster K., Schilling V.N., Deisenhofer A.-K., Hehlmann M.I., Gómez Penedo J.M., Lutz W.. The influence of extra-therapeutic social support on the association between therapeutic bond and treatment outcome.. Psychother. Res. 2021;31:726–736.
    doi: 10.1080/10503307.2020.1847344pubmed: 33252021google scholar: lookup
  71. Feeney B.C., Van Vleet M., Jakubiak B.K., Tomlinson J.M.. Predicting the pursuit and support of challenging life opportunities.. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2017;43:1171–1187.
    doi: 10.1177/0146167217708575pubmed: 28903716google scholar: lookup
  72. Hauge H., Kvalem I.L., Berget B., Enders-Slegers M.J., Braastad B.O.. Equine-assisted activities and the impact on perceived social support, self-esteem and self-efficacy among adolescents—An intervention study.. Int. J. Adolesc. Youth. 2014;19:1–21.
    doi: 10.1080/02673843.2013.779587pmc: PMC4017275pubmed: 24833811google scholar: lookup
  73. Anderson T., Perlman M.R., McCarrick S.M., McClintock A.S.. Modeling therapist responses with structured practice enhances facilitative interpersonal skills.. J. Clin. Psychol. 2020;76:659–675.
    doi: 10.1002/jclp.22911pubmed: 31851382google scholar: lookup
  74. Burch G.F., Giambatista R., Batchelor J.H., Burch J.J., Hoover J.D., Heller N.A.. A meta-analysis of the relationship between experiential learning and learning outcomes.. Decis. Sci. J. Innov. Educ. 2019;17:239–273.
    doi: 10.1111/dsji.12188google scholar: lookup
  75. Hoover J.D., Giambatista R.C., Belkin L.Y.. Eyes on, hands on: Vicarious observational learning as an enhancement of direct experience.. Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ. 2012;11:591–608.
    doi: 10.5465/amle.2010.0102google scholar: lookup
  76. Batson C.D., Ahmad N.Y.. Using empathy to improve intergroup attitudes and relations.. Soc. Issues Policy Rev. 2009;3:141–177.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1751-2409.2009.01013.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  77. Gómez-Leal R., Costa A., Megías-Robles A., Fernández-Berrocal P., Faria L.. Relationship between emotional intelligence and empathy towards humans and animals.. PeerJ. 2021;9:e11274.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.11274pmc: PMC8054732pubmed: 33959424google scholar: lookup
  78. Bove L.L.. Empathy for service: Benefits, unintended consequences, and future research agenda.. J. Serv. Mark. 2019;33:31–43.
    doi: 10.1108/JSM-10-2018-0289google scholar: lookup
  79. Rumble A.C., Van Lange P.A., Parks C.D.. The benefits of empathy: When empathy may sustain cooperation in social dilemmas.. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 2010;40:856–866.
    doi: 10.1002/ejsp.659google scholar: lookup
  80. Epstein R., Robertson R.E., Smith R., Vasconcellos T., Lao M.. Which relationship skills count most? A large-scale replication.. J. Couple Relatsh. Ther. 2016;15:341–356.
    doi: 10.1080/15332691.2016.1141136google scholar: lookup
  81. Hemingway A.. A Study Exploring the Implementation of an Equine Assisted Intervention for Young People with Mental Health and Behavioural Issues.. J. 2019;2:236–246.
    doi: 10.3390/j2020017google scholar: lookup
  82. Johnson K.J.. Good Friends Have Boundaries: Provider Strategies for Creating Support Boundaries in Friendships.. Communication Studies. 2024;76:350–370.
    doi: 10.1080/10510974.2024.2408047google scholar: lookup
  83. Carlsson C.. Equine-assisted social work counteracts self-stigmatisation in self-harming adolescents and facilitates a moment of silence.. J. Soc. Work. Pract. 2018;32:17–30.
    doi: 10.1080/02650533.2016.1274883google scholar: lookup
  84. Kroll J.. The horse-human bond as catalyst for healing from sexual or domestic abuse: Metaphors in Gillian Mears’ Foal’s Bread.. New Writ. 2020;17:50–70.
    doi: 10.1080/14790726.2018.1545790google scholar: lookup
  85. Gearing R.E., Townsend L., MacKenzie M., Charach A.. Reconceptualizing medication adherence: Six phases of dynamic adherence.. Harv. Rev. Psychiatry. 2011;19:177–189.
    doi: 10.3109/10673229.2011.602560pubmed: 21790266google scholar: lookup
  86. Rippon D., Shepherd J., Wakefield S., Lee A., Pollet T.V.. The role of self-efficacy and self-esteem in mediating positive associations between functional social support and psychological wellbeing in people with a mental health diagnosis.. J. Ment. Health. 2022;33:721–730.
    doi: 10.1080/09638237.2022.2069695pubmed: 35510768google scholar: lookup
  87. Cagle-Holtcamp K., Nicodemus M.C., Parker J., Dunlap M.H.. Does Equine Assisted Learning Create Emotionally Safe Learning Environments for At-Risk Youth?. J. Youth Dev. 2019;14:232–252.
    doi: 10.5195/jyd.2019.727google scholar: lookup
  88. Corallo F., Bonanno L., Cardile D., Luvarà F., Giliberto S., Di Cara M., Leonardi S., Quartarone A., Rao G., Pidalà A.. Improvement of self-esteem in children with specific learning disorders after donkey-assisted therapy.. Children. 2023;10:425.
    doi: 10.3390/children10030425pmc: PMC10047257pubmed: 36979983google scholar: lookup
  89. Souilm N.. Equine-assisted therapy effectiveness in improving emotion regulation, self-efficacy, and perceived self-esteem of patients suffering from substance use disorders.. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2023;23:363.
    doi: 10.1186/s12906-023-04191-6pmc: PMC10576391pubmed: 37833688google scholar: lookup
  90. Messina J., Evans T., Manson S., Shortridge A., Deadman P., Verburg P.. Complex systems models and the management of error and uncertainty.. J. Land Use Sci. 2008;3:11–25.
    doi: 10.1080/17474230802047989google scholar: lookup
  91. Hatteberg S.J.. A tale of many sources: The perceived benefits of significant other, similar other, and significant and similar other social support.. Sociol. Perspect. 2021;64:37–57.
    doi: 10.1177/0731121420908885google scholar: lookup
  92. Johnson E., Volsche S.. COVID-19: Companion Animals Help People Cope during Government-Imposed Social Isolation.. Soc. Anim. 2021;32:56–73.
    doi: 10.1163/15685306-BJA10035google scholar: lookup
  93. McConnell A.R., Paige Lloyd E., Humphrey B.T.. We Are Family: Viewing Pets as Family Members Improves Wellbeing.. Anthrozoös. 2019;32:459–470.
    doi: 10.1080/08927936.2019.1621516google scholar: lookup
  94. Gee N.R., Rodriguez K.E., Fine A.H., Trammell J.P.. Dogs Supporting Human Health and Well-Being: A Biopsychosocial Approach.. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021;8:630465.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.630465pmc: PMC8042315pubmed: 33860004google scholar: lookup
  95. Fridén L., Sally H., Marie L., Jormfeldt H.. Relatives’ experiences of an equine-assisted intervention for people with psychotic disorders.. Int. J. Qual. Stud. Health Well-Being. 2022;17:2087276.
    doi: 10.1080/17482631.2022.2087276pmc: PMC9310814pubmed: 35698741google scholar: lookup
  96. Janssens M., Janssens E., Eshuis J., Lataster J., Simons M., Reijnders J., Jacobs N.. Companion animals as buffer against the impact of stress on affect: An experience sampling study.. Animals. 2021;11:2171.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11082171pmc: PMC8388427pubmed: 34438629google scholar: lookup
  97. Bert F., Gualano M.R., Camussi E., Pieve G., Voglino G., Siliquini R.. Animal assisted intervention: A systematic review of benefits and risks.. Eur. J. Integr. Med. 2016;8:695–706.
    doi: 10.1016/j.eujim.2016.05.005pmc: PMC7185850pubmed: 32362955google scholar: lookup
  98. Campbell-Yeo M.L., Disher T.C., Benoit B.L., Johnston C.C.. Understanding kangaroo care and its benefits to preterm infants.. Pediatr. Health Med. Ther. 2015;6:15–32.
    doi: 10.2147/PHMT.S51869pmc: PMC5683265pubmed: 29388613google scholar: lookup
  99. Field T.. Touch for socioemotional and physical well-being: A review.. Dev. Rev. 2010;30:367–383.
    doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2011.01.001google scholar: lookup
  100. Morrison I.. Keep calm and cuddle on: Social touch as a stress buffer.. Adapt. Hum. Behav. Physiol. 2016;2:344–362.
    doi: 10.1007/s40750-016-0052-xgoogle scholar: lookup
  101. Saluja S., Croy I., Stevenson R.J.. The functions of human touch: An integrative review.. J. Nonverbal Behav. 2024;48:387–417.
    doi: 10.1007/s10919-024-00464-xgoogle scholar: lookup
  102. Ward-Griffin E., Klaiber P., Collins H.K., Owens R.L., Coren S., Chen F.S.. Petting away pre-exam stress: The effect of therapy dog sessions on student well-being.. Stress Health. 2018;34:468–473.
    doi: 10.1002/smi.2804pubmed: 29528189google scholar: lookup
  103. Beetz A., Uvnäs-Moberg K., Julius H., Kotrschal K.. Psychosocial and Psychophysiological Effects of Human-Animal Interactions: The Possible Role of Oxytocin.. Front. Psychol. 2012;3:234.
    doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00234pmc: PMC3408111pubmed: 22866043google scholar: lookup
  104. Beetz A.M.. Theories and possible processes of action in animal-assisted interventions.. Appl. Dev. Sci. 2017;21:139–149.
    doi: 10.1080/10888691.2016.1262263google scholar: lookup
  105. Petrovici A., Dobrescu T.. The Role of Emotional Intelligence in Building Interpersonal Communication Skills.. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014;116:1405–1410.
    doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.406google scholar: lookup
  106. Salovey P., Mayer J.D.. Emotional intelligence.. Imagin. Cogn. Personal. 1990;9:185–211.
    doi: 10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDGgoogle scholar: lookup
  107. Hughes D.J., Evans T.R.. Putting ‘emotional intelligences’ in their place: Introducing the integrated model of affect-related individual differences.. Front. Psychol. 2018;9:2155.
    doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02155pmc: PMC6246631pubmed: 30487765google scholar: lookup
  108. Llamas-Díaz D., Cabello R., Megías-Robles A., Fernández-Berrocal P.. Systematic review and meta-analysis: The association between emotional intelligence and subjective well-being in adolescents.. J. Adolesc. 2022;94:925–938.
    doi: 10.1002/jad.12075pubmed: 35860897google scholar: lookup
  109. Delhom I., Satorres E., Meléndez J.C.. Emotional intelligence intervention in older adults to improve adaptation and reduce negative mood.. Int. Psychogeriatr. 2022;34:79–89.
    doi: 10.1017/S1041610220003579pubmed: 33153515google scholar: lookup
  110. Cheung C.-K., Cheung H.Y., Hue M.-T.. Emotional intelligence as a basis for self-esteem in young adults.. J. Psychol. 2015;149:63–84.
    doi: 10.1080/00223980.2013.838540pubmed: 25495163google scholar: lookup
  111. Schutte N.S., Malouff J.M., Thorsteinsson E.B., Bhullar N., Rooke S.E.. A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between emotional intelligence and health.. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2007;42:921–933.
    doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.003google scholar: lookup
  112. Clark D.Y., Mack J.M., McCurdy K.G.. Can an Equine-Assisted Learning Course Improve Emotional Intelligence in Undergraduate Students?. People Anim. Int. J. Res. Pract. 2024;7:17.
  113. Krüger L., Hohberg M., Lehmann W., Dresing K.. Assessing the risk for major injuries in equestrian sports.. BMJ Open Sport Exerc. Med. 2018;4:e000408.
    doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000408pmc: PMC6196937pubmed: 30364519google scholar: lookup
  114. Meredith L., Ekman R., Brolin K.. Epidemiology of equestrian accidents: A literature review.. Internet J. Allied Health Sci. Pract. 2019;17:9.
    doi: 10.46743/1540-580X/2019.1795google scholar: lookup
  115. Luke K.L., McAdie T., Smith B.P., Warren-Smith A.K.. New insights into ridden horse behaviour, horse welfare and horse-related safety.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2022;246:105539.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105539google scholar: lookup
  116. Riding for the Disabled Association. Home. Riding for the Disabled Association. [(accessed on 30 April 2025)]. Available online: https://rda-learning.org.uk/all-courses/
  117. Du Plessis N., Uys K., Buys T.. Hippotherapy concepts: A scoping review to inform transdisciplinary practice guidelines.. Scand. J. Occup. Ther. 2023;30:1424–1440.
    doi: 10.1080/11038128.2023.2231562pubmed: 37493646google scholar: lookup
  118. VanFleet R., Faa-Thompson T.. Animal Assisted Play Therapy TM.. .
  119. Freeman D.W.. “First Time” Horse Ownership: Selecting Horses and Budgeting Horse Interests.. .
  120. . Equine Assisted Services in Northern Ireland: An Exploratory Survey of Practitioners; One Equine.. .
  121. Galt R.E.. The moral economy is a double-edged sword: Explaining farmers’ earnings and self-exploitation in community-supported agriculture.. Econ. Geogr. 2013;89:341–365.
    doi: 10.1111/ecge.12015google scholar: lookup
  122. British Grooms Association . BGA Survey 2024. British Grooms Association; London, UK: 2024. [(accessed on 30 April 2025)]. Available online: https://britishgrooms.org.uk/blog/790/latest-bga-research-shocking.
  123. Morris L.. Looking a gift horse in the mouth: Working students under the Fair Labor Standards Act.. Wash. Lee Law Rev. 2023;80:445.
  124. Sylvia E., Currie E.. The Equine Industry Employment Crisis: Exploring Opinions of Employment Practices within the Ontario Equine Industry.. Organ. Cult. 2022;22:59.
    doi: 10.18848/2327-8013/CGP/v22i01/59-75google scholar: lookup
  125. Watson N., Thompson N., Jooste J.. Why the long face? Experiences and observations of bullying behaviour at equestrian centres in Great Britain.. Eur. J. Sport Soc. 2024;21:374–392.
    doi: 10.1080/16138171.2024.2335737google scholar: lookup
  126. Spett D.. Towards Ethical and Competent Equine-Assisted Social Work: A Qualitative Study.. Stud. Clin. Soc. Work. Transform. Pract. Educ. Res. 2023;94:24–44.
    doi: 10.1080/00377317.2023.2216275google scholar: lookup
  127. Fine A.H., Andersen S.J.. A Commentary on the Contemporary Issues Confronting Animal Assisted and Equine Assisted Interactions.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2021;100:103436.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103436pubmed: 34030793google scholar: lookup
  128. Hartwig E.K., Pliske M.M.. Are you and your dog competent? Integrating animal-assisted play therapy competencies.. Int. J. Play. Ther. 2023;32:146–155.
    doi: 10.1037/pla0000198google scholar: lookup
  129. Lewis A.. What are the Short and Long-Term Impacts of Animal Assisted Interventions on the Therapy Animals?. J. Appl. Anim. Ethics Res. 2024;1:1–23.
    doi: 10.1163/25889567-bja10054google scholar: lookup
  130. Trevathan-Minnis M., Schroeder K., Eccles E.. Changing with the times: A qualitative content analysis of perceptions toward the study and practice of human–animal interactions.. Humanist. Psychol. 2023;51:150–159.
    doi: 10.1037/hum0000251google scholar: lookup
  131. Hallberg L.. The Clinical Practice of Equine-Assisted Therapy: Including Horses in Human Healthcare.. .
  132. Douglas J., Owers R., Campbell M.L.H.. Social Licence to Operate: What Can Equestrian Sports Learn from Other Industries?. Animals 2022;12:1987.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12151987pmc: PMC9367437pubmed: 35953977google scholar: lookup
  133. Heleski C., Stowe C.J., Fiedler J., Peterson M.L., Brady C., Wickens C., MacLeod J.N.. Thoroughbred Racehorse Welfare through the Lens of ‘Social License to Operate—With an Emphasis on a US Perspective.. Sustainability 2020;12:1706.
    doi: 10.3390/sህ1706google scholar: lookup
  134. Holmes T.Q., Brown A.F.. Champing at the bit for improvements: A review of equine welfare in equestrian sports in the United Kingdom.. Animals 2022;12:1186.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12091186pmc: PMC9100173pubmed: 35565612google scholar: lookup
  135. Palmquist G.T., Alveheim N.K., Huot-Marchand F., Ashton L., Lewis V.. The Role of European Equestrian Institutions in Training Professionals: Outcomes from a Workshop on Horse Welfare in Equestrian Education.. Animals 2025;15:183.
    doi: 10.3390/ani15020183pmc: PMC11758323pubmed: 39858183google scholar: lookup
  136. Taylor J.. ‘I Can’t Watch Anymore’: The Case for Dropping Equestrian from the Olympic Games.. .

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.