Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2011; 44(4); 466-471; doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00493.x

A questionnaire study on parasite control practices on UK breeding Thoroughbred studs.

Abstract: Improved education of veterinarians and equine owners/managers is essential in implementing parasite control strategies that are less reliant on chemicals. Methods: This questionnaire study, conducted on 61 UK Thoroughbred (TB) establishments during 2009 and 2010, was designed to obtain an understanding of current helminth control practices on studs. To our knowledge, this is the first occasion that statements obtained from TB studs via questionnaire have been supported by statistical analysis. Results: Despite many respondents indicating high levels of concern regarding anthelmintic resistance, 56% of these establishments that received visiting equines co-grazed these animals with permanent stock and <74% administered anthelmintics prior to integration. In the 12 months preceding the study, most respondents administered frequent macrocyclic lactone (ML) treatments, with none appearing to leave any animals in groups untreated at each administration. Indiscriminate whole group treatments with MLs and movement of animals to 'clean grazing' post treatment (reported by >25% of respondents), indicates that many stud owners/managers are not aware of the strong risk factors for the development of anthelmintic resistance. Few studs had conducted faecal egg count (FEC) analysis in the past and only 22% indicated that they considered this form of analysis beneficial in determining anthelmintic choice. Conclusions: The challenge now is to convince stud owners/managers to deviate from their current practices to control strategies that are more likely to preserve anthelmintic efficacy. Veterinarians need to get more involved in implementing these control strategies, with better emphasis placed on the role of diagnostic tests in facilitating targeted treatments and in investigating anthelmintic sensitivity in the associated nematode populations.
Publication Date: 2011-11-02 PubMed ID: 22050130DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00493.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study conducted via questionnaires on 61 UK Thoroughbred horse breeding establishments in 2009 and 2010 examines current parasite control strategies and the level of awareness around practices that can promote parasite resistance to common treatments.

Overview of Study

  • The study was done through questionnaires on 61 UK-based Thoroughbred horse breeding stud establishments to gain insights on current practices for controlling parasites in these facilities.
  • This is an unprecedented study of such scale, with previously collected data not backed by statistical analysis. Equine owners, vets, and managers completed the questionnaire with data from 2009 and 2010 benefiting the study.

Findings

  • The study found that many respondents expressed concerns about anthelmintic resistance – the ability of parasites to resist worming treatments. Despite the concern, over half of the establishments that received visiting equines allowed these horses to graze with their own stock, and less than 74% administered anthelmintics before integrating them.
  • It was also noted that indiscriminate group treatments with Macrocyclic Lactone (ML), a common equine wormer, were prevalent. All establishments surveyed treated every animal in a group, with none leaving any untreated at each administration.
  • The results additionally highlighted that over a quarter of respondents moved their horses to ‘clean grazing’ areas after treatment, a practice that increases the risk of developing parasite resistance.
  • Few of the stud owners/managers had performed faecal egg count (FEC) analysis to monitor the effectiveness of their parasite control – only 22% found such analysis beneficial in deciding their choice of anthelmintic.

Conclusions

  • The study concludes that there is a need for better education and training for equine owners and vets to effectively implement parasite control strategies that do not overly depend on chemical treatments, which could contribute to the growth of anthelmintic resistance.
  • The researchers encourage a shift from current practices to control strategies that sustain the efficacy of anthelmintics. This includes the greater use of faecal egg count (FEC) analysis which would allow for more targeted treatments and help investigate anthelmintic sensitivity in the nematode populations.
  • This crucial change would require veterinarians to take a more proactive role in implementing these strategies. They need to focus more on diagnostic tests, advocating for their importance to horse owners and managers, and provide guidance on their use to ensure accurate results.

Cite This Article

APA
Relf VE, Morgan ER, Hodgkinson JE, Matthews JB. (2011). A questionnaire study on parasite control practices on UK breeding Thoroughbred studs. Equine Vet J, 44(4), 466-471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00493.x

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 44
Issue: 4
Pages: 466-471

Researcher Affiliations

Relf, V E
  • Moredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park, Midlothian, EP26 0PZ, UK. valerie.relf@moredun.ac.uk
Morgan, E R
    Hodgkinson, J E
      Matthews, J B

        MeSH Terms

        • Animal Husbandry
        • Animals
        • Anthelmintics / administration & dosage
        • Anthelmintics / therapeutic use
        • Data Collection
        • Feces / parasitology
        • Female
        • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
        • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
        • Horses
        • Male
        • Parasite Egg Count
        • Parasitic Diseases, Animal / epidemiology
        • Parasitic Diseases, Animal / prevention & control
        • Surveys and Questionnaires
        • Time Factors

        Citations

        This article has been cited 12 times.
        1. Elghryani N, Lawlor A, McOwan T, de Waal T. Unravelling the Effectiveness of Anthelmintic Treatments on Equine Strongyles on Irish Farms. Animals (Basel) 2024 Jul 2;14(13).
          doi: 10.3390/ani14131958pubmed: 38998069google scholar: lookup
        2. Hamad MH, Islam SI, Jitsamai W, Chinkangsadarn T, Naraporn D, Ouisuwan S, Taweethavonsawat P. Patterns of Equine Small Strongyle Species Infection after Ivermectin Intervention in Thailand: Egg Reappearance Period and Nemabiome Metabarcoding Approach. Animals (Basel) 2024 Feb 8;14(4).
          doi: 10.3390/ani14040574pubmed: 38396542google scholar: lookup
        3. Abbas G, Stevenson MA, Bauquier J, Beasley A, Jacobson C, El-Hage C, Wilkes EJA, Carrigan P, Cudmore L, Hurley J, Beveridge I, Nielsen MK, Hughes KJ, Jabbar A. Assessment of worm control practices recommended by equine veterinarians in Australia. Front Vet Sci 2023;10:1305360.
          doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1305360pubmed: 38026649google scholar: lookup
        4. de Souza RB, Guimarães JR. Effects of Avermectins on the Environment Based on Its Toxicity to Plants and Soil Invertebrates-a Review. Water Air Soil Pollut 2022;233(7):259.
          doi: 10.1007/s11270-022-05744-0pubmed: 35789787google scholar: lookup
        5. McMahon TA, Fernandez-Denmark S, Grim JM. Early-life exposure to Ivermectin alters long-term growth and disease susceptibility. PLoS One 2021;16(10):e0258185.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258185pubmed: 34644335google scholar: lookup
        6. Sallé G, Canlet C, Cortet J, Koch C, Malsa J, Reigner F, Riou M, Perrot N, Blanchard A, Mach N. Integrative biology defines novel biomarkers of resistance to strongylid infection in horses. Sci Rep 2021 Jul 12;11(1):14278.
          doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93468-2pubmed: 34253752google scholar: lookup
        7. Crotch-Harvey L, Thomas LA, Worgan HJ, Douglas JL, Gilby DE, McEwan NR. The effect of administration of fenbendazole on the microbial hindgut population of the horse. J Equine Sci 2018;29(2):47-51.
          doi: 10.1294/jes.29.47pubmed: 29991923google scholar: lookup
        8. Molena RA, Peachey LE, Di Cesare A, Traversa D, Cantacessi C. Cyathostomine egg reappearance period following ivermectin treatment in a cohort of UK Thoroughbreds. Parasit Vectors 2018 Jan 25;11(1):61.
          doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2638-6pubmed: 29370872google scholar: lookup
        9. Sallé G, Cortet J, Bois I, Dubès C, Guyot-Sionest Q, Larrieu C, Landrin V, Majorel G, Wittreck S, Woringer E, Couroucé A, Guillot J, Jacquiet P, Guégnard F, Blanchard A, Leblond A. Risk factor analysis of equine strongyle resistance to anthelmintics. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2017 Dec;7(3):407-415.
          doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2017.10.007pubmed: 29149701google scholar: lookup
        10. Laing R, Gillan V, Devaney E. Ivermectin - Old Drug, New Tricks?. Trends Parasitol 2017 Jun;33(6):463-472.
          doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2017.02.004pubmed: 28285851google scholar: lookup
        11. Sallé G, Cabaret J. A survey on parasite management by equine veterinarians highlights the need for a regulation change. Vet Rec Open 2015;2(2):e000104.
          doi: 10.1136/vetreco-2014-000104pubmed: 26421153google scholar: lookup
        12. Corbett CJ, Love S, Moore A, Burden FA, Matthews JB, Denwood MJ. The effectiveness of faecal removal methods of pasture management to control the cyathostomin burden of donkeys. Parasit Vectors 2014 Jan 24;7:48.
          doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-48pubmed: 24460700google scholar: lookup