Analyze Diet
Scientific data2026; 13(1); 1365; doi: 10.1038/s41597-026-08404-8

A single-cell RNA-seq dataset characterizing cellular diversity in healthy equine skin.

Abstract: The skin serves as the primary barrier tissue in horses and is frequently affected by immune-mediated dermatological conditions, most notably insect bite hypersensitivity (IBH). Yet, the cellular composition and transcriptional landscape of normal equine skin have never been characterized at single-cell resolution. Here, we present a single-cell RNA sequencing dataset of healthy equine skin comprising 85,574 high-quality transcriptomes from two horses, with one skin biopsy collected from each horse, divided into two portions for independent processing via manual or automated tissue dissociation. The dataset resolved 22 transcriptionally distinct cell populations, encompassing keratinocyte subpopulations that reflect discrete epidermal differentiation states, adnexal epithelial lineages, stromal and vascular compartments, and resident immune cell types. Cell-type identities are supported by marker gene expression, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis, and functional module scoring. This dataset constitutes the first single-cell transcriptomic reference of normal equine skin, enabling investigations into equine dermatological diseases, wound healing, immune responses and comparative skin biology.
Publication Date: 2026-09-30 PubMed ID: 42816519PubMed Central: PMC13627664DOI: 10.1038/s41597-026-08404-8Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Dataset

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This research presents a comprehensive single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) dataset that profiles the cellular diversity of healthy horse skin.
  • The study provides a detailed map of different skin cell types and their gene expression patterns, establishing a foundational resource for studying equine skin biology and disease mechanisms.

Background and Motivation

  • The skin is the horse’s primary barrier tissue and plays a critical role in protecting against environmental insults and pathogens.
  • Equine skin is commonly affected by immune-related conditions, such as insect bite hypersensitivity (IBH), which significantly impacts horse health and welfare.
  • Despite the importance of skin, prior to this study, the cellular composition and gene expression profiles of normal (healthy) equine skin had not been characterized at the single-cell level.
  • Understanding the baseline cellular landscape is essential for comparative studies of disease states, wound healing, immune responses, and skin biology.

Study Design and Methods

  • Samples: Skin biopsies were obtained from two healthy horses, with one biopsy per horse.
  • Sample Processing: Each biopsy was split into two portions to compare processing methods — one portion underwent manual tissue dissociation and the other automated tissue dissociation.
  • Single-Cell RNA Sequencing: The study generated 85,574 high-quality single-cell transcriptomes (individual cell gene expression profiles), enabling in-depth analysis of cellular diversity.
  • Data Analysis involved:
    • Clustering of cells based on transcriptomic profiles to identify distinct cell populations.
    • Identification of marker genes uniquely or highly expressed in each cluster to assign cell identities.
    • KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathway enrichment analysis to understand the functional roles of each cell population.
    • Functional module scoring to assess specific gene sets related to epidermal differentiation, immune function, and other biological processes relevant to skin physiology.

Key Findings

  • The dataset identified 22 transcriptionally distinct cell populations in healthy equine skin.
  • These populations included:
    • Keratinocyte subpopulations that reflect various stages of epidermal cell differentiation, crucial for skin barrier formation and maintenance.
    • Adnexal epithelial lineages which contribute to skin appendages such as hair follicles and glands.
    • Stromal cells that provide structural support.
    • Vascular cells involved in blood vessel formation and function.
    • Resident immune cells vital for skin immune surveillance and responses.
  • Marker gene expression validated the identities of these clusters, providing confidence in the annotations of each cell type.
  • KEGG enrichment helps interpret the biological pathways active in each population, offering insight into their function in healthy skin.

Significance and Applications

  • This is the first comprehensive single-cell transcriptomic reference specifically for normal equine skin.
  • The dataset provides a valuable resource for:
    • Investigating pathogenesis and cellular dynamics in equine dermatological diseases such as IBH.
    • Studying the mechanisms of wound healing processes in horses.
    • Exploring immune responses in equine skin at a granular, cellular level.
    • Facilitating comparative biology studies by comparing equine skin with that of other species.
  • The availability of both manual and automated tissue dissociation processed samples also allows future researchers to evaluate technical impacts on single-cell data quality.

Conclusion

  • This study establishes a foundational single-cell gene expression atlas of healthy horse skin, revealing cellular heterogeneity and providing essential tools for future skin biology and disease research in equine species.

Cite This Article

APA
Akula S, Zhang B, Riihimäki M, Wernersson S, Raine A. (2026). A single-cell RNA-seq dataset characterizing cellular diversity in healthy equine skin. Sci Data, 13(1), 1365. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-08404-8

Publication

ISSN: 2052-4463
NlmUniqueID: 101640192
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 13
Issue: 1
PII: 1365

Researcher Affiliations

Akula, Srinivas
  • Department of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden. srinivas.akula@slu.se.
Zhang, Birong
  • Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Riihimäki, Miia
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Wernersson, Sara
  • Department of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Raine, Amanda
  • Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. amanda.raine@medsci.uu.se.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses / genetics
  • Skin / cytology
  • Transcriptome
  • RNA-Seq
  • Single-Cell Analysis
  • Single-Cell Gene Expression Analysis
  • Sequence Analysis, RNA

Grant Funding

  • 2023-01000 / Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
  • 2023-01377 / Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas

Conflict of Interest Statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

This article includes 31 references
  1. Scott, D. W. & Miller, W. H. in (eds Danny W. Scott & William H. Miller) 1–34 10.1016/B978-1-4377-0920-9.00001-9 (W.B. Saunders, 2011).
  2. Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM, Grinwis GCM. Basics of equine dermatology.. 520–529 (2016).
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12444google scholar: lookup
  3. Jørgensen E, Lazzarini G, Pirone A, Jacobsen S, Miragliotta V. Normal microscopic anatomy of equine body and limb skin: A morphological and immunohistochemical study.. 205–212 (2018).
    doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2018.03.010pubmed: 29730469google scholar: lookup
  4. van der Haegen A. Immunoglobulin-E-bearing cells in skin biopsies of horses with insect bite hypersensitivity.. 699–706 (2001).
    doi: 10.2746/042516401776249444pubmed: 11770993google scholar: lookup
  5. Marsella R. Equine allergic skin diseases: Clinical consensus guidelines of the World Association for Veterinary Dermatology.. 175–208 (2023).
    doi: 10.1111/vde.13168pubmed: 37154488google scholar: lookup
  6. Cvitas I. Investigating the epithelial barrier and immune signatures in the pathogenesis of equine insect bite hypersensitivity.. e0232189 (2020).
  7. Wagner B. IgE and IgG antibodies in skin allergy of the horse.. 813–825 (2006).
    doi: 10.1051/vetres:2006039pubmed: 16973120google scholar: lookup
  8. Heimann M. Skin-infiltrating T cells and cytokine expression in Icelandic horses affected with insect bite hypersensitivity: a possible role for regulatory T cells.. 63–74 (2011).
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2010.11.016pubmed: 21168921google scholar: lookup
  9. Fettelschoss-Gabriel A. Treating insect-bite hypersensitivity in horses with active vaccination against IL-5.. 1194–1205.e1193 (2018).
    doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.01.041pubmed: 29627082google scholar: lookup
  10. Jebbawi F. Cytokines and chemokines skin gene expression in correlation with immune cells in blood and severity in equine insect bite hypersensitivity.. 1414891 (2024).
    doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1414891pmc: PMC11284025pubmed: 39076967google scholar: lookup
  11. Jonsdottir S. New Strategies for Prevention and Treatment of Insect Bite Hypersensitivity in Horses.. 303–312 (2019).
  12. Cheng JB. Transcriptional Programming of Normal and Inflamed Human Epidermis at Single-Cell Resolution.. 871–883 (2018).
  13. Solé-Boldo L. Single-cell transcriptomes of the human skin reveal age-related loss of fibroblast priming.. 188 (2020).
    doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-0922-4pmc: PMC7181753pubmed: 32327715google scholar: lookup
  14. Lun ATL. EmptyDrops: distinguishing cells from empty droplets in droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing data.. 63 (2019).
    doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1662-ypmc: PMC6431044pubmed: 30902100google scholar: lookup
  15. Griffiths JA, Richard AC, Bach K, Lun ATL, Marioni JC. Detection and removal of barcode swapping in single-cell RNA-seq data.. 2667 (2018).
    doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05083-xpmc: PMC6039488pubmed: 29991676google scholar: lookup
  16. Hao Y. Dictionary learning for integrative, multimodal and scalable single-cell analysis. 293–304 (2024).
    doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01767-ypmc: PMC10928517pubmed: 37231261google scholar: lookup
  17. McGinnis CS, Murrow LM, Gartner ZJ. DoubletFinder: Doublet Detection in Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data Using Artificial Nearest Neighbors. 329–337 e324 (2019).
    doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2019.03.003pmc: PMC6853612pubmed: 30954475google scholar: lookup
  18. Korsunsky I. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. 1289–1296 (2019).
    doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0619-0pmc: PMC6884693pubmed: 31740819google scholar: lookup
  19. Restrepo P. Single-cell spatial transcriptomic analysis of human skin anatomy. 903–915 (2026).
    doi: 10.1038/s41588-026-02552-8pmc: PMC13083264pubmed: 41872488google scholar: lookup
  20. Franzen O, Gan LM, Bjorkegren JLM. PanglaoDB: a web server for exploration of mouse and human single-cell RNA sequencing data. (2019).
    doi: 10.1093/database/baz046pmc: PMC6450036pubmed: 30951143google scholar: lookup
  21. Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y, He QY. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. 284–287 (2012).
    doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0118pmc: PMC3339379pubmed: 22455463google scholar: lookup
  22. Joost S. The Molecular Anatomy of Mouse Skin during Hair Growth and Rest. 441–457 e447 (2020).
    doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.01.012pubmed: 32109378google scholar: lookup
  23. Liberzon A. The Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection. 417–425 (2015).
    doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2015.12.004pmc: PMC4707969pubmed: 26771021google scholar: lookup
  24. Reynolds G. Developmental cell programs are co-opted in inflammatory skin disease. (2021).
    doi: 10.1126/science.aba6500pmc: PMC7611557pubmed: 33479125google scholar: lookup
  25. Akula, S., Zhang, B., Riihimäki, M., Wernersson, S. & Raine, A. European Nucleotide Archive SRP690566 https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/SRP690566 (2026).
  26. Akula, S., Zhang, B., Riihimäki, M., Wernersson, S. & Raine, A. 10.6084/m9.figshare.31980441 (2026).
    doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.31980441pubmed: 42816519google scholar: lookup
  27. Alcolea MP, Jones PH. Lineage analysis of epidermal stem cells. a015206 (2014).
    doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a015206pmc: PMC3869281pubmed: 24384814google scholar: lookup
  28. He H. Single-cell transcriptome analysis of human skin identifies novel fibroblast subpopulation and enrichment of immune subsets in atopic dermatitis. 1615–1628 (2020).
    doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.01.042pubmed: 32035984google scholar: lookup
  29. Cohen E. Significance of stress keratin expression in normal and diseased epithelia. 108805 (2024).
    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.108805pmc: PMC10828818pubmed: 38299111google scholar: lookup
  30. van den Brink SC. Single-cell sequencing reveals dissociation-induced gene expression in tissue subpopulations.. 935–936 (2017).
    doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4437pubmed: 28960196google scholar: lookup
  31. O’Flanagan CH. Dissociation of solid tumor tissues with cold active protease for single-cell RNA-seq minimizes conserved collagenase-associated stress responses.. 210 (2019).
    doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1830-0pmc: PMC6796327pubmed: 31623682google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.