Analyze Diet

A three-year evaluation of four commercial equine influenza vaccines in ponies maintained in isolation.

Abstract: Ponies held in isolation for 40 months were vaccinated and revaccinated with four commercial equine influenza vaccines. Little or no HI antibody was detected after the first inoculation; second and subsequent annual revaccinations produced peak HI antibody titres between 7 and 14 days. Titres fell quickly between 14 and 28 days and less quickly thereafter. The decline of HI antibody appeared to be related more to the initial titre attained and to the period after vaccination than to the composition of the vaccine. The response to a first annual revaccination was superior to that produced by a second annual revaccination. Ether-treated antigens were required to identify primary and secondary responses to the equine-2-component of vaccines.
Publication Date: 1977-06-01 PubMed ID: 604118
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study examines the effectiveness of four commercial equine influenza vaccines given to ponies in isolation over three years. The research indicates an initial low response, with improved results on second and subsequent annual revaccinations.

Methods and Research Setup

  • The researchers carried out the study over a period of 40 months with ponies kept in isolation for the duration of the experiment.
  • The ponies involved were vaccinated and revaccinated with four different commercial equine influenza vaccines.

Initial Vaccine Response

  • According to the researchers, there was little to no detectable HI (Hemagglutination inhibition) antibody response after the first inoculation.
  • This means that the first dose of the vaccine did not significantly stimulate the immune system to produce antibodies to fight against the influenza virus.

Subsequent Vaccine Responses

  • Upon second and subsequent annual revaccinations, an improved immune response was observed.
  • There was a peak in HI antibody levels between 7 to 14 days following these revaccinations.
  • However, these antibody titres fell sharply within the first month after vaccination, and then decreased at a slower rate thereafter.

Factors Influencing HI Antibody Levels

  • The decline in HI antibody levels appeared to be more closely tied to the initial titre achieved and the time elapsed since vaccination, rather than the specific composition of the vaccine itself.
  • In other words, the initial immune response to the vaccine and the time after vaccination appeared to play a more significant role in the rate of antibody level decline than the particular ingredients or formulation of the influenza vaccine.

Comparisons between First and Second Annual Revaccinations

  • The immune response produced by a first annual revaccination was found to be superior to that produced by a second annual revaccination.
  • Thus, time elapsed since the first revaccination plays a vital role in the immune response of the ponies.

Requirement of Ether-Treated Antigens

  • Ether-treated antigens were needed to identify both primary and secondary immune responses to the equine-2-component of vaccines.
  • This suggests that a special type of antigen processing (ether treatment) was necessary to detect the immune response specifically to the equine-2-component part of the vaccine.

Cite This Article

APA
Burrows R, Spooner PR, Goodridge D. (1977). A three-year evaluation of four commercial equine influenza vaccines in ponies maintained in isolation. Dev Biol Stand, 39, 341-346.

Publication

ISSN: 0301-5149
NlmUniqueID: 0427140
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 39
Pages: 341-346

Researcher Affiliations

Burrows, R
    Spooner, P R
      Goodridge, D

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Antibodies, Viral
        • Evaluation Studies as Topic
        • Hemagglutinins, Viral
        • Horses
        • Immunization Schedule
        • Immunization, Secondary
        • Influenza A virus / immunology
        • Influenza Vaccines / administration & dosage

        Citations

        This article has been cited 4 times.
        1. Mumford JA, Wilson H, Hannant D, Jessett DM. Antigenicity and immunogenicity of equine influenza vaccines containing a Carbomer adjuvant. Epidemiol Infect 1994 Apr;112(2):421-37.
          doi: 10.1017/s0950268800057848pubmed: 8150017google scholar: lookup
        2. Goto H, Shimizu K, Taya Y, Noda H, Tokunaga T. Antibody responses of horses to equine influenza viruses during a postepizootic period in Japan. Can J Comp Med 1982 Jan;46(1):27-32.
          pubmed: 7074415
        3. Wood JM, Mumford J, Folkers C, Scott AM, Schild GC. Studies with inactivated equine influenza vaccine. 1. Serological responses of ponies to graded doses of vaccine. J Hyg (Lond) 1983 Jun;90(3):371-84.
          doi: 10.1017/s0022172400029004pubmed: 6345659google scholar: lookup
        4. Burrows R, Denyer M. Antigenic properties of some equine influenza viruses. Arch Virol 1982;73(1):15-24.
          doi: 10.1007/BF01341723pubmed: 6181759google scholar: lookup