Analyze Diet
Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics1986; 9(1); 26-39; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1986.tb00009.x

Absorption and pharmacokinetics of phenylbutazone in Welsh Mountain ponies.

Abstract: The disposition of phenylbutazone (4.4 mg/kg), administered intravenously to six Welsh Mountain ponies, was described by a two-compartment open model. Pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly different after morning dosing in comparison with afternoon dosing. When phenylbutazone (4.4 mg/kg) was administered orally to the same ponies, marked variations in time to peak concentrations were produced with different feeding schedules. When access to hay was permitted before and after dosing, the mean time to peak concentration was 13.2 +/- 1.2 h and double peaks in the plasma concentration-time curve were common. Double peaks were also encountered when phenylbutazone was given to ponies deprived of food prior to, and allowed access to hay after, dosing. In this circumstance, mean times to peak concentration were much shorter (3.8 +/- 1.3 h after morning dosing and 5.3 +/- 1.5 h followed afternoon dosing). Absorption was more regular and double peaks were less apparent when food was withheld both before and after dosing. In order to explain these findings, it is tentatively postulated that, whereas some of the administered dose of phenylbutazone may be absorbed quickly, some may become adsorbed on to the feed and subsequently released by fermentative digestion in the large intestine and/or caecum. The consequences of delayed absorption in fed animals for toxicity and clinical efficacy, and for the use of phenylbutazone in equestrian sports, are considered. Delayed absorption in ponies given access to hay was not accompanied by a significant reduction in total absorption. Bioavailability was estimated to be approximately 69% in fed and 78% in unfed ponies. Estimates of bioavailability gave similar values for morning (72%) and afternoon (71%) dosing.
Publication Date: 1986-03-01 PubMed ID: 3701913DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1986.tb00009.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The researchers studied how phenylbutazone, a common pain reliever and anti-inflammatory drug, is absorbed and metabolized in Welsh Mountain ponies. They found that feeding schedules greatly influenced absorption rates, with double peaks in blood levels being common when food was consumed before and after drug administration, posing potential implications for its clinical efficacy and use in equestrian sports.

Research Methodology

  • The team administered intravenous doses of phenylbutazone (4.4 mg/kg) to six Welsh Mountain ponies and observed that the drug’s disposition followed a two-compartment open model. They monitored the pharmacokinetic parameters to notice any significant differences between morning and afternoon dosing.
  • The researchers then administered the same dose of phenylbutazone orally to these ponies under varying feeding schedules to track variations in peak concentration times.

Findings

  • When ponies were given hay before and after dosing, there were marked variations in time to peak concentrations, and double peaks were common. These phenomena were still seen when ponies were deprived of food prior to dosing and allowed hay afterward, albeit with much shorter peak times.
  • When food was withheld both before and after dosing, absorption was more regular, and double peaks were less prominent.
  • The researchers tentatively suggested that this inconsistency in absorption could be due to some phenylbutazone being absorbed quickly while some might get adsorbed onto the food and subsequently released during digestion.

Implications

  • The study suggested that delayed absorption might have implications for the drug’s toxicity and clinical efficacy. In sports equestrian scenarios where phenylbutazone is commonly used, this could play a significant role.
  • Despite the delayed absorption in ponies given hay, there was no significant reduction in total absorption. The bioavailability (amount of drug that enters circulation after administration) was estimated to be approximately 69% in fed and 78% in unfed ponies.
  • The estimates of bioavailability were similar for both morning (72%) and afternoon (71%) dosing, indicating that the time of day did not significantly impact the drug’s absorption.

Cite This Article

APA
Maitho TE, Lees P, Taylor JB. (1986). Absorption and pharmacokinetics of phenylbutazone in Welsh Mountain ponies. J Vet Pharmacol Ther, 9(1), 26-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.1986.tb00009.x

Publication

ISSN: 0140-7783
NlmUniqueID: 7910920
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 9
Issue: 1
Pages: 26-39

Researcher Affiliations

Maitho, T E
    Lees, P
      Taylor, J B

        MeSH Terms

        • Administration, Oral
        • Animals
        • Blood Proteins / metabolism
        • Horses / metabolism
        • Injections, Intravenous
        • Intestinal Absorption
        • Kinetics
        • Male
        • Orchiectomy
        • Phenylbutazone / administration & dosage
        • Phenylbutazone / blood
        • Phenylbutazone / metabolism
        • Protein Binding
        • Wales

        Citations

        This article has been cited 6 times.
        1. Mercer MA, Davis JL, McKenzie HC. The Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutic Evaluation of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Adult Horses. Animals (Basel) 2023 May 10;13(10).
          doi: 10.3390/ani13101597pubmed: 37238029google scholar: lookup
        2. Barreto da Rocha P, Driessen B, McDonnell SM, Hopster K, Zarucco L, Gozalo-Marcilla M, Hopster-Iversen C, Esteves Trindade PH, Gonzaga da Rocha TK, Taffarel MO, Alonso BB, Schauvliege S, Luna SPL. A critical evaluation for validation of composite and unidimensional postoperative pain scales in horses. PLoS One 2021;16(8):e0255618.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255618pubmed: 34352001google scholar: lookup
        3. Galvin N, Dillon H, McGovern F. Right dorsal colitis in the horse: minireview and reports on three cases in Ireland. Ir Vet J 2004 Aug 1;57(8):467-73.
          doi: 10.1186/2046-0481-57-8-467pubmed: 21851661google scholar: lookup
        4. Lees P. Pharmacology of drugs used to treat osteoarthritis in veterinary practice. Inflammopharmacology 2003;11(4):385-99.
          doi: 10.1163/156856003322699564pubmed: 15035792google scholar: lookup
        5. Baggot JD. Clinical pharmacokinetics in veterinary medicine. Clin Pharmacokinet 1992 Apr;22(4):254-73.
        6. Knych HK. Administration Studies in Equine Antidoping Research: Designing Scientific Investigations to Effectively Direct Medication Control in Racehorses. Drug Test Anal 2025 Sep;17(9):1560-1566.
          doi: 10.1002/dta.3857pubmed: 39876751google scholar: lookup