Analyze Diet
Journal of biomechanics2014; 47(5); 1220-1224; doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.12.018

Accuracy and precision of gait events derived from motion capture in horses during walk and trot.

Abstract: This study aimed to create an evidence base for detection of stance-phase timings from motion capture in horses. The objective was to compare the accuracy (bias) and precision (SD) for five published algorithms for the detection of hoof-on and hoof-off using force plates as the reference standard. Six horses were walked and trotted over eight force plates surrounded by a synchronised 12-camera infrared motion capture system. The five algorithms (A-E) were based on: (A) horizontal velocity of the hoof; (B) Fetlock angle and horizontal hoof velocity; (C) horizontal displacement of the hoof relative to the centre of mass; (D) horizontal velocity of the hoof relative to the Centre of Mass and; (E) vertical acceleration of the hoof. A total of 240 stance phases in walk and 240 stance phases in trot were included in the assessment. Method D provided the most accurate and precise results in walk for stance phase duration with a bias of 4.1% for front limbs and 4.8% for hind limbs. For trot we derived a combination of method A for hoof-on and method E for hoof-off resulting in a bias of -6.2% of stance in the front limbs and method B for the hind limbs with a bias of 3.8% of stance phase duration. We conclude that motion capture yields accurate and precise detection of gait events for horses walking and trotting over ground and the results emphasise a need for different algorithms for front limbs versus hind limbs in trot.
Publication Date: 2014-01-22 PubMed ID: 24529754DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.12.018Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article investigates the accuracy and precision of determining gait events in horses through various motion detection algorithms, highlighting the need for different methods for front and hind limbs.

Objective and Methods

  • The main purpose of this study is to verify the accuracy and precision of stance-phase timing detection in the gait of horses, using motion capture technology. Five previously published algorithms for detecting hoof-on and hoof-off events (the instances when the hoof touches and leave the ground, respectively) were examined against a reference standard, provided by eight force plates.
  • The participants for this study were six horses, which were made to walk and trot over the force plates while twelve infrared motion capture cameras synchronously recorded their movements.
  • The five algorithms tested were based on various combinations or metrics related to hoof velocity, the fetlock angle (the joint that connects the horse’s foot with its leg), displacement relative to the horse’s centre of mass, and vertical acceleration of the hoof.

Findings

  • Total of 480 stance phases (240 in walk and 240 in trot) were assessed to determine the effectiveness of the algorithms.
  • Method D (based on horizontal velocity of the hoof relative to the Centre of Mass) provided the most accurate and precise measurements of stance phase duration during walk, showing 4.1% bias for front limbs and 4.8% for hind limbs. This indicates that method D can predict stance phase duration relatively accurately in walking horses.
  • For the trotting phase, a combination of methods was found to be the most effective. Method A (based on the horizontal velocity of the hoof) was best for detecting the hoof-on event and method E (based on the vertical acceleration of the hoof) for the hoof-off event in the front limbs, resulting in a -6.2% bias of stance phase duration. Meanwhile, method B (based on Fetlock angle and horizontal hoof velocity) showed a bias of 3.8% of stance phase duration for the hind limbs.

Conclusion

  • The research concludes that motion capture can accurately and precisely detect gait events in walking and trotting horses. However, the study’s findings underline the necessity for alternate algorithms when interpreting gait data from the front and hind limbs of trotting horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Boye JK, Thomsen MH, Pfau T, Olsen E. (2014). Accuracy and precision of gait events derived from motion capture in horses during walk and trot. J Biomech, 47(5), 1220-1224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.12.018

Publication

ISSN: 1873-2380
NlmUniqueID: 0157375
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 47
Issue: 5
Pages: 1220-1224
PII: S0021-9290(13)00645-3

Researcher Affiliations

Boye, Jenny Katrine
  • University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Large Animal Sciences, Hojbakkegaard Allé 5, 2630 Taastrup, Denmark.
Thomsen, Maj Halling
  • University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Large Animal Sciences, Hojbakkegaard Allé 5, 2630 Taastrup, Denmark.
Pfau, Thilo
  • The Royal Veterinary College, Department of Clinical Sciences and Services, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, AL9 7TA, United Kingdom.
Olsen, Emil
  • University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Large Animal Sciences, Hojbakkegaard Allé 5, 2630 Taastrup, Denmark; The Royal Veterinary College, Department of Clinical Sciences and Services, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, AL9 7TA, United Kingdom. Electronic address: eo@sund.ku.dk.

MeSH Terms

  • Algorithms
  • Animals
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Extremities / physiology
  • Female
  • Gait
  • Hoof and Claw
  • Horses / physiology
  • Motion
  • Reference Values
  • Walking / physiology

Citations

This article has been cited 5 times.
  1. Hatrisse C, Macaire C, Sapone M, Hebert C, Hanne-Poujade S, De Azevedo E, Marin F, Martin P, Chateau H. Stance Phase Detection by Inertial Measurement Unit Placed on the Metacarpus of Horses Trotting on Hard and Soft Straight Lines and Circles.. Sensors (Basel) 2022 Jan 18;22(3).
    doi: 10.3390/s22030703pubmed: 35161452google scholar: lookup
  2. Tijssen M, Hernlund E, Rhodin M, Bosch S, Voskamp JP, Nielen M, Serra Braganςa FM. Automatic hoof-on and -off detection in horses using hoof-mounted inertial measurement unit sensors.. PLoS One 2020;15(6):e0233266.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233266pubmed: 32492034google scholar: lookup
  3. Sapone M, Martin P, Ben Mansour K, Château H, Marin F. Comparison of Trotting Stance Detection Methods from an Inertial Measurement Unit Mounted on the Horse's Limb.. Sensors (Basel) 2020 May 25;20(10).
    doi: 10.3390/s20102983pubmed: 32466104google scholar: lookup
  4. Bragança FM, Bosch S, Voskamp JP, Marin-Perianu M, Van der Zwaag BJ, Vernooij JCM, van Weeren PR, Back W. Validation of distal limb mounted inertial measurement unit sensors for stride detection in Warmblood horses at walk and trot.. Equine Vet J 2017 Jul;49(4):545-551.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12651pubmed: 27862238google scholar: lookup
  5. Starke SD, Clayton HM. A universal approach to determine footfall timings from kinematics of a single foot marker in hoofed animals.. PeerJ 2015;3:e783.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.783pubmed: 26157641google scholar: lookup