Analyze Diet
Australian veterinary journal1992; 69(11); 288-291; doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1992.tb09896.x

Adverse drug reactions: report of the Australian Veterinary Association Adverse Drug Reaction Subcommittee, 1992.

Abstract: Fifty-nine reports of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were received by the Adverse Drug Reaction Subcommittee of the Australian Veterinary Association from February 1991-March 1992 inclusive. The number of reports received/number of animals involved per species was: dogs (23/24); cats (20/30); horses (4/4); cattle (7/10); sheep (3/745); poultry (1/580); pigs (1/8). Of these, 38 (64%) were classified as definite ADRs and 9 (15%) as probable ADRs. In 10 (17%) reports an ADR could not be substantiated or there was insufficient information available to make a decision. Two reports involved veterinarians inadvertently overdosing animals. Eighteen reports involved apparent hypersensitivity reactions and 6 reports involved probable drug interactions. Four reports involved the use of drugs at appropriate doses but in inappropriate clinical situations, and 3 reports were associated with 'off-label' use.
Publication Date: 1992-11-01 PubMed ID: 1288477DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1992.tb09896.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Congress

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study discusses the findings of the Australian Veterinary Association’s Adverse Drug Reaction Subcommittee from 1991-1992, where they investigated 59 reports of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in various animal species. The majority of these were classified as definite ADRs, with a significant portion being a result of probable drug interactions, overdoses, and inappropriate usage.

Study Overview

The Australian Veterinary Association’s Adverse Drug Reaction Subcommittee took on the task of investigating 59 cases of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that were reported from February 1991 to March 1992. These reports involved various animals like dogs, cats, horses, cattle, and pigs among others. The primary aim was to classify these incidents based on the definiteness of ADR and identify any systemic issues in veterinary drug administration.

  • The majority of cases involved dogs (23 out of 59) and cats (20 out of 59).
  • Of the total, 38 (64%) were classified as definite ADRs.
  • 9 (15%) reports were considered as probable ADRs.
  • For 10 (17%) cases, it was either impossible to confirm an adverse reaction or there was not enough information to make a conclusive decision.

Focused Findings

Further analysis of the data reveals some specifics about the nature and causes of these ADRs.

  • Two of these reports involve cases where veterinarians accidentally overdosed animals.
  • Six reports were associated with likely drug interactions causing the negative response.
  • Eighteen of the reports were thought to be hypersensitivity reactions, where the animal had an overactive immune response to the drug.
  • Three reports were tied to the off-label use of drugs, meaning that the medication was used in a way not specified by the drug’s official label.
  • Four reports noted the usage of drugs in inappropriate clinical situations despite the dosage being correct.

In conclusion, the study illuminates a need for a vigilant approach in veterinary drug administration, taking into account potential for hypersensitivity, interactions with other drugs, appropriate dosages, and suitable clinical contexts.

Cite This Article

APA
Maddison JE. (1992). Adverse drug reactions: report of the Australian Veterinary Association Adverse Drug Reaction Subcommittee, 1992. Aust Vet J, 69(11), 288-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.1992.tb09896.x

Publication

ISSN: 0005-0423
NlmUniqueID: 0370616
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 69
Issue: 11
Pages: 288-291

Researcher Affiliations

Maddison, J E
  • Department of Pharmacology, University of Sydney, New South Wales.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Animals, Domestic
  • Australia
  • Cats
  • Cattle
  • Dogs
  • Drug Hypersensitivity / veterinary
  • Drug Overdose / veterinary
  • Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
  • Horses
  • Poultry
  • Product Surveillance, Postmarketing
  • Sheep
  • Swine

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.