Analyze Diet
Australian veterinary journal1996; 73(4); 132-136; doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1996.tb10005.x

Adverse drug reactions: report of the Australian Veterinary Association Adverse Drug Reaction Subcommittee, 1994.

Abstract: Seventy-seven reports of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were received by the Adverse Drug Reaction Subcommittee (ADRSc) of the Australian Veterinary Association from April 1993 to December 1994 inclusive. The number of reports received/number of animals involved per species were: dogs (32/44), cats (18/31), horses (17/48), and cattle (10/21). Of these, 49 (64%) were classified as definite ADRs and 9 (12%) as probable ADRs. In 11 (14%) reports an ADR could not be substantiated or there was insufficient information available to make a decision. Eight reports were not classified because the manufacturer and the ADRSc disagreed as to the appropriate classification. Sixteen reports involved apparent hypersensitivity reactions, which resulted in death on 6 occasions. Six reports were associated with 'off label' use and 1 report with use of an expired product. Of the definite, probable and unclassified reports of suspect ADRs, the most frequent types of drugs involved were antimicrobial drugs (13 reports), anthelmintics (13), insecticides (11), vaccines (10), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory preparations (5), chondroprotective agents (4),anaesthetic/sedative agents (4) and vitamin preparations (2). Single reports concerning definite, probable or unclassified ADRs to a vasodilator, a corticosteroid, a local anaesthetic and a disinfectant were received.
Publication Date: 1996-04-01 PubMed ID: 8660227DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1996.tb10005.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Congress

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research is about a study conducted by the Adverse Drug Reaction Subcommittee of the Australian Veterinary Association, which reviewed 77 reports of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in animals from April 1993 to December 1994.

Introduction and Methodology

  • The research is a review and analysis of 77 reported cases of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in animals. These reports were received by the Adverse Drug Reaction Subcommittee (ADRSc) of the Australian Veterinary Association between April 1993 and December 1994.
  • The different species involved in the study included dogs, cats, horses, and cattle.

Findings

  • Out of the 77 reports, 49 were classified as definite ADRs, 9 were seen as probable ADRs, and in 11 reports an ADR couldn’t be substantiated or there was not enough information available to make a decision.
  • Eight reports were not classified due to disagreements between the manufacturer and the ADRSc over the proper classification.
  • There were 16 instances of apparent hypersensitivity reactions, six of which resulted in death.
  • There were also cases associated with the ‘off label’ use of drugs and use of an expired product.

Types of Drugs Involved

  • The study also classified the suspected ADRs according to the types of drugs involved. The drugs most commonly linked to ADRs were antimicrobial drugs, anthelmintics, insecticides, vaccines, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory preparations, chondroprotective agents, anaesthetic/sedative agents and vitamin preparations.
  • ADRs linked to a vasodilator, a corticosteroid, a local anaesthetic, and a disinfectant were also observed, though there were only single reports for each.

Conclusion

  • This in-depth review of reported ADRs in animals provides valuable information which can lead to better drug management and usage in the veterinary industry.

Cite This Article

APA
Maddison JE. (1996). Adverse drug reactions: report of the Australian Veterinary Association Adverse Drug Reaction Subcommittee, 1994. Aust Vet J, 73(4), 132-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.1996.tb10005.x

Publication

ISSN: 0005-0423
NlmUniqueID: 0370616
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 73
Issue: 4
Pages: 132-136

Researcher Affiliations

Maddison, J E
  • Department of Pharmacology, University of Sydney, New South Wales.

MeSH Terms

  • Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems
  • Animals
  • Anthelmintics / adverse effects
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / adverse effects
  • Australia
  • Cats
  • Cattle
  • Dogs
  • Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
  • Horses
  • Insecticides / adverse effects

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.