An in vitro biomechanical comparison of two fixation methods for transverse osteotomies of the medial proximal forelimb sesamoid bones in horses.
Abstract: This study compared the mechanical properties of the normal intact suspensory apparatus and two methods of fixation for repair of transverse, midbody fractures of the proximal sesamoid bones of adult horses: transfixation wiring (TW) and screws placed in lag fashion (LS). Methods: An in vitro, paired study using equine cadaver limbs mounted in a loading apparatus was used to test the mechanical properties of TW and LS. Methods: Seventeen paired (13 repaired, 4 normal) equine cadaver limbs consisting of the suspensory apparatus third metacarpal bone, and first and second phalanges. Methods: The two methods of repair and normal intact specimens were evaluated in single cycle-to-failure loading. Yield failure was defined to occur at the first notable discontinuity (>50 N) in the load-displacement curve, the first visible failure as evident on the videotape, or a change in the slope of the moment-fetlock angle curve. Ultimate failure was defined to occur at the highest load resisted by the specimen. Corresponding resultant force and force per kg of body weight on the suspensory apparatus, fetlock joint moment, and angle of fetlock dorsiflexion were calculated by use of specimen dimensions and applied load. These were compared along with specimen stiffness, and ram displacement. Results: Load on the suspensory apparatus, load on the suspensory apparatus per kg of body weight, moment, applied load, and angle of fetlock dorsiflexion at yield failure were significantly greater for the TW-repaired than for the LS-repaired specimens. A 3 to 5 mm gap was observed before yield failure in most TW-repaired osteotomies. Conclusions: Transfixation wiring provided greater strength to yield failure than screws placed in lag fashion in single cycle load-to-failure mechanical testing of repaired transverse osteotomized specimens of the medial proximal forelimb sesamoid bone.
Publication Date: 1999-09-24 PubMed ID: 10493640DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1999.00355.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Comparative Study
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The researchers carried out an in vitro comparison to ascertain the mechanical strength of two methods for repairing fractures in horse’s proximal sesamoid bones. They found that transfixation wiring proved to be stronger than screws placed in lag fashion during single cycle load-to-failure testing.
Study Methods and Materials
- The team utilized a total of 17 paired equine cadaver limbs, including 13 that were repaired and 4 in normal condition. These limbs comprised the suspensory apparatus third metacarpal bone, and first as well as second phalanges.
- The medical technique used was transverse osteotomy, a surgical procedure where a bone is cut across its long axis. The researchers tested two ways to repair the resultant fractures: Transfixation Wiring (TW) and screws placed in Lag Fashion (LS).
- The limbs were mounted in a loading apparatus for single cycle-to-failure testing to ascertain mechanical properties and strength of the TW and LS repair methods. The team defined yield failure and ultimate failure based on load displacement, visual evidence of failure, or change in the moment-fetlock angle curve.
Calculations and Measurements
- Many parameters were calculated and compared to determine the effectiveness of the TW and LS methods. These factors included: force on the suspensory apparatus, force on the suspensory apparatus per kg of body weight, fetlock joint moment, angle of fetlock dorsiflexion, specimen stiffness, and ram displacement.
- These calculations were achieved using individual dimensions of the specimen and the load applied to it.
Study Findings and Conclusion
- According to the results, the load on the suspensory apparatus, load per kg of body weight, moment, applied load and angle of fetlock dorsiflexion at yield failure were significantly higher for the TW-repaired when compared to the LS-repaired specimens.
- In most TW-repaired samples, before yield failure, a gap of around 3 to 5 mm was noticed.
- Considering these results, the study concluded that, in single cycle load-to-failure mechanical tests, TW offered more strength for yield failure than LS in repairing transversely osteotomized specimens of the medial proximal forelimb sesamoid bone.
Cite This Article
APA
Wilson DA, Keegan KG, Carson WL.
(1999).
An in vitro biomechanical comparison of two fixation methods for transverse osteotomies of the medial proximal forelimb sesamoid bones in horses.
Vet Surg, 28(5), 355-367.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950x.1999.00355.x Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211, USA.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Biomechanical Phenomena
- Bone Screws / veterinary
- Bone Wires / veterinary
- Cadaver
- Forelimb / injuries
- Forelimb / physiology
- Fracture Fixation, Internal / instrumentation
- Fracture Fixation, Internal / veterinary
- Fractures, Bone / surgery
- Fractures, Bone / veterinary
- Horses / injuries
- Internal Fixators / veterinary
- Osteotomy / veterinary
- Sesamoid Bones / injuries
- Sesamoid Bones / physiology
- Videotape Recording
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists