Analyze Diet
Journal of equine veterinary science2025; 156; 105746; doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2025.105746

An in vitro investigation into the effects of postbiotic supplementation on stabilising equine hindgut pH.

Abstract: Dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiome is a precursor to hindgut acidosis. As microbial diversity and fermentation are influenced by diet, including a postbiotic could help maintain healthy gastrointestinal microbes and reduce acidosis risk. Objective: It was hypothesised that including a postbiotic in batch culture would reduce the degree of pH decline and lactate accumulation during fermentation. Methods: In vitro batch cultures with faecal inoculant were prepared with either low starch (LS) or high glucose (G) substrate to represent normal and acidic fermentation. Saccharomyces cerevisiae derived postbiotic was added at 280 μg (T1), corresponding to the recommended daily feeding rate for a 500 kg horse adjusted to the dry matter of the incubated substrate, and 560 μg (T2), representing twice this rate, and incubated for 48 h to assess effects on pH, gas, volatile fatty acids (VFAs), ammonia (NH₃), and d-lactate production. Results: Substrate G showed a faster decline in pH (P < 0.001) than LS at 6 and 12 h post incubation. Postbiotic concentration had a positive linear relationship with pH in G and observed higher (P < 0.001) pH for T1 at 6 h, and T2 at 6 and 12 h. Production of propionic, and acetic acids was increased (P < 0.001) with postbiotic at 12 h and 36 h, and butyric acid at 36 h (P = 0.05). d-lactate production was greater in G than LS (P < 0.001) at 12 h and lower at 36 h (P < 0.001). Postbiotics reduced lactate at 12 and 36 h (P < 0.001) in LS. Conclusions: The addition of postbiotic could reduce the severity of pH decline in high non-structural carbohydrate rations and increase VFAs, however acidosis was not prevented.
Publication Date: 2025-12-01 PubMed ID: 41338496DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2025.105746Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study investigated how supplementing with a postbiotic derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae affects the acidity (pH) and fermentation products in the equine hindgut when exposed to different carbohydrate levels.
  • The research aimed to determine if postbiotic addition could stabilize pH and reduce harmful lactate accumulation, which are key factors in preventing hindgut acidosis in horses.

Background and Rationale

  • Hindgut acidosis in horses is caused by dysbiosis—an imbalance in the gut microbial population—which can result from dietary changes, particularly increased levels of easily fermentable carbohydrates.
  • The microbial community diversity and fermentation profile in the hindgut are crucial for maintaining gut health; disturbances can lead to a drop in pH and harmful metabolite accumulation such as lactate.
  • Postbiotics, which are bioactive compounds produced by beneficial microbes (in this case, from yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae), might modulate fermentation processes and help maintain a healthier microbial environment.

Objective and Hypothesis

  • The study tested whether including a yeast-derived postbiotic in in vitro fermentation would reduce the extent of pH drop and lactate accumulation during fermentation, potentially stabilizing hindgut conditions.

Methods

  • In vitro batch cultures were prepared using faecal inoculum from horses to simulate hindgut fermentation.
  • Two substrates were used to imitate different dietary conditions:
    • Low starch (LS) – representing normal fermentation and healthier conditions.
    • High glucose (G) – representing high fermentable carbohydrate ingestion that can cause acidic fermentation conditions.
  • Two concentrations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae postbiotic were tested:
    • T1: 280 μg – equivalent to the recommended daily dose for a 500 kg horse adjusted for dry matter.
    • T2: 560 μg – double the recommended dose.
  • Incubations lasted 48 hours to track fermentation changes over time.
  • Measured parameters included:
    • pH changes over time to assess acidity trends.
    • Gas production as an indicator of fermentation activity.
    • Volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations (propionic, acetic, butyric acids), which serve as key energy sources and indicators of fermentation products.
    • Ammonia (NH₃) levels, relevant for nitrogen metabolism and microbial activity.
    • D-lactate concentrations, an organic acid that can accumulate under acidic conditions and contribute to acidosis.

Key Results

  • The high glucose (G) substrate caused a faster and more significant decline in pH compared to the low starch (LS) substrate at 6 and 12 hours—confirming the acidic fermentation condition model.
  • A positive linear relationship was found between the postbiotic concentration and pH in the high glucose substrate:
    • T1 postbiotic dose improved pH at 6 h.
    • T2 dose improved pH at both 6 and 12 h.
  • Postbiotic supplementation increased production of key VFAs:
    • Propionic and acetic acids were significantly increased at 12 and 36 hours.
    • Butyric acid was higher at 36 hours with postbiotic addition.
  • D-lactate production was:
    • Higher in the high glucose substrate at 12 h, indicating acidotic risk.
    • Lower at 36 h, indicating possible metabolic shifts over time.
    • Postbiotic reduced d-lactate accumulation at 12 and 36 h in the low starch substrate.
  • Gas and ammonia levels were measured but specifics were not highlighted as significant in the abstract.

Conclusions

  • Postbiotic supplementation from Saccharomyces cerevisiae can help moderate the decline in hindgut pH under high non-structural carbohydrate (high glucose) conditions, suggesting it may reduce the severity of hindgut acidification.
  • It also positively influences production of beneficial volatile fatty acids, which are important for gut health and energy supply to the host animal.
  • Despite these benefits, the postbiotic did not completely prevent acidosis in vitro, indicating that while it may reduce risk or severity, it is not a standalone solution to hindgut acidosis.
  • Overall, postbiotic supplementation shows promise as a strategy to enhance hindgut microbial stability and fermentation profiles, but further in vivo studies are warranted to evaluate practical effects in live horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Sheridan L, Hutton P, Noble G, Nobari B. (2025). An in vitro investigation into the effects of postbiotic supplementation on stabilising equine hindgut pH. J Equine Vet Sci, 156, 105746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2025.105746

Publication

ISSN: 0737-0806
NlmUniqueID: 8216840
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 156
Pages: 105746
PII: S0737-0806(25)00404-6

Researcher Affiliations

Sheridan, L
  • School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga, NSW, 2678, Australia.
Hutton, P
  • UWA School of Agriculture and Environment and UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, M085, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
Noble, G
  • School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga, NSW, 2678, Australia.
Nobari, B
  • Registered Animal Nutritionist (RAnNutr.) Nutrition Society of Australia (NSA), PO Box 669, 3134, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: Nobari.b@gmail.com.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
  • Horses / physiology
  • Fermentation
  • Saccharomyces cerevisiae
  • Dietary Supplements
  • Animal Feed / analysis
  • Fatty Acids, Volatile
  • Probiotics / pharmacology
  • Lactic Acid / metabolism
  • Gastrointestinal Microbiome

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Lauren sheridan reports financial support was provided by Ridley AgriProducts Pty Ltd. Lauren Sheridan reports a relationship with Ridley AgriProducts Pty Ltd that includes: employment. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.