Analyze Diet
BMC genomics2013; 14; 487; doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-487

Analysis of copy number variants by three detection algorithms and their association with body size in horses.

Abstract: Copy number variants (CNVs) have been shown to play an important role in genetic diversity of mammals and in the development of many complex phenotypic traits. The aim of this study was to perform a standard comparative evaluation of CNVs in horses using three different CNV detection programs and to identify genomic regions associated with body size in horses. Results: Analysis was performed using the Illumina Equine SNP50 genotyping beadchip for 854 horses. CNVs were detected by three different algorithms, CNVPartition, PennCNV and QuantiSNP. Comparative analysis revealed 50 CNVs that affected 153 different genes mainly involved in sensory perception, signal transduction and cellular components. Genome-wide association analysis for body size showed highly significant deleted regions on ECA1, ECA8 and ECA9. Homologous regions to the detected CNVs on ECA1 and ECA9 have also been shown to be correlated with human height. Conclusions: Comparative analysis of CNV detection algorithms was useful to increase the specificity of CNV detection but had certain limitations dependent on the detection tool. GWAS revealed genome-wide associated CNVs for body size in horses.
Publication Date: 2013-07-18 PubMed ID: 23865711PubMed Central: PMC3720552DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-487Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article analyzes the impact of copy number variants (CNVs) on the body size of horses by leveraging three separate CNV detection programs. Identified CNVs were observed to affect genes related to sensory perception, signal transduction, and cellular components. Some of the detected CNV regions were also significantly connected to human height.

Objective of the Research

  • The study was primarily centered around performing a comparative evaluation of CNVs in horses using three distinct CNV detection applications: CNVPartition, PennCNV, and QuantiSNP. The main goal was to identify the genomic regions associated with the body size of horses.

Research Methodology

  • The analysis was conducted using the Illumina Equine SNP50 Genotyping Beadchip, a technology specifically designed for studying genetic variations in horses. The subject group was composed of 854 horses.
  • The CNV detection was achieved using three different algorithms. The detected CNVs were then compared to enhance the accuracy of the results and increase specificity.

Results of the Research

  • The comparative analysis yielded 50 CNVs impacting 153 different genes. These genes were primarily involved in sensory perception, signal transduction, and cellular components.
  • A Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) was performed to associate the detected CNVs with body size in horses.
  • The analysis revealed highly significant deleted regions on ECA1, ECA8, and ECA9 which have a strong correlation with the body size of horses.
  • Interestingly, it was also found that homologous regions to the detected CNVs on ECA1 and ECA9 have been previously correlated with human height, suggesting a potential genetic overlap in determining the size metrics between species.

Conclusions of the Research

  • The comparative analysis of the CNV detection algorithms proved to be effective in augmenting the detection specificity of CNVs. However, this approach also had certain limitations, influenced by the detection tool used.
  • The study concluded that the GWAS analysis effectively highlighted significant CNVs associated with body size in horses. This revelation paves the way for a better genetic understanding of body size in horses and potentially in other mammals, including humans.

Cite This Article

APA
Metzger J, Philipp U, Lopes MS, da Camara Machado A, Felicetti M, Silvestrelli M, Distl O. (2013). Analysis of copy number variants by three detection algorithms and their association with body size in horses. BMC Genomics, 14, 487. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-487

Publication

ISSN: 1471-2164
NlmUniqueID: 100965258
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 14
Pages: 487

Researcher Affiliations

Metzger, Julia
  • Institute for Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17p, 30559, Hannover, Germany.
Philipp, Ute
    Lopes, Maria Susana
      da Camara Machado, Artur
        Felicetti, Michela
          Silvestrelli, Maurizio
            Distl, Ottmar

              MeSH Terms

              • Algorithms
              • Animals
              • Body Size / genetics
              • DNA Copy Number Variations / genetics
              • Genomics / methods
              • Horses / genetics
              • Horses / growth & development
              • Humans
              • Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
              • Polymerase Chain Reaction
              • Species Specificity

              References

              This article includes 45 references
              1. Clop A, Vidal O, Amills M. Copy number variation in the genomes of domestic animals.. Anim Genet 2012 Oct;43(5):503-17.
              2. Beckmann JS, Estivill X, Antonarakis SE. Copy number variants and genetic traits: closer to the resolution of phenotypic to genotypic variability.. Nat Rev Genet 2007 Aug;8(8):639-46.
                doi: 10.1038/nrg2149pubmed: 17637735google scholar: lookup
              3. Redon R, Ishikawa S, Fitch KR, Feuk L, Perry GH, Andrews TD, Fiegler H, Shapero MH, Carson AR, Chen W, Cho EK, Dallaire S, Freeman JL, González JR, Gratacòs M, Huang J, Kalaitzopoulos D, Komura D, MacDonald JR, Marshall CR, Mei R, Montgomery L, Nishimura K, Okamura K, Shen F, Somerville MJ, Tchinda J, Valsesia A, Woodwark C, Yang F, Zhang J, Zerjal T, Zhang J, Armengol L, Conrad DF, Estivill X, Tyler-Smith C, Carter NP, Aburatani H, Lee C, Jones KW, Scherer SW, Hurles ME. Global variation in copy number in the human genome.. Nature 2006 Nov 23;444(7118):444-54.
                doi: 10.1038/nature05329pmc: PMC2669898pubmed: 17122850google scholar: lookup
              4. Dupuis MC, Zhang Z, Durkin K, Charlier C, Lekeux P, Georges M. Detection of copy number variants in the horse genome and examination of their association with recurrent laryngeal neuropathy.. Anim Genet 2013 Apr;44(2):206-8.
              5. Doan R, Cohen N, Harrington J, Veazey K, Juras R, Cothran G, McCue ME, Skow L, Dindot SV. Identification of copy number variants in horses.. Genome Res 2012 May;22(5):899-907.
                doi: 10.1101/gr.128991.111pmc: PMC3337435pubmed: 22383489google scholar: lookup
              6. Ramayo-Caldas Y, Castelló A, Pena RN, Alves E, Mercadé A, Souza CA, Fernández AI, Perez-Enciso M, Folch JM. Copy number variation in the porcine genome inferred from a 60 k SNP BeadChip.. BMC Genomics 2010 Oct 22;11:593.
                doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-593pmc: PMC3091738pubmed: 20969757google scholar: lookup
              7. Seroussi E, Glick G, Shirak A, Yakobson E, Weller JI, Ezra E, Zeron Y. Analysis of copy loss and gain variations in Holstein cattle autosomes using BeadChip SNPs.. BMC Genomics 2010 Nov 29;11:673.
                doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-673pmc: PMC3091787pubmed: 21114805google scholar: lookup
              8. Doan R, Cohen ND, Sawyer J, Ghaffari N, Johnson CD, Dindot SV. Whole-genome sequencing and genetic variant analysis of a Quarter Horse mare.. BMC Genomics 2012 Feb 17;13:78.
                doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-78pmc: PMC3309927pubmed: 22340285google scholar: lookup
              9. Pinto D, Darvishi K, Shi X, Rajan D, Rigler D, Fitzgerald T, Lionel AC, Thiruvahindrapuram B, Macdonald JR, Mills R, Prasad A, Noonan K, Gribble S, Prigmore E, Donahoe PK, Smith RS, Park JH, Hurles ME, Carter NP, Lee C, Scherer SW, Feuk L. Comprehensive assessment of array-based platforms and calling algorithms for detection of copy number variants.. Nat Biotechnol 2011 May 8;29(6):512-20.
                doi: 10.1038/nbt.1852pmc: PMC3270583pubmed: 21552272google scholar: lookup
              10. Alkan C, Coe BP, Eichler EE. Genome structural variation discovery and genotyping.. Nat Rev Genet 2011 May;12(5):363-76.
                doi: 10.1038/nrg2958pmc: PMC4108431pubmed: 21358748google scholar: lookup
              11. Winchester L, Yau C, Ragoussis J. Comparing CNV detection methods for SNP arrays.. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 2009 Sep;8(5):353-66.
                doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elp017pubmed: 19737800google scholar: lookup
              12. Li Y, Mei S, Zhang X, Peng X, Liu G, Tao H, Wu H, Jiang S, Xiong Y, Li F. Identification of genome-wide copy number variations among diverse pig breeds by array CGH.. BMC Genomics 2012 Dec 24;13:725.
                doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-725pmc: PMC3573951pubmed: 23265576google scholar: lookup
              13. Lai WR, Johnson MD, Kucherlapati R, Park PJ. Comparative analysis of algorithms for identifying amplifications and deletions in array CGH data.. Bioinformatics 2005 Oct 1;21(19):3763-70.
              14. Tsuang DW, Millard SP, Ely B, Chi P, Wang K, Raskind WH, Kim S, Brkanac Z, Yu CE. The effect of algorithms on copy number variant detection.. PLoS One 2010 Dec 30;5(12):e14456.
              15. Zhang D, Qian Y, Akula N, Alliey-Rodriguez N, Tang J, Gershon ES, Liu C. Accuracy of CNV Detection from GWAS Data.. PLoS One 2011 Jan 13;6(1):e14511.
              16. Baross A, Delaney AD, Li HI, Nayar T, Flibotte S, Qian H, Chan SY, Asano J, Ally A, Cao M, Birch P, Brown-John M, Fernandes N, Go A, Kennedy G, Langlois S, Eydoux P, Friedman JM, Marra MA. Assessment of algorithms for high throughput detection of genomic copy number variation in oligonucleotide microarray data.. BMC Bioinformatics 2007 Oct 2;8:368.
                doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-368pmc: PMC2148068pubmed: 17910767google scholar: lookup
              17. Wang K, Li M, Hadley D, Liu R, Glessner J, Grant SF, Hakonarson H, Bucan M. PennCNV: an integrated hidden Markov model designed for high-resolution copy number variation detection in whole-genome SNP genotyping data.. Genome Res 2007 Nov;17(11):1665-74.
                doi: 10.1101/gr.6861907pmc: PMC2045149pubmed: 17921354google scholar: lookup
              18. Glazier AM, Nadeau JH, Aitman TJ. Finding genes that underlie complex traits.. Science 2002 Dec 20;298(5602):2345-9.
                doi: 10.1126/science.1076641pubmed: 12493905google scholar: lookup
              19. Brooks SA, Makvandi-Nejad S, Chu E, Allen JJ, Streeter C, Gu E, McCleery B, Murphy BA, Bellone R, Sutter NB. Morphological variation in the horse: defining complex traits of body size and shape.. Anim Genet 2010 Dec;41 Suppl 2:159-65.
              20. Dauber A, Yu Y, Turchin MC, Chiang CW, Meng YA, Demerath EW, Patel SR, Rich SS, Rotter JI, Schreiner PJ, Wilson JG, Shen Y, Wu BL, Hirschhorn JN. Genome-wide association of copy-number variation reveals an association between short stature and the presence of low-frequency genomic deletions.. Am J Hum Genet 2011 Dec 9;89(6):751-9.
                doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.10.014pmc: PMC3234379pubmed: 22118881google scholar: lookup
              21. Signer-Hasler H, Flury C, Haase B, Burger D, Simianer H, Leeb T, Rieder S. A genome-wide association study reveals loci influencing height and other conformation traits in horses.. PLoS One 2012;7(5):e37282.
              22. Makvandi-Nejad S, Hoffman GE, Allen JJ, Chu E, Gu E, Chandler AM, Loredo AI, Bellone RR, Mezey JG, Brooks SA, Sutter NB. Four loci explain 83% of size variation in the horse.. PLoS One 2012;7(7):e39929.
              23. Metzger J, Schrimpf R, Philipp U, Distl O. Expression levels of LCORL are associated with body size in horses.. PLoS One 2013;8(2):e56497.
              24. Colella S, Yau C, Taylor JM, Mirza G, Butler H, Clouston P, Bassett AS, Seller A, Holmes CC, Ragoussis J. QuantiSNP: an Objective Bayes Hidden-Markov Model to detect and accurately map copy number variation using SNP genotyping data.. Nucleic Acids Res 2007;35(6):2013-25.
                doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm076pmc: PMC1874617pubmed: 17341461google scholar: lookup
              25. Dellinger AE, Saw SM, Goh LK, Seielstad M, Young TL, Li YJ. Comparative analyses of seven algorithms for copy number variant identification from single nucleotide polymorphism arrays.. Nucleic Acids Res 2010 May;38(9):e105.
                doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq040pmc: PMC2875020pubmed: 20142258google scholar: lookup
              26. Marenne G, Rodríguez-Santiago B, Closas MG, Pérez-Jurado L, Rothman N, Rico D, Pita G, Pisano DG, Kogevinas M, Silverman DT, Valencia A, Real FX, Chanock SJ, Génin E, Malats N. Assessment of copy number variation using the Illumina Infinium 1M SNP-array: a comparison of methodological approaches in the Spanish Bladder Cancer/EPICURO study.. Hum Mutat 2011 Feb;32(2):240-8.
                doi: 10.1002/humu.21398pmc: PMC3230937pubmed: 21089066google scholar: lookup
              27. Young JM, Endicott RM, Parghi SS, Walker M, Kidd JM, Trask BJ. Extensive copy-number variation of the human olfactory receptor gene family.. Am J Hum Genet 2008 Aug;83(2):228-42.
                doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.07.005pmc: PMC2495065pubmed: 18674749google scholar: lookup
              28. Guryev V, Saar K, Adamovic T, Verheul M, van Heesch SA, Cook S, Pravenec M, Aitman T, Jacob H, Shull JD, Hubner N, Cuppen E. Distribution and functional impact of DNA copy number variation in the rat.. Nat Genet 2008 May;40(5):538-45.
                doi: 10.1038/ng.141pubmed: 18443591google scholar: lookup
              29. Conrad DF, Andrews TD, Carter NP, Hurles ME, Pritchard JK. A high-resolution survey of deletion polymorphism in the human genome.. Nat Genet 2006 Jan;38(1):75-81.
                doi: 10.1038/ng1697pubmed: 16327808google scholar: lookup
              30. Wong KK, deLeeuw RJ, Dosanjh NS, Kimm LR, Cheng Z, Horsman DE, MacAulay C, Ng RT, Brown CJ, Eichler EE, Lam WL. A comprehensive analysis of common copy-number variations in the human genome.. Am J Hum Genet 2007 Jan;80(1):91-104.
                doi: 10.1086/510560pmc: PMC1785303pubmed: 17160897google scholar: lookup
              31. Feuk L, Carson AR, Scherer SW. Structural variation in the human genome.. Nat Rev Genet 2006 Feb;7(2):85-97.
                pubmed: 16418744doi: 10.1038/nrg1767google scholar: lookup
              32. de Smith AJ, Walters RG, Froguel P, Blakemore AI. Human genes involved in copy number variation: mechanisms of origin, functional effects and implications for disease.. Cytogenet Genome Res 2008;123(1-4):17-26.
                pmc: PMC2920180pubmed: 19287135doi: 10.1159/000184688google scholar: lookup
              33. Frippiat JP, Williams SC, Tomlinson IM, Cook GP, Cherif D, Le Paslier D, Collins JE, Dunham I, Winter G, Lefranc MP. Organization of the human immunoglobulin lambda light-chain locus on chromosome 22q11.2.. Hum Mol Genet 1995 Jun;4(6):983-91.
                doi: 10.1093/hmg/4.6.983pubmed: 7655473google scholar: lookup
              34. Fan B, Onteru SK, Du ZQ, Garrick DJ, Stalder KJ, Rothschild MF. Genome-wide association study identifies Loci for body composition and structural soundness traits in pigs.. PLoS One 2011 Feb 24;6(2):e14726.
              35. Qin A, Cheng TS, Pavlos NJ, Lin Z, Dai KR, Zheng MH. V-ATPases in osteoclasts: structure, function and potential inhibitors of bone resorption.. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2012 Sep;44(9):1422-35.
                doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2012.05.014pubmed: 22652318google scholar: lookup
              36. Kornak U, Kasper D, Bösl MR, Kaiser E, Schweizer M, Schulz A, Friedrich W, Delling G, Jentsch TJ. Loss of the ClC-7 chloride channel leads to osteopetrosis in mice and man.. Cell 2001 Jan 26;104(2):205-15.
                doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00206-9pubmed: 11207362google scholar: lookup
              37. Frattini A, Orchard PJ, Sobacchi C, Giliani S, Abinun M, Mattsson JP, Keeling DJ, Andersson AK, Wallbrandt P, Zecca L, Notarangelo LD, Vezzoni P, Villa A. Defects in TCIRG1 subunit of the vacuolar proton pump are responsible for a subset of human autosomal recessive osteopetrosis.. Nat Genet 2000 Jul;25(3):343-6.
                doi: 10.1038/77131pubmed: 10888887google scholar: lookup
              38. Gudbjartsson DF, Walters GB, Thorleifsson G, Stefansson H, Halldorsson BV, Zusmanovich P, Sulem P, Thorlacius S, Gylfason A, Steinberg S, Helgadottir A, Ingason A, Steinthorsdottir V, Olafsdottir EJ, Olafsdottir GH, Jonsson T, Borch-Johnsen K, Hansen T, Andersen G, Jorgensen T, Pedersen O, Aben KK, Witjes JA, Swinkels DW, den Heijer M, Franke B, Verbeek AL, Becker DM, Yanek LR, Becker LC, Tryggvadottir L, Rafnar T, Gulcher J, Kiemeney LA, Kong A, Thorsteinsdottir U, Stefansson K. Many sequence variants affecting diversity of adult human height.. Nat Genet 2008 May;40(5):609-15.
                doi: 10.1038/ng.122pubmed: 18391951google scholar: lookup
              39. Karim L, Takeda H, Lin L, Druet T, Arias JA, Baurain D, Cambisano N, Davis SR, Farnir F, Grisart B, Harris BL, Keehan MD, Littlejohn MD, Spelman RJ, Georges M, Coppieters W. Variants modulating the expression of a chromosome domain encompassing PLAG1 influence bovine stature.. Nat Genet 2011 May;43(5):405-13.
                doi: 10.1038/ng.814pubmed: 21516082google scholar: lookup
              40. Hensen K, Braem C, Declercq J, Van Dyck F, Dewerchin M, Fiette L, Denef C, Van de Ven WJ. Targeted disruption of the murine Plag1 proto-oncogene causes growth retardation and reduced fertility.. Dev Growth Differ 2004 Oct;46(5):459-70.
              41. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, de Bakker PI, Daly MJ, Sham PC. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.. Am J Hum Genet 2007 Sep;81(3):559-75.
                doi: 10.1086/519795pmc: PMC1950838pubmed: 17701901google scholar: lookup
              42. Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources.. Nat Protoc 2009;4(1):44-57.
                pubmed: 19131956doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.211google scholar: lookup
              43. Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists.. Nucleic Acids Res 2009 Jan;37(1):1-13.
                doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn923pmc: PMC2615629pubmed: 19033363google scholar: lookup
              44. Mi H, Thomas P. PANTHER pathway: an ontology-based pathway database coupled with data analysis tools.. Methods Mol Biol 2009;563:123-40.
                doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-175-2_7pmc: PMC6608593pubmed: 19597783google scholar: lookup
              45. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.. Methods 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8.
                doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262pubmed: 11846609google scholar: lookup

              Citations

              This article has been cited 27 times.
              1. Tong X, Chen D, Hu J, Lin S, Ling Z, Ai H, Zhang Z, Huang L. Accurate haplotype construction and detection of selection signatures enabled by high quality pig genome sequences.. Nat Commun 2023 Aug 23;14(1):5126.
                doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40434-3pubmed: 37612277google scholar: lookup
              2. Novak TE, Bailey NP, Stevison LS. Genetic characterization of Macaca arctoides: A highlight of key genes and pathways.. Primates 2023 Jul;64(4):451-462.
                doi: 10.1007/s10329-023-01064-xpubmed: 37142891google scholar: lookup
              3. Wang Y, Li YX, Zhang J, Qian Y, Meng CH, Zhong JF, Cao SX. PLAG1 g.8795C>T Mutation Regulates Early Body Weight in Hu Sheep by Weakening miR-139 Binding.. Genes (Basel) 2023 Feb 11;14(2).
                doi: 10.3390/genes14020467pubmed: 36833394google scholar: lookup
              4. Laseca N, Molina A, Valera M, Antonini A, Demyda-Peyrás S. Copy Number Variation (CNV): A New Genomic Insight in Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Jun 2;12(11).
                doi: 10.3390/ani12111435pubmed: 35681904google scholar: lookup
              5. Wang M, Liu Y, Bi X, Ma H, Zeng G, Guo J, Guo M, Ling Y, Zhao C. Genome-Wide Detection of Copy Number Variants in Chinese Indigenous Horse Breeds and Verification of CNV-Overlapped Genes Related to Heat Adaptation of the Jinjiang Horse.. Genes (Basel) 2022 Mar 28;13(4).
                doi: 10.3390/genes13040603pubmed: 35456409google scholar: lookup
              6. Wei Z, Wang K, Wu H, Wang Z, Pan C, Chen H, Lan X. Detection of 15-bp Deletion Mutation within PLAG1 Gene and Its Effects on Growth Traits in Goats.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jul 10;11(7).
                doi: 10.3390/ani11072064pubmed: 34359192google scholar: lookup
              7. Yuan C, Lu Z, Guo T, Yue Y, Wang X, Wang T, Zhang Y, Hou F, Niu C, Sun X, Zhao H, Zhu S, Liu J, Yang B. A global analysis of CNVs in Chinese indigenous fine-wool sheep populations using whole-genome resequencing.. BMC Genomics 2021 Jan 23;22(1):78.
                doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07387-7pubmed: 33485316google scholar: lookup
              8. Binversie EE, Baker LA, Engelman CD, Hao Z, Moran JJ, Piazza AM, Sample SJ, Muir P. Analysis of copy number variation in dogs implicates genomic structural variation in the development of anterior cruciate ligament rupture.. PLoS One 2020;15(12):e0244075.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244075pubmed: 33382735google scholar: lookup
              9. Ablondi M, Eriksson S, Tetu S, Sabbioni A, Viklund Å, Mikko S. Genomic Divergence in Swedish Warmblood Horses Selected for Equestrian Disciplines.. Genes (Basel) 2019 Nov 27;10(12).
                doi: 10.3390/genes10120976pubmed: 31783652google scholar: lookup
              10. Solé M, Ablondi M, Binzer-Panchal A, Velie BD, Hollfelder N, Buys N, Ducro BJ, François L, Janssens S, Schurink A, Viklund Å, Eriksson S, Isaksson A, Kultima H, Mikko S, Lindgren G. Inter- and intra-breed genome-wide copy number diversity in a large cohort of European equine breeds.. BMC Genomics 2019 Oct 22;20(1):759.
                doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6141-zpubmed: 31640551google scholar: lookup
              11. Beeson SK, Mickelson JR, McCue ME. Exploration of fine-scale recombination rate variation in the domestic horse.. Genome Res 2019 Oct;29(10):1744-1752.
                doi: 10.1101/gr.243311.118pubmed: 31434677google scholar: lookup
              12. Jia C, Wang H, Li C, Wu X, Zan L, Ding X, Guo X, Bao P, Pei J, Chu M, Liang C, Yan P. Genome-wide detection of copy number variations in polled yak using the Illumina BovineHD BeadChip.. BMC Genomics 2019 May 14;20(1):376.
                doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5759-1pubmed: 31088363google scholar: lookup
              13. Rafter P, Purfield DC, Berry DP, Parnell AC, Gormley IC, Kearney JF, Coffey MP, Carthy TR. Characterization of copy number variants in a large multibreed population of beef and dairy cattle using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism genotype data.. J Anim Sci 2018 Sep 29;96(10):4112-4124.
                doi: 10.1093/jas/sky302pubmed: 30239746google scholar: lookup
              14. Schurink A, da Silva VH, Velie BD, Dibbits BW, Crooijmans RPMA, Franҫois L, Janssens S, Stinckens A, Blott S, Buys N, Lindgren G, Ducro BJ. Copy number variations in Friesian horses and genetic risk factors for insect bite hypersensitivity.. BMC Genet 2018 Jul 30;19(1):49.
                doi: 10.1186/s12863-018-0657-0pubmed: 30060732google scholar: lookup
              15. Metzger J, Rau J, Naccache F, Bas Conn L, Lindgren G, Distl O. Genome data uncover four synergistic key regulators for extremely small body size in horses.. BMC Genomics 2018 Jun 25;19(1):492.
                doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4877-5pubmed: 29940849google scholar: lookup
              16. Yang M, Lv J, Zhang L, Li M, Zhou Y, Lan X, Lei C, Chen H. Association study and expression analysis of CYP4A11 gene copy number variation in Chinese cattle.. Sci Rep 2017 May 11;7:46599.
                doi: 10.1038/srep46599pubmed: 28492277google scholar: lookup
              17. Walker LC, Wiggins GA, Pearson JF. The Role of Constitutional Copy Number Variants in Breast Cancer.. Microarrays (Basel) 2015 Sep 8;4(3):407-23.
                doi: 10.3390/microarrays4030407pubmed: 27600231google scholar: lookup
              18. McQueen CM, Dindot SV, Foster MJ, Cohen ND. Genetic Susceptibility to Rhodococcus equi.. J Vet Intern Med 2015 Nov-Dec;29(6):1648-59.
                doi: 10.1111/jvim.13616pubmed: 26340305google scholar: lookup
              19. Zhang L, Jia S, Plath M, Huang Y, Li C, Lei C, Zhao X, Chen H. Impact of Parental Bos taurus and Bos indicus Origins on Copy Number Variation in Traditional Chinese Cattle Breeds.. Genome Biol Evol 2015 Aug 10;7(8):2352-61.
                doi: 10.1093/gbe/evv151pubmed: 26260653google scholar: lookup
              20. Bertolini F, Scimone C, Geraci C, Schiavo G, Utzeri VJ, Chiofalo V, Fontanesi L. Next Generation Semiconductor Based Sequencing of the Donkey (Equus asinus) Genome Provided Comparative Sequence Data against the Horse Genome and a Few Millions of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms.. PLoS One 2015;10(7):e0131925.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131925pubmed: 26151450google scholar: lookup
              21. Gurgul A, Jasielczuk I, Szmatoła T, Pawlina K, Ząbek T, Żukowski K, Bugno-Poniewierska M. Genome-wide characteristics of copy number variation in Polish Holstein and Polish Red cattle using SNP genotyping assay.. Genetica 2015 Apr;143(2):145-55.
                doi: 10.1007/s10709-015-9822-9pubmed: 25648957google scholar: lookup
              22. Ghosh S, Qu Z, Das PJ, Fang E, Juras R, Cothran EG, McDonell S, Kenney DG, Lear TL, Adelson DL, Chowdhary BP, Raudsepp T. Copy number variation in the horse genome.. PLoS Genet 2014 Oct;10(10):e1004712.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004712pubmed: 25340504google scholar: lookup
              23. Zhou W, Liu R, Zhang J, Zheng M, Li P, Chang G, Wen J, Zhao G. A genome-wide detection of copy number variation using SNP genotyping arrays in Beijing-You chickens.. Genetica 2014 Oct;142(5):441-50.
                doi: 10.1007/s10709-014-9788-zpubmed: 25214021google scholar: lookup
              24. Zhang L, Jia S, Yang M, Xu Y, Li C, Sun J, Huang Y, Lan X, Lei C, Zhou Y, Zhang C, Zhao X, Chen H. Detection of copy number variations and their effects in Chinese bulls.. BMC Genomics 2014 Jun 17;15(1):480.
                doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-480pubmed: 24935859google scholar: lookup
              25. McQueen CM, Doan R, Dindot SV, Bourquin JR, Zlatev ZZ, Chaffin MK, Blodgett GP, Ivanov I, Cohen ND. Identification of genomic loci associated with Rhodococcus equi susceptibility in foals.. PLoS One 2014;9(6):e98710.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098710pubmed: 24892408google scholar: lookup
              26. Zhao Q, Han MJ, Sun W, Zhang Z. Copy number variations among silkworms.. BMC Genomics 2014 Mar 31;15:251.
                doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-251pubmed: 24684762google scholar: lookup
              27. Wang W, Wang S, Hou C, Xing Y, Cao J, Wu K, Liu C, Zhang D, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Zhou H. Genome-wide detection of copy number variations among diverse horse breeds by array CGH.. PLoS One 2014;9(1):e86860.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086860pubmed: 24497987google scholar: lookup