Analyze Diet
Acta veterinaria Scandinavica2009; 51(1); 45; doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-51-45

Anthelmintic efficacy on Parascaris equorum in foals on Swedish studs.

Abstract: In the last few years stud farms have experienced increasing problems with Parascaris equorum infections in foals despite intensive deworming programs. This has led to the question as to whether the anthelmintic drugs used against this parasite are failing. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of ivermectin, fenbendazole and pyrantel on the faecal output of ascarid eggs of foals. Methods: A Faecal Egg Count Reduction Test (FECRT) was performed on nine large studs in Sweden. Anthelmintic drugs were given orally and faecal samples were examined for ascarid eggs on the day of deworming and 14 days later. Faecal Egg Count Reductions (FECRs) were calculated on arithmetic means of transformed individual FECRs and on arithmetic means of individual FECRs. Results: Seventy-nine (48%) out of a total of 165 foals sampled were positive for P. equorum eggs before deworming and 66 of these met the criteria for being used in the efficacy assessment. It was shown that there was no, or very low activity of ivermectin on the output of ascarid eggs in the majority of the foals, whereas for fenbendazole and pyrantel it was >90%. Conclusions: Ivermectin resistance was shown in 5 out of 6 farms. Therefore, ivermectin should not be the drug of choice in the control of P. equorum infections in foals. According to the results of this study, fenbendazole or pyrantel are still effective and should be used against this parasite.
Publication Date: 2009-11-22 PubMed ID: 19930608PubMed Central: PMC2788565DOI: 10.1186/1751-0147-51-45Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article investigates the effectiveness of various anthelmintic drugs on reducing the output of ascarid eggs in foals infected with the parasite Parascaris equorum in Swedish studs. The study concludes that ivermectin proved largely ineffective and suggests the use of fenbendazole or pyrantel instead.

Study’s Purpose and Methodology

  • The primary purpose of this research was to explore the effectiveness of three anthelmintic drugs namely, ivermectin, fenbendazole, and pyrantel, in treating the infections of Parascaris equorum, a type of parasite, in foals at stud farms.
  • The study stemmed from the concern regarding the rising issues of infections in foals at these farms despite rigorous deworming programs being undertaken.
  • To investigate the issue, the authors employed a Faecal Egg Count Reduction Test (FECRT) on nine large stud farms in Sweden.
  • The drugs were administered orally, and faecal samples from the foals were evaluated for the presence of ascarid eggs both on the day of deworming and 14 days after the treatment.
  • To ascertain the efficacy of the drugs, the authors calculated the Faecal Egg Count Reductions (FECRs) based on the arithmetic means of altered individual FECRs and on the arithmetic means of individual FECRs.

Major Observations and Conclusions

  • Out of the total 165 foals sampled, 79 (48%) were found to be hosting P. equorum eggs prior to the deworming process.
  • Upon examination, it was observed that ivermectin displayed little to no activity on reducing the output of ascarid eggs in most foals. In opposition, fenbendazole and pyrantel showcased an effectiveness greater than 90%.
  • Ivermectin resistance was documented on 5 out of the 6 farms surveyed, pointing towards its inefficacy against P. equorum infections.
  • Thus, the authors concluded that fenbendazole and pyrantel should be preferred over ivermectin for controlling the said infections in foals.

Study’s Implications

  • This study provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of different anthelmintic drugs against P. equorum infections in foals and contributes significantly to the understanding of anthelmintic resistance.
  • By demonstrating the inefficacy of ivermectin, the study has crucial implications for farm management and veterinary practices. It suggests a need to revise deworming strategies at stud farms.
  • The research findings recommend employing fenbendazole and pyrantel as the primary drugs of choice in tackling the said infections, thereby providing a concrete course of action for their better management and control.

Cite This Article

APA
Lind EO, Christensson D. (2009). Anthelmintic efficacy on Parascaris equorum in foals on Swedish studs. Acta Vet Scand, 51(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-51-45

Publication

ISSN: 1751-0147
NlmUniqueID: 0370400
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 51
Issue: 1
Pages: 45

Researcher Affiliations

Lind, Eva Osterman
  • National Veterinary Institute, Department of Virology, Immunobiology and Parasitology, Section for Parasitological Diagnostics, SE-751 89 Uppsala, Sweden. eva.osterman-lind@sva.se
Christensson, Dan

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Anthelmintics / therapeutic use
    • Ascaridida Infections / drug therapy
    • Ascaridida Infections / veterinary
    • Ascaridoidea
    • Feces / parasitology
    • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
    • Horses
    • Male
    • Parasite Egg Count / veterinary
    • Sweden
    • Treatment Outcome

    References

    This article includes 17 references
    1. Cribb NC, Coté NM, Bouré LP, Peregrine AS. Acute small intestinal obstruction associated with Parascaris equorum infection in young horses: 25 cases (1985-2004). N Z Vet J 2006;54(6):338–343.
      pubmed: 17151735
    2. Clayton HM. Ascarids: Recent advances. The Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 1986;pp. 313–328.
      pubmed: 3527375
    3. Lindgren K, Ljungvall Ö, Nilsson O, Ljungström B-L, Lindahl C, Höglund J. Parascaris equorum in foals and in their environment on a Swedish stud farm, with notes on treatment failure of ivermectin. Vet Parasitol 2008;151:337–343.
      doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.10.014pubmed: 18077096google scholar: lookup
    4. Boersema JH, Eysker M, Nas JWM. Apparent resistance of Parascaris equorum to macrocyclic lactones. Vet Rec 2002;150:279–281.
      pubmed: 11924584
    5. Hearn FP, Peregrine AS. Identification of foals infected with Parascaris equorum apparently resistant to ivermectin. J Am Vet Med Ass 2003;15:482–485.
      doi: 10.2460/javma.2003.223.482pubmed: 12930086google scholar: lookup
    6. Lyons ET, Tolliver BS, Collins SS. Field studies on endoparasites of Thoroughbred foals on seven farms in central Kentucky in 2004. Parasitol Res 2006;98:496–500.
      doi: 10.1007/s00436-005-0091-xpubmed: 16385405google scholar: lookup
    7. Slocombe JO, de Gannes RV, Lake MC. Macrocyclic lactone-resistant Parascaris equorum on stud farms in Canada and effectiveness of fenbendazole and pyrantel pamoate. Vet Parasitol 2007;145:371–376.
      doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.08.008pubmed: 16962243google scholar: lookup
    8. Samson-Himmelstjerna Gv, Fritzen B, Demeler J, Schürmann S, Rohn K, Schnieder T, Epe C. Cases of reduced cyathostomin egg-reappearance period and failure of Parascaris equorum egg count reduction following ivermectin treatment as well as survey on pyrantel efficacy on German horse farms. Vet Parasitol 2007;144:74–80.
      doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.09.036pubmed: 17112667google scholar: lookup
    9. Schougaard H, Nielsen MK. Apparent ivermectin resistance of Parascaris equorum in foals in Denmark. Vet Rec 2007;160:439–440.
      pubmed: 17400903
    10. Anonymous. Manual of Veterinary Parasitological Laboratory Techniques. 1986;p. 24.
    11. Pook JF, Power ML, Sangster NC, Hodgson JL, Hodgson DR. Evaluation of tests for anthelmintic resistance in cyathostomes. Vet Parasitol 2002;106:331–343.
      doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00093-6pubmed: 12079739google scholar: lookup
    12. Austin SM, DiPietro JA, Foreman JH, Baker GJ, Todd KSJ. Parascaris equorum infections in horses. Comp Cont Educ Pract Vet 1990;12:1110–1119.
    13. DiPietro JA, Lock TF, Todd KS, Reuter VE. Evaluation of ivermectin paste in the treatment of ponies for Parascaris equorum infections. J Am Vet Med Ass 1987;190:1181–1183.
      pubmed: 3583895
    14. DiPietro JA, Todd KS. Chemotherapeutic treatment of larvae and migratory stages of Parascaris equorum. Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Annual Convention of the American Association of Equine Practitioners 1988;pp. 611–618.
    15. French DD, Klei TR, Taylor HW, Chapman MR, Wright FR. Efficacy of ivermectin in the oral paste formulation against naturally acquired adult and larval stages of Parascaris equorum in pony foals. Am J Vet Res 1988;49:1000–1003.
      pubmed: 3421521
    16. Daurio CPaL HD. The effect of oral ivermectin on immature ascarids in foals. Equine Vet Sci 1989;9:312–315.
    17. Reinemeyer CR. Diagnosis and control of anthelmintic-resistant Parascaris equorum. Parasites and Vectors 2009;2(Suppl 2):S8.
      doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-2-S2-S8pmc: PMC2751844pubmed: 19778469google scholar: lookup