Analyze Diet
Acta veterinaria Scandinavica2021; 63(1); 5; doi: 10.1186/s13028-021-00569-z

Anthelmintic resistance of horse strongyle nematodes to ivermectin and pyrantel in Lithuania.

Abstract: With intensive use of anthelmintic drugs in recent decades, anthelmintic resistance (AR) in horse nematodes is becoming a growing issue in many countries. However, there is little available information about the parasites, treatment practices or AR in the horse population in Lithuania. The aim of this study was to assess the current situation of AR on horse farms in Lithuania. The study was conducted in 25 stables on horses with a strongyle faecal egg count (FEC) of ≥ 200 eggs per gram. A faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) was performed on each farm after administration of ivermectin (IVM) or pyrantel (PYR). Results: The efficacy of IVM was comparatively high, with 98.8% of 250 horses having a zero egg count 14 days after treatment. Two conditions were used to interpret the FECRT results for PYR: firstly, resistance was determined when FECR was < 90% and the lower 95% confidence interval (LCL) was < 80%, and secondly when in addition the upper confidence level (UCL) was < 95%. Under the first condition, resistance against PYR was found in five stables (25% of all tested herds), while when considering the UCL as well, resistance was only detected in two stables (8%). The FEC showed a significant (P < 0.01) difference between the treatment and control groups. Only cyathostomin larvae were detected in larval cultures derived from strongyle-positive faecal samples collected 14 days after treatment of a test group with PYR. Conclusions: This in vivo study showed that PYR resistance is prevalent on horse farms in Lithuania, while the efficacy of IVM still appears to be unaffected. However, further studies of ivermectin resistance are needed. These findings should guide the implementation of more sustainable management of strongyle infections in horses in Lithuania.
Publication Date: 2021-01-25 PubMed ID: 33494770PubMed Central: PMC7836172DOI: 10.1186/s13028-021-00569-zGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study investigates the increasing issue of anthelmintic resistanc in horse nematodese in Lithuania due to the extensive use of anthelmintic drugs, studying the extent of resistance to ivermectin and pyrantel on Lithuanian horse farms.

Objective and Methodology

  • The goal of the study was to understand the level of anthelmintic resistance in horse nematodes on farms in Lithuania, a topic that has been lightly researched until now.
  • The study was carried out on 25 horse farms where the horses had a high level of strongyle faecal egg count (FEC). The influence of ivermectin or pyrantel on FEC was measured through a faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT).

Findings

  • The study found that ivermectin had a relatively high efficacy, with nearly all of the horses (98.8%) showing zero egg count two weeks post-treatment.
  • The efficacy of pyrantel was assessed under two scenarios. In the first, resistance was deemed to exist when FECR was less than 90% and the lower 95% confidence interval was less than 80%. In the second, resistance was assessed considering if the upper confidence level was less than 95% as well. Under the former condition, five stables (25%) showed resistance, while under the latter, resistance was detected in two stables (8%).
  • There was a significant difference in FEC between the treatment and control groups.
  • Only cyathostomin larvae were found in the faecal samples collected from strongyle-positive horses, two weeks after they were treated with pyrantel.

Conclusions

  • The findings of this in vivo study showcase that pyrantel resistance is common in the horse farms of Lithuania, while ivermectin resistance doesn’t seem to be an issue at this point.
  • Despite the findings, further research on ivermectin resistance is still needed.
  • Based on the results, the authors call for a sustainable management approach to handle strongyle infections in Lithuanian horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Dauparaitė E, Kupčinskas T, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Petkevičius S. (2021). Anthelmintic resistance of horse strongyle nematodes to ivermectin and pyrantel in Lithuania. Acta Vet Scand, 63(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-021-00569-z

Publication

ISSN: 1751-0147
NlmUniqueID: 0370400
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 63
Issue: 1
Pages: 5

Researcher Affiliations

Dauparaitė, Evelina
  • Laboratory for Parasitology, Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Veterinary Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Tilzes str. 18, 47181, Kaunas, Lithuania. evelina.dauparaite@lsmu.lt.
Kupčinskas, Tomas
  • Laboratory for Parasitology, Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Veterinary Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Tilzes str. 18, 47181, Kaunas, Lithuania.
von Samson-Himmelstjerna, Georg
  • Institute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Free University of Berlin, Robert-von-Ostertag Strasse 7-13, 14163, Berlin, Germany.
Petkevičius, Saulius
  • Laboratory for Parasitology, Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Veterinary Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Tilzes str. 18, 47181, Kaunas, Lithuania.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Anthelmintics / pharmacology
  • Anthelmintics / therapeutic use
  • Drug Resistance
  • Feces / parasitology
  • Female
  • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
  • Horse Diseases / parasitology
  • Horses
  • Ivermectin / pharmacology
  • Ivermectin / therapeutic use
  • Lithuania
  • Male
  • Nematoda / drug effects
  • Nematode Infections / drug therapy
  • Nematode Infections / veterinary
  • Parasite Egg Count / veterinary
  • Pyrantel / pharmacology
  • Pyrantel / therapeutic use

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

This article includes 49 references
  1. Bucknell D, Hoste H, Gasser RB, Beveridge I. The structure of the community of strongyloid nematodes of domestic equids.. J Helminthol 1996;70:185–192.
    doi: 10.1017/S0022149X0001539Xpubmed: 8960216google scholar: lookup
  2. Lichtenfels JR, Kharchenko VA, Dvojnos GM. Illustrated identification keys to strongylid parasites (Strongylidae: Nematoda) of horses, zebras and asses (Equidae). Vet Parasitol 2008;156:4–161.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.04.026pubmed: 18603375google scholar: lookup
  3. Herd RP. The changing world of worms: the rise of the cyathostomes and the decline of Strongylus vulgaris.. Compend Contin Educ Vet 1990;12:732–734.
  4. Nielsen MK, Olsen SN, Lyons ET, Monrad J, Thamsborg SM. Real-time PCR evaluation of Strongylus vulgaris in horses on farms in Denmark and Central Kentucky.. Vet Parasitol 2012;190:461–6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.07.018pubmed: 22877828google scholar: lookup
  5. Kaplan RM, Nielsen MK. An evidence-based approach to equine parasite control: It ain't the 60s anymore.. Equine Vet Educ 2010;22:306–316.
  6. Nielsen MK, Mittel L, Grice A, Erskine M, Graves E, Vaala W. AAEP Parasite Control Guidelines.. 2019.
  7. Kaplan RM. Anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of horses.. Vet Rec 2002;33:491–507.
    doi: 10.1051/vetres:2002035pubmed: 12387486google scholar: lookup
  8. Kaplan RM, Vidyashankar AN. An inconvenient truth: Global worming and anthelmintic resistance.. Vet Parasitol 2012;186:70–78.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.11.048pubmed: 22154968google scholar: lookup
  9. Nielsen MK. Sustainable equine parasite control: perspectives and research needs.. Vet Parasitol 2012;185:32–44.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.10.012pubmed: 22055611google scholar: lookup
  10. Kumar S, Garg R, Kumar S, Banerjee PS, Ram H, Prasad A. Benzimidazole resistance in equine cyathostomins in India.. Vet Parasitol 2016;218:93–97.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.01.016pubmed: 26872934google scholar: lookup
  11. Bellaw JL, Krebs K, Reinemeyer CR, Norris JK, Scare JA, Pagano S. Anthelmintic therapy of equine cyathostomin nematodes—larvicidal efficacy, egg reappearance period, and drug resistance.. Int J Parasitol 2018;48:97–105.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2017.08.009pubmed: 29050919google scholar: lookup
  12. Kaplan RM, Klei TR, Lyons ET, Lester G, Courtney CK, French DD. Prevalence of anthelmintic resistant cyathostomes on horse farms.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004;225:903–910.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.2004.225.903pubmed: 15485051google scholar: lookup
  13. Lestera HE, Spanton J, Stratford CH, Bartley CH, Morgan ER, Hodgkinson JE. Anthelmintic efficacy against cyathostomins in horses in Southern England.. Vet Parasitol 2013;197:189–198.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.06.009pubmed: 23830687google scholar: lookup
  14. Traversa D, Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Demeler J, Milillo P, Schürmann S, Barnes H. Anthelmintic resistance in cyathostomin populations from horse yards in Italy, United Kingdom and Germany.. Parasit Vectors 2009;2:S2.
    doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-2-S2-S2pmc: PMC2751838pubmed: 19778463google scholar: lookup
  15. Balicka-Ramisz AK, Ramisz AZ. Benzimidazol resistance in nematode parasites in domesticated animals in north-west part Poland.. Electron. J Pol Agric Univ 1999;2.
  16. Borgsteede FHM, Dvojnos GM, Kharchenko VA. Benzimidazole resistance in cyathostomes in horses in the Ukraine.. Vet Parasitol 1997;68:113–117.
    doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(96)01050-3pubmed: 9066057google scholar: lookup
  17. Lassen B, Peltola SM. Anthelmintic resistance of intestinal nematodes to ivermectin and pyrantel in Estonian horses.. Vet Parasitol 2012;188:294–300.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.03.048pubmed: 25007041google scholar: lookup
  18. Osterman Lind E, Kuzmina T, Uggla A, Waller PJ, Höglund J. A field study on the effect of some anthelmintics on cyathostomins of horses in Sweden.. Vet Res Commun 2007;31:53–65.
    doi: 10.1007/s11259-006-3402-5pubmed: 17186406google scholar: lookup
  19. Vyšniauskas A, Kaziūnaitė V, Kharchenko VA, Pereckienė A, Tolliver SC, Lyons ET. Determining anthelmintic-resistance of cyathostomes using anthelmintics from two drug classes.. Medycyna Wet 2006;62:883–886.
  20. Traversa D, Castagna G, Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Meloni S, Bartolini R, Geurden T. Efficacy of major anthelmintics against horse cyathostomins in France.. Vet Parasitol 2012;188:294–300.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.03.048pubmed: 22538094google scholar: lookup
  21. Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Fritzen B, Demelera J, Schürmann S, Rohn K, Schnieder T. Cases of reduced cyathostomin egg-reappearance period and failure of Parascaris equorum egg count reduction following ivermectin treatment as well as survey on pyrantel efficacy on German horse farms.. Vet Parasitol 2007;144:74–80.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.09.036pubmed: 17112667google scholar: lookup
  22. Geurden T, Doorn D, Claerebout E, Kooyman F, Keersmaecker S, Vercruysse J. Decreased strongyle egg re-appearance period after treatment with ivermectin and moxidectin in horses in Belgium, Italy and The Netherlands.. Vet Parasitol 2014;204:291–196.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.04.013pubmed: 24880643google scholar: lookup
  23. Tzelos T, Barbeito JS, Nielsen MK, Morgan ER, Hodgkinson JE, Matthews JB. Strongyle egg reappearance period after moxidectin treatment and its relationship with management factors in UK equine populations.. Vet Parasitol 2017;237:70–76.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.02.018pubmed: 28249767google scholar: lookup
  24. Cain JL, Foulk D, Jedrzejewski E, Stofanak H, Nielsen MK. The importance of anthelmintic efficacy monitoring: results of an outreach effort.. Parasitol Res 2019;118:2877–2883.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-019-06423-6pubmed: 31422463google scholar: lookup
  25. Wyk JA. Refugia-overlooked as perhaps the most potent factor concerning the development of anthelmintic resistance.. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 2001;68:55–67.
    pubmed: 11403431
  26. Matthews JB. An update on cyathostomins: antihelmintic resistance and worm control.. Equine Vet Educ 2008;20:552–560.
    doi: 10.2746/095777308X363912google scholar: lookup
  27. . A Guide to the Treatment and Control of Equine Gastrointestinal Parasite Infections. ESCCAP Guideline.. 2019.
  28. Coles GC, Bauer C, Borgsteede FH, Geerts S, Klei TR, Taylor MA. World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (W.A.A.V.P.) methods for the detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance.. Vet Parasitol 1992;44:35–44.
    doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(92)90141-Upubmed: 1441190google scholar: lookup
  29. Lyndal-Murphy M, Swain AJ, Pepper PM. Methods to determine resistance to anthelmintics when continuing larval development occurs.. Vet Parasitol 2014;199:191–200.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.11.002pubmed: 24314600google scholar: lookup
  30. . Lithuanian Equestrian Federation http://www.equestrian.lt/ Accessed 12 Feb 2019.. .
  31. Roepstorff A, Nansen P. Epidemiology, diagnosis and control of helminth parasites of swine.. Animal Health Manual 1998:161.
  32. Relf VE, Lester HE, Morgan ER, Hodgkinson JE, Matthews JB. Anthelmintic efficacy on UK Thoroughbred stud farms.. Int J Parasitol 2014;44:507–514.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.03.006pubmed: 24746779google scholar: lookup
  33. Baermann G. Eine einfache Methode zur Auffindung von Ankylostomum (Nematoden) Larven in Erdproben.. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd 1917;57:131–137.
  34. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF). Manual of veterinary parasitological laboratory techniques 1986.. Reference Book 418.
  35. Cernea M, Carvalho LMM, Cozma V, Cernea I, Raileanu S, Silberg R. Atlas of diagnosis of equine strongylidosis.. Edutura Academic Pres 2008;p. 120.
  36. Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Anthelmintic resistance in equine parasites—detection, potential clinical relevance and implications for control.. Vet Parasitol 2012;185:2–8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.10.010pubmed: 22100141google scholar: lookup
  37. Duncan JL, Love S. Preliminary observations on an alternative strategy for the control of horse strongyles.. Equine Vet J 1991;23:226–228.
  38. Buzatu MC, Mitrea IL, Miron L, Ionita M. Efficacy of two anthelmintic products on strongyles in horses from stud farms in Romania.. Agric Agric Sci Procedia 2015;6:293–298.
  39. Gomez HH, Georgi JR. Equine helminth infections: control by selective chemotherapy.. Equine Vet J 1991;23:198–200.
  40. Nielsen MK, Haaning N, Olsen SN. Strongyle egg shedding consistency in horses on farms using selective therapy in Denmark.. Vet Parasitol 2006;135:333–335.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.09.010pubmed: 16226379google scholar: lookup
  41. Keidane D, Ozola G, Ilgaza A. Ivermectin resistance of horse digestive strongyles.. 26th NJF Congress: Agriculture for the Next 100 Years 27–29 of June, 2018.
  42. Zak A, Siwinska N, Slowikowska M, Borowicz H, Kubiak K, Hildebrand J. Searching for ivermectin resistance in a Strongylidae population of horses stabled in Poland.. Vet Rec 2017;13:210.
    pmc: PMC5496315pubmed: 28673347
  43. Edward CL, Hoffmann AA. Ivermectin resistance in a horse in Australia.. Vet Rec 2008;162:56–57.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.162.2.56pubmed: 18192659google scholar: lookup
  44. Lyons ET, Tolliver SC, Ionita M, Lewellen A, Collins SS. Field studies indicating reduced activity of ivermectin on small strongyles in horses on a farm in Central Kentucky.. Parasitol Res 2008;103:209–213.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-008-0959-7pubmed: 18389281google scholar: lookup
  45. Nareaho A, Vainio K, Oksanen A. Impaired efficacy of ivermectin against Parascaris equorum, and both ivermectin and pyrantel against strongyle infections in trotter foals in Finland.. Vet Parasitol 2011;182:372–377.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.05.045pubmed: 21689886google scholar: lookup
  46. Kooymans FNJ, Doorn DCK, Geurden T, Mughini-Gras L, Ploeger HW, Wagenaar JA. Species composition of larvae cultured after anthelmintic treatment indicates reduced moxidectin susceptibility of immature Cylicocyclus species in horses.. Vet Parasitol 2016;227:77–84.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.07.029pubmed: 27523942google scholar: lookup
  47. Lyons ET, Tolliver SC, Collins SS. Probable reason why small strongyle EPG counts are returning ‘early’ after ivermectin treatment of horses on a farm in Central Kentucky.. Parasitol Res 2009;104:569–574.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-008-1231-xpubmed: 18931857google scholar: lookup
  48. Traversa D, Klei TR, Iorio R, Paoletti B, Lia RP, Otranto D. Occurence of anthelmintic resistant equine cyathostome populations in central and southern Italy.. Prev Vet Med 2007;82:314–320.
  49. Lyons ET, Drudge JH, Tolliver SC. Studies of the development and chemotherapy of larvae of Parascaris equorum (Nematoda: Ascaridoidea) in experimentally and naturally infected foals.. J Parasitol 1976;62:453–459.
    doi: 10.2307/3279157pubmed: 945338google scholar: lookup