Analyze Diet
Australian veterinary journal2025; 103(6); 307-313; doi: 10.1111/avj.13428

Antimicrobial use and prescribing practices by equine veterinarians in Australia: Insights into reproduction, dentistry, compounding and use for nonbactericidal effects.

Abstract: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a problem for equine practitioners in Australia, but antimicrobial use in practice has been largely understudied. We aimed to evaluate equine veterinarians' intentions of prescribing antimicrobials in areas where we perceived there to be wide ranges of practice - dentistry, reproduction and for nonbactericidal effects. Methods: An online cross-sectional survey of veterinarians working in equine practice was conducted over 4 months in 2023 and 2024. Antimicrobial use, including compounding practices, for reproductive and dental disorders, and nonbactericidal effects were investigated. Results: Responses were received from 134 equine practitioners in Australia. Most respondents reported using common equine antimicrobials (trimethoprim sulphonamide (TMS), penicillin and gentamicin). Low- and medium-importance-rated antimicrobials predominated for dental and reproductive disorders although there were some reported uses of high-importance agents, including some not registered for use in horses. Prescribing compounded antimicrobials was common (70% of respondents). Antimicrobials were also reported to be used for contracted tendons, matrix metalloprotease inhibition, anti-inflammatory and antiendotoxic and other nonbacteriocidal effects. Conclusions: Although antimicrobial prescribing patterns varied, most respondents reported using common equine antimicrobials. Antimicrobial guidelines may assist in aligning practice and reducing inappropriate antimicrobial use in horses.
Publication Date: 2025-02-25 PubMed ID: 40000246PubMed Central: PMC12134839DOI: 10.1111/avj.13428Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study examines how equine veterinarians in Australia prescribe antimicrobials, focusing on practices in dentistry, reproduction and nonbactericidal uses. The aim is to assess the issue of antimicrobial resistance and understand the prevalence of practices like compounding.

Research Context

  • Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) presents a significant problem in equine veterinary practice in Australia, with limited existing research on real-world antimicrobial use.
  • The intention of the study was to analyze the prescribing behaviors of equine veterinarians in areas with potentially variable practices – notably dentistry, reproduction, and nonbactericidal effects.

Methodology

  • An online survey was conducted over a period of four months in 2023 and 2024, targeting veterinarians working primarily with horses.
  • The survey looked into antimicrobial usage, including compounding practices, for reproductive and dental disorders, and for nonbactericidal effects.

Results

  • Responses were received from 134 equine veterinarians practicing in Australia.
  • The majority of respondents reported using common equine antimicrobials, including trimethoprim sulphonamide (TMS), penicillin, and gentamicin.
  • Most antimicrobial use reported was for low- and medium-importance-rated disorders in dental and reproductive care, though there were instances of high-importance agent usage, including some not registered for use in horses.
  • 70% of the respondents admit to prescribing compounded antimicrobials, which involves combining, mixing, or altering ingredients to create a medication tailored to the needs of an individual patient.
  • Additionally, antimicrobials were reported to be used for several nonbactericidal effects like treatment of contracted tendons, matrix metalloprotease inhibition, and as anti-inflammatory and antiendotoxic agents.

Conclusions

  • The prescribing patterns of antimicrobials varied among respondents, but the consensus was towards the usage of common equine antimicrobials.
  • The study highlighted the need for antimicrobial guidelines to align practice and reduce the inappropriate use of antimicrobials in horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Hardefeldt LY, Thomas K, Begg L. (2025). Antimicrobial use and prescribing practices by equine veterinarians in Australia: Insights into reproduction, dentistry, compounding and use for nonbactericidal effects. Aust Vet J, 103(6), 307-313. https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.13428

Publication

ISSN: 1751-0813
NlmUniqueID: 0370616
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 103
Issue: 6
Pages: 307-313

Researcher Affiliations

Hardefeldt, L Y
  • Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Thomas, K
  • School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, Australia.
Begg, L
  • REC Equine Specialists, Horsley Park, Australia.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Veterinarians / statistics & numerical data
  • Horses
  • Australia
  • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Humans
  • Anti-Infective Agents / therapeutic use
  • Male
  • Female
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use
  • Drug Prescriptions / veterinary
  • Drug Prescriptions / statistics & numerical data
  • Reproduction / drug effects
  • Dentistry / veterinary
  • Drug Compounding / veterinary
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians' / statistics & numerical data

Grant Funding

  • DE200100030 / Australian Research Council
  • Australian Veterinary Association through the Antimicrobial Prescribing Guideline project

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have no conflicts to declare.

References

This article includes 19 references
  1. Kawarizadeh A, Gilkerson J, Mitchell K. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Klebsiella pneumoniae reproductive isolates from mares.. Australian veterinary antimicrobial stewardship conference Gold Coast, QLD. 2023.
  2. Flood JA, Carrick JB, Collins NM. Blood culture isolates and antimicrobial sensitivities from 1621 critically ill neonatal foals (2005‐2022).. Bain Fallon memorial lectures Tweed Heads, QLD, Australia: Equine Veterinarians Australia. 2023.
    pubmed: 39873324
  3. Johns IC, Adams EL. Trends in antimicrobial resistance in equine bacterial isolates: 1999‐2012.. Vet Rec 2015;176(13):334.
    pubmed: 25628448
  4. Hardefeldt LY, Browning GF, Thursky K. Antimicrobials used for surgical prophylaxis by equine veterinary practitioners in Australia.. Equine Vet J 2017;50(1):65–72.
    pubmed: 28608525
  5. Allen SE, Verheyen KLP, O'Neill DG. Use of antimicrobials licensed for systemic administration in UK equine practice.. Equine Vet J 2023;55(5):808–819.
    pubmed: 36199158
  6. Rule EK, Boyle AG, Redding LE. Antimicrobial prescribing patterns in equine ambulatory practice.. Prev Vet Med 2021;193:105411.
    pubmed: 34147960
  7. Lydiksen CI, Christensen JI, Rosenmeier JG. Equine dental sinusitis ‐ a statistical analysis of the effect of antibiotics on dental sinusitis following dental extraction.. Equine Vet Educ 2024;36:357–365.
  8. Christiansen MS, Rosenmeier JG, Jensen DB. Standing equine cheek tooth extraction: a multivariate analysis of the effect of antibiotics on the risk of post‐operative complications.. Equine Vet J 2023;55(6):968–978.
    pubmed: 36516304
  9. Pasquale TR, Tan JS. Nonantimicrobial effects of antibacterial agents.. Clin Infect Dis 2005;40(1):127–135.
    pubmed: 15614702
  10. Australian Strategic and Technical Advisory Group on Antimicrobial Resistance. Australian Strategic and Technical Advisory Group on Antimicrobial Resistance Importance Ratings and Summary of Antibacterial Uses in Humans and Animal Health in Australia.. 2018.
  11. Malaluang P, Wilen E, Lindahl J. Antimicrobial resistance in equine reproduction.. Animals Basel 2021;11(11):3035.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11113035pmc: PMC8614435pubmed: 34827768google scholar: lookup
  12. Scarborough RO, Sri AE, Browning GF. 'Brave Enough': a qualitative study of veterinary decisions to withhold or delay antimicrobial treatment in pets.. Antibiotics Basel 2023;12(3):540.
    pmc: PMC10044613pubmed: 36978407
  13. Hardefeldt LY, Gilkerson JR, Billman‐Jacobe H. Barriers to and enablers of implementing antimicrobial stewardship programs in veterinary practices.. J Vet Intern Med 2018;32(3):1092–1099.
    pmc: PMC5980358pubmed: 29573053
  14. Gustafsson A, Baverud V, Gunnarsson A. The association of erythromycin ethylsuccinate with acute colitis in horses in Sweden.. Equine Vet J 1997;29(4):314–318.
    pubmed: 15338913
  15. Knych HK, Magdesian KG. Equine antimicrobial therapy: current and past issues facing practitioners.. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2021;44(2):270–279.
    pubmed: 33650183
  16. Australian Veterinary Association. Guidelines for the preparation and use of compounded pharmaceuticals.. 2020.
  17. Ellis C, Odunayo A, Tolbert MK. The use of metronidazole in acute diarrhea in dogs: a narrative review.. Top Companion Anim Med 2023;56‐57:100824.
    pubmed: 37884173
  18. Kim SE, Hwang SY, Jeong M. Clinical and microbiological effects of a subantimicrobial dose of oral doxycycline on periodontitis in dogs.. Vet J 2016;208:55–59.
    pubmed: 26639830
  19. Mitchell CF, Fugler LA, Eades SC. The management of equine acute laminitis.. Vet Med Auckl 2015;6:39–47.
    pmc: PMC6067769pubmed: 30101095