Analyze Diet
Veterinary surgery : VS2026; doi: 10.1111/vsu.70061

Application of a framework to mitigate the risk of surgical site infection after exploratory celiotomy in horses: A retrospective study.

Abstract: To describe the methodology used to identify the contributors to a perceived sudden increase in exploratory celiotomy surgical site infections (SSI) and complications at the North Carolina State University Veterinary Teaching Hospital (NCSU VTH) between 2019 and 2020 and evaluate the effect of the designed intervention up to 4 years after its implementation. Methods: Case-control retrospective study over a five-year period. Methods: A total of 448 horses that underwent exploratory celiotomy for the treatment of acute abdominal pain were included. Methods: Medical records of horses that underwent exploratory celiotomy between 2019-2024 were reviewed from software systems used at the NCSU VTH. A surgical audit was conducted to assess adherence to best practices and identify factors contributing to increased SSI incidence. This led to the development of an evidence-based intervention to address procedural deficiencies and incorporate preventative perioperative strategies. The approach, resultant protocols, and reduction of SSI incidence are described. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and univariate logistic regression. Statistical significance was set to p < .05. Results: A significant increase in %SSI was observed from 7.7% in 2019 to 29% in 2020 (p = .0067). Following new protocol implementation, %SSI decreased to 2.3%. Conclusions: A surgical audit enabled the development of an evidence-based intervention that significantly reduced SSI incidence after exploratory celiotomy surgery. Conclusions: Surgical audits serve as critical quality-of-care measure, allowing hospitals to identify procedural deficiencies. There is currently no literature that describes structured processes to manage this kind of problem in veterinary medicine. Surgical audit implementation may help other hospitals faced with similar challenges.
Publication Date: 2026-03-03 PubMed ID: 41776752DOI: 10.1111/vsu.70061Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study analyzed the causes behind a sudden increase in surgical site infections (SSI) following exploratory celiotomy in horses at a veterinary hospital, developed an intervention to address procedural issues, and then evaluated the intervention’s effectiveness over several years.
  • After implementing new protocols based on a detailed surgical audit, the rate of SSIs dropped significantly, demonstrating that systematic review and process improvement can enhance surgical outcomes in veterinary medicine.

Introduction and Background

  • Exploratory celiotomy is a surgical procedure performed on horses to treat acute abdominal pain by opening the abdomen to diagnose or treat internal conditions.
  • Surgical site infections (SSI) are a common and serious complication that can occur after such surgeries, leading to prolonged recovery, additional treatments, and increased costs.
  • At North Carolina State University Veterinary Teaching Hospital (NCSU VTH), a sharp increase in SSIs was noticed between 2019 and 2020—a jump from 7.7% to 29% incidence rate, which raised concerns about existing surgical processes.
  • The hospital wanted to systematically investigate the causes of this increased infection rate and implement strategies to reduce SSIs.

Study Design and Methods

  • Type of study: Retrospective case-control study conducted over a five-year period (2019–2024).
  • Subjects: 448 horses underwent exploratory celiotomy for acute abdominal pain were included for review.
  • Data sources: Medical records from the NCSU VTH electronic software systems were reviewed to collect information on surgical practices, infection rates, and outcomes.
  • Surgical audit: A thorough audit assessed adherence to best practices in surgery with the aims of identifying procedural lapses or deficiencies that could have contributed to the spike in SSIs.
  • Development of intervention: Based on audit findings, the team created an evidence-based intervention protocol targeting identified weaknesses, including:
    • Implementation of preventative perioperative strategies
    • Standardization of surgical procedures and hygiene practices
    • Better monitoring and documentation procedures
  • Statistical analysis: Fisher’s exact test and univariate logistic regression were used to evaluate SSI incidence changes, with significance set at p < 0.05.

Key Findings

  • There was a statistically significant increase in SSIs from 7.7% in 2019 to 29% in 2020 (p = 0.0067), confirming a clear problem.
  • After the new surgical protocols were implemented, the SSI rate dramatically dropped to 2.3%, demonstrating the effectiveness of the intervention.
  • The audit and intervention effectively identified and addressed procedural factors related to infection control.

Conclusions and Implications

  • The study highlights surgical audits as a critical quality assurance tool that can identify root causes of complications in a clinical setting.
  • Implementing evidence-based, structured interventions following audits can significantly reduce infection rates after surgery.
  • Currently, there is a lack of published literature on structured approaches to managing surgical complications like SSIs in veterinary medicine; this study fills an important gap.
  • Other veterinary hospitals facing similar issues can consider adopting surgical audits and tailored interventions to improve patient outcomes.

Cite This Article

APA
Lopez Cruz C, Gonzalez LM, McKinney-Aguirre CA, Hepworth-Warren KL, Roessner HA, Burke M, Fogle CA. (2026). Application of a framework to mitigate the risk of surgical site infection after exploratory celiotomy in horses: A retrospective study. Vet Surg. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.70061

Publication

ISSN: 1532-950X
NlmUniqueID: 8113214
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Lopez Cruz, Carla
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Gonzalez, Liara M
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
McKinney-Aguirre, Caroline A
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Hepworth-Warren, Kate L
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Roessner, Holly A
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Burke, Megan
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Fogle, Callie A
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA.

References

This article includes 38 references
  1. Gardner A, Dockery A, Quam V. Exploratory celiotomy in the horse secondary to acute colic: a review of indications and success rates. Top Companion Anim Med 2019;34:1‐9.
  2. Christophersen MT, Dupont N, Berg‐Sørensen KS, Konnerup C, Pihl TH, Andersen PH. Short‐term survival and mortality rates in a retrospective study of colic in 1588 Danish horses. Acta Vet Scand 2014;56(1):20.
  3. Freeman DE, Rötting AK, Inoue OJ. Abdominal closure and complications. Clinical Techniques in Equine Practice 2002;1(3):174‐187.
    doi: 10.1053/ctep.2002.35575google scholar: lookup
  4. Kobluk CN, Ducharme NG, Lumsden JH. Factors affecting incisional complication rates associated with colic surgery in horses: 78 cases (1983‐1985). .
  5. Torfs S, Levet T, Delesalle C. Risk factors for incisional complications after exploratory celiotomy in horses: do skin staples increase the risk?: risk factors for celiotomy incisional complications in horses. Vet Surg 2010;39(5):616‐620.
  6. Smith LJ, Mellor DJ, Marr CM, Reid SWJ, Mair TS. Incisional complications following exploratory celiotomy: does an abdominal bandage reduce the risk?. Equine Vet J 2007;39(3):277‐283.
    doi: 10.2746/042516407x193963google scholar: lookup
  7. Dziubinski N, Mählmann K, Lübke‐Becker A, Lischer C. Retrospective identification of bacterial isolates from emergency laparotomy surgical site infections in horses. J Equine Vet Sci 2020;87:102927.
  8. Isgren CM, Salem SE, Townsend NB, Timofte D, Maddox TW, Archer DC. Sequential bacterial sampling of the midline incision in horses undergoing exploratory laparotomy. Equine Vet J 2019;51(1):38‐44.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12958google scholar: lookup
  9. Davis W, Fogle CA, Gerard MP, Levine JF, Blikslager AT. Return to use and performance following exploratory celiotomy for colic in horses: 195 cases (2003–2010). Equine Vet J 2013;45(2):224‐228.
  10. Shearer TR, Holcombe SJ, Valberg SJ. Incisional infections associated with ventral midline celiotomy in horses. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2020;30(2):136‐148.
    doi: 10.1111/vec.12936google scholar: lookup
  11. Tnibar A, Grubbe Lin K, Thurøe Nielsen K. Effect of a stent bandage on the likelihood of incisional infection following exploratory coeliotomy for colic in horses: a comparative retrospective study. Equine Vet J 2013;45(5):564‐569.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12026google scholar: lookup
  12. Canada NC, Beard WL, Guyan ME, White BJ. Comparison of sub‐bandage pressures achieved by 3 abdominal bandaging techniques in horses. Equine Vet J 2015;47(5):599‐602.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12329google scholar: lookup
  13. Biedrzycki AH, Brounts SH. Case series evaluating the use of absorbable staples compared with metallic staples in equine ventral midline incisions. Equine Veterinary Education 2016;28(2):83‐88.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12523google scholar: lookup
  14. Colbath AC, Patipa L, Berghaus RD, Parks AH. The influence of suture pattern on the incidence of incisional drainage following exploratory laparotomy. Equine Vet J 2014;46(2):156‐160.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12091google scholar: lookup
  15. Salciccia A, de la Rebière Pouyade G, Gougnard A. Complications associated with closure of the linea alba using a combination of interrupted vertical mattress and simple interrupted sutures in equine laparotomies. Vet Rec 2020;187(11):e94.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.105855google scholar: lookup
  16. Darnaud SJM, Southwood LL, Aceto HW, Stefanovski D, Tomassone L, Zarucco L. Are horse age and incision length associated with surgical site infection following equine colic surgery?. Vet J 2016;217:3‐7.
  17. Durward‐Akhurst SA, Mair TS, Boston R, Dunkel B. Comparison of two antimicrobial regimens on the prevalence of incisional infections after colic surgery. Vet Rec 2013;172(11):287.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.101186google scholar: lookup
  18. Ban KA, Minei JP, Laronga C. American College of Surgeons and surgical infection society: surgical site infection guidelines, 2016 update. J Am Coll Surg 2017;224(1):59‐74.
  19. Kaya GK, Ward JR, Clarkson PJ. A framework to support risk assessment in hospitals. Int J Qual Health Care 2019;31(5):393‐401.
    doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy194google scholar: lookup
  20. Khan T, Mushtaq E, Khan F, Ahmad A, Sharma KA. Decreasing the rate of surgical site infection in patients operated by cesarean section in a tertiary care hospital in India: a quality improvement initiative. Cureus 2023;15:e34439.
    doi: 10.7759/cureus.34439google scholar: lookup
  21. Pronovost P, Chu H, Roth G. An intervention to decrease catheter‐related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2725‐2732.
  22. Su CF, Chu CM, Yuan YJ. Use of a Modified Fishbone Diagram to Analyze Diagnostic Errors in Emergency Physicians. J Acute Med 2017;7(4):149‐157.
  23. Chang H. Evaluation framework for telemedicine using the logical framework approach and a fishbone diagram. Healthc Inform Res 2015;21(4):230‐238.
    doi: 10.4258/hir.2015.21.4.230google scholar: lookup
  24. Reilly JB, Myers JS, Salvador D, Trowbridge RL. Use of a novel, modified fishbone diagram to analyze diagnostic errors. Diagnosi 2014;1(2):167‐171.
    doi: 10.1515/dx‐2013‐0040google scholar: lookup
  25. Isgren CM, Salem SE, Archer DC, Worsman FCF, Townsend NB. Risk factors for surgical site infection following laparotomy: effect of season and perioperative variables and reporting of bacterial isolates in 287 horses. Equine Vet J 2017;49(1):39‐44.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12564google scholar: lookup
  26. Hann M, Timofte D, Isgren CM, Archer DC. Bacterial translocation in horses with colic and the potential association with surgical site infection: a pilot study. Vet Rec 2020;187(2):68.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.105788google scholar: lookup
  27. Tallon RE, Allen SE, Bladon BM, McGovern KF. Retrospective evaluation of the effects of a single intraoperative dose of dexamethasone in horses undergoing exploratory laparotomy for small intestinal lesions (2008–2019): 240 cases. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2024;34(3):245‐251.
    doi: 10.1111/vec.13374google scholar: lookup
  28. Hall TL. Disorders of the Peritoneum in Horses. .
  29. McGovern KF, Bladon BM. Prophylactic treatment of laparotomy incisions with medical manuka honey may reduce the incidence of incisional infection in horses. Equine Vet Educ 2021;33(S12):43.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.80_13534google scholar: lookup
  30. Gustafsson K, Tatz AJ, Slavin RA. Intraincisional medical grade honey decreases the prevalence of incisional infection in horses undergoing colic surgery: a prospective randomised controlled study. Equine Vet J 2021;53(6):1112‐1118.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13407google scholar: lookup
  31. Akçakaya A. Peritonitis‐an overview. Bezmialem Sci 2023;11(3):242‐246.
  32. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Surgical Site Infection Event: January 2024. .
  33. Freeman KD, Southwood LL, Lane J, Lindborg S, Aceto HW. Post operative infection, pyrexia and perioperative antimicrobial drug use in surgical colic patients. Equine Vet J 2012;44(4):476‐481.
  34. Kelmer G. What do we currently know about incisional complications of colic surgery?. Equine VetEdu 2023;35(9):489‐497.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13763google scholar: lookup
  35. Maurer M, Mangrum R, Hilliard‐Boone T. Understanding the influence and impact of stakeholder engagement in patient‐centered outcomes research: a qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med 2022;37(S1):6‐13.
  36. Williams VW, Finkelstein JB. Speaking and listening: the importance of stakeholder engagement in quality improvement in pediatric urology. J Pediatr Urol 2023;19(6):792‐799.
  37. Rosen MA, DiazGranados D, Dietz AS. Teamwork in healthcare: key discoveries enabling safer, high‐quality care. Am Psychol 2018;73(4):433‐450.
    doi: 10.1037/amp0000298google scholar: lookup
  38. Basbulut E, Kucuk GO. Causative pathogens in surgical drain infections and antibiotic resistance profiles of these pathogens: growing frequency of resistance among the Enterobacteriaceae family. Cureus 2023;15(3).
    doi: 10.7759/cureus.36431google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.