Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2005; 37(5); 394-395; doi: 10.2746/042516405774479979

Assessing allocation concealment and blinding in randomised controlled trials: why bother?

Abstract: No abstract available
Publication Date: 2005-09-17 PubMed ID: 16163939DOI: 10.2746/042516405774479979Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Cite This Article

APA
Schulz KF. (2005). Assessing allocation concealment and blinding in randomised controlled trials: why bother? Equine Vet J, 37(5), 394-395. https://doi.org/10.2746/042516405774479979

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 37
Issue: 5
Pages: 394-395

Researcher Affiliations

Schulz, K F
  • Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Bias
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Random Allocation
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / standards
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / veterinary
  • Research
  • Veterinary Medicine / standards
  • Veterinary Medicine / trends

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Aziz Z, Cullum N. Electromagnetic therapy for treating venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015 Jul 2;2015(7):CD002933.