Assessing the Effect of Packing the Sulcus on Image Quality in Equine Digital Radiography.
Abstract: The requirement to pack the sulcus of the equine foot as an aid to diagnostic interpretation before acquisition of dorsoproximal-palmarodistal oblique projections is debatable. The purpose of this study was to investigate the benefit of packing the sulcus in the assessment of normal anatomy. 23 cadaver limbs were radiographed in a podoblock (https://www.podoblock.com/products-page/podoblock/podoblock/) A non-packed image (NP) and a packed image (P) of the same foot were acquired. The image quality of P was graded against the reference NP by five observers, where -1=P was superior, 0=no difference between P and NP, and +1=NP was superior. Four anatomical criteria were used: the distal solar margin of the distal phalanx (DP), the vascular channels of DP, the palmar aspect of the distal interphalangeal joint and the articulation of the navicular bone with DP. A total Visual Grading Analysis Score of 0.28 indicates a preference for NP images. Packing was of benefit in only 10.8 per cent of cases. While judicious high-quality packing may be of benefit in a minority of cases, the routine packing of the sulcus in equine radiography was not found to be of benefit in the assessment of anatomical features in this study.
© British Veterinary Association 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Publication Date: 2019-02-02 PubMed ID: 30711918DOI: 10.1136/vr.104737Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research investigates the effectiveness of packing the sulcus in equine foot radiography to enhance diagnostic interpretation. It concludes that in most cases, packing does not significantly improve the quality of radiographic images.
Research Methodology
- The study involved photographing 23 cadaver equine limbs using a podoblock, a tool used for positioning equine limbs for radiographs.
- Two types of images were taken from each foot; a non-packed (NP) image and a packed (P) image.
- The quality of the packed images was assessed against the non-packed images by five separate observers.
- The observers graded the image quality on a scale that ranged from -1 to +1; where -1 was given if the packed image was of higher quality, 0 if there was no difference in image quality, and +1 if the non-packed image was superior.
Criteria Considered
- The study took into consideration four anatomical features for comparison of the images – the distal solar margin of the distal phalanx (DP), the vascular channels of the DP, the palmar aspect of the distal interphalangeal joint and the articulation of the navicular bone with the DP.
Findings
- The Visual Grading Analysis Score of 0.28 indicated a preference for the non-packed (NP) images over the packed (P) ones.
- Only in about 10.8 per cent of cases was packing found to be beneficial in enhancing image quality.
Conclusion
- The study concluded that routinely packing the sulcus in equine radiography does not significantly enhance the quality of images or the assessment of anatomical features. However, careful high-quality packing might be beneficial in a minority of cases.
Cite This Article
APA
Rowan C, Puggioni A, Hoey SE, O'Leary JM, Kearney C, Connolly SE, Skelly C.
(2019).
Assessing the Effect of Packing the Sulcus on Image Quality in Equine Digital Radiography.
Vet Rec, 184(7), 221.
https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.104737 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Equine Clinical Studies, Diagnostic Imaging and Anaesthesia, School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
- Equine Clinical Studies, Diagnostic Imaging and Anaesthesia, School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
- Equine Clinical Studies, Diagnostic Imaging and Anaesthesia, School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
- Equine Clinical Studies, Diagnostic Imaging and Anaesthesia, School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
- Equine Clinical Studies, Diagnostic Imaging and Anaesthesia, School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
- Equine Clinical Studies, Diagnostic Imaging and Anaesthesia, School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Hoof and Claw / diagnostic imaging
- Horses
- Radiographic Image Enhancement / methods
- Radiography / veterinary
Conflict of Interest Statement
Competing interests: Not required.
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists