Analyze Diet
International journal for parasitology2016; 46(8); 485-493; doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2016.02.004

Automated parasite faecal egg counting using fluorescence labelling, smartphone image capture and computational image analysis.

Abstract: Intestinal parasites are a concern in veterinary medicine worldwide and for human health in the developing world. Infections are identified by microscopic visualisation of parasite eggs in faeces, which is time-consuming, requires technical expertise and is impractical for use on-site. For these reasons, recommendations for parasite surveillance are not widely adopted and parasite control is based on administration of rote prophylactic treatments with anthelmintic drugs. This approach is known to promote anthelmintic resistance, so there is a pronounced need for a convenient egg counting assay to promote good clinical practice. Using a fluorescent chitin-binding protein, we show that this structural carbohydrate is present and accessible in shells of ova of strongyle, ascarid, trichurid and coccidian parasites. Furthermore, we show that a cellular smartphone can be used as an inexpensive device to image fluorescent eggs and, by harnessing the computational power of the phone, to perform image analysis to count the eggs. Strongyle egg counts generated by the smartphone system had a significant linear correlation with manual McMaster counts (R(2)=0.98), but with a significantly lower coefficient of variation (P=0.0177). Furthermore, the system was capable of differentiating equine strongyle and ascarid eggs similar to the McMaster method, but with significantly lower coefficients of variation (P<0.0001). This demonstrates the feasibility of a simple, automated on-site test to detect and/or enumerate parasite eggs in mammalian faeces without the need for a laboratory microscope, and highlights the potential of smartphones as relatively sophisticated, inexpensive and portable medical diagnostic devices.
Publication Date: 2016-03-26 PubMed ID: 27025771DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2016.02.004Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • N.I.H.
  • Extramural
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • Non-P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study introduces a new method for identifying intestinal parasites in fecal samples. The method involves using a fluorescent protein, a smartphone for image capture, and computational image analysis to count the parasite eggs, with the aim to provide a convenient, more precise, and portable solution for parasite detection.

Background

  • The study originates from the need to address the problems in detecting intestinal parasites, which pose a significant concern in veterinary medicine and human health in developing countries.
  • The traditional method used for identifying these infections is the microscopic visualization of parasite eggs in fecal samples, but this technique is time-consuming, requires technical expertise, and is not practical for on-site use.
  • This traditional approach has been leading to overuse of prophylactic treatments with anthelmintic drugs, promoting anthelmintic resistance. Thus, there is a strong need for a more convenient egg counting method.

Method

  • The researchers used a fluorescent chitin-binding protein, a structural carbohydrate found in the shells of parasite eggs, to highlight the eggs in fecal samples.
  • They then used a smartphone to capture images of these highlighted eggs, demonstrating the potential of smartphones as portable diagnostic devices.
  • The study also utilized the computational power of smartphones to perform image analysis and count the parasite eggs, introducing a more automated process and reducing the need for manual intervention.

Findings

  • The egg counts generated by the smartphone system showed a significant linear correlation with manual McMaster counts, implying a high level of accuracy. Moreover, the system had a significantly lower coefficient of variation, suggesting improved precision in egg counting.
  • The system was also capable of differentiating between different types of parasite eggs, such as equine strongyle and ascarid eggs, demonstrating its robustness and applicability.
  • The findings demonstrate the feasibility of a simple, automated, on-site test to detect and count parasite eggs without needing a laboratory microscope leading to the potential widespread adoption of this method in the future.

Cite This Article

APA
Slusarewicz P, Pagano S, Mills C, Popa G, Chow KM, Mendenhall M, Rodgers DW, Nielsen MK. (2016). Automated parasite faecal egg counting using fluorescence labelling, smartphone image capture and computational image analysis. Int J Parasitol, 46(8), 485-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2016.02.004

Publication

ISSN: 1879-0135
NlmUniqueID: 0314024
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 46
Issue: 8
Pages: 485-493

Researcher Affiliations

Slusarewicz, Paul
  • MEP Equine Solutions, 3905 English Oak Circle, Lexington, KY 40514, USA; M.H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. Electronic address: pslusarewicz@mepequinesolutions.com.
Pagano, Stefanie
  • MEP Equine Solutions, 3905 English Oak Circle, Lexington, KY 40514, USA; M.H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Mills, Christopher
  • MEP Equine Solutions, 3905 English Oak Circle, Lexington, KY 40514, USA; M.H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Popa, Gabriel
  • Department of Molecular & Cellular Biochemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Chow, K Martin
  • Department of Molecular & Cellular Biochemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Mendenhall, Michael
  • Department of Molecular & Cellular Biochemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Rodgers, David W
  • Department of Molecular & Cellular Biochemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Nielsen, Martin K
  • M.H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Ascaridida / isolation & purification
  • Cats
  • Cattle
  • Chitin / metabolism
  • Dogs
  • Feces / parasitology
  • Filtration / instrumentation
  • Fluorescent Dyes
  • Goats
  • Horses
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / instrumentation
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / methods
  • Parasite Egg Count / instrumentation
  • Parasite Egg Count / methods
  • Sheep
  • Smartphone
  • Strongyloidea / isolation & purification