Analyze Diet
The American journal of sports medicine2016; 44(9); 2366-2374; doi: 10.1177/0363546516648644

BioCartilage Improves Cartilage Repair Compared With Microfracture Alone in an Equine Model of Full-Thickness Cartilage Loss.

Abstract: Microfracture (MFx) remains a dominant treatment strategy for symptomatic articular cartilage defects. Biologic scaffold adjuncts, such as particulated allograft articular cartilage (BioCartilage) combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP), offer promise in improving clinical outcomes as an adjunct to MFx. To evaluate the safety, biocompatibility, and efficacy of BioCartilage and PRP for cartilage repair in a preclinical equine model of full-thickness articular cartilage loss. Controlled laboratory study. Two 10-mm-diameter full-thickness cartilage defects were created in 5 horses in the trochlear ridge of both knees: one proximal (high load) and another distal (low load). Complete blood counts were performed on each peripheral blood and resultant PRP sample. In each horse, one knee received MFx with BioCartilage + PRP, and the other knee received MFx alone. Horses were euthanized at 13 months. Outcomes were assessed with serial arthroscopy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), and histology. Statistics were performed using a mixed-effects model with response variable contrasts. No complications occurred. PRP generated in all subjects yielded an increase in platelet fold of 3.8 ± 4.7. Leukocyte concentration decreased in PRP samples by an average fold change of 5 ± 0.1. The overall International Cartilage Repair Society repair score in both the proximal and distal defects was significantly higher (better) in the BioCartilage group compared with MFx (proximal BioCartilage: 7.4 ± 0.51, MFx 4.8 ± 0.1, P = .041; distal BioCartilage: 5.6 ± 0.98, MFx 2.6 ± 1.5, P = .022). BioCartilage-treated proximal defects demonstrated improved histologic scores for repair-host integration (BioCartilage, 96 ± 9; MFx, 68 ± 18; P = .02), base integration (BioCartilage, 100 ± 0; MFx, 70 ± 37; P = .04), and formation of collagen type II (BioCartilage, 82 ± 8; MFx, 58 ± 11; P = .05) compared with the positive control. On MRI, T2 relaxation time was significantly shorter (better) in the superficial region of BioCartilage-treated distal defects compared with MFx (P = .05). There were no significant differences between BioCartilage and MFx on micro-CT analysis. BioCartilage with PRP safely improved cartilage repair compared with MFx alone in an equine model of articular cartilage defects up to 13 months after implantation. The 1-year results of BioCartilage + PRP suggest that homologous allograft tissue provides a safe and effective augmentation of traditional MFx.
Publication Date: 2016-06-13 PubMed ID: 27298478DOI: 10.1177/0363546516648644Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study looked at the effects of BioCartilage combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus Microfracture alone in repairing cartilage loss on horses. The results showed that combining BioCartilage with PRP was safer and more effective in improving cartilage repair compared to Microfracture alone.

Study Methodology

  • The researchers created two full-thickness cartilage defects in the knee joints of five horses to mimic conditions of high load and low load scenarios.
  • One knee of each horse underwent Microfracture treatment supplemented with BioCartilage and PRP, while the other knee received Microfracture alone.
  • The horses were monitored for 13 months, during which their outcomes were recorded through arthroscopy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), and histology.
  • A mixed-effects model was used for statistical analysis of the collected data.

Study Results

  • All subjects successfully generated PRP, resulting in a 3.8 ± 4.7 fold increase in platelet count and a decrease of about 5 ± 0.1 average fold change in leukocyte concentration.
  • No complications were recorded throughout the experiment.
  • The International Cartilage Repair Society repair scores in both high and low load scenarios were notably higher in the BioCartilage group compared to the Microfracture alone group.
  • On histological comparison, the defects treated with BioCartilage showed improved integration with the host and formed more type II collagen, which is critical for cartilage repair.
  • Upon reviewing the MRI results, the relaxation time, denoting better repair, was shorter in the superficial region of the defects treated with BioCartilage.
  • In contrast, the micro-CT analysis showed no significant differences between the BioCartilage-treated group and Microfracture alone group.

Study Conclusions

  • Using BioCartilage along with PRP as an adjunct to Microfracture significantly enhanced cartilage repair, compared to using Microfracture alone.
  • The combination therapy was also safe, with no reported complications during the 13-month study period.
  • The findings suggest that homologous allograft tissue, like BioCartilage, could be a better augmentation for traditional Microfracture technique, specifically in osteochondral tissue engineering.

Cite This Article

APA
Fortier LA, Chapman HS, Pownder SL, Roller BL, Cross JA, Cook JL, Cole BJ. (2016). BioCartilage Improves Cartilage Repair Compared With Microfracture Alone in an Equine Model of Full-Thickness Cartilage Loss. Am J Sports Med, 44(9), 2366-2374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516648644

Publication

ISSN: 1552-3365
NlmUniqueID: 7609541
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 44
Issue: 9
Pages: 2366-2374

Researcher Affiliations

Fortier, Lisa A
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Chapman, Hannah S
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Pownder, Sarah L
  • MRI Laboratory, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Roller, Brandon L
  • Arthrex Inc, Naples, Florida, USA.
Cross, Jessica A
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Cook, James L
  • Comparative Orthopaedic Laboratory, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Cole, Brian J
  • Division of Sports Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA cole.research@rushortho.com.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Arthroscopy
  • Cartilage Diseases / diagnostic imaging
  • Cartilage Diseases / surgery
  • Cartilage, Articular / diagnostic imaging
  • Cartilage, Articular / surgery
  • Disease Models, Animal
  • Fractures, Stress / diagnostic imaging
  • Fractures, Stress / surgery
  • Horses
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Platelet-Rich Plasma / metabolism
  • X-Ray Microtomography

Citations

This article has been cited 38 times.
  1. Parmar RP, Tummala SV, Pathuri SS, Shah J, Khurmi J, Economopoulos KJ. Cartilage Scaffolds Implanted Without Subchondral Drilling Are Associated With Improved Outcomes and Fewer Complications Compared to Scaffolds Implanted With Subchondral Drilling in the Treatment of Isolated Patellar Cartilage Lesions. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2025 Dec;7(6):101299.
    doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101299pubmed: 41541537google scholar: lookup
  2. Miura T, Yeow BEB, Jujo Y, Iwashita K, Sivasamy P, Okugura K, Mori Y, Komesu K, Takao M. Comparison of the effects of leukocyte-rich and leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma following bone marrow stimulation technique on osteochondral lesions of the talus in athletes: a retrospective cohort study. Int Orthop 2026 Feb;50(2):401-410.
    doi: 10.1007/s00264-025-06709-8pubmed: 41307669google scholar: lookup
  3. Liu M, Ding J, Peng Y, Fang J, Zhao M, Zhang W, Chen H, Zhang J, Peng H, Wang Q. Platelet-rich plasma-contained drug delivery systems to treat orthopedic injuries. Int J Pharm X 2025 Dec;10:100372.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpx.2025.100372pubmed: 40895344google scholar: lookup
  4. Cheng L, Wang X. Advancements in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Orthop Surg Res 2024 Dec 6;19(1):827.
    doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05314-6pubmed: 39639331google scholar: lookup
  5. Tian G, Li R, Yang Y, Ning C, Guo Q. [Advances in clinical repair techniques for localized knee cartilage lesions]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2024 Jul 15;38(7):889-895.
    doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202402056pubmed: 39013829google scholar: lookup
  6. Butler J, Hartman H, Dhilllon R, Wingo T, Vargas L, Cole WW 3rd, Montgomery SR, Samsonov AP, Kerkhoffs GM, Kennedy JG. Outcomes Following the Use of Extracellular Matrix Cartilage Allograft for the Management of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2024 Jun;16(6):e62044.
    doi: 10.7759/cureus.62044pubmed: 38989354google scholar: lookup
  7. Cognetti DJ, Defoor MT, Yuan TT, Sheean AJ. Knee Joint Preservation in Tactical Athletes: A Comprehensive Approach Based upon Lesion Location and Restoration of the Osteochondral Unit. Bioengineering (Basel) 2024 Mar 1;11(3).
  8. Hu X, Jin M, Sun K, Zhang Z, Wu Z, Shi J, Liu P, Yao H, Wang DA. Type II collagen scaffolds repair critical-sized osteochondral defects under induced conditions of osteoarthritis in rat knee joints via inhibiting TGF-β-Smad1/5/8 signaling pathway. Bioact Mater 2024 May;35:416-428.
  9. Bi AS, Colasanti CA, Kirschner N, Neal WHE, Owusu-Sarpong S, Fariyike B, Azam MT, Stone JW, Kennedy JG. In-Office Needle Arthroscopy With Cartilage Allograft Extracellular Matrix Application for Cartilage Lesions of the Knee. Arthrosc Tech 2023 Sep;12(9):e1507-e1513.
    doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2023.04.023pubmed: 37780651google scholar: lookup
  10. Zlotnick HM, Jiang X, Mauck RL, Dyment NA. Multiplexed tape-stabilized cryohistology of mineralized large animal specimens. J Biol Methods 2022;9(4):e166.
    doi: 10.14440/jbm.2022.389pubmed: 36992919google scholar: lookup
  11. Rayes J, Sparavalo S, Wong I. Biological Augments for Acetabular Chondral Defects in Hip Arthroscopy-A Scoping Review of the Current Clinical Evidence. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2021 Dec;14(6):328-339.
    doi: 10.1007/s12178-021-09721-8pubmed: 34778917google scholar: lookup
  12. Looney AM, Rigor PD, Bodendorfer BM. Evaluation and management of elbow injuries in the adolescent overhead athlete. SAGE Open Med 2021;9:20503121211003362.
    doi: 10.1177/20503121211003362pubmed: 33996078google scholar: lookup
  13. Hinckel BB, Thomas D, Vellios EE, Hancock KJ, Calcei JG, Sherman SL, Eliasberg CD, Fernandes TL, Farr J, Lattermann C, Gomoll AH. Algorithm for Treatment of Focal Cartilage Defects of the Knee: Classic and New Procedures. Cartilage 2021 Dec;13(1_suppl):473S-495S.
    doi: 10.1177/1947603521993219pubmed: 33745340google scholar: lookup
  14. DeFroda SF, Cregar W, Vadhera A, Singh H, Perry A, Chahla J. Arthroscopic Autologous Chondrocyte Bone Grafting of a Lateral Tibial Plateau Chondral Defect. Arthrosc Tech 2021 Mar;10(3):e861-e865.
    doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2020.10.078pubmed: 33738225google scholar: lookup
  15. Lall AC, Ankem HK, Diulus SC, Maldonado DR, Meghpara MB, Rosinsky PJ, Shapira J, Domb BG. Capsular Management of the Hip During Arthroscopic Acetabular Chondral Resurfacing: Pearls, Pitfalls, and Optimal Surgical Technique. Arthrosc Tech 2021 Feb;10(2):e587-e597.
    doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2020.10.045pubmed: 33680797google scholar: lookup
  16. Andjelkov N, Riyadh H, Ivarsson M, Kacarevic-Popovic Z, Krstic J, Wretenberg P. The enhancement of cartilage regeneration by use of a chitosan-based scaffold in a 3D model of microfracture in vitro: a pilot evaluation. J Exp Orthop 2021 Feb 18;8(1):12.
    doi: 10.1186/s40634-021-00328-zpubmed: 33599885google scholar: lookup
  17. Vellios EE, Jones KJ, Williams RJ. Osteochondral Autograft Transfer for Focal Cartilage Lesions of the Knee With Donor-Site Back-Fill Using Precut Osteochondral Allograft Plugs and Micronized Extracellular Cartilage Augmentation. Arthrosc Tech 2021 Jan;10(1):e181-e192.
    doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2020.09.025pubmed: 33532227google scholar: lookup
  18. Eichman EA, Harris BT, Burrus MT. Management of bilateral osteochondritis dissecans of the trochlea in a skeletally immature patient. BMJ Case Rep 2021 Jan 27;14(1).
    doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-239849pubmed: 33504536google scholar: lookup
  19. Bagheri K, Sierra F, Jamali AA. Acetabular cartilage repair: state of the art in surgical treatment. J Hip Preserv Surg 2020 Jul;7(2):205-224.
    doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnaa025pubmed: 33163205google scholar: lookup
  20. Hevesi M, Jacob G, Shimomura K, Ando W, Nakamura N, Krych AJ. Current hip cartilage regeneration/repair modalities: a scoping review of biologics and surgery. Int Orthop 2021 Feb;45(2):319-333.
    doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04789-2pubmed: 32910240google scholar: lookup
  21. Tauro TM, Gifford A, Haunschild ED, Gilat R, Fu MC, Cole BJ. Cartilage Restoration Using Dehydrated Allogeneic Cartilage, Platelet-Rich Plasma, and Autologous Cartilage Mixture Sealed With Activated Autologous Serum. Arthrosc Tech 2020 Jun;9(6):e847-e857.
    doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2020.02.021pubmed: 32577362google scholar: lookup
  22. Cunningham DJ, Adams SB. Arthroscopic Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus With Microfracture and Platelet-Rich Plasma-Infused Micronized Cartilage Allograft. Arthrosc Tech 2020 May;9(5):e627-e637.
    doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2020.01.012pubmed: 32489837google scholar: lookup
  23. Hede K, Christensen BB, Olesen ML, Thomsen JS, Foldager CB, Lind MC. CARGEL Bioscaffold improves cartilage repair tissue after bone marrow stimulation in a minipig model. J Exp Orthop 2020 May 8;7(1):26.
    doi: 10.1186/s40634-020-00245-7pubmed: 32385730google scholar: lookup
  24. Fang J, Wang X, Jiang W, Zhu Y, Hu Y, Zhao Y, Song X, Zhao J, Zhang W, Peng J, Wang Y. Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy in the Treatment of Diseases Associated with Orthopedic Injuries. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2020 Dec;26(6):571-585.
    doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2019.0292pubmed: 32380937google scholar: lookup
  25. Commins J, Irwin R, Matuska A, Goodale M, Delco M, Fortier L. Biological Mechanisms for Cartilage Repair Using a BioCartilage Scaffold: Cellular Adhesion/Migration and Bioactive Proteins. Cartilage 2021 Dec;13(1_suppl):984S-992S.
    doi: 10.1177/1947603519900803pubmed: 31965816google scholar: lookup
  26. Fugazzola MC, van Weeren PR. Surgical osteochondral defect repair in the horse-a matter of form or function?. Equine Vet J 2020 Jul;52(4):489-499.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13231pubmed: 31958175google scholar: lookup
  27. Irwin RM, Bonassar LJ, Cohen I, Matuska AM, Commins J, Cole B, Fortier LA. The clot thickens: Autologous and allogeneic fibrin sealants are mechanically equivalent in an ex vivo model of cartilage repair. PLoS One 2019;14(11):e0224756.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224756pubmed: 31703078google scholar: lookup
  28. Martín AR, Patel JM, Zlotnick HM, Carey JL, Mauck RL. Emerging therapies for cartilage regeneration in currently excluded 'red knee' populations. NPJ Regen Med 2019;4:12.
    doi: 10.1038/s41536-019-0074-7pubmed: 31231546google scholar: lookup
  29. Lepage SIM, Robson N, Gilmore H, Davis O, Hooper A, St John S, Kamesan V, Gelis P, Carvajal D, Hurtig M, Koch TG. Beyond Cartilage Repair: The Role of the Osteochondral Unit in Joint Health and Disease. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2019 Apr;25(2):114-125.
    doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2018.0122pubmed: 30638141google scholar: lookup
  30. Saltzman BM, Redondo ML, Beer A, Cotter EJ, Frank RM, Yanke AB, Cole BJ. Wide Variation in Methodology in Level I and II Studies on Cartilage Repair: A Systematic Review of Available Clinical Trials Comparing Patient Demographics, Treatment Means, and Outcomes Reporting. Cartilage 2021 Jan;12(1):7-23.
    doi: 10.1177/1947603518809398pubmed: 30378453google scholar: lookup
  31. Cengiz IF, Oliveira JM, Reis RL. Micro-CT - a digital 3D microstructural voyage into scaffolds: a systematic review of the reported methods and results. Biomater Res 2018;22:26.
    doi: 10.1186/s40824-018-0136-8pubmed: 30275969google scholar: lookup
  32. Shieh AK, Singh SG, Nathe C, Lian E, Haudenschild DR, Nolta JA, Lee CA, Giza E, Kreulen CD. Effects of Micronized Cartilage Matrix on Cartilage Repair in Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus. Cartilage 2020 Jul;11(3):316-322.
    doi: 10.1177/1947603518796125pubmed: 30156865google scholar: lookup
  33. Schallmo MS, Marquez-Lara A, Luo TD, Rosas S, Stubbs AJ. Arthroscopic Treatment of Hip Chondral Defect With Microfracture and Platelet-Rich Plasma-Infused Micronized Cartilage Allograft Augmentation. Arthrosc Tech 2018 Apr;7(4):e361-e365.
    doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.10.005pubmed: 29868405google scholar: lookup
  34. Kantrowitz DE, Padaki AS, Ahmad CS, Lynch TS. Defining Platelet-Rich Plasma Usage by Team Physicians in Elite Athletes. Orthop J Sports Med 2018 Apr;6(4):2325967118767077.
    doi: 10.1177/2325967118767077pubmed: 29780836google scholar: lookup
  35. Lamplot JD, Schafer KA, Matava MJ. Treatment of Failed Articular Cartilage Reconstructive Procedures of the Knee: A Systematic Review. Orthop J Sports Med 2018 Mar;6(3):2325967118761871.
    doi: 10.1177/2325967118761871pubmed: 29619397google scholar: lookup
  36. Wang KC, Frank RM, Cotter EJ, Christian DR, Cole BJ. Arthroscopic Management of Isolated Tibial Plateau Defect With Microfracture and Micronized Allogeneic Cartilage-Platelet-Rich Plasma Adjunct. Arthrosc Tech 2017 Oct;6(5):e1613-e1618.
    doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.06.018pubmed: 29399444google scholar: lookup
  37. Caldwell PE 3rd, Auerbach B, Pearson SE. Arthroscopic Treatment of Capitellum Osteochondritis Dissecans With Micronized Allogeneic Cartilage Scaffold. Arthrosc Tech 2017 Jun;6(3):e815-e820.
    doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.04.007pubmed: 28706836google scholar: lookup
  38. Shimozono Y, Yasui Y, Ross AW, Kennedy JG. Osteochondral lesions of the talus in the athlete: up to date review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2017 Mar;10(1):131-140.
    doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9393-8pubmed: 28188546google scholar: lookup