Analyze Diet
Proceedings. Biological sciences2021; 288(1942); 20202465; doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2465

Biogeography a key influence on distal forelimb variation in horses through the Cenozoic.

Abstract: Locomotion in terrestrial tetrapods is reliant on interactions between distal limb bones (e.g. metapodials and phalanges). The metapodial-phalangeal joint in horse (Equidae) limbs is highly specialized, facilitating vital functions (shock absorption; elastic recoil). While joint shape has changed throughout horse evolution, potential drivers of these modifications have not been quantitatively assessed. Here, I examine the morphology of the forelimb metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint of horses and their extinct kin (palaeotheres) using geometric morphometrics and disparity analyses, within a phylogenetic context. I also develop a novel alignment protocol that explores the magnitude of shape change through time, correlated against body mass and diet. MCP shape was poorly correlated with mass or diet proxies, although significant temporal correlations were detected at 0-1 Myr intervals. A clear division was recovered between New and Old World hipparionin MCP morphologies. Significant changes in MCP disparity and high rates of shape divergence were observed during the Great American Biotic Interchange, with the MCP joint becoming broad and robust in two separate monodactyl lineages, possibly exhibiting novel locomotor behaviour. This large-scale study of MCP joint shape demonstrates the apparent capacity for horses to rapidly change their distal limb morphology to overcome discrete locomotor challenges in new habitats.
Publication Date: 2021-01-13 PubMed ID: 33434465PubMed Central: PMC7892410DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2465Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article focuses on examining the changes in the shape of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint in the forelimbs of horses and their extinct relatives during their evolution, in relation to environmental factors such as body mass, diet, and geographical location.

Research Methodology and Analysis

  • The author studies the morphology of the forelimb MCP joint in horses and extinct horse-like animals, better known as palaeotheres. This is achieved by applying a method known as geometric morphometrics, which is a statistical tool used to analyze variations in form and the correlations between different attributes.
  • The study also takes into account the impact of evolution on this transformation. This is done through a process called disparity analysis that involves comparing the morphological differences among species in relation to their phylogeny, that is, their evolutionary history.
  • A unique alignment protocol is also introduced in this research. It aims to measure the extent of shape change through time and evaluates its correlation with aspects such as body mass and diet.

Research Findings and Conclusions

  • The shape of the MCP joint was found to have little direct correlation with factors like mass or diet, although significant time-related correlations were evident at one million year intervals.
  • A notable difference was found in the MCP joint morphology of hipparionins (ancient three-toed horses) between those from the New and Old World.
  • During a significant geographical migration known as the Great American Biotic Interchange, there were significant changes in MCP disparity and high rates of shape divergence were observed. Specifically, the MCP joint became broad and robust in two separate monodactyl (single-toed) lineages, suggesting the adoption of new locomotor behaviors.
  • The study overall emphasizes the apparent ability of horses to rapidly alter their distal limb morphology in response to distinct locomotor challenges in new environments, highlighting the significant role of biogeography in this process.

Cite This Article

APA
MacLaren JA. (2021). Biogeography a key influence on distal forelimb variation in horses through the Cenozoic. Proc Biol Sci, 288(1942), 20202465. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.2465

Publication

ISSN: 1471-2954
NlmUniqueID: 101245157
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 288
Issue: 1942
Pages: 20202465
PII: 20202465

Researcher Affiliations

MacLaren, Jamie A
  • Evolution and Diversity Dynamics Laboratory, Department of Geology, Université de Liege, Building B18, Allée du Six Août 14, Sart-Tillman Campus, Liege 4000, Belgium.
  • Functional Morphology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerpen 2610, Belgium.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Ecosystem
  • Forelimb
  • Horses
  • Locomotion
  • Phylogeny

Conflict of Interest Statement

I declare I have no competing interests.

References

This article includes 52 references
  1. Bonnan MF. The evolution of manus shape in sauropod dinosaurs: implications for functional morphology, forelimb orientation, and phylogeny.. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 23, 595–613.
    doi: 10.1671/A1108google scholar: lookup
  2. Nyakatura JA. The convergent evolution of suspensory posture and locomotion in tree sloths.. J. Mamm. Evol. 19, 225–234.
    doi: 10.1007/s10914-011-9174-xgoogle scholar: lookup
  3. Druelle F, Young J, Berillon G. Behavioral implications of ontogenetic changes in intrinsic hand and foot proportions in olive baboons (Papio Anubis).. Am J Phys Anthropol 2018 Jan;165(1):65-76.
    doi: 10.1002/ajpa.23331pubmed: 29076148google scholar: lookup
  4. MacFadden BJ. What's the use? Functional morphology of feeding and locomotion.. In Fossil horses: systematics, paleobiology, and evolution of the family equidae, pp. 229–262. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press..
  5. Thomason JJ. The functional morphology of the manus in the tridactyl equids Merychippus and Mesohippus: paleontological inferences from neontological models.. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 6, 143–161.
  6. McHorse BK, Biewener AA, Pierce SE. The Evolution of a Single Toe in Horses: Causes, Consequences, and the Way Forward.. Integr Comp Biol 2019 Sep 1;59(3):638-655.
    doi: 10.1093/icb/icz050pubmed: 31127281google scholar: lookup
  7. Bai B. Eocene Pachynolophinae (Perissodactyla, Palaeotheriidae) from China, and their palaeobiogeographical implications.. Palaeontology 60, 837–852.
    doi: 10.1111/pala.12319google scholar: lookup
  8. MacLaren JA, Nauwelaerts S. Modern tapirs as morphofunctional analogues for locomotion in endemic Eocene European perissodactyls.. J. Mamm. Evol. 27, 245–263.
  9. Ring SJ, Bocherens H, Wings O, Rabi M. Divergent mammalian body size in a stable Eocene greenhouse climate.. Sci Rep 2020 Mar 4;10(1):3987.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60379-7pmc: PMC7055232pubmed: 32132560google scholar: lookup
  10. Mihlbachler MC, Rivals F, Solounias N, Semprebon GM. Dietary change and evolution of horses in North America.. Science 2011 Mar 4;331(6021):1178-81.
    doi: 10.1126/science.1196166pubmed: 21385712google scholar: lookup
  11. Levering D, Hopkins S, Davis E. Increasing locomotor efficiency among North American ungulates across the Oligocene-Miocene boundary.. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 466, 279–286.
  12. Semprebon GM, Rivals F, Janis CM. The role of grass vs. exogenous abrasives in the paleodietary patterns of North American ungulates.. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7, 65.
    doi: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00065google scholar: lookup
  13. MacFadden BJ. Fossil horses from ‘Eohippus’ (Hyracotherium) to Equus; scaling, Cope's law, and the evolution of body size.. Paleobiology 12, 355–369.
    doi: 10.1017/s0094837300003109google scholar: lookup
  14. Joomun SC, Hooker JJ, Collinson ME. Dental wear variation and implications for diet: an example from Eocene perissodactyls (Mammalia).. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 263, 92–106.
  15. O'Dea A, Lessios HA, Coates AG, Eytan RI, Restrepo-Moreno SA, Cione AL, Collins LS, de Queiroz A, Farris DW, Norris RD, Stallard RF, Woodburne MO, Aguilera O, Aubry MP, Berggren WA, Budd AF, Cozzuol MA, Coppard SE, Duque-Caro H, Finnegan S, Gasparini GM, Grossman EL, Johnson KG, Keigwin LD, Knowlton N, Leigh EG, Leonard-Pingel JS, Marko PB, Pyenson ND, Rachello-Dolmen PG, Soibelzon E, Soibelzon L, Todd JA, Vermeij GJ, Jackson JB. Formation of the Isthmus of Panama.. Sci Adv 2016 Aug;2(8):e1600883.
    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600883pmc: PMC4988774pubmed: 27540590google scholar: lookup
  16. Casanovas-Vilar I, Van Den Hoek Ostende LW, Furió M, Madern PA. The range and extent of the Vallesian Crisis (Late Miocene): new prospects based on the micromammal record from the Vallès-Penedès basin (Catalonia, Spain).. J. Iber. Geol. 40, 29–49.
  17. Fraser D, Gorelick R, Rybczynski N. Macroevolution and climate change influence phylogenetic community assembly of North American hoofed mammals.. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 114, 485–494.
    doi: 10.1111/bij.12457google scholar: lookup
  18. Sondaar PY. The osteology of the manus of fossil and recent Equidae.. Verh. der K. Ned. Akad. van Wet. Natuurkd. 25, 1–76.
  19. McHorse BK, Biewener AA, Pierce SE. Mechanics of evolutionary digit reduction in fossil horses (Equidae).. Proc Biol Sci 2017 Aug 30;284(1861).
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1174pmc: PMC5577487pubmed: 28835559google scholar: lookup
  20. Macfadden BJ. Evolution. Fossil horses--evidence for evolution.. Science 2005 Mar 18;307(5716):1728-30.
    doi: 10.1126/science.1105458pubmed: 15774746google scholar: lookup
  21. Scott KM. Postcranial dimensions of ungulates as predictors of body size.. In Body size in mammalian paleobiology: estimation and biological implications (eds Damuth J, MacFadden BJ), pp. 301–335. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press..
  22. RStudioTeam. nRStudio: integrated development for R.. See http://www.rstudio.com/..
  23. Bapst DW. paleotree: an R package for paleontological and phylogenetic analyses of evolution.. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 803–807.
  24. Rohlf FJ, Slice DE. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks.. Syst. Zool. 39, 40–59.
    doi: 10.2307/2992207google scholar: lookup
  25. Wiley DF. Landmark editor 3.0.. Davis, CA: Institute for Data Analysis and Visualization, University of California..
  26. Dryden IL, Mardia KV. The shapes package in R.. In Statistical shape analysis with applications in R (eds Dryden IL, Mardia K V.), pp. 6–7. Chichester, UK: Wiley..
  27. Garland T, Dickerman AW, Janis CM, Jones JA. Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation.. Syst. Biol. 42, 265–292.
    doi: 10.1093/sysbio/42.3.265google scholar: lookup
  28. Revell LJ. phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things).. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 217–223.
  29. Castiglione S, Tesone G, Piccolo M, Melchionna M, Mondanaro A, Serio C, Di Febbraro M, Raia P. A new method for testing evolutionary rate variation and shifts in phenotypic evolution.. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 974–983.
    doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12954google scholar: lookup
  30. R Core Development Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing..
  31. Guillerme T. dispRity: a modular R package for measuring disparity.. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 1755–1763.
    doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13022google scholar: lookup
  32. Cantalapiedra JL, Prado JL, Hernández Fernández M, Alberdi MT. Decoupled ecomorphological evolution and diversification in Neogene-Quaternary horses.. Science 2017 Feb 10;355(6325):627-630.
    doi: 10.1126/science.aag1772pubmed: 28183978google scholar: lookup
  33. Klingenberg CP, Marugán-Lobón J. Evolutionary covariation in geometric morphometric data: analyzing integration, modularity, and allometry in a phylogenetic context.. Syst Biol 2013 Jul;62(4):591-610.
    doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syt025pubmed: 23589497google scholar: lookup
  34. Gould SJ, Lewontin RC. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme.. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1979 Sep 21;205(1161):581-98.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.1979.0086pubmed: 42062google scholar: lookup
  35. Janis CM, Bernor RL. The evolution of equid monodactyly: a review including a new hypothesis.. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1–19.
    doi: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00119google scholar: lookup
  36. Damuth J, Janis CM. On the relationship between hypsodonty and feeding ecology in ungulate mammals, and its utility in palaeoecology.. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2011 Aug;86(3):733-58.
  37. Parker AK, McHorse BK, Pierce SE. Niche modeling reveals lack of broad-scale habitat partitioning in extinct horses of North America.. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 511, 103–118.
  38. Maguire KC, Stigall AL. Paleobiogeography of Miocene Equinae of North America: a phylogenetic biogeographic analysis of the relative roles of climate, vicariance, and dispersal.. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 267, 175–184.
  39. Figueirido B, Janis CM, Pérez-Claros JA, De Renzi M, Palmqvist P. Cenozoic climate change influences mammalian evolutionary dynamics.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012 Jan 17;109(3):722-7.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110246108pmc: PMC3271923pubmed: 22203974google scholar: lookup
  40. Hooker JJ. The ‘Grande Coupure’ in the Hampshire Basin, UK: taxonomy and stratigraphy of the mammals on either side of this major Paleogene faunal turnover.. In Micropalaeontology, sedimentary environments and stratigraphy: a tribute to Dennis Curry (1912–2001) (eds Whittaker JE, Hart MB), pp. 147–215. Bath, UK: The Geological Society Publishing House;.
    doi: 10.1144/tms004.8google scholar: lookup
  41. Blois JL, Hadly EA. Mammalian response to Cenozoic climatic change.. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 37, 181–208.
  42. Prothero DR, Heaton TH. Faunal stability during the early Oligocene climatic crash.. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 127, 257–283.
  43. Blondel C. The Eocene-Oligocene ungulates from Western Europe and their environment.. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 168, 125–139.
  44. Prado JL, Alberdi MT. Global evolution of Equidae and Gomphotheriidae from South America.. Integr Zool 2014 Aug;9(4):434-43.
    doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12064pubmed: 25236414google scholar: lookup
  45. Machado H, Grillo O, Scott E, Avilla LS. Following the footsteps of the South American Equus: are autopodia taxonomically informative?. J. Mamm. Evol. 25, 397–405.
    doi: 10.1007/s10914-017-9389-6google scholar: lookup
  46. Prado JL, Alberdi MT. Nomenclature and taxonomy.. In Fossil horses of South America: phylogeny, systemics and ecology, pp. 7–60. Cham, Switzerland: Springer..
  47. Sondaar PY. Insularity and its effect on mammal evolution.. In Major patterns in vertebrate evolution (eds Hecht MK, Goody PC, Hecht BM), pp. 671–707. Boston, MA: Springer US;.
  48. Rozzi R, Varela S, Bover P, Martin JM. Causal explanations for the evolution of ‘low gear’ locomotion in insular ruminants.. J. Biogeogr. 47, 2274–2285.
    doi: 10.1111/jbi.13942google scholar: lookup
  49. Brown NA, Kawcak CE, McIlwraith CW, Pandy MG. Architectural properties of distal forelimb muscles in horses, Equus caballus.. J Morphol 2003 Oct;258(1):106-14.
    doi: 10.1002/jmor.10113pubmed: 12905538google scholar: lookup
  50. Soffler C, Hermanson JW. Muscular design in the equine interosseus muscle.. J Morphol 2006 Jun;267(6):696-704.
    doi: 10.1002/jmor.10433pubmed: 16511864google scholar: lookup
  51. Hanot P, Herrel A, Guintard C, Cornette R. The impact of artificial selection on morphological integration in the appendicular skeleton of domestic horses.. J Anat 2018 Apr;232(4):657-673.
    doi: 10.1111/joa.12772pmc: PMC5835793pubmed: 29315551google scholar: lookup
  52. MacLaren JA. Biogeography a key influence on distal forelimb variation in horses through the Cenozoic.. Proc Biol Sci 2021 Jan 13;288(1942):20202465.
    doi: 10.5061/dryad.x0k6djhhgpmc: PMC7892410pubmed: 33434465google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.