FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / J Vet Intern Med / Brainstem auditory evoked responses in foals: reference valu...
Journal of veterinary internal medicine2015; 29(1); 362-367; doi: 10.1111/jvim.12499

Brainstem auditory evoked responses in foals: reference values, effect of age, rate of acoustic stimulation, and neurologic deficits.

Abstract: Age and rate of acoustic stimulation affect peak latencies in brainstem auditory evoked responses (BAER) in humans. Those effects are unknown in foals. Objective: Our goals were to (1) establish reference values for BAER in foals by using 3 different stimulation protocols, (2) evaluate the effects of age and stimulation frequencies on BAER tracing in foals up to 6 months old, and (3) compare the data with BAER obtained from foals with central nervous system (CNS) disorders. Methods: Thirty-nine neurologically normal foals and 16 foals with neurologic diseases. Methods: Prospective observational clinical study. BAER recorded by using 3 protocols of stimulation (11.33 repetitions per second [Hz]/70 decibel normal hearing level [dBNHL]; 11.33 Hz/90 dBNHL; 90 Hz/70 dBNHL). Results: No effect of age was observed in normal foals (P > .005). No significant difference was observed for latencies and interpeak latencies (IPL) when comparing foals with neurologic diseases and normal foals (P > .05), but 78.6% of foals with neurologic diseases had an asymmetry in their tracing, reflecting a difference in conduction time between the left and right side of the brainstem. Increasing the stimulation rate did not improve detection of CNS disorders. Conclusions: We propose BAER reference values for foals up to 6 months of age by using 3 protocols. Most foals with neurologic deficits had abnormal BAER tracing.
Copyright © 2015 by the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2015-01-27 PubMed ID: 25619523PubMed Central: PMC4858096DOI: 10.1111/jvim.12499Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study looks at Brainstem Auditory Evoked Responses (BAER) in foals, exploring the impact of age, level of acoustic stimulation, and presence of neurological conditions. It is concluded that age has no significant effect on BAER in healthy foals, while majority of foals with neurological diseases exhibit asymmetry in BAER tracing. The rate of acoustic stimulation also does not enhance the detection of neurological disorders.

Objective of the Study

  • The research aimed to establish reference values for BAER in foals, using three stimulation protocols;
  • Examine the effects of age and stimulation frequencies on BAER tracing in foals up to 6 months old;
  • Compare the collected data with BAER results from foals affected by central nervous system (CNS) disorders.

Methods Used

  • The study incorporated 39 neurologically healthy foals and 16 foals with nervous system disorders;
  • The research approach was a prospective observational clinical study;
  • BAER was recorded using three protocols of stimulation – 11.33 repetitions per second [Hz]/70 decibel normal hearing level [dBNHL]; 11.33 Hz/90 dBNHL; 90 Hz/70 dBNHL.

Results of the Study

  • The study found that age doesn’t significantly impact BAER in normal foals;
  • There was no observable major difference for latencies and interpeak latencies (IPL) when comparing foals with neurological diseases and healthy ones;
  • However, an outstanding 78.6% of foals with neurological conditions manifested asymmetry in BAER tracing, indicating a disparity in conduction time between the left and right sides of the brainstem.
  • The increment of stimulation rate did not assist in better detection of CNS disorders.

Conclusions of the Study

  • The research team presented BAER reference values for foals aged up to 6 months, utilising the aforementioned three protocols;
  • Most foals with neurological deficits displayed aberrant BAER tracing.

Cite This Article

APA
Lecoq L, Gains M, Blond L, Parent J. (2015). Brainstem auditory evoked responses in foals: reference values, effect of age, rate of acoustic stimulation, and neurologic deficits. J Vet Intern Med, 29(1), 362-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.12499

Publication

Journal of veterinary internal medicine
ISSN: 1939-1676
NlmUniqueID: 8708660
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 29
Issue: 1
Pages: 362-367

Researcher Affiliations

Lecoq, L
  • Département de Sciences Cliniques, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.
Gains, M
    Blond, L
      Parent, J

        MeSH Terms

        • Aging
        • Animals
        • Central Nervous System Diseases / diagnosis
        • Central Nervous System Diseases / veterinary
        • Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem / physiology
        • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
        • Horses
        • Reference Values

        References

        This article includes 29 references
        1. Chiappa KH. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials: Methodology. In: Chiappa KH, ed. Evoked Potential in Clinical Medicine, 3rd ed Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott‐Raven Press; 1997:157–198.
        2. Markand ON. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials.. J Clin Neurophysiol 1994 May;11(3):319-42.
          pubmed: 8089204doi: 10.1097/00004691-199405000-00004google scholar: lookup
        3. Mayhew IG, Washbourne JR. A method of assessing auditory and brainstem function in horses.. Br Vet J 1990 Nov-Dec;146(6):509-18.
          pubmed: 2271908doi: 10.1016/0007-1935(90)90054-7google scholar: lookup
        4. Wilson WJ, Mills PC. Brainstem auditory-evoked response in dogs.. Am J Vet Res 2005 Dec;66(12):2177-87.
          pubmed: 16379665doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.2177google scholar: lookup
        5. Mayhew IG, Washbourne JR. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in horses and ponies.. Vet J 1997 Jan;153(1):107-13.
          pubmed: 9125363doi: 10.1016/s1090-0233(97)80015-9google scholar: lookup
        6. Parkkonen L, Fujiki N, Mäkelä JP. Sources of auditory brainstem responses revisited: contribution by magnetoencephalography.. Hum Brain Mapp 2009 Jun;30(6):1772-82.
          pmc: PMC6870971pubmed: 19378273doi: 10.1002/hbm.20788google scholar: lookup
        7. Levy SR. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in pediatrics. In: Chiappa KH, ed. Evoked Potential in Clinical Medicine, 3rd ed Philadelphia, PA: Lipincott‐Raven Press; 1997:269–282.
        8. Jiang ZD, Brosi DM, Wilkinson AR. Comparison of brainstem auditory evoked responses recorded at different presentation rates of clicks in term neonates after asphyxia.. Acta Paediatr 2001 Dec;90(12):1416-20.
          pubmed: 11853340doi: 10.1080/08035250152708833google scholar: lookup
        9. Jiang ZD, Brosi DM, Wilkinson AR. Auditory neural responses to click stimuli of different rates in the brainstem of very preterm babies at term.. Pediatr Res 2002 Apr;51(4):454-9.
          pubmed: 11919329doi: 10.1203/00006450-200204000-00009google scholar: lookup
        10. Wilkinson AR, Jiang ZD. Brainstem auditory evoked response in neonatal neurology.. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2006 Dec;11(6):444-51.
          pubmed: 17015048doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2006.07.005google scholar: lookup
        11. Steiss JE, Brendemuehl JP, Wright JC. Nerve conduction velocities and brainstem auditory evoked responses in normal neonatal foals compared to foals exposed to endophyte‐infected fescue in utero. Prog Vet Neurol 1991;2:252–260.
        12. Magdesian KG, Williams DC, Aleman M, Lecouteur RA, Madigan JE. Evaluation of deafness in American Paint Horses by phenotype, brainstem auditory-evoked responses, and endothelin receptor B genotype.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2009 Nov 15;235(10):1204-11.
          pubmed: 19912043doi: 10.2460/javma.235.10.1204google scholar: lookup
        13. MacKay RJ. Neurologic disorders of neonatal foals.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2005 Aug;21(2):387-406, vii.
          pubmed: 16051055doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2005.04.006google scholar: lookup
        14. Jiang ZD, Yin R, Shao XM, Wilkinson AR. Brain-stem auditory impairment during the neonatal period in term infants after asphyxia: dynamic changes in brain-stem auditory evoked response to clicks of different rates.. Clin Neurophysiol 2004 Jul;115(7):1605-15.
          pubmed: 15203061doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.02.017google scholar: lookup
        15. Mayhew IG, Washbourne JR. Short latency auditory evoked potentials recorded from non-anaesthetized thoroughbred horses.. Br Vet J 1992 Jul-Aug;148(4):315-27.
          pubmed: 1498644doi: 10.1016/0007-1935(92)90084-egoogle scholar: lookup
        16. Poncelet LC, Coppens AG, Deltenre PF. Audiograms estimated from brainstem tone-evoked potentials in dogs from 10 days to 1.5 months of age.. J Vet Intern Med 2002 Nov-Dec;16(6):674-9.
          pubmed: 12465764doi: 10.1892/0891-6640(2002)016<0674:aefbtp>2.3.co;2google scholar: lookup
        17. Sleifer P, da Costa SS, Cóser PL, Goldani MZ, Dornelles C, Weiss K. Auditory brainstem response in premature and full-term children.. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2007 Sep;71(9):1449-56.
          pubmed: 17629955doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.05.029google scholar: lookup
        18. Mayhew IG. Neurological and neuropathological observations on the equine neonate.. Equine Vet J Suppl 1988 Sep;(5):28-33.
          pubmed: 9118082doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1988.tb04632.xgoogle scholar: lookup
        19. Sweasey D, Patterson DS, Leadon DP. Chemical composition of the spinal cord in the normal developing fetus and in the premature foal.. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1982;32:563-7.
          pubmed: 6962895
        20. Poma R, Chambers H, da Costa RC, Konyer NB, Nykamp S, Dobson H, Milgram NW. MRI measurement of the canine auditory pathways and relationship with brainstem auditory evoked responses.. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008;21(3):238-42.
          pubmed: 18536850
        21. Munro KJ, Shiu JN, Cox CL. The effect of head size on the auditory brainstem response for two breeds of dog.. Br J Audiol 1997 Oct;31(5):309-14.
          pubmed: 9373740doi: 10.3109/03005364000000025google scholar: lookup
        22. Triulzi F, Parazzini C, Righini A. Patterns of damage in the mature neonatal brain.. Pediatr Radiol 2006 Jul;36(7):608-20.
          pubmed: 16770665doi: 10.1007/s00247-006-0203-5google scholar: lookup
        23. Freeman S, Sohmer H, Silver S. The effect of stimulus repetition rate on the diagnostic efficacy of the auditory nerve-brain-stem evoked response.. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991 Apr;78(4):284-90.
          pubmed: 1706249doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(91)90182-4google scholar: lookup
        24. Jiang ZD, Xiu X, Brosi DM, Shao XM, Wilkinson AR. Sub-optimal function of the auditory brainstem in term infants with transient low Apgar scores.. Clin Neurophysiol 2007 May;118(5):1088-96.
          pubmed: 17368093doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.01.018google scholar: lookup
        25. Harland MM, Stewart AJ, Marshall AE, Belknap EB. Diagnosis of deafness in a horse by brainstem auditory evoked potential.. Can Vet J 2006 Feb;47(2):151-4.
          pmc: PMC1345730pubmed: 16579041
        26. . Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs.. Pediatrics 2007 Oct;120(4):898-921.
          pubmed: 17908777doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2333google scholar: lookup
        27. Strain GM. Deafness prevalence and pigmentation and gender associations in dog breeds at risk.. Vet J 2004 Jan;167(1):23-32.
          pubmed: 14623147doi: 10.1016/s1090-0233(03)00104-7google scholar: lookup
        28. Strain GM, Kearney MT, Gignac IJ, Levesque DC, Nelson HJ, Tedford BL, Remsen LG. Brainstem auditory-evoked potential assessment of congenital deafness in Dalmatians: associations with phenotypic markers.. J Vet Intern Med 1992 May-Jun;6(3):175-82.
          pubmed: 1619594doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.1992.tb00333.xgoogle scholar: lookup
        29. Tsui PW, McPherson B, Wong EC, Ng IH. Infant hearing screening: effects of timeline.. Clin Otolaryngol 2008 Apr;33(2):108-12.
          pubmed: 18429859doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01663.xgoogle scholar: lookup

        Citations

        This article has been cited 0 times.
        Subscribe to our newsletter
        Join 99,383 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.