FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Vet Sci / Breath Alcohol Test Results in Equine Veterinarians after Pe...
Veterinary sciences2023; 10(3); 222; doi: 10.3390/vetsci10030222

Breath Alcohol Test Results in Equine Veterinarians after Performing an Abdominal Ultrasound with Ethanol.

Abstract: Transcutaneous abdominal ultrasonography using alcohol saturation is used in the diagnostic workup of a variety of conditions in horses. The duration of the examination and the amount of alcohol used in each case may vary depending on several factors. The aim of this study is to describe the breath alcohol test results obtained by veterinarians performing abdominal ultrasound on horses. Six volunteers were enrolled, after written consent, and a Standardbred mare was used for the whole study protocol. Each operator performed a total of 6 ultrasounds by pouring the ethanol solution from a jar or by spray application, for a duration of 10, 30, and 60 min. An infrared breath alcohol analyzer was used immediately after completing the ultrasonography and at 5-min intervals until a negative result was obtained. Positive results were obtained for 0-60 min after the procedure. A statistically significant difference was found between the groups that used more than 1000 mL, 300-1000 mL, and less than 300 mL of ethanol. No significant differences were observed between the type of ethanol administration and the time of exposure. Based on this study, equine vets who perform ultrasound on horses can test positive at the breath alcohol test for up to 60 min following ethanol exposure.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2023-03-14 PubMed ID: 36977261PubMed Central: PMC10053296DOI: 10.3390/vetsci10030222Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research study examined the breath alcohol test results in equine veterinarians after performing abdominal ultrasounds using ethanol on horses. It demonstrated that vets may test positive for alcohol up to an hour after exposure to ethanol especially when over 1000 mL is used, regardless of how it is administered or the duration of the exposure.

Study Design and Process

  • The study involved six volunteer veterinarians who consented in writing to participate. These volunteers performed a total of six ultrasounds on a Standardbred mare using an ethanol solution.
  • The application method of ethanol varied among two options – either by pouring the solution from a jar or by spraying it. The duration of each ultrasound procedure also differed, taking either 10, 30, or 60 minutes.
  • An infrared breath alcohol analyzer was used to test the breath alcohol level of the veterinarians immediately after their ultrasound procedure. The tests were repeated in 5-minute intervals until a negative result was achieved.

Findings and Interpretation

  • The results indicated that the alcohol breath test showed positive results for timeframes ranging from zero to 60 minutes after completing the ultrasound procedure.
  • Statistical analysis of the data showed a significant difference in the chances of alcohol detection in breath tests among groups that used more than 1000 mL, between 300 and 1000 mL, and less than 300 mL of ethanol. This suggests that the volume of ethanol used during the procedure correlates with the level of alcohol detected in the breath test.
  • The study found no significant differences with regards to the type of ethanol administration (jar or spray) and the length of exposure in relation to the breath test results.

Conclusions

  • The study concluded that equine veterinarians who conduct ultrasounds on horses could test positive in alcohol breath tests due to ethanol exposure. This is particularly prevalent when a large amount of ethanol (over 1000 mL) is used, even if the duration of exposure or the method of administration changes.
  • The findings of this research could be relevant for occupational health and safety policies and procedures, especially within veterinary workplaces, to address potential false-positive breath alcohol test results among their workforce.

Cite This Article

APA
Vitale V, Nocera I, van Galen G, Sgorbini M, Conte G, Aliboni B, Verwilghen D. (2023). Breath Alcohol Test Results in Equine Veterinarians after Performing an Abdominal Ultrasound with Ethanol. Vet Sci, 10(3), 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10030222

Publication

Veterinary sciences
ISSN: 2306-7381
NlmUniqueID: 101680127
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 10
Issue: 3
PII: 222

Researcher Affiliations

Vitale, Valentina
  • Sydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2570, Australia.
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, San Piero a Grado, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
  • Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad CEU-Cardenal Herrera, CEU Universities, Alfara del Patriarca, 46115 Valencia, Spain.
Nocera, Irene
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, San Piero a Grado, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
van Galen, Gaby
  • Sydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2570, Australia.
Sgorbini, Micaela
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, San Piero a Grado, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Conte, Giuseppe
  • Department of Agricultural, Food, and Agro-Environmental Sciences, Via del Borghetto 80, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Aliboni, Bendetta
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, San Piero a Grado, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Verwilghen, Denis
  • Sydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2570, Australia.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 22 references
  1. le Jeune S, Whitcomb MB. Ultrasound of the equine acute abdomen.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2014 Aug;30(2):353-81, viii.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2014.04.011pubmed: 25016496google scholar: lookup
  2. Kaikkonen R, Niinistö K, Sykes B, Anttila M, Sankari S, Raekallio M. Diagnostic evaluation and short-term outcome as indicators of long-term prognosis in horses with findings suggestive of inflammatory bowel disease treated with corticosteroids and anthelmintics.. Acta Vet Scand 2014 Jun 3;56(1):35.
    doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-56-35pmc: PMC4055252pubmed: 24894126google scholar: lookup
  3. Stewart HL, Engiles JB, Stefanovski D, Southwood L. Clinical and intestinal histologic features of horses treated for recurrent colic: 66 cases (2006-2015).. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2018 May 15;252(10):1279-1288.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.252.10.1279pubmed: 29701532google scholar: lookup
  4. Odelros E, Kendall A, Hedberg-Alm Y, Pringle J. Idiopathic peritonitis in horses: a retrospective study of 130 cases in Sweden (2002-2017).. Acta Vet Scand 2019 Apr 25;61(1):18.
    doi: 10.1186/s13028-019-0456-2pmc: PMC6485108pubmed: 31023351google scholar: lookup
  5. Reef VB. Adult Abdominal Ultrasonography. pp. 273–363.
  6. Busoni V, De Busscher V, Lopez D, Verwilghen D, Cassart D. Evaluation of a protocol for fast localised abdominal sonography of horses (FLASH) admitted for colic.. Vet J 2011 Apr;188(1):77-82.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.02.017pubmed: 20347357google scholar: lookup
  7. Foglio-Bonda PL, Poggia F, Foglio-Bonda A, Mantovani C, Pattarino F, Giglietta A. Determination of breath alcohol value after using mouthwashes containing ethanol in healthy young adults.. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2015;19(14):2562-6.
    pubmed: 26221882
  8. Emerson BL, Whitfill T, Baum CR, Garlin-Kane K, Santucci K. Effects of alcohol-based hand hygiene solutions on breath alcohol detection in the emergency department.. Am J Infect Control 2016 Dec 1;44(12):1672-1674.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.05.036pubmed: 27614708google scholar: lookup
  9. Strawsine E, Lutmer B. The Effect of Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizer Vapors on Evidential Breath Alcohol Test Results.. J Forensic Sci 2018 Jul;63(4):1284-1290.
    doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13691pubmed: 29143333google scholar: lookup
  10. Logan BK, Distefano S. Ethanol content of various foods and soft drinks and their potential for interference with a breath-alcohol test.. J Anal Toxicol 1998 May-Jun;22(3):181-3.
    doi: 10.1093/jat/22.3.181pubmed: 9602932google scholar: lookup
  11. Ignacio-García JM, Ignacio-García JM, Almenara-Barrios J, Chocrón-Giraldez MJ, Hita-Iglesias C. A comparison of standard inhalers for asthma with and without alcohol as the propellant on the measurement of alcohol in breath.. J Aerosol Med 2005 Summer;18(2):193-7.
    doi: 10.1089/jam.2005.18.193pubmed: 15966773google scholar: lookup
  12. Lindsay HA, Hannam JA, Bradfield CN, Mitchell SJ. Breath alcohol of anesthesiologists using alcohol hand gel and the "five moments for hand hygiene" in routine practice.. Can J Anaesth 2016 Aug;63(8):938-44.
    doi: 10.1007/s12630-016-0666-2pubmed: 27142004google scholar: lookup
  13. Rhodes DM, Madrigal R. Management of Colic in the Field.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2021 Aug;37(2):421-439.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2021.04.010pubmed: 34243880google scholar: lookup
  14. Kloeden CN, McLean AJ. What about the humble mouthpiece? Breath sample modifications and implications for breath alcohol analysis. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety; Adelaide, Australia. 13–18 August 1995.
  15. Le Foll B, Loheswaran G. Alcohol inhalation.. CMAJ 2014 Jul 8;186(10):E399.
    doi: 10.1503/cmaj.131763pmc: PMC4081238pubmed: 24756624google scholar: lookup
  16. MacLean RR, Valentine GW, Jatlow PI, Sofuoglu M. Inhalation of Alcohol Vapor: Measurement and Implications.. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2017 Feb;41(2):238-250.
    doi: 10.1111/acer.13291pmc: PMC6143144pubmed: 28054395google scholar: lookup
  17. Vendruscolo LF, Roberts AJ. Operant alcohol self-administration in dependent rats: focus on the vapor model.. Alcohol 2014 May;48(3):277-86.
    doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2013.08.006pmc: PMC4007394pubmed: 24290310google scholar: lookup
  18. Mouton AJ, Maxi JK, Souza-Smith F, Bagby GJ, Gilpin NW, Molina PE, Gardner JD. Alcohol Vapor Inhalation as a Model of Alcohol-Induced Organ Disease.. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2016 Aug;40(8):1671-8.
    doi: 10.1111/acer.13133pmc: PMC4961570pubmed: 27375174google scholar: lookup
  19. Elgàn TH, Durbeej N, Gripenberg J. Breath alcohol concentration, hazardous drinking and preloading among Swedish university students.. Nordisk Alkohol Nark 2019 Oct;36(5):430-441.
    doi: 10.1177/1455072519863545pmc: PMC7434137pubmed: 32934577google scholar: lookup
  20. Rukmini AV, Jos AM, Yeo SC, Lee N, Mo D, Mohapatra L, Karamchedu S, Gooley JJ. Circadian regulation of breath alcohol concentration.. Sleep 2021 Jun 11;44(6).
    doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsaa270pubmed: 33305816google scholar: lookup
  21. Saldich EB, Wang C, Rosen IG, Bartroff J, Luczak SE. Effects of stomach content on the breath alcohol concentration-transdermal alcohol concentration relationship.. Drug Alcohol Rev 2021 Nov;40(7):1131-1142.
    doi: 10.1111/dar.13267pmc: PMC8848829pubmed: 33713037google scholar: lookup
  22. Quigg Z, Hughes K, Bellis MA. Student drinking patterns and blood alcohol concentration on commercially organised pub crawls in the UK.. Addict Behav 2013 Dec;38(12):2924-9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.08.029pubmed: 24064191google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.