Analyze Diet
Veterinary medicine and science2022; 8(5); 1930-1935; doi: 10.1002/vms3.882

Caecal dysfunction following standing surgical procedures.

Abstract: The aim of this study is to report cases of caecal dysfunction following surgical procedures in the standing horse. The study design is retrospective. Six client-owned horses developed caecal dysfunction following a variety of surgical procedures undertaken in the standing sedated horse. Medical records were reviewed for caecal dysfunctions that had occurred in horses within 2 weeks of standing surgical procedures. Signalment, details of the original standing surgery and medications administered were recorded. Short-term outcome was obtained from clinical records. Long-term outcome was obtained by telephone questionnaire with the owner. Six horses were identified to have developed caecal dysfunction following standing surgery for tooth extraction, laparoscopic ovariectomy, laparoscopic cryptorchidectomy, fracture repair, melanoma removal and castration. Three horses were euthanised with caecal perforation at the time of diagnosis. Three underwent surgical treatment (typhlotomy, decompression and caecal bypass by ileocolostomy). All three horses were alive post-operatively (follow-up at 2, 12 and 24 months). Caecal dysfunction may develop following surgical procedures performed under standing sedation. Careful post-operative monitoring and early identification of caecal dysfunction, and consequent potential need for surgical intervention, are important to optimise outcomes and minimise the risk of fatal caecal perforation occurring.
Publication Date: 2022-07-27 PubMed ID: 35894758PubMed Central: PMC9514489DOI: 10.1002/vms3.882Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Case Reports
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research reports cases of caecal dysfunction that occur post-surgery in standing horses, highlighting its potential risks and necessity for effective monitoring to optimize outcomes and prevent fatal consequences such as caecal perforation.

Research Objective and Methodology

  • The study aims to bring attention to the complications of caecal dysfunction in horses following various types of surgeries performed while the horse is standing and sedated.
  • For this research, a retrospective analysis was conducted, reviewing medical records of six horses that developed caecal dysfunction within 2 weeks of standing surgery.
  • The parameters taken into account include the breed, age & gender of the horse (signalment), specifics of the original surgery, and the medicines administered.
  • Short-term outcomes were sourced from clinical records, while long-term results were obtained via phone questionnaire with the horse owners.

Key Findings

  • The six horses observed developed caecal dysfunction following various surgeries such as tooth extraction, laparoscopic ovariectomy, laparoscopic cryptorchidectomy, fracture repair, melanoma removal, and castration.
  • Half of the horses were euthanised due to caecal perforation detected at the time of diagnosis.
  • The other three who underwent surgical treatment (typhlotomy, decompression, and caecal bypass via ileocolostomy) survived post-surgery, with the longest follow-up being at 24 months.

Conclusions

  • The findings suggest that caecal dysfunction can develop following surgeries performed under standing sedation.
  • Effective post-operative monitoring and early identification of caecal dysfunction are vitally important to help optimize patient outcomes and reduce the risk of lethal complications such as caecal perforation.

Cite This Article

APA
Gough RL, McGovern KF, Bladon BM, Carmichael LA. (2022). Caecal dysfunction following standing surgical procedures. Vet Med Sci, 8(5), 1930-1935. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.882

Publication

ISSN: 2053-1095
NlmUniqueID: 101678837
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 8
Issue: 5
Pages: 1930-1935

Researcher Affiliations

Gough, Rachel L
  • Donnington Grove Veterinary Group, Newbury, Berkshire, UK.
McGovern, Kate F
  • Donnington Grove Veterinary Group, Newbury, Berkshire, UK.
Bladon, Bruce M
  • Donnington Grove Veterinary Group, Newbury, Berkshire, UK.
Carmichael, Lucy Aj
  • Donnington Grove Veterinary Group, Newbury, Berkshire, UK.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Cecum / surgery
  • Female
  • Horse Diseases / etiology
  • Horse Diseases / surgery
  • Horses
  • Laparoscopy / veterinary
  • Retrospective Studies

Conflict of Interest Statement

Some of the cases were presented at the Colic Symposium, Lexington, Kentucky, USA 2017.

References

This article includes 19 references
  1. Dart AJ, Dowling BA, Hodgson DR. Caecal disease. Equine Veterinary Education 1999;11(4):7.
  2. Sherlock CE, Eggleston RB. Clinical signs, treatment, and prognosis for horses with impaction of the cranial aspect of the base of the cecum: 7 cases (2000‐2010). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2013;243(11):1596–1601.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.243.11.1596pubmed: 24261810google scholar: lookup
  3. Dabareiner RM, White II NA. Diseases and surgery of the cecum. Veterinary Clinics of North America – Equine Practice 1997;13(2):303–315.
    pubmed: 9290185
  4. Roberts CT, Slone DE. Caecal impactions managed surgically by typhlotomy in 10 cases (1988‐1998). Equine Veterinary Journal 2000;32:74–76.
    pubmed: 11202388
  5. Ross MW. Surgical diseases of the equine cecum. The Veterinary Clinics of North America Equine Practice 1989;5(2):363–375.
    doi: 10.1016/s0749-0739(17)30594-1pubmed: 2670113google scholar: lookup
  6. Plummer AE, Rakestraw PC, Hardy J, Lee RM. Outcome of medical and surgical treatment of cecal impaction in horses: 114 cases (1994–2004). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2007;231(9):1378–1385.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.231.9.1378pubmed: 17975999google scholar: lookup
  7. Campbell ML, Colahan PC, Brown MP, Grandstedt ME, Peyton LC. Cecal impaction in the horse. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 1984;184(8):950–952.
    pubmed: 6715224pmc: 6715224
  8. Velloso Alvarez A, Reid Hanson R, Schumacher J. Caecal impactions: Diagnosis, management and prognosis. Equine Veterinary Education 2021;33(7):376–385.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13317google scholar: lookup
  9. Aitken MR, Southwood LL, Ross BM, Ross MW. Outcome of surgical and medical management of cecal impaction in 150 horses (1991‐2011). Veterinary Surgery 2015;44(5):540–546.
  10. Smith LCR, Payne RJ, Boys Smith SJ, Bathe AP, Greet TRC. Outcome and long‐term follow‐up of 20 horses undergoing surgery for caecal impaction: A retrospective study (2000 2008). Equine Veterinary Journal 2010;42(5):388–392.
  11. Dart AJ, Hodgson DR, Snyder JR. Caecal disease in equids. Australian Veterinary Journal 1997;75(8):552–557.
    pubmed: 9293333
  12. Schusser GF, Scheidemann W, Huskamp B. Muscle thickness and neuron density in the caecum of horses with chronic recurrent caecal impaction. Equine Veterinary Journal 2000;32:69–73.
    pubmed: 11202387
  13. Ross MW, Rutkowski JA, Cullen KK. Myoelectric activity of the cecum and right ventral colon in female ponies. American Journal of Veterinary Research 1989;50(3):374–379.
    pubmed: 2930024pmc: 2930024
  14. Lester GD, Merritt AM, Neuwirth L, Vetro‐Widenhouse T, Steible C, Rice B. Effect of alpha 2‐adrenergic, cholinergic, and nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs on myoelectric activity of ileum, cecum, and right ventral colon and on cecal emptying of radiolabeled markers in clinically normal ponies. American Journal of Veterinary Research 1998;59(3):320–327.
    pubmed: 9522952pmc: 9522952
  15. Rutkowski JA, Ross MW, Cullen K. Effects of xylazine and/or butorphanol or neostigmine on myoelectric activity of the cecum and right ventral colon in female ponies. American Journal of Veterinary Research 1989;50(7):1096–1101.
    pubmed: 2774334pmc: 2774334
  16. Roger T, Ruckebusch Y. Colonic alpha‐adrenoceptor‐mediated responses in the pony. The Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1987;10(4):310–318.
    pubmed: 2893840
  17. Thibault C, Wilson D, Robertson S, Sharma D, Kinsley M. A retrospective study of fecal output and postprocedure colic in 246 horses undergoing standing sedation with detomidine, or general anesthesia with or without detomidine. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 2019;46(4):458–465.
    pubmed: 31196750
  18. Boscan P, van Hoogmoed LM, Farver TB, Snyder JR. Evaluation of the effects of the opioid agonist morphine on gastrointestinal tract function in horses. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2006;67(6):992–997.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.67.6.992pubmed: 16740092google scholar: lookup
  19. Patipa LA, Sherlock CE, Witte SH, Pirie GD, Berghaus RD, Peroni JF. Risk factors for colic in equids hospitalized for ocular disease. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2012;240(12):1488–1493.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.240.12.1488pubmed: 22657933google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 2 times.
  1. Wenzel CJ, Mochal-King CA, Eddy AL, Bowser JE, Wills RW, Jumper WI, Claude A, Swiderski CE. Surgical Assessment and Post-Operative Complications Following Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) of Horses with Severe Equine Pasture Asthma During Asthma Exacerbation and Remission. Animals (Basel) 2025 Aug 4;15(15).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15152276pubmed: 40805066google scholar: lookup
  2. Obrochta B, Tapio H, Raekallio M, Gracia Calvo LA, Pöyhönen RR, Hagman K, Jantunen N, Karikoski N. Effects of vatinoxan on gastrointestinal motility, sedation, and antinociception during and after long-lasting detomidine infusion in horses. Equine Vet J 2026 Jan;58(1):212-219.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14499pubmed: 40110892google scholar: lookup