Analyze Diet
Journal of veterinary medical education2022; 50(2); 217-227; doi: 10.3138/jvme-2021-0153

Can Online Teaching of Radiographic Anatomy Replace Conventional On-Site Teaching? A Randomized Controlled Study.

Abstract: Different modalities such as lectures, dissections, 3D models, and online learning are used for teaching anatomy. To date, online learning has been considered a useful additional didactic tool. This study aimed to compare veterinary students' performance in radiographic anatomy (radio-anatomy) after online or classroom-based teaching to assess the extent to which the two methods were interchangeable. Three strategies were compared in a cohort of 83 learners. Students were committed to online learning only, online learning with the use of specimen equine bones, or learning on conventional radiographs with specimen equine bones. At baseline (pre-test), scores from a mental rotation test and radio-anatomy knowledge test were similar between groups. After training (post-test), scores in mental rotation and radio-anatomy significantly increased by 6.7/40 units (95% CI: 5.2-8.2; < .001) and 5.1/20 units (95% CI: 4.3-5.9; < .001), respectively. There was no difference in scores for mental rotation and radio-anatomy knowledge between groups at post-test. Gender influenced the mental rotation, with men scoring significantly higher than women at pre-test ( = 23.0, = 8.8 vs. = 16.5, = 6.9; = .001) and post-test ( = 32.1, = 5.5 vs. = 22.7, = 8.6; < .001). However, radio-anatomy knowledge was not influenced by gender. These results suggest radio-anatomy teaching can be safely achieved with either conventional radiographs or online resources. This is of interest since, due to the COVID-19 outbreak, rapidly changing from on-site to online methods for teaching veterinary medical education proved necessary.
Publication Date: 2022-04-06 PubMed ID: 35385366DOI: 10.3138/jvme-2021-0153Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study investigates the effectiveness of online learning compared to conventional classroom-based teaching in the area of radiographic anatomy or radio-anatomy. The findings suggest that the online method can be a viable alternative to traditional teaching methods with no significant differences in student performance between the two approaches.

Research Objectives and Methods

  • The primary purpose of the study was to evaluate the possible interchangeability of online radio-anatomy teaching with traditional classroom-based teaching, by comparing the performance of veterinary students taught using these different methods.
  • Three teaching strategies were compared: online learning only, online learning incorporating the use of specimen equine bones, and traditional classroom learning also using specimen equine bones. The subjects for the study were a cohort of 83 learners.
  • The study employed pre-test and post-test methods to gauge the students’ knowledge in radio-anatomy and mental rotation. The aim was to assess any possible improvements in performance after the teaching interventions.

Key Findings

  • The study found comparable baseline scores across the groups on the pre-test assessments. The scores significantly improved across all groups after the teaching intervention, indicating effectiveness in knowledge acquisition regardless of the teaching methodology.
  • The scores, post-teaching, demonstrated no significant differences between the three groups. This suggests that online teaching of radiographic anatomy could be used interchangeably with conventional methods.
  • Gender influenced mental rotation scores with men scoring significantly higher than women both in the pre-test and post-test. However, this gender effect wasn’t observed in terms of radio-anatomy knowledge, which remained consistent across all groups.

Implications

  • The findings of the study suggest that online resources can be successfully implemented for teaching radio-anatomy. Importantly, the study provides evidence that online teaching can potentially replace traditional classroom teaching without compromising the learning outcomes, which becomes highly significant in extraordinary situations like the COVID-19 pandemic, which mandated a rapid shift to online teaching methods.
  • The study also provides implications for the broader context of medical education, validating the effectiveness and utility of online learning.

Cite This Article

APA
Hontoir F, Simon V, De Raeve Y, Dumortier L, Dugdale A, Vandeweerd JM. (2022). Can Online Teaching of Radiographic Anatomy Replace Conventional On-Site Teaching? A Randomized Controlled Study. J Vet Med Educ, 50(2), 217-227. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2021-0153

Publication

ISSN: 0748-321X
NlmUniqueID: 7610519
Country: Canada
Language: English
Volume: 50
Issue: 2
Pages: 217-227

Researcher Affiliations

Hontoir, Fanny
  • University of Namur, Rue de Bruxelles 61, 5000 Namur, Belgium.
Simon, Vincent
  • Veterinary Department, University of Namur, Rue de Bruxelles 61, 5000 Namur, Belgium.
De Raeve, Yves
  • University of Namur, Rue de Bruxelles 61, 5000 Namur, Belgium.
Dumortier, Laurence
  • Technology and Education Department-DET, University of Namur, Rue de Bruxelles 61, 5000 Namur, Belgium.
Dugdale, Alex
  • Paragon Veterinary Referrals, Paragon Business Village, Paragon Way, 1 Red Hall Crescent, Wakefield WF1 2DF UK.
Vandeweerd, Jean-Michel
  • Veterinary Department, University of Namur, Rue de Bruxelles 61, 5000 Namur, Belgium.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Anatomy / education
  • COVID-19 / veterinary
  • Education, Medical, Undergraduate
  • Education, Veterinary
  • Educational Measurement
  • Horse Diseases
  • Horses
  • Students, Medical
  • Teaching

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.